Slashdot Mirror


Senator Clinton Slams GTA

Joining the ranks of such luminaries as Jack Thompson and Governor Blagojevich, GamesIndustry.biz has the word that Senator Hillary Clinton has joined right wing advocates in decrying the gaming industry as a paragon of loose morals and corrupting influences. From the article: "Children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them...This is a silent epidemic of media desensitisation that teaches kids it's OK to diss people because they are a woman, they're a different colour or they're from a different place." Commentary available at The Australian. Update: 03/30 02:22 GMT by T : Thanks to reader mantle_etching, here is a link to the entire speech as delivered, so you can judge its content for yourself.

49 of 1,493 comments (clear)

  1. Fantasy and reality by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    You think killing prostitutes are bad? Wait until you see soldiers team-killing each other in CounterStrike.

    1. Re:Fantasy and reality by prell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are there any studies that link games to real life violence, discrimination, or any altered behavior at all?

    2. Re:Fantasy and reality by CSMastermind · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.apa.org/science/psa/sb-anderson.htmlFac ts versus Myths about video game violence The guy covers the main points about video game violence. In short, yes there are. But there are more studies that show that children are likely to become violent if their parents are negligent or violent.

    3. Re:Fantasy and reality by frikazoyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I actually did some research on this for a paper a while back. The one study that I saw that was of any interest goes as follows:

      Two sets of children, same age, same geographical area, same school, kept separate as much as possible to prevent "polluting".

      Set A: Given video games to play for X hours a day.

      Set B: No video games.

      I can't remember for sure, I'd have to dig it up again, but I believe that Set B also was limited on their television intake.

      Results: Set A children angered more easily and were more prone to hitting each other in play. Set B children were more patient, hit each other less, and had calmer attitudes.

      At best though, this is only one study, so it was careful to point out that this drew a "correlation" between more violent play, quick tempers, and Video Games. They didn't list what games were played, or any details on the children, so results are dubious at best.

      When I find a link, I'll paste it.

    4. Re:Fantasy and reality by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It depends on who you ask. There are volumes of studies to both support and deny the assertion that video game violence trickles out into real life.

      Whereas private money used to fund research, it has now become research. Scientists and researchers, being that they are still human beings, are typically as close-minded as any fundies out there and they are as easily influenced by money, power, prestige and the need to protect that which they have achieved as the most corrupt politician.

      The scientific method is high school fodder. The new scienfitic method is as easily purchased as a loaf of bread.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    5. Re:Fantasy and reality by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      George Washington.
      After that, it gets iffy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Fantasy and reality by sgant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, I like GTA. It was a cool game when I had it...I mean, like anything got bored with it after a while.

      But no way is my 11 year old son going to play it.

      And last I checked, there ARE ratings on these games, like on movies. We don't need anything more do we? More laws? WTF?

      My son plays Mario and other games like that on his Gamecube. No, not the most exciting games in the world, but he likes them. We also don't have a TV other than the one that the Gamecube is hooked up on.

      No cable or even over-the-air TV. Because I'm making a statement? Yeah, kinda...I don't feel like paying 60 bucks a month for basic cable here from Comcast. And no antena can really pull down a broadcast. So, we've been without TV now for almost a year in the new house and guess what, we don't miss it.

      Sorry, got off on a tangent. This is common sense kind of stuff here folks, and Hillery is mainly just saying "hey, look at me...over here...yoo hoo...I've got something sort of controversal to say, yet not really". Yeah, I'm a little jaded.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    7. Re:Fantasy and reality by Skye16 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do you at least know what age these children were? I could easily see a 5 or 6 year old being more violent after excessively violent video games and tv shows, but I'm not so sure about a 16 year old, unless they had completely horrible parenting.

      Parents really need to be more in tune with violence in video games. My step brother was about 11 and was very prone to violence (not against people, but he was all about breaking things and punching holes in the wall). My dad had just married to his mom, so he didn't feel he was exactly in a position to put this brat in his place, but the point is, the kid was violent and got angry entirely too easily. For Christmas, he got a PlayStation 2. I talked to my Dad at some point before hand and told him "no matter what you do, do NOT get Matt any games that are rated M, it's probably not in his best interests". Then I find out a few weeks later, my dad or stepmom went out and bought him GTA3.

      I do take exception to people saying video games are the root of all evil. But I completely agree when people say they could - in conjunction with other factors - cause a child with many more social problems (ie: violence and the like, or, at the least, improper anger management). I was infuriated that my father had bought this kid GTA3. Frankly, if you wouldn't trust them with a gun, they shouldn't be playing that type of video game. I honestly think it was the only time in my adult life I ever yelled at my father. I yelled so much my voice turned hoarse over it. Even aside from the problems Matt had with anger management and violent disposition, 11 year olds don't need to be playing video games where the purpose of the game is to drive around, steal cars, shoot people, kill cops and screw hookers. When you're mature enough, fine, but the kid wouldn't even brush his teeth or take a shower if you didn't make him do it.

    8. Re:Fantasy and reality by Some_Llama · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Results: Set A children angered more easily and were more prone to hitting each other in play. Set B children were more patient, hit each other less, and had calmer attitudes."

      Makes sense, my daughter often punches her brother in the arm after he kills her for the 5th in CS with the awp on our LAN.

      Did the study show any correlation between games and outburts of profantiy? (like AWP WHORE!!)

    9. Re:Fantasy and reality by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Funny

      Set A was boys and Set B was girls?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    10. Re:Fantasy and reality by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, the two circumstances are highly related.

      People tend to mimic what they are exposed to. It is the same pscyhological pattern that first enabled us to learn how to communicate when we were little, and although there is some dissipation of this phenomenon as we grow older, it never completely goes away.

      Sufficient exposure to violence, even if entirely virtual, will tend to result in more violent behaviour in the individual. The amount of exposure to violence that a person can tolerate with no outwardly obvious effects ever manifesting varies greatly from individual to individual, but is fundamentally linked to the pscyhological bent that all human beings have to mimic their surroundings, as I mentioned above. Because, as I said before, this phenomenon dissipates somewhat with age, younger children _TEND TO BE_ more susceptible to influence caused by exposure to violence than older people.

      Because the impact varies so much from person to person, however, it's probably simply most appropriate to let a child's parent determine if they should be allowed to be exposed to the material. Obviously, video game stores are not going to be responsible for parenting other people's children, so it's probably reasonable for them to err on the side of caution. If the parent thinks it's okay, then the parent should get it for the kid himself.

    11. Re:Fantasy and reality by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I love GTA and I'm in my 30s.

      But, when I went to a friend's house and played it with my friend's 12 year old son in the room (we were just racing around vice city) and the kid yells "pick up the hooker! Give her money and run her over and get it back!" it made me immediately question video games, violence, GTA, and the future of America.

      Needless to say, we shut off the game. Asked him where he heard about that (at school) and dad sent him to his room.
    12. Re:Fantasy and reality by robertjw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Show me one parent that isn't absolutely mortified by GTA and I will provide you with a list of hundreds that will take the other side.

      Well gee, maybe those hundreds of parents should get off their collective fat asses and pay some attention to what their kids are doing. Don't like? Fine, then don't play it, don't let your kids play it. Don't waste time and money to keep other people and their kids from playing it.

    13. Re:Fantasy and reality by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Informative
      She still looks like a socialist.

      Conservatives like to throw that word "socialist" around. In the words of Inigo Montoya, "I do not think it means what you think it means."

      Or is Hillary working for a democratic society and economy run to meet the needs of all instead of the profits of a few? For the worker's democratic ownership and/or control of the means of production? For the end of capitalist oppression and exploitation?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Fantasy and reality by nathanh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I love GTA and I'm in my 30s.

      Cough. I'm glad I'm not the only one. Makes it slightly less embarrassing.

      But, when I went to a friend's house and played it with my friend's 12 year old son in the room (we were just racing around vice city) and the kid yells "pick up the hooker! Give her money and run her over and get it back!" it made me immediately question video games, violence, GTA, and the future of America. Needless to say, we shut off the game. Asked him where he heard about that (at school) and dad sent him to his room.

      What's particularly strange is that although this "kill the hooker in GTA" meme is now well known, it is only ever mentioned by people who don't actually play the game. Nobody who plays the game would ever do it because there's no point. You don't make any money, you don't complete a mission, so it's an entirely pointless thing to do.

      I'm convinced that the feature is there purely to cause controversy and get free advertising for the game, based on the premise that even bad publicity is worth having. The fact that your friend's 12-year old was discussing it in the playground is proof of that. It's a taboo thing to do, so it's immediately worthy of gossip.

    15. Re:Fantasy and reality by Rhone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's particularly strange is that although this "kill the hooker in GTA" meme is now well known, it is only ever mentioned by people who don't actually play the game. Nobody who plays the game would ever do it because there's no point.

      Hey, that's not true. When I get my fiancee to play GTA, killing hookers is all she wants to do. Actually, not even just hookers, but any woman who happens to be scantily clad. She doesn't care about the missions, races, etc., she just wants to run around killing "sluts".

      Even among people who play the game more seriously than my fiancee (like me, for example), the ability to commit violent acts at will is part of the appeal of the game. What those who scapegoat video games (and movies, music, etc.) fail to understand is that the game is a safe and healthy way to release your aggressive urges without having to hurt real people. For the most part, the people committing the real murders and rapes out on the streets aren't the people who have the latest ultra-violent video games to come home to.

      Not to be Freudian or anything, but almost all of our entertainment-oriented media (and even much of the media that's not supposed to be about entertainment, like the NEWS) is filled with sex and/or aggression, because ultimately that's what humans get off on. Whether you're talking about movies, video games, sports, gladiators in the arena, or whatever, that's how human entertainment has always been and how it will always be. And there's nothing wrong with that.

      And I strongly suspect that even the 12-year old mentioned by the grandparent post understands the difference between play/fantasy violence and real violence. Personally, I think a positive chat about the subject would have done him far more good than resorting to the silly and unproductive send-him-to-his-room tactic.

    16. Re:Fantasy and reality by lsdino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm amazed with the number of comments in this article that no one's really picked up on this.

      I find it hard to agree that this teaches that "it's OK to diss people because they are a woman, they're a different colour or they're from a different place." is accurate.

      The common argument against this is that did playing super mario brothers make us all want to jump on and throw turtles around? Did playing tetris make people obsessive about placing blocks in tightly packed configuration? If you played Monopoly as a child are you bound to end up trying to corner a market in your adult life? It's obvious that the things we do as a child have affects upon who we become when we're adults. What isn't clear is what effect playing a violent video game will have on the developing mind. Maybe it causes more violence, maybe it causes LESS evidence (as it serves as an outlet), or maybe it's just a wash... We really need multiple case studies in order to judge this, and I don't believe we have these multiple case studies.

      Now let me come back to some specifics on Hillary's comment. First I think if killing a prositute is a diss on all women, isn't jailing prositutes also a diss on all women? I mean after all in both cases an external party is depriving the women of her rights to treat her body as she wishes. Is Hillary for legalized prostituion as well?

      Next I haven't heard of any overtly racist portions of GTA or other equally popular games. I think it would have made a pretty big stink if there were racist elements to the games, so I'm not sure where this comes from. I would say the US public has a pretty low level of tolerance for overt racism and you usually hear about it when it occurs anywhere in mainstream media.

      Finally, we're allowed to discriminate against people from a different place. We can hate the French all day long for example (American Fries anyone?) and for the most part this doesn't spark outrage. We have a long history of hating different countries for different reasons. Russia, Cuba, etc... We hate the people of a country all the time. It's hating them for their race that's bad! And the US government continues to discrimate against those from foreign countries today. We see it overtly in the form of immigration laws and more recently in the treatment of people siezed during Bush's little war.

      On a slightly different note I don't see why this is an issue for the federal government. Do you not want your kids to play GTA? Fine, don't buy them GTA. Oh, but one of their friends might have it! God forbid that as a parent you might need to get involved in your childs life, talk to their friends parents, or even have to say no to your child once in a while. This is just the government pandering to lazy parents who aren't willing to take responsibility for how they raise their children. The more the government does this the lazier parents are bound to become as their responsibilities (and along with those rights!) are taken away from them.

      So to sumarize: No one needs to admit anything's true. Saying that without providing any facts is a really lame. Just like Hillary you're playing off the fears of people without any hard data. Where's the problem? As video games have become more and more popular crime rates have been going down. It seems to me that video games occupy teenagers time and cause crime to go down. Perhaps you could get your head out of your ass and admit that this is true.

    17. Re:Fantasy and reality by Nailer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? Most people who play videogames aren't children, they're in their 20s. Someone who isn't aware of that thingks that GTA causes kids to be violent in much the same way watching somebody beaten to death with a baseball bat in Goodfellas does.

      No wait, kids can't see Goodfellas. That's a grown up movie.
      What, you mean grownups watch movies

      I don't know if the US has videogame ratings, but if they do, and they're enforced, children would have a pretty hard time getting their hands on GTA.

      If the US doesn't have videogame ratings, or they're not enforced, then that's your problem.

      It looks as if someone who doesn't understand video games is trying to create a problem.

  2. Probably hits too close to home... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    ... but did you ever notice that not a single politician slams Thief?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is wrong to murder prostitutes after you have sex with them.

    Unless they charge more than $50, then its ok.

  4. Quick! BAN BOOKS! by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know of some books that suggest similar things! Kids could read it then do it! Ban all forms of seeing while we are at it!!


    If your kid has a problem defining fantasy vs reality, video games are the least of his concern...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  5. Campaign Tactic by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Discussion is a good thing. If you read further into the Australian article this appears more a political tack than anything substantive. Even so, I've seen some of the GTA footage and wonder where we're going. Fantasy is OK, to what point? Discussion is important because while people are forced to defend opinions rather than simply bully the opposing view, options are open. I've thought Free Speach, regarding the content of video games to be a pretty tawdry use of constitutional protection. But years ago I could sacrifice the corpse of a @ at an altar in NetHack, granted it was very graphic, but I haven't tried that to anyone on the street lately.

    I remember reading about how wonderful alcohol was, while in Jr. High and Highschools. Never Cry Wolf, by Farley Mowat, painted a lovely picture of something called "wolf juice" which was (IIRC) half whiskey and half beer. This book was required reading for some classes. Should I blame Mr. Mowat for how much I spend on ales, porters and stouts these days? I suggest a few million to conduct a meaningful study. If it's approved, I'll see you all down at the bar, first round is on me.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. diss?! by JazzyJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hilary Clinton... used the word 'diss' in a sentence? Hilary Clinton?!?...

    Isn't that one of the signs of the Apocalypse???!?!

    Are we sure it wasn't George Clinton?....

    1. Re:diss?! by BlueMud · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not so concerned with 'diss' as I am 'colour.' When did she stop using American-English? Last I knew, we banned the letter 'u' about the same time we dumped all that tea in the harbour. CRAP!! There it is again!!! Please save me from the extraneous U's!!!

  7. Young Republicans by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is Hilary Clinton trying to swell the ranks of the Young Republicans? Whatever happened to Democrats sticking up for things like civil liberties? When do I get my Deomocrat party back from the corps and self righteous? Yet another disillusioned Democrat that desperatelhy want a middle of the road party to balance things out in this country of mine.

    1. Re:Young Republicans by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whatever happened to Democrats sticking up for things like civil liberties? When do I get my Deomocrat party back from the corps and self righteous?

      At the same time I get my Republican Party back from the New Aged GOP that has started supporting Big Government, Business, and Big Spending.

    2. Re:Young Republicans by sjwaste · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At the same time I get my Republican Party back from the New Aged GOP that has started supporting Big Government, Business, and Big Spending.

      I'm wondering the same thing. Where'd all the real republicans go? The ones who don't pay subsidies to big business (and would've let some of the major airlines fold, to be replaced by more competitive ones) and don't spend needlessly on programs that aren't working or entire departments (the IRS could be mostly cut out in favor of a VAT, for example). Oh well, on the other hand, at least we're not as bad as most of the european countries in terms of the tax rate, spending, or unemployment (this isn't a swipe at europeans, many of your nations DO tax and spend more and have higher rates of unemployment).

    3. Re:Young Republicans by ninjagin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Perhaps it is you who is asleep.

      The "War on Drugs" was not a creation of the Clinton administration. It's actually a very very old propaganda effort, and most of its proponents have been republicans.

      See: http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/pol/495lect03.htm

      From my own formative years, I remember when Reagan re-invigorated the Nixon anti-drug efforts after Ford let them fade out. Carter was very much anti-drug (still is), but thought that there were more pressing concerns for the executive.

      If you do your homework (which it seems you do not), you'll see that your perceived "democratic legislation of morality" has historically (over the last 40-50 years or so) included legalized abortion, civil rights and equal rights for women.

      Sadly, it is republicans that want to pass laws that restrict personal freedoms and civil rights... controlling who you marry, how you die, what you watch, where you can go, what you can see and where you can travel. Now that they have majority, this is also their great opportunity to force christian values on everyone -- not by bringing them to church in fellowship, but by only passing laws that pass a christian fundamentalist litmus test. For shame.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  8. GTA definitely had no effect on me. by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was murdering prostitutes WAY before GTA came out.

  9. Bullshit by op51n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't make you kill prostitutes. Just something you are free to do, as in real life. I choose not to in SA, for various reasons.

    Also I think with SA they have been more consistent with who is racist/sexist &c. You're character isn't overly either, yet the more dislikable people are, as in films for instance.

    I bought it, and it had an 18 label on it. Moral of the story - DON'T LET YOUR KIDS PLAY IT IF THEY'RE NOT INTELLIGENT, FREE THINKING INDIVIDUALS. Jesus!

  10. Re:Or... by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The key part of the sound bite:

    "Children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them..."

    Wow. Sounds like those children have some really crappy parents. My brother would never let his daughter play a game like Grand Theft Auto.

    Perhaps, Senator Clinton, this is what comes of trying to get the "village" to raise a child. There are a lot of jerks in any given community who will happily sell violent soft-core pornography to children at $60 retail.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  11. Re:Quick! BAN BOOKS! by Webtommy88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ban the bible, lest the citizens learn to stone rapists, murders, and maybe even the politicians to death.

  12. Doesn't the solution seem obvious? by jbarket · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Legally enforcing those ESRB ratings seems like the obvious choice to please both sides.

    Hillary Clinton doesn't want an impressionable 15 year old playing GTA. I'm 22, and want to play whatever the hell I please because I'm an adult that's responsible for his own actions.

    I know the ESRB rating system has been around for a while, but nobody enforces it. Nobody is preventing a 15 year old kid from buying a copy of GTA, BMX XXX, or any other game that *probably* isn't all that appropriate for younger kids, even if I played similar games at that age myself and have never physically harmed another human being.

    The problem is that enforcing this screws the retail chains that carry these titles (in addition to screwing the under-18 market, but since they can't vote, I doubt Hilly cares anyway).

    --

    -----
    jonathan barket
  13. Re:STAY OUT OF OUR PERSONAL LIVES! by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to be forgetting that there was a period of ten years between the two events...

    It's not up to politicians to determine the morality of music, video games, or any other communication. Politicians are always trying to get an angle on something to better their own political gain.

    Their constituents shouldn't be admonished for "bad morals" because they have free thought while they strive to cheat, steal, lie, and sneak around to get higher up the political food chain.

  14. Re:Some Perspective by stonedonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Completely out of context.

    Context:

    "Headlining an appearance with other Democratic women senators on behalf of Sen. Barbara Boxer, who is up for re-election this year, Hillary Clinton told several hundred supporters -- some of whom had ponied up as much as $10,000 to attend -- to expect to lose some of the tax cuts passed by President Bush if Democrats win the White House and control of Congress.

    "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

  15. Re:Slashdot Translator by govtcheez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kids don't grow up to become prostitute-murdering psychopaths because they played a videogame that "taught them it was cool."

    But my mom said I could be whatever I wanted when I grew up!

  16. This link says it all : by isotope23 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look here

    The best quotes :
    "Serious violent crime levels declined since 1993. "
    "Firearm-related crime has plummeted since 1993."

    The most amusing thing is Doom was released at the peak in 1993. Perhaps people are taking their frustations out in violent video games instead of real life?

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  17. Re:maybe i'm gittin' old... by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see how playing GTA is any worse than enjoying an episode of The Sopranos.

    We are invited to sympathize with Tony Soprano as he:

    - Covers up the murder of a stripper by one of his henchmen.
    - Kills and decapitates the very same henchman for mistreating an animal he liked.
    - Shatters the knee of a gambler who owes him money
    - Bankrupts the father of his daughter's best friend
    - Cheats on his wife with multiple partners

    Why don't people complain about The Sopranos they way they do about GTA?

    Because people understand that The Sopranos is intended for adults. GTA and games like it are also intended for adults, but there are a lot of people out there who don't understand that.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  18. Re:STAY OUT OF OUR PERSONAL LIVES! by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I'd like someone to sit down the youngsters in our country and try to explain to them how killing or torturing someone in a war that was permitted under false pretenses is morally acceptable"
    It is not permitted. In fact in case you have not noticed several people are being tried or have already been convicted of these crimes. I have a feeling that more people in the CIA need to be put on trial.

    "but allowing an incapacitated woman to pass away peacefully is not. "

    The court is on your side so far on this one. But isn't good that all the questions about it have been brought up. I for one do not know if starving to death is "peaceful" as you put it. They claim she does not feel pain but then why did the Hospice give her morphine? She left no living will and her family is even at odds over it. This is in no way a simple case.

    "Or how the President willed a young woman to suck him off and put a cigar in her vagina because he had the power to do so was still allowed to run this "moral" country after he was found guilty of lying?"

    You got me on this one. I have no freaking idea. All I hear is that he was a good president and that the economy was better when he was president. Frankly giving him credit for what was an HUGE stock bubble plus the rise of the Internet plus the IT investment in Y2K

    I feel that everything you have pointed out except the Shivo case are more signs of the problem than the root cause. The very fact that so many people like to play GTA is a bad sign. Couldn't the same style of game involve sneaking jews out of Nazi Germany or trying to bring down an oppressive government? The very idea of being good or a hero has fallen out of favor and become comedy. It is sad.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  19. Everyone ignore her--what's really going on by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps, Senator Clinton, this is what comes of trying to get the "village" to raise a child.

    Everyone should just ignore her. This is Hillary Clinton just trying to appear centrist in order to set herself up for a 2008 Presidential run. She's been saying a lot of things lately about "faith" and "morals" due to the "moral values" issue of the last election.

    I don't even care if you're Democrat. Just pointing out what is obviously going on, and why she's suddenly speaking out on this. Decide what you want (personally, I'm not sure she'll ever successfully shake her image as an ultra-liberal from upper New York).

  20. Re:STAY OUT OF OUR PERSONAL LIVES! by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    perfectly valid moral laws that have sound logic behind them .

    Demonstrate to me that my decade plus of playing wolfenstein 3D, Doom, Quake, and so on will compel me to go out and kill someone.

    Then we'll talk about sound logic.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  21. Why don't you join my party? by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's pretty nice in my party. We aren't beholden to anybody, and we only follow what we believe.

    It's called being an Independent. :)

    I learned long ago that political parties are nothing more than organized religions. They're only right some of the time, and they all tell the truth, but only their agreeable versions of it.

    Lean Democrat, if that so suits you. But do it because it's what you believe, not what the party believes. Clearly, you are already disillusioned with the Democrats. So don't be one, and wait along for someone to come along you agree with and vote for them based on the issues, not affiliation.

    You'd be amazed how difficult this concept is for so many people. "Which party are you?" "None." *blank stare*

  22. The answer: by zCyl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When do I get my Deomocrat party back

    Where'd all the real republicans go?

    It won't change until you find a way to convince the general public to stop voting people they don't really want up through the primary elections just because they think they can win, and find a way to convince the general public to stop believing fabricated rhetoric from the "news" telling them what to think about a candidate's character.

    It's a much bigger problem than just finding a new candidate. It's a systemic problem involving the distribution and control of information, and it has hit both parties.

  23. Nor does GTA command anyone to murder by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't even endore it, in fact, it is advertised as a work of fiction, entertainment, not the divine word by which to live your life, as the Bible is.

    So while you contend that the OT doesn't apply to modern people (care to back that up? not saying it can't be, just want to see fi you can) some people may get the wrong idea, and that is what we are worried about with GTA right? That someone might read the sotry and believe they should actually do it.

    I mean clearly there are many that think at least some parts of the OT are to be taken literally. Look at all those that cite it as reason why gay couples shouldn't be allowed to marry. Or how about the jurors receantly that cited the eye for an eye part when deciding to sentence a rapist to death (http://go.fark.com/cgi/fark/go.pl?IDLink=1421604& location=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FUS%2FwireSt ory%3Fid%3D621347).

    Point is that the Bible is full of authorization to do violence to others. Now perhaps the way you choose to interpret it says that doesn't apply now, that's fine, but it is still there. GTA doesn't command anyone to do anything, it's just a game, yet people seem to object to it based on its content. Why then, isn't there the same objection to the bible (rehtorical question)?

  24. Re:Or... by Some_Llama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "My brother would never let his daughter play a game like Grand Theft Auto."

    I let my 9 year old daughter play it, guess what she did?

    She drove around in the taxi giving people rides or the fire truck/ambulence helping people...

    When she watched me play it she kept telling me "No don't shoot the people!!! Don't drive on the sidewalk!!! You're not supposed to be the bad guy!!"

    Maybe this can be taken as one of the "its a tool and depends on how you use it" arguements?

    Not everything is inherently bad or evil...

  25. $90million for a study? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [Hillary Clinton] wants a $90 million investigation to be launched

    Who are they paying with this money? Do you really need $90million worth of research on this topic? Classrooms are overcrowded, people are going hungry, teachers are underpaid... the deficit is going up...

    Isn't there something more important to go after than this? This is EXACTLY what Bush did during the election by making gay marriage the issue of the election instead of the economy...

    All she's doing is grandstanding to get elected by the rightwing while calling herself a leftwing democrat.

  26. Re:She is actually quite rightwing by robertjw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is Jon Stewart any less qualified than George W. Bush was when he ran?

    Or Ronald Reagan, or Jimmy Carter, or any number of other presidents we have. Why is there this common notion that we need someone "qualified" to be President. The Constitution requires that a candidate for the presidency must be a "natural-born" citizen of the United States, at least 35 years of age, and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. That appears to be all of the "qualifications" needed.

    Part of the problem with this country is we think we have to elect lifetime politicians to every office and somehow incumbents magically are better at governing. I wish I knew how to change the attitude of the American people on this. I would LOVE to see some average Joe off the street elected president. Someone intelligent for sure, but someone that hasn't made a career out of lying to everyone and could serve is four years and get out.

    I probably don't agree with Jon Stewart's politics, but I have not problem with him running and might actually vote for him because he's not a career politician.

  27. Re:She is actually quite rightwing by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you think (as a staunch Democrat) that I like this? Do you think I like having to settle for somebody center-left/centrist/center-right? Hell no. But the reality of current demographics and the Electoral College is such that I don't foresee any leftist Democrats being elected in the next decade or so

    This was the exact logic that lead to the nomination of John Kerry.

    As long as this logic is followed, only people like John Kerry will be nominated by the Democrats for election.

    And as long as this logic is followed, the Democratic party will continue losing every single election they enter.

    Listen: There is no such thing as "centrist". There is no "political spectrum". There are only two things. There are people who stand for something, and people who don't. Right now the Republicans are winning elections because they stand for something and they can convince people of what they stand for. If you put this up against what the democrats are offering-- which the democratic leadership thinks of as "centrism", but everyone else in the entire world sees as "we agree with the republicans, but we don't want to take it quite as far"-- it will lose every time. And in every election since 1994 not involving Bob Dole, it has. Whether what the Republicans offer is what people want is uncertain, but it is certain people would rather have real Republicans than fake Republicans.

  28. So... by geekee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hillary believes it's ok for a teenage girl to have the right to have an abortion without parental consent, but she can't play a video game with simulated sex and violence.

    --
    Vote for Pedro