Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Government Wants Detailed College Data

Doofus writes "Apparently aggregate data are no longer enough for the trusty US Dept. of Education, as we can read in this opinion piece Alma Mater as Big Brother in today's Washington Post. As the author, a college president tells us, the governement would require schools "to report all their students' Social Security numbers and other information about each individual -- including credits earned, degree plan, race and ethnicity, and grants and loans received -- to a national databank". And the author counters by pointing out the obvious but real threat of such aggregation: "The creation of a gigantic database containing educational records and other personal data on millions would be a costly and troubling assault on privacy. This information could all too easily be shared with other government agencies or even with the private sector.""

78 comments

  1. God bless the Republic by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cause the way things are going, it's damn sure that it's dead and someone needs to be saying the prayers.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
    1. Re:God bless the Republic by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      God damn it - you ripped the words right out of my mouth dude... (well, I lied - Pat Buchanan's mouth)

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  2. what?? by josepha48 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    why so everyone can have their identity stolen after they graduate from college?

    Its bad enough reading about all these idetity thefts taking place, but when you find out its because someone decided to create this wonderful new database of only info that an identity theif could use.. does anyone else think this is a dumb idea?

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:what?? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      It's a complicated situation. Every school do things differently. I can't imagine coordinating a single DB for a 1000 schools, foreign & domestic.

      Student A was an undergrad for 2 years got a degree. Student B was an undergrad for 1 year, went to work, came back for 6 years. Got a degree. Took an extra course for a minor. Changed major 3 times etc etc.

      What level of detail are we talking about, just a student with a degree? Schools generally have an alumni list or database internally. Dunno if it matters to merge them. The US government doesn't do a very good job financing non-political projects to begin with.

    2. Re:what?? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a little easier than that. First, a college can give semesters unique identifiers like "Summer 2004" "Fall 2004" and "Winter 2005", and report which students took which classes which semesters.

      But it gets even easier for the federal government...they need only dictate the format of data sent to them, and let the individual schools figure out the rest. That's part of the equipment and training costs that the artical mentions.

  3. Oh dear... by Morlark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Won't somebody think of the children!
    Nice to see that they're still churning out complete screw-up policies like this. Oh wait, no it's not. Damn. It really saddens me how society seems to be going right down the drain, and the people who are supposed to be preventing this are usually the ones that end up causing it. This situation is a perfect example of why I really dislike the concept of politicians. Lets see, a group of people who desperately want lots of personal power. Uh, hello? Alarm bells ringing!

    --
    Santa's suicide mission go!
    1. Re:Oh dear... by birdman17 · · Score: 1
      concept of politicians. Lets see, a group of people who desperately want lots of personal power.

      I think Douglas Adams put it best:

      The major problem - one of the major problems, for there are several - one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

      To summarize: It is a well known fact, that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

  4. and thanks to FAFSA by museumpeace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...no male who ever got a nickle in loans or scholarships has avoided being enrolled in this database from the get-go and which database is that? The selective service of course.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:and thanks to FAFSA by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eh? I was required to register when I turned 18. Did it online.

      And, while I applied for FAFSA aid, I never got a cent.

  5. These guys aren't Republicans by kshkval · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The people who are recommending this are not interested in your privacy. I recall a time when Republicans stood for a less intrusive government, or they did until they figured it served their interests to do otherwise. I switched my party affiliation from Republican to Democrat this year. Even Newt Gingrich doesn't understand what happened to the GOP. If it weren't for the fact that all the newspapers (except NYT) have rolled over in the face of the constant Bush terror propaganda, this kind of thing would be big news. Scary as fuckin hell.

    1. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I feel the same way about Republicans, but wouldn't moving Libertarian be a more logical choice?

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by kshkval · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe... the one good thing that has come out of all this is that I'm looking at all the options, including Libertarian. The move to the Democratic party was as much a symbolic protest as a tactical move.

    3. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by slughead · · Score: 4, Informative

      Newt's gaining of power was directly related to the 19% Ross Perot got in 1992.

      You going democrat doesn't mean nearly as much as you going off the map. Off the map means they might get you back, democrat means you're in the "Us Vs. Them" mentality and are beyond convincing.

      Tactically, everyone should vote 3rd party. the lowest spending increases in 30 years occurred right after the 2nd biggest 3rd party triumph in over 50 years.

      Coincidence? Not a chance.

    4. Re: These guys aren't Republicans by kshkval · · Score: 1

      Like I said, a tactical move. I might vote third party, but I'm still disappointed in a party I'd held to be a protector of individual liberties, and I doubt I'll ever vote for a Republican ticket again. I want Republicans to know it, for what it's worth. Was I naive to think that any party was a protector of liberties? Yes. I just can't seem to shake off the amazement I experience looking at the overspending, the war, the deterioration of veteran health care, the unfunded mandates, the databases. Was I also disappointed in any Democrat who voted for the USA Patriot Act. Yes.

    5. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      the USA PATRIOT Act, which gave most of this power to law enforcement, was approved under a democratically controlled congress

      WTF are you talking about? There hasn't been a Democrat controlled Congress since Clinton's first term!

      The Senate at that point was nominally Democratic (50-49, 1 IND, I believe -- Jeffries), but it was certainly not a "democratically controlled congress".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i am actually going to enroll libertarian next time i get to the post office, I guess the last straw was the Terri Schiavo controversy and the complete asshattery of the entire party.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by alexo · · Score: 3, Funny


      > I switched my party affiliation from Republican to Democrat this year.

      So you switched your affiliation from Kang to Kodos?
      Congratulations... I guess.

    8. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by slughead · · Score: 1

      Actually when Jim Jeffords switched to independent in 2001, it became a democratically controlled congress all the way up to 2002.

      The house was still Republican IIRC

      And the vote was 48-1 in the Senate, Feingold against.

    9. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by sconeu · · Score: 1

      But if the house was Republican, then it couldn't be a democratically controlled congress. The Senate was democrat, but Congress as a whole was not.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      You want a less intrusive government and you switched from Republican to Democrat? Good grief! There are other alternatives that still advocate small government, you know.

    11. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by kshkval · · Score: 1

      Well, I did mention I was a conservative. So, now I'm looking at the alternatives and trying to keep in mind that I might have to make a bigger leap. Maybe just more involved would help right off, or better informed. But I still delight in telling (select) neighbors in my 12,000 citizen lilttle town that I switched. Around here, putting a Democrat's sign in your lawn is like announcing gender surgery. Perhaps I should just move to France (just kidding)?

    12. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Well said - so there's at least two of us old time GOPers left that haven't been crushed. Smaller, less intrusive government and greater personal liberty. Now my old party's been overrun by zealots of the Christian right wing, terrorism "chicken littles", and huge corporate interests. Ain't a damn libertarian-leaning Republican left in sight.

      I, too, went Democratic in affiliation this last year, because while I agree with the Libertarians on most social issues, I disagree heartily on their economic plans. I'm a relatively moderate conservative, personally against privatizing everything and believing that some regulation of the private sector is necessary to keep capitalism healthy. I still think the government needs to provide basic services that cannot be better provided in another way. Just FYI, though, my ballot was filled with votes for members of four different parties, however, including one for a socialist, because the two mainstream candidates were both blow-hard idiots.

    13. Re:These guys aren't Republicans by kshkval · · Score: 1

      Mr. Quasi, you have said it so well. So, I suppose it makes sense to switch to the Democratic Party, despite what some of the LPers have said above. I looked at the LP site, and it goes overboard in some areas, altho' I feel more at home there now than I do listening to Tom Delay, for example. Some of the Republicans in our little upstate NY town of 12,000 tried an in-your-face, crush the opposition, you must not dissent or you're a commie approach to zoning and commercial issues and recently got booted out of an 18 year majority. The idiots were from out of town mostly and bullied the well-loved mayor, a genteel educator and a 20ish councilwoman, the gracious daughter of a local banker, the only Democrats on a 9 member council. In a county with a 60% Republican demographic, the Democrats won by landslide margins. My read on this is that there is hope that extremists won't win in the long run, but local politics are so different from the national scene. Amo Houghton was our man until his retirement last year. Now that's a Republican. After Amo and Hillary Clinton worked together to save our regional VA, many dyed-in-the-wool Republican veterans decided they'd think about voting for her. I'm sure that somewhere someone checked to see if it was a cool afternoon in Hell, but it's true. When I was in graduate school, I was a Peace Corps recruiter and an Army Reserve sergeant in the medical platoon of a tank battalion at the same time. That seeming dichotomy shook some trees, but all of my friends understood.

  6. Funny quote from the article by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Researchers at the Education Department say this mammoth project would give them better information on graduation rates and what students pay for college."

    The Deparment of Education has no problem with taking money out of tax refunds when students have outstanding loans. Obviously, the IRS and Dept of Education are at least acquaintances. After, they're both part of the same government.

    1. Re:Funny quote from the article by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this redudant? Since government agencies can work with each other, there is no need for such a database in the first place. They already know all the information.

  7. Striking similarity? by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    "Should an institution refuse, the government could take away federal grants, loans and work-study funds from every student at the college, a penalty that would fall on students in need while leaving more affluent students unaffected."

    That's almost like freezing someone's bank account.

    1. Re:Striking similarity? by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Sounds more like Microsoft negotiating a deal.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  8. This article is a bunch of FUD by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Department of Education already collects more information about students than you even imagine.

    First of all is the FAFSA. This has become the defacto student financial aid applications. Many institutions have their own financial aid applications but to receive any federal financial aid the person must fill out the FAFSA. All the data on the FAFSA is electronically transfered to the student's institution.

    Since federal financial aid can be administered by private banks as well as the government and this aid goes to millions of students in thousands of schools it is an enormaous exercise to track the data. Say hello to the National Student Clearinghouse. Not every school participaces in the NSCH but most of them do because everybody else does. From the NSCH, institutions can BUY your data.

    Each year ALL institutions that participate in federal financial aid programs, which is over 90% of them, must respond to the NCES IPEDS data collection. IPEDS is a complete, albeit aggregate, data collection tool but it drills down to such detail that for a small to medium sized instituion it's not difficult to get some good stuff.

    Many states have combined student data repositories that the state higher education committe can regularly utilize.

    This is just the start. Colleges regularly participate in data exchanges with other institutions. For those who want to scream FERPA right now, remember there is a big loophole called "legitimate academic interest" that allows the institution to use whatever data they so choose.

    There is more personalized data about each and every student floating around hundreds and even thousands of institutions that nobody has any control over any of it.

    The proposed list of variables the the department of education wants to collect per student can be seen on page 74 of the IPEDS SURS Feasability study.

    I work in an Institutional Research office in a major university what NCES is proposing in nothing compared to what is already available.

    1. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by kshkval · · Score: 1

      I think the college President is suggesting that there is an option, in effect, to "opt out" of the federal databases, if only by not applying for or accepting federal student aid. I wonder what percentage of students that comprises, but it still represents a choice. K. Will's intent is to point out a tipping point, something you refute to an extent. Not enough of an extent to convince me that there is a need for the database... or no need to wonder about its purposes.

    2. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question, to a large degree, is "Why?" Why are they collecting this data? They stated reason is to get "better information on graduation rates and what students pay for college." However, that doesn't make any sense, as A: agregate information would reveal the answer to that and B: you just don't do a sociological study by polling everyone. Attempting to get data on every individual student in the US is a terribly, terribly wasteful study. Therefore, they must be looking for something different.

      And that is the fear, that the govermnet is fishing for dissidents. Lots of people subscribe to Mother Jones. But subscribing to Mother Jones, majoring in ecology at Berkeley, and flying out to Montana every 6 months? Must be a nut, they go on the TSA grey list. White, rich, and majoring in business administration? Must be OK.

      And that's really one of the major problems with data mining people. It's difficult to make such generalizations without being racist or discriminatory. Even if it is statistically justified, it still goes against a lot of the ideals of this country to say that being Muslim makes you more likely to hijack a plane, or that being poor increases your chances of trying to blow something up.

      There are volumes of aggregate information out there. There are huge repositories of privately-owned data that anyone can buy a piece of. But to have individual histories at such resolution and without stating the real reason you collect that data? It's a little scary.

      Of course, nothing that bad could ever happen here.

    3. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      to "opt out" of the federal databases, if only by not applying for or accepting federal student aid.

      Interesting point. Essentially it's analogous to not forcing you to give your SSN to any businesses, but also not prohibiting business from requiring it in exchange for goods or services. As in "it's our money, we can decide what we want in exchange for it."

      There are several problems here:

      1. It's not private money, it's government, i.e. public money. The government is not a private for-profit enterprise.
      2. Educational institutions would not differentiate between financial aid recipients and those who do not get any dough. So if I'm paying for college at an institution which admits financial aid recipients, I cannot choose to not have the school submit my information. Which sort of leads us to point
      3. Should there be a differentiation between public institutions (public as in "belongs to the people") and private? A private university can operate for profit, but like the government, a public school is not meant to operate for profit.

      So my same philosophical point applies--they should not be allowed to say "unless you give x, you don't give y", unless of course that's money/fees or something similar directly relevant for the service they provide.

      Now if you pass a law saying "well they just have to require this information from everyone regardless", that's a different story, and just a stupid law to boot..

      ...stop rambling...

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    4. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Each year ALL institutions that participate in federal financial aid programs, which is over 90% of them, must respond to the NCES IPEDS data collection. IPEDS is a complete, albeit aggregate, data collection tool but it drills down to such detail that for a small to medium sized instituion it's not difficult to get some good stuff.

      But there is a difference, they are asking for SSN's. Which are not of much use in aggregrate statistics, so the only rational explanation is they are looking to develop a databank of each and every college student in the US.

    5. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful


      There is more personalized data about each and every student floating around hundreds and even thousands of institutions that nobody has any control over any of it.


      You know, although I don't trust the Federal Government that much, I wouldn't mind one agency having default ownership of all this data and be responsible for locking down the data sharing and keeping students privacy being intact.

      I always find it funny that people are upset at the federal government for tracking information about them. Hey, when I was born I got a birth cert. and a social sec. card., when I went to college I had to fill out FAFSA forms, when I got married I had to get a marriage cert. and it changes my tax status for some strange reason, when my two kids were born we had to get them birth cert. and SS cards. To attend public schools, we had to provide copies of shot records.

      We filled out the census.
      I and my wife have driver's license.

      We have a mortage on our house. We pay taxes to the IRS.

      If my wife and I decided to separate, that would be registered come tax time at a min.

      When my wife, one of my kids, or I die, their will be a death cert.

      What data do my wife and I have left that the government would care about?

    6. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by vrimj · · Score: 1

      This suggestion reminds me of commerce clause cases like South Dakota v. Dole. The federal goverment does not have much actual authorty, but they use spending authority to make things happen. They almost always offer states a choice, and the finanical consquances of saying "No" cannot be so severe that the choice is illusory.

      It would be intersting to see what would happen if a school did say no, it would set up a very intersting commercace clause case in front of a court that has been the first in ages to restrict commerace clause authority.

    7. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by antimatt · · Score: 1

      Will the current administration please repeat after me:

      The United States was never meant to have transparent citizenship. The United States was meant to have transparent government.

      What happened?

    8. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What data do my wife and I have left that the government would care about?

      Shhh... the a YRO submission, you aren't allowed to be rational here.;)

    9. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Will the current administration please repeat after me:

      The United States was never meant to have transparent citizenship. The United States was meant to have transparent government.


      I'm perfectly happy giving all of my data to the current administration. In return, though, I expect they won't mind my installing webcams around the oval office, tapping Bush's phone line, rifling through his financial records, and interviewing his daughters... I mean, unless he's doing something wrong, he's got nothing to hide. Right?

    10. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by kshkval · · Score: 1

      Well, your point about public money surprised me, in a good way, tho'. Public money, never thought about it THAT way. On the other hand, I WAS a Republican and believed for many years that some of what I held was all mine and didn't belong to anybody else. I'm not even trying to sound ironic here, but I do feel like I'm waking up from a dream.

    11. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Well, it _is_ your money; one thing a lot of people seem to forget is that it's not a question of owing the government some inherent debt of gratitude (and cash), but rather of holding your elected representatives and their minions accountable for what they do with your dough.

      Sort of analogous to the point that's often brought up in these discussions--the government does not grant liberties, it is supposed to safeguard them.

      Now back to reality... :-)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    12. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by kabocox · · Score: 1

      What data do my wife and I have left that the government would care about?

      Shhh... the a YRO submission, you aren't allowed to be rational here.;)


      My point is simple though. The government is already tracking every important event in my life already. The only major event left that the government doesn't track is first instance of having sexual relations.

      Let's see the government doesn't care about: what I buy at Wal-mart unless its guns, cigs. or beer, they don't care how I and my wife behave in the bedroom (the government really doesn't care what same sex couples do in the bed as long as they are quietly invisible), they don't care about the videos and video games that my wife and I watch, but they are being forced by groups to restict what my kids are allowed to watch. The government generally doesn't care what my wife and I eat although there are health groups that want the government to play around with the nutritional values of my food before I'm allowed to buy it.

      You know now that I think about it, I'd like the government to track what recipes everyone uses. Our weekly menu would be something like pasta, pasta, hamburger helper, burger king, pizza, hamburger helper, and then another pasta.

      If my wife goes somewhere for the weekend, I eat taquitos.

    13. Re:This article is a bunch of FUD by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In return, though, I expect they won't mind my installing webcams around the oval office, tapping Bush's phone line, rifling through his financial records, and interviewing his daughters.

      Interviewing, huh? Never heard it called that before...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  9. What wouldn't be so bad... by kenthorvath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is if they collected this information, but didn't cross reference it between fields. Let them have my SSN, my majors, etc... but don't let them tie them all together in one big identifying lump.

    1. Re:What wouldn't be so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well they are going to, that's the whole point of them asking for your SSN. So they have a key they can use to tie all of the data together. If they didn't want to do that, they wouldn't ask for your SSN.

  10. I'm not a historian by SunFan · · Score: 2, Insightful


    but governments cracking down on academia sounds stangely familiar to me.

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  11. What SSN? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How can schools report every students SSN when the colleges are required, by law, not to ask for SSN? Yes, yes, I know that they all DO ask for it, but it seems like this is going from ignorance of the law to intentionally going against it.

    On a note of that, I've been told that the social security act banned certain uses of the SSN as ID. Is that really really true? If so, where does it say that? I would love to actually take a university to court and make them change. Why hasn't anyone done this?

    1. Re:What SSN? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a note of that, I've been told that the social security act banned certain uses of the SSN as ID.
      Is that really really true?


      Yes.

      If so, where does it say that?

      On the back of your social security card, "Not to be used for identification." At least they used to.

      I would love to actually take a university to court and make them change. Why hasn't anyone done this?

      Because it only applied to the card, not the actual number.

      Read the straight dope about it for more details.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:What SSN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I needed to know. Thanks!

    3. Re:What SSN? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I just had this discussion. As you say, the "not to be used for identification" part refers to the card itself, as I could not find it in the SSA. However, I believe there is a speech by FDR introducing FICA in which he specifically stated that it would not be used for "big brother"-ish purposes.

      Anyway, I stand by my argument that use of SSN for identification is stupid, and cross-purpose use of this sort of number is a Bad Thing (tm).

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    4. Re:What SSN? by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even back in the mid-eighties, the fine print on college admission forms stated that you were not *required* to give your actual social security number, and that if you choose not to, a unique non-SSN number would be assigned to you. But then of course, you have two 9-digit ID numbers to keep up with, possibly more if you have psuedo numbers assigned by more than one organization.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  12. And the next round of denials for credit would be by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Sorry sir we cannot provide this mortgage because you do not have the required education requirements that our lender has approved.

    Worse is that it would be legal.

    So a person with a PHD in Astrophysics would get a 5% credit card and someone with just a BA in the same field would get 15%.

  13. Re:Out with the DoE! by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

    I have to agree with you, since they aren't mentioned specifically in the constitution education is an enumerated right and belongs as a state right.

  14. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not too smart, are you? Don't answer, it was a rhetorical question.

  15. Dont quote me on this by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    Its been a few years though..
    This is how it functions in the UK , All the universitys are state owned and funded to a large degree.
    They collect records to keep track and allow sharing between universitys ,Social security numbers are collected on forms iirc probably to check your not trying to claim benefits at the same time as studying and reciving your grant or loan.
    To me this sounds like a lot of paranoia as im sure its how it works in the rest of the world.

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  16. God damn it man.. by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

    you ripped the words right out of my mouth (or, well, Pat Buchanan's mouth). Eventually, all democracies commit suicide.

    --
    'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    1. Re:God damn it man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you ripped the words right out of my mouth (or, well, Pat Buchanan's mouth). Eventually, all democracies commit suicide.

      Frank Herbert beat him to the punch by a couple of decades. There is a line in Dune that goes something to the effect of "all democracies become autocractic". Then of course you had the Cynics of Classical Greece. This is a long history of political and moral doomsaying...

  17. No, that's almost like coming off welfare by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    Big Brother empties the pockets of working folk and kindly pays on their behalf for your education, and then you go whining when he expects favours in return?

    You know, in the USA unlike in some socialist pestholes, there exist a few genuine private universities. They don't take handouts, so they don't have to take shit from the feds. You fancy being treated like a customer, not like the product? You know what they say: you get what you pay for.

    1. Re:No, that's almost like coming off welfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are actually no private universities in the UK? I thought that what you call "free universities" are basically private.

      I'm assuming that you're UK from your email address and inflammatory Thatcherite critique of my country.

    2. Re:No, that's almost like coming off welfare by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      There's exactly one: http://www.buckingham.ac.uk.

  18. Oh good by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    They'll probably store it on a laptop.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  19. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    Ability to pay back the loan is what credit institutions look for, and while there is a strong corelation between income and education, no lender is going to turn down a potentially profitable customer on such an arbitrary basis. Nor would they reduce the profits from credit cards simply due to the holder's qualifications, since highly educated people are prepared to pay the existing rates; where's the advantage?

    "Worse is that it would be legal."

    Doubtful; it would probably fall into some category of discrimination. But even if it was legal, it would be financially stupid.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  20. Privacy by bostonsoxfan · · Score: 1
    This is rediculous, I value my privacy. I am starting to get ready to apply for colleges next year and I don't want big brother knowing everything about me and what I do in college. They are propably going to use this to create a terrorist watch list or some stupid list that has no bearing in real life.

    Bring out your tin hats people.

    1. Re:Privacy by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      don't worry, you'd only get on that list if you studied something only perverts or commies or terrorists or godless traitors would find interesting. I trust you feel better now.

  21. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by faloi · · Score: 1

    It's already out there to some degree. When I went to get a car loan, I got a "special deal" from the finance company because I had a degree. As near as I could tell from the paperwork, they didn't care so much what your degree was in or the earning power associated with it. But they did verify the degree, and I got a better rate on the loan for it.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  22. hellooooo draft. by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    why so everyone can have their identity stolen after they graduate from college?

    No. So that the US Armed Forces can recruit (or, if you want to be even more cynical, draft) who they please.

    Military recruiting is an an all-time low despite rather large bonuses for signing up, re-enlistment, and so on. If Iraq doesn't wrap up soon, the military will simply run out of people who want to be in the military.

    Rumsfield keeps telling us how they prefer a volunteer military, but if it comes down to "needing a soldier for that gun", they'll put anyone there.

    1. Re:hellooooo draft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey idiot, ever heard of the Selective Service? The government already knows about you, they don't need this information to find your ass.

      How does idiotic posts like this get modded up? It's not remotely insightful, and is just more leftist FUD to scare people.

    2. Re:hellooooo draft. by isotope23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but the Selective Service does not know WHAT skills you have. Although I do not necessarily agree with the parent that this related to the draft, there has been much more talk about a special skills draft as opposed to a general one.
      Having such a database would enable the feds to say : "We need people who speaks farsi, people with computer skills and medical skills." They would then have the ability to pull the records for people with those skills.

      IMO it is much more likely that this information will be used to target those people who do not fit the norm so they can be watched.
      One of the excuses I can see :

      "For your safety we need the records, so we know who took any biological or chemistry classes. Thus we will know who has the knowledge to make anthrax, nerve gas etc."

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  23. It does not MANDATE, it encourages by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

    What this proposal actually does is play the now classic "purse string game." The Federal government lacks the authority to require local schools to collect & submit this data. Instead, they condition federal money on it.

    If, of course, we were to simply keep those education dollars in-state in the first place, this wouldn't even come up. The solution is simple, stop letting D.C. have so much of your money.

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:It does not MANDATE, it encourages by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Let's abolish the Dept of Ed. It's not Constitutional anyway.

  24. Re:Out with the DoE! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I've read A1S8 of the Constitution and cannot find authority for the Congress to legislate on educational matters nor create an executive department to administer same.

    How'd you get modded Troll for that?

  25. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by daremonai · · Score: 1
    So a person with a PHD in Astrophysics would get a 5% credit card and someone with just a BA in the same field would get 15%.
    Considering the job and earning prospects of the typical astrophysics Ph.D., I think you might have that backwards. (The BA could at least get a job as a programmer like everybody else.)
  26. Bull by rwven · · Score: 1

    Assault on privacy? Any idiot who has ever worked for any university knows how many reports are sent to state and federal government already... The only difference will be that any huge database with all this information will likely hold LESS information about each student than the current reports that are sent out do. I myself have prepared state database reports which hold 90+ pieces of information about every student who got any need-based financial aid... This is called sensationalism and is no change from the way things are already being done.

  27. States' Rights by Randym · · Score: 1
    Just say NO, and encourage your legislature to just say NO too.

    Perhaps it is time to stop Federalism and go back to the Articles of Confederation. After all, isn't this a classic case of abnegation of the Fifth Amendment?

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  28. Same thing with Real ID Act - driver databases by COredneck · · Score: 1

    It is the same thing with the Real ID Act of 2005 legislation (HR418) by Sensenbrenner. Section 203 requires that states must participate in the Driver License Agreement (DLA). Also states will be required to keep information on personal information like social security numbers, addresses, and driving record items such as license suspensions, points (both redundant since it is done already) and all other violations (moving, non-moving/equipment, parking) and share them with ofhter jurisdictions. In addition, it would require states to punish their drivers for out of state and out of country infractions (Canada & Mexico so far).

    Not known to many people is the data will be shared with Canada and Mexico as a start. Reference DLA at the AAMVA. Look on page 4, item 11 defining jurisdiction.The sharing of personal info like SS#'s would be a great bonanza for foreigners and US people alike to abuse such as identity theft.

    The Senate so far has refused to pass the legislation so it was attached to the emergency funding for Iraq War and Tsunami Relief (HR1268) since it is a must pass legislation. The House will attempt to pigeon hole the Senate to pass this contrary to their reseversations for this piece of draconian legislation. It will come up for discussion in the second week of April when the Congress reconvenes from their Easter break.

    The time is now to speak against this. Contact Congress

  29. yes rediculous by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    If you value your privacy, limit the personal information that goes into your applications.

    Don't give them your ssn or anything else they don't legitimately need.

    Tell your HS not to include your SSN w/your transcript or any other documents they send out.

    G'luck with college. Sleep, Party, Study.
    Choose two.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  30. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    When I went to get a car loan, I got a "special deal" from the finance company because I had a degree. As near as I could tell from the paperwork, they didn't care so much what your degree was in or the earning power associated with it.

    I wonder if an AAS in General Studies would count.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  31. Re:And the next round of denials for credit would by faloi · · Score: 1

    I can verify that an Associates was all it took, the didn't care about a Bachelors or better.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein