Slashdot Mirror


Online Business Model for a Band?

Backes asks: "I've seen a lot of submissions about P2P, iTMS, DRM, piracy, and the RIAA, lately. Apparently everyone has an opinion on this and most seem think that the recording industry are a bunch of greedy people that stick it to the consumer as well as their own artists. After hearing some of the stories, I'm not even sure that getting signed to a label would be the best course of action for an aspiring musician or band. So what is a better option? What would you, the Slashdot community, do to make it big on your own using the Internet?" "What kinds of features would a site need? Would you pay for downloads of MP3s from a band's site or not? At what price? Would donations work, or would everyone just freeload? How often would you need updates or new songs to keep you coming back? If downloads were free, would you then buy a full length album from the site just to get the CD? What special features should the CD include? How would you get your name out? What do you think is the best course of action for a band that wants to completely circumvent the whole music industry process and do it themselves?"

64 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Get your priorities right by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Groupie model first, then business

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Get your priorities right by notque · · Score: 2, Funny

      Groupie model first, then business

      Both of those questions are ill suited for Slashdot. What about Sci-Fi television show model?

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Get your priorities right by ZephyrXero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are quite a few successful online-only artists these days. First off, sell your CD's through CDbaby.com. They take a very small cut of your profits and will put your stuff on iTunes for you (you also get a larger cut than the standard artist there as well via cdbaby). Next, put free downloads on your site. The only way people will know if they like your music or not is if they can hear it, right? Now...I would suggest putting them in a slightly over-compressed format. Meaning, it's a high enough quality to hear your music properly, but not quite high enough for them to be satisfied with just that file. I'd suggest either a 96kbit MP3 or Q0(~64k) Ogg Vorbis file... Now they can proceed to buy your CD or download a high quality file from something like Mindawn.com. The next step, and it's the hardest one...is to get advertising of some sort. You can have the best music and the best site, but if no one knows about it, no one will ever see/hear it. This is the music industry's trump card currently, but it is possible. My current favorite band, Celldweller, does all their stuff themselves, sells primarily online, and are doing pretty well (they had a song featured in the Spiderman 2 trailers last year). They even have a small distribution deal to get their stuff in mainstream stores like Best Buy and whatnot. Good luck!

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    3. Re:Get your priorities right by ndtechnologies · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the web hasn't been totally utilized as an asset for bands, in fact many underestimate the power of it. For years i had my bands music up on sites like Angelfire back in the mid 90's. Now in the world of broadband, I decided to start my own online Music Store http://ind-music.com/ because I wanted a way in which I could sell my music online, and still be able to make some money. At this point, we have over 20+ bands that have signed up, and we also work to get them gigs here in Nashville as well as feature them in commercials for our site on local radio stations. The artist doesn't get charged for it. The site takes a commission on the song sold, but the numbers work out so that the artist makes more per song sold, than they do on other competing sites. They set the price for their songs and the bands also earn more money as they sell more downloads. Best of all the accounts are free, and when someone purchases a song, it stays in their account for two years. None of this 90 day expiring DRM stuff. Also, the band doesn't have to give away their creative freedom. They can make the music that they want, without fear of being dropped. The bands choose when they want to close their accounts. We really try to do as much for the artist as possible. I am as frustrated with the Recording Industry as the next person. That is why I created my own.

      --
      I have nothing clever to put here...
    4. Re:Get your priorities right by ionrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being in a band and having some success, I would say it is near impossible to truly do everything on your own. The problem is not that you are unable to do everything yourself. The real issue is getting credibility. Credibility can be purchased to some extent but there is always a certain amount of respect that you must have earned before you are offered the ability to purchase this kind of credibility.

      The label gives you credability because they spend money on you. A publicist gives you credibility because they took you on as a client (which isn't easy!). The distributor gives you credibility because they keep 500+ of your record around waiting for the masses to buy them. The booking agent gives you credibility because of the months of time they spend talking to promoters and arranging the tours (along with the money, food, blue m&ms, etc.). The writers that take the word of the publicist that you are good gives you credibility. And the radio stations that are constantly being asked how many times you song has been played give the impression to program directors that you are important.

      It is all about being given this respect and credibility from those in position to make things happen for you. If you do it all yourself, you are at a disadvantage b/c are you having to toot your own horn all the time. No one thinks I am a great hacker because I say I am. It is when Eric Raymond and Alan Cox are saying I can change the world with my code that I am respected and given opportunities. With that said, anyone can do it. If you work hard and don't mind the fact that talent is not enough, then you can do it (and have a ton of fun!).

      With that said, a shameless ad for my own band is required. We have a record coming out on Pretty Activity Records (http://prettyactivity.com). Our website is http://umemusic.com (be gentle...). We are touring in late May to early June and then again in August (I have an internship with Novell/Ximian in between :). Good luck to anyone going for it. The politics have never taken away from the great experiences and people that we have met and it is all totally worth it.

  2. I would like to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How to protect your music/lyrics from being stolen. If I have a band and we publish music on the web (for free, or a price, whatever) how can I protect them from being stolen and used by another band?

    1. Re:I would like to know by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Funny

      dress like KISS or Gwar, act angry.. throw in some weapons, sex toys and, believe me, they will not risk the consiquences of stealing something you might miss.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    2. Re:I would like to know by GileadGreene · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Uh, perhaps the fact that you own the copyright on your lyrics?

      And, just to please the slashbots, note that it wouldn't be "stealing" if another band used your material, it would be "copyright infringement".

    3. Re:I would like to know by shrewmy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure how true this is, but i remember reading it before... and it said to email the lyrics to yourself. That way you have a copy of the lyrics with time and date stamped all over it.
      I'd think emailing yourself an mp3 or sheet music (if your band does that kind of thing... the couple i've been in havent) to yourself could protect the music in the same way

    4. Re:I would like to know by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Funny

      if this works, and I'm not entirely sure this has been tested in too many courts.. you would most certainly have to leave the mail UNOPENED and I would keep them all in a safety deposit box away from your house for extra security (like fire, water, theft, tornado, ex-girlfriend, etc).

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    5. Re:I would like to know by redivider · · Score: 5, Informative

      Register with the US copyright office. It's not expensive. Its $30 to register a whole album worth of music and lyrics.

      http://www.copyright.gov/register/sound.html

      There you will find Form SR (Sound Recording) and instructions on how to register.

      --
      Sinch
    6. Re:I would like to know by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting


      There's no such thing as "stolen".

      It's merely "unauthorized independent marketing" - and you need it to be a success.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    7. Re:I would like to know by jessecurry · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called a poor man's copyright, but you need to mail a copy to yourself via the us postal service and make sure to leave the letter unopened. This basically will establish ownership through the date of the postmark.
      Make sure to note the outside of the envelope with its contents if you're planning on doing this more than once.

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    8. Re:I would like to know by ZephyrXero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Copyrights are fine when used properly. It's when giant corporations own them and the artists ignorantly sign their rights away b/c they feel it's their only option that it becomes a problem. But yes... make sure you decide what kind of copy rights you would like to retain and then have it posted on your site along with your music downloads. It's just as valid as any other printed media. I'd suggest looking through your options at the creative commons first too.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    9. Re:I would like to know by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just to amplify on the parent post, you automatically own copyright on anything you create once it's fixed in a tangible medium (recorded, written down,...) but yes, it is wise to send in the registration form and the $30 anyway. There are a couple of reasons for this:
      1. If you have to sue somebody for infringement, you have more remedies available if you did the registration.
      2. It proves that you really were the author, and that you wrote it first.
      BTW, point #1 can be important for OSS. If you don't do the registration, and someone violates the GPL, you can only sue them for actual damages. But your actual damages are likely to be zero, since it's open source.

      On a different topic, I have some exeprience with bypassing the traditional book publishing industry with some of my own free-as-in-speech books. Here's some advice:

      • Keep your expectations reasonable, and make sure that if you never see a dime of revenue, you'll still have had a good time doing it, and won't have lost any money you couldn't afford to lose.
      • Don't underestimate how much work it is to set up all the functions of a publisher (or in your case, record label). Taking credit card orders is a pain to set up, and entails continuing hassles. Are you going to have https on your site? -- another hassle, and another expense. What's going to happen with orders if you go on vacation? If you're cursed with success, how much bandwidth are you going to need, and what kind of webhosting costs will that bring with it? How are you going to advertise? Advertising is expensive, and it can be hard to tell if you've reached the right audience, or what the return was on a particular amount of money you spent on advertising.
    10. Re:I would like to know by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If what you are asking is how to prevent other people from covering your songs, the basic answer is that you cannot prevent them from doing so. There is a compulsory license in 17 USC 115, which permits other people to make and sell records of a recording of them, performing your music and lyrics.

      Oh, and all those people talking about envelopes and such are just morons. They have no idea what the hell they're talking about.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:I would like to know by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've heard of people also publishing the md5sum of the music in the newspaper legal section; no idea of what the courts think of this. This will pretty well prove the files owner and date as its nearly impossible to get the same checksum on two different files on purpose. If the court actualy threw out the md5sum because its not absolute, they'd also have to throw out finger-prints and dna too.

      on the mail it to your self method, put the stamp and addresses on the back of the envelope, more difficult to open and reseal without being obviously damaged. all of the above seems ideal to me.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:I would like to know by belial · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've taken copyright law classes specifically for the music business. The 'poor man's copyright' was brought up several times, and although it can be used as partial proof, it really doesn't stand up. In fact, it can hurt you.

      If you sue someone for infringement, you can use your dated envelope for evidence (although not proof) that your story is what you say it is, but damages can only be collected from the date your work is filed at the library of congress.

      If you were to file properly instead of going through the 'poor man' routine, you'll make out a lot better in an infringement case.

      Also remember, Copyrights are given for 'original' works. They don't have to be 'unique'.

      It is very possible that two people can come up with the exact same song. lyrics, chord progression, etc.

      At that point, the owner of the older work (who is claiming infringement) must show that the infringer had access to the original work.

  3. Magnatune by kernel_dan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Magnatune. Motto: We're a record label. But we're not evil.

    --

    Illegal? Samir, This is America.
    1. Re:Magnatune by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      www.mindawn.com is pretty nice too. It's about the only place that sells songs in a lossless audio format (FLAC).

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  4. take the contract by geekee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "After hearing some of the stories, I'm not even sure that getting signed to a label would be the best course of action for an aspiring musician or band. So what is a better option?"

    Don't be stupid. If a label offers you a contract take it. If your career goes anywhere, you can renegotiate a better contract after the terms of the first have been completed

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:take the contract by File_Breaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but then 99% of the time you lose all rights to your own music. I was in many bands and even when we got an offer that was pretty good deal we said no because we wanted to own our music and not have the record lable own it. You have to watch out.

    2. Re:take the contract by DoorFrame · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but has anyone ever heard of your band? Would they have heard of your band if you'd signed the contract?

      Take the contract, get famous, then worry about rights.

    3. Re:take the contract by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Would they have heard of your band if you'd signed the contract?

      Maybe, maybe not. That's not an indicator.

      You've probably never heard of 95 percent of the bands that have signed on to a record label. Many, many times, the label simply does nothing with the band/artist. And they'll still prevent you from actually doing anything else creative.

      Sometimes it's in your best interest not to sign.

    4. Re:take the contract by beatljuice · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and when standing at the crossroads, be sure to make a deal with the devil. You can always back out later... right?

      --
      Look for a reason to smile you jaded #*^ *(%$
    5. Re:take the contract by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't be stupid. If a label offers you a contract take it. If your career goes anywhere, you can renegotiate a better contract after the terms of the first have been completed.

      I agree, don't be stupid. But that's all I agree with.

      90% of signed bands never release a second album, because their label dumps them first. Meanwhile, just about all bands make negative money from their first contract. This is important, if you sign with a label, you will end up in debt, you will also end up not owning your own work made while on contract. Standard label contracts are really that abusive. They get away with it, because prior to the internet, they were the only game in town.

      You know why Prince changed his name for a few years to that weird multisexual symbol? Because his label owned his name. We got to hear all those jokes about it, when it was really a creative way to escape a hideously abusive recording contract.

      Don't be stupid, don't sign with a major label. You never win the lottery, you ain't going to win the label lottery either.

      If you are good, you don't need the labels anymore (and chances are they don't want you because "good" does not usually equal "easily packaged up as sex symbols for young teenagers").

      Make your own way.

      Release your current work to the net with a Creative Commons license. Promote your live performances, sell doodads.

      If you are good, you'll gain a following after a while (years probably - so don't quit those day jobs just yet). With a substantial fanbase you can start working on commission. Here's how in a nutshell:

      1) Set up an escrow account that people can deposit money in via paypal, credit cards and electronic checks.

      2) Name your asking price for the release of a new recording - a whole album or just a track or somewhere in between.

      3) Make sure your fanbase knows about your offer, publicisize it every which way you can.

      4) When enough people have pre-ordered your new music (via the escrow account) to reach your asking price, release the new performance with a Creative Commons license, and take your money.

      If you continue to make good music, each time you release a new track to the public, it becomes advertising for your next commission. If you get popular enough, say just 1 million fans (out of the possible 1 billion or so people on the net), you can really start raking in the bucks on the commissions - ask for a cool $1M to release your next album and all it takes is just 10% of your fans to pay $10 and you are now a very well paid artist. Your fans are happy because unlike with RIAA music, they really will own the music they buy from you, no guilt, shame or jail time for sharing copies with all of their friends and strangers too.

      Everybody wins, except the RIAA and their old guard distributors, and nobody will shed a tear for them.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:take the contract by redivider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't be stupid. If a label offers you a contract take it. If your career goes anywhere, you can renegotiate a better contract after the terms of the first have been completed.

      That seems to be the advice you hear from a lot of different people. I've been through one record deal already and have talked to a *lot* of other bands in the same position, and it rarely works out like that.

      Also, in most cases a major label deal guarantees *one* album but locks you in for *seven*, all at the sole discretion of the label. That's a long time to wait for a renegitiation. There are bands that have been around for 10-15 years and still haven't released seven albums.

      Just out of curiosity do you have any experience in the music industry? Specifically with signing record contracts, releasing and promoting albums and renegotiating contracts?

      Thousands of good bands have totally fallen apart because of the way the label handled them. Not because they weren't good or there wasn't an audience for their music, but because labels want immediate success and try to put all their eggs in one basket. They spend ridiculous amounts of money up front so when it doesn't work right away the bands are tossed out with nothing but whatever's left from their advance. That might last you another few months, but what then?

      I guess what I'm saying is, it's not always as simple as what you're making it out to be. Obviously a young band isn't going to get the best deal. I'm not saying to turn down every record deal just on principle. But make sure the label at least beleives in what you do and is willing to put their money where their mouth is. You might not be able to get a good royalty rate right away, but try to get 2 albums guaranteed or a certain amount of money for promotion/tour support. At the very least get whatever you can up front, because no matter what they say, they want to give you as little money as possible. The last thing you want is to be broke 6 months later and begging the label for more money so you can pay your bills while you're out on the road. If you just take any deal that is thrown in front of you, you're just asking to get screwed. I've seen it plenty of times. I know at least 4-5 bands that signed major label deals. One of them had their album shelved (ie: it never got released) and they got dropped. The rest got such little support that the records never sold enough to satify the label, the bands all got dropped and everyone went their separate ways.

      And in almost all the cases, if they had released the album on a smaller label and had a better deal, they would have been considered successful with the amount of albums that they sold and would've actually made some money.

      Sure it's a much harder road to follow. But do you really want to put the future of your band in the hands of some company that is gonna toss you out whenever they feel like it? For some people it's worth the risk. At one point it was for me. But we got tossed out just like everyone else. Luckily we all have confidence in what we do and decided it was worth pushing forward.

      I think with the technology we have today its possible to put your band in a position to be able to negotiate the right deal up front. It's gonna be hard, but it will be worth it in the long run.

      Don't even try to get signed until you have some kind of following. Sell you music online and at shows. Give it away on P2P networks if you have to. If its good eventually the fans will come. Once you have a decent fanbase, even if it's in one area, you at least have something to bargain with. Labels love numbers. If you can sell 10,000 CDs regionally, even if it takes you a couple of years, you're gonna be in a much better position to get the right deal from a major label.

      If you go just with a demo and nothing else, you really don't have anything. Sure the demo might be amazing. But labels don't really care if something is good anymore. They'd rather you show up with a demo that sucks, but you sold 25,000 copies of it. If it sells they'll get behind it.

      --
      Sinch
    7. Re:take the contract by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You know why Prince changed his name for a few years to that weird multisexual symbol? Because his label owned his name.

      That's funny, considering Prince is his real first name. How greedy can the record companies get?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:take the contract by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So how much money have you made so far?

      Over the last 7 years, I've generated ~$1.6M in revenue for my work alone.

      I'm not a musician, but I do commissioned work.

      You, like almost everyone else with a job in the USA works on commission too, you just haven't realized it yet. You go to work, you get paid for putting in a day's worth of labor and then you do not care about what happens to the end results of your labor. If you consistently do good work, you get promoted or move to a job at a new employer that pays better. If the quality of your work sucks, you get fired or "parked" in a dead-end position.

      The internet just makes it possible to aggregate the payment from thousands, even millions, of people to commission the work of artists.

      Or are you talking out your ass?

      Nope, my vocal chords are anatomically correct.

      It is precisely because of my personal experience doing commissioned work that I realized artists could do the same thing if they leveraged the internet to directly reach their customers rather than rely on the disintegrating business model of using (or really being used by) a distributor of physical goods.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:take the contract by bfields · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You've probably never heard of 95 percent of the bands that have signed on to a record label.

      It's also worth noting that you've almost certainly never heard of 99.99% of the succesful musicians out there. Where by "succesful" I mean, they make a living, and enjoy and excel at what they do.

      If your primary goal is to "make it big", or become "famous"--well, I think your priorities are weird, but I also think you're setting yourself up for disappointment....

      --Bruce Fields

    10. Re:take the contract by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is precisely because of my personal experience doing commissioned work that I realized artists could do the same thing if they leveraged the internet to directly reach their customers rather than rely on the disintegrating business model of using (or really being used by) a distributor of physical goods.

      Let me begin on a bit of a tangent and then connect it later.

      The basic difference between math and physics is that math is based on a system in which any set of rules that are internally consistent are equally valid. Physics is a science in which many competing theories are internally consistent, but they are only valid if they describe the world in which we live.

      So what have you done? You have claimed that most peoples' daily jobs are like a commission in that you are paid by someone to do work that they dictate. (I don't disagree with that, although I probably would have put it the other way - a commission is just a type of job, rather than vice-versa.)

      But that's an example of an organized entity (a corporation) paying workers a substantial salary in an attempt to make a profit, subject to various legal restrictions. Going from that to having tens of thousands of people contributing small sums on the Internet involves changing several variables at once. It's just too much of a logical leap.

      You didn't even mention recent Internet efforts to raise money to save Blender, Mandrake, ST:Enterprise, etc. that worked, to an extent. And hey, Howard Dean funded his political campaign with contributions from the Internet. But then again, he didn't win. Every cause is different. So whether this strategy can work for musicians doesn't seem clear to me. And whether it can work if thousands of other bands are using the same strategy is a further open question.

      BTW, it's a logical fallacy to believe that just because a business model is "disintegrating" then the alternative must be better. Very often, an imperfect status quo is still preferable to all the alterantives.

      -a

  5. Making money as a musician by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember... information wants to be free. You have no right to earn money. Just provide all of your music. We will download it, and then tell you that if your music weren't crap, we'd pay for it.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  6. my take by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to have worked for some 'indie' bands recently, using viral marketing - offering demos or live versions of their songs via p2p, or even the full song to get publicity

    After they get a name for themselves with fans who download music to check out new stuff, they make an effort to get signed, the problem here being the production of new material if they used their best to get a name for themselves online

    I don't think the internet would ever top the playing in bars to get your name out, but if mixed with services such as download.com - while sharing live or demo versions on p2p, you could build yourselves a name quickly. A lot of things would also depend on the type of record label who would sign you, the 'indie' kind who give out songs online for promotion, or the big labels who try to stop download and have huge budgets for promotion

  7. To make it big on the internet... by Peterus7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get one of your fat friends to do something really stupid, videotape it, and put it up on newgrounds with a music track. Then sell t-shirts.

  8. I'm so glad you asked.. by peculiarmethod · · Score: 5, Informative


    Well, I am not famous, yet.. but I am working on exactly what you speak of, and here is a simplified version of what I am doing:

    I have a living room studio where I record all of our practices and jam sessions to firewire harddrives. I use 24 channels to mix down about 6 different sized diaphram condensers and a few 57s here and there. There's all the gear we need (amps, bass, guitar, two keys, and a trap set), effects, a PA, and we have and now own the only copies of all our material. We all learn and teach each other to engineer.. play.. compose.. we all treat it democraticaly when decisions are to be made about lyrics, composition, song selection, mastering, mechandise, etc. With all this in our own hands, we all sell CDs and merch at our gigs and in our spare time (running to local record stores and getting things on consinement), and reinvest certain monies from band oriented sales into necessary things like legal docs or advice.. expensive promotional materials such as ads, cds, etc. Repeat.. profit. we've removed the need for a label at the expense of not having everything all at once. But with a bit of work, the band can work like a sucessful startup company, and we're having one hell of a time while we're at it!

    pego the jerk

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:I'm so glad you asked.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of bands do this. It's pretty much the normal way to go about things BEFORE you get a label contract, if thats what your looking for. It seems your not, but that is the normal thing any successful band had to go through to get to the point where a label would be interested. That and actually have good music and a loyal fanbase.

      It seems kind of ironic that you have to have a successful promotion and distribution model before a label will step up and offer to provide promotion and distribution in exchange for your money and the rights to your work, doesn't it. Its no wonder the RIAA is scared spitless.

  9. Model by seaniqua · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, I don't see a band making more than a moderate regional success without the aid of a lebel. The industry is just too closed to outsiders. You won't get your album shelved in Sam Goody, Wal Mart, and the like without the aid of a high-powered record company. The only other option is to join a smallish, "indie" label. While you still won't make MTV (most likely), a good indie label will be able to get you some exposure in independant record stores, radio stations, and the like. Some idie labels even band together in loose organizations, and can manage to get more clout that way. With this setup, you might be able to get a regional distribution in major outlets, but you still won't make the billboard charts. Sad to say, but if you want to be a rock star, you still have to play the label's games. At least until I get my plan to revolutionize the record industry underway...

    --
    That's right, I read at +2 and post at +1. Not even I care what I have to say.
  10. A Sure thing by RyoShin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know all the details behind becoming a big band, but one thing is for sure: If you go on your own, and you suck, you're going to go nowhere. (Hopefully you would realize this, though.)

    There have been 'big names' that were mediocre groupd/people that their labels hyped like crazy (and who also generally had looks to help them out.)

    Anyone looking for wide recognition would do well to become local stars. Especially if you live in a bigger city, being a local star, with fans who will post on the internet, will help your career if you try to be independent.

  11. Star Wars Kid by kai.chan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "What would you, the Slashdot community, do to make it big on your own using the Internet?"

    Having a site with your work isn't enough these days. Unless you are the best of the best out of the billions of sites with the same type of content as yours, you won't be recognized. Although it might sound like a joke, but doing something wacky and weird will get you all the attention on the internet, as people start propagating and promoting your site to others. Take Star Wars Kid, realultimatepower.net, Yata, etc, for example, instant fame in a matter of days. Now, shifting from wackiness to the content you are promoting might be a more difficult challenge.

  12. CD Baby by fohat · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm currently considering being my own label and selling CD's through CD Baby. My experience with them has been positive so far.

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
  13. its pretty simple really by deathcloset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    play shows.

    That's all.

    The "recording artist" is becomming something of an anacronism - or will become so IMO.

    We are returning to a time when musicians get payed to actually perform their music, not just record it.

    Ask a signed band, and the record company always, always gets the biggest cut of the money from record sales.

    the band just counts on the sales driving concert attendance...but it's not really SALES driving the attendence, it's the people hearing the music.

    and that hearing can now be achieved without the expenses of distribution from a decade ago.

    that's truely why the Recording Industry is going to the toilet. The fleets of trucks driving to the stores and the warehouses of duplicatation equipment are already outdated - and that was really all that we needed those guys for. They didn't MAKE artists, the found and held them - like a zoo animal.

    Give your music away, if you love it set it free. They will come to see you play if you rock :)

    and I hope you do :D

    link to your bands website?

    1. Re:its pretty simple really by wtmcgee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. I enjoy the live show as much as the next guy, but saying the studio album is simply an ad is a bit naive. I'm way too busy (and live way too far away from any decent venues) to see every band I enjoy playing live.

      The album format may be dying (slowly, but yes, it's dying), but for someone who spends way too much time in a car or at work, live music (and ESPECIALLY merch - I don't want a t-shirt of my favorite band ... i just don't care about such things) is not a viable way for me to support artists.

      --
      *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
    2. Re:its pretty simple really by mjfgates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can disagree, but you'll be wrong.

      The simple truth is that, from the band's point of view, albums are advertising expense. Bands do not profit from albums.. even the tiny slice of royalties they're officially given are inevitably taken by the labels.

      If all you do is buy albums, you are doing nothing, nothing at all, to help the band survive. It's not worth feeling guilty over it, but it is a good reason for the bands to find new ways to distribute their music... if they can actually make a nickel a tune selling it on mp3.com or whatever, that's five cents more than they get now.

  14. What I would Do by Travelsonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Offer decent quality samples or one or two(more as I made more music) full tracks, ABSOLUTELY NO "Digital Rights Management" (DRM), it has proven itself to be nothing but a worthless, overcrackable piece of shit. 2. Price the individual songs, or singles, and full CDs at low prices. - Single songs: $0.99 - $1.10 - "Singles" CD: $5 - "Full CDs": $7 - $10 3. Use a website to promote my stuff, try to get music on as many sites (pay-per, or free) as possible, including Dmusic.com, ITunes, Napster, etc. 4. If piracy helps you, truthfully show it. If piracy hurts, truthfully show it too. If they have both a negative and positive impact, hell, show that to your fans as well. Don't call them theives or robbers, or make analy incorrect analogies to compare to copyright infringement to. Don't go to making false "losses" clainms or do anything to make yourself look like a whiny baby. Show them that while you have a firm stance, it is truthful, and you can actually prove/back it up, unlike the **aa/BSA/MPAA/CRIA/ETC

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  15. Give It Away Now by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Give the music away for free, with URLs embedded in the MP3 ID3 tags etc. Sell the things you can control access to, like concert admissions, copies of CDs for people who want that (many still will), t-shirts and other merchandise. Try to license your songs to people selling other things, if you think that's cool. If you sell the songs, there's a cost to sales, and you'll wind up spending lots of other money on other promotion and marketing. With the Internet offering so much free distribution, the music itself is the most effective, cheapest promotion available. And the primary idea is to get as many people listening as possible. So help the music get to the people who want it, and your audience will be more interested in paying for the rest of the package.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  16. being a band by pronobozo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to try and succeed on the net, you have to get hits, lots of hits, more hits than you could probably get. For every million, there 100,000 that'll like your style, 50,000 that'll visit your site twice, 10,000 that'll be a fan, 1,000 that'll buy a cd.


    Get hits is key, use internet as your main tool, everything else is too expensive. Find the indie radio stations, sites, genre related communities. It's your only tool but the best tool. You can get thousands of people hearing your music everyday, something you can't do very well with other methods.

    Stick in the game for a long time, let your name build.

    There isn't much more to it.

    yes sell mp3s,cds,shirts whatever you can. If you are trying to make a living, then damn, you need more ways to make the money.


    p.s. please visit my site. I'll have an album out in a month or two. http://www.pronobozo.com


    --
    ------
    insert sig here,here, and here
  17. Multiple Strategies by wwahammy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of what the internet gives is number of different avenues for bands to get their music out. Getting onto Napster for its subscription service could be a really good idea as it allows people to relate your music to more established bands' music. For example, people won't necessarily check out a new band but if they see this new band is similar to say Korn they're gonna be more likely to give it a whirl and with the subscription service they're not out anything. If you don't like the idea of selling people DRM music, I believe you can just distribute it on these services as a subscription album not for individual sale.

    I also think something like Magnatune is a good idea in that it gives you a more direct distribution channel. One of the advantages of smaller bands is that people tend to actually buy their music instead of getting it over P2P networks of a band that's on the radio.

    I think something that's been mentioned too that is important is the idea of giving out certain tracks while selling others. Live versions could be given for free while the album version could be downloaded from a service.

    What's most important though is creating a buzz and fans. Getting the music out there is relatively easy, its actually finding listeners and a group of loyal fans to preach the gospel so to speak is what's hard.

  18. Live Broadcasts Over The Net by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Only way to go.

    Set up a monthly subscription plan whereby people who like your music can log on and see live (and prerecorded live) streaming video (and audio) of concerts and jam sessions on a regular (weekly, whatever) basis.

    All the money goes directly to you (and your bandwidth provider, of course - somebody's going to take a percentage of your earnings, and that's a fact.)

    Do NOT concern yourself about "pirating" of your content - it's irrelevant to your success. It's merely "unauthorized marketing" and will do you some good.

    Secondly, do major marketing. Look at The Corrs - they went to practically every country on the planet, as they say, "selling each album door-to-door, country-to-country, stage-to-stage". They feel it's only right if someone buys your music, they should have the opportunity to see you live. (And the Net allows that without the jet lag.)

    And they have a cameraman following them around practically twenty four hours a day, given all the documentary footage they're released over the last ten years. They have a good Web site. They log on to their fan sites and post messages (both Sharon and Caroline Corr logged on to the Corrboard in the last couple weeks to thank fans for birthday wishes). They walk across traffic to sign autographs. Treat your fans right - they buy your music.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  19. I think the turn is just around the corner. by Asprin · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I'm waiting for that first new act to realize they can make a ton more money selling $7 CDs themselves over the internet than going through a label selling them for $20 and giving up their catalog to the man. As soon as the first band is succesful making it work, the floodgates are open!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  20. Not so sure by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Informative
    Don't be stupid. If a label offers you a contract take it.

    A friend and I set up a web site for my wife's music and did some basic advertising with SingingFish. Her top download song last month had 13,336 downloads (lo res mp3's), second place 2,450 plus the samples. We've started getting several inquiries a week about the due date of her next CD. And we're not even pushing it that hard. This was spending less than a hundred bucks on advertising.

    I'm not at all certain you'd be able to make a huge amount of money just on the internet, but we're satisfied enoough with the initial results to spend some money on taking it to the next level.

    The way record labels calculate expenses on a CD, most artists don't make squat on CD sales. Getting a CD professionally produced, if you do the mastering yourself, isn't that expensive. The break-even sales figures are fairly modest and I do think we can turn a reasonable profit if we hold expenses down.

    Getting back to your original comment...if you have some business sense and access to the creative talent, I don't think it's at all foolish to be skeptical of signing with a record label. The more you're able to demonstrate success without them, it would seem at a minimum one could negotiate a better deal. And at some near-future point in time record labels will no longer be necessary.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  21. They Might Be Giants by Phantasmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check out They Might Be Downloads. Their prices compete with iTMS, but you get high-quality, LAME-encoded MP3s without any DRM. You can also pay a little extra to get FLAC rips of selected albums.

    Give away some songs for free (maybe enter Songfight! once in a while and link to it), but just let people know that the songs are for sale and that they're DRM-free for the customer's convenience, and that you trust them. Charge a reasonable price and make the site easy to use and you'll get customers.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  22. Re:its pretty simple really - not by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A lot of people, such as myself, who work in a totally electronic realm don't "ROCK". At all. We sit behind a laptop. Playing live is a boring exercise in futility. As far as the audience is concerned, I might as well be playing tetris or minesweeper. I make sure I grimace as much as I can when I hit the spacebar.

    That said, I do agree with you and think that there will be a general trend toward live performance. As usual, China is a model: musicians there don't make shit from their CDs - they're instantly pirated. They make their living from constant grueling tour schedules.

    That's fine when you're in your 20s and you want to "rock", but it really sucks for people who are older or have family obligations.

    I think he crux of the matter is one of raising consciousness among consumers.

    Sure: go and trade your mp3s on P2P, but: if there is something you like and you listen to it more than a few times, GET OFF YOUR ASS AND BUY IT, YOU CHEAP ASS MOTHER FUCKER.

    And if you can buy it directly from the musician(s), all the better. Go for it. By doing so you support the people who made the stuff and deserve your money. They have to pay rent too.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  23. Here's my uninformed opinion. by kwalker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The recording industry ARE a bunch of greedy bastards that are just in it for the money, so any place they can squeeze out a few more bucks, they'll do it. And they know the power of Intellectual Property © ® and all the fists full of money that can generate, so they do everything they can to extend and expand copyright, so they can retain monopoly rights on something they paid someone to create but somehow they own.

    But the real question is how can you make it. Well, to make it on-line as a musician, this is what I would do:

    • Make sure your website has features to keep and gain fan attention. Make sure you have available media such as:
      • MP3s, WMAs, OGGs, and AACs of your music in lower but still acceptable quality. I'd say 56k-96kbit, so casual listeners can listen but true fans would want to purchase high quality (192-512k) copies and lossless copies. Doesn't even have to be all your music. Imagine it like singles played on the radio. You can even have a tip section for each song so they can donate if they feel like it. And since you're distributing these files, you could have an introduction where you thank them for listening and direct them to your website, and put meta-data tags (ID3 tags and OGG comments, and I'm sure WMA and AAC have similar info blocks) on the files so it shows your information in iTunes, Winamp, Windows Media Player, XMMS, and so on.
      • Maybe setup a Shoutcast, or IceCast channel. "All $MYBAND! All the time!"
      • Videos of the band. Again, low quality, Windows Media, Quicktime, screw Real Player. Make them stream-only for free and offer to sell downloads of higher quality copies.
      • Sell swag from your website. Audio CDs, DVDs of shows you've played, music videos if you're inclined to make them; T-shirts, hoodies, baby-doll shirts and all that crap that Cafepress will make for you. Turn album covers into desktop wallpapers, and have band photos for download. Make cell phone themes and ring-tones, sell those for $0.99 or even $0.50. Find a local starving-artist to help with the media if you want.
      • If you've got the time and energy, have a band blog, podcast, or even for have those for individual band members.
      • Promote your site with other artists and promote them on yours if you like them or if you think your fans would like them. A couple of banner ads on your site (provided that they're not obnoxious) in return for a couple banner ads on someone else's site.
    • Get signed with whoever you can, but make sure you retain copyrights and possibly distribution rights. Get your music on iTMS if you can. Look into on-line record companies/distributors like Magnatune or MP3 Tunes as long as they won't interfere with you hosting your music on your own if you want.

    Make it easy for interested fans to find you, refer you to their friends, buy stuff from you. Make your website easy to find and accessible. If you're not so good with visual media or website design, you probably know of a geek or a family member who is good at that, you could have them make a site for you (Payment would be between you and them). Once you're big enough, see if you can setup some tour dates. Sell CDs there, give out business cards with your website URL on them. Give away CDs with a few singles on them. You can even have an introduction on the CDs and DVDs and direct them back to your website, especially on any CDs you give away. Put a data track on audio CDs and DVDs that has some promo material or music files for your band and a link to your website. Remember everything can be used to promote yourself/your band, so make sure you've got it there where you can. But don't be obnoxious about it. People understand self-promo

    --
    ... And so it comes to this.
  24. "The Internet" is not the answer... by nunchux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... It's a way for the fans to reach you, and for interested parties to find your music... But you won't be found if no one knows who you are. The only reason left to sign up with a label is their publicity machine; they would potentially get your videos on MTV, advertise in Spin and get your songs on TV and movie soundtracks (of course it's more than likely they'd just sit on your contract and do nothing, but that's another issue.)

    So if you're going at it alone, you have to do more than put your music on P2P and your web site.
    You have to TOUR, extensively and relentlessly. Get a good booking agent to find the prime clubs and team you up with bigger names. Hit the big cities as often as you can, particularly L.A. and New York. Make a lot of friends, because people listen to indie bands because they're "cool guys" as often as they like their music.

    You're also in charge of your own merchandise, and I would tell you to go all-out to make it good. Don't just have your little brother who thinks he knows Illustrator make your shirt-- get a well-known underground artist, cartoonist or designer if you can, even if you have to pay for it. T-shirts are billboards, and if yours gathers attention just for being cool to wear people will seek out your band. Don't skimp on the CD design, either-- instead of duping your own and printing the label on the inkjet, have the label screened and the insert printed professionally (and again, designed by a pro.) It WILL pay off.

    Consider doing a funny cover song or two. Not only will it get noticed on the P2P networks (by people searching for the real thing, of course), but it's a crowd pleaser that will draw people in to the rest of your music. Find a cheesy 80's or 90's song and make it good. This isn't for everybody, but when it works it works well. Along the same lines, it's kind of cheesy but consider having a "look" beyond jeans and a t-shirt. If you can, hook up with an aspiring fashion designer.
    Image counts for a lot, and some sort of costume or theme goes a long way towards creating a memorable show. Make it look like you put a lot more money into it than you really did...

    Finally, consider hooking up with artists in other mediums. Get your music into an indie film if you can, or a cool Flash cartoon.

    On second thought, just sit in your basement and put your songs on KaZaa. I don't need the competition.

  25. Watch your audience, too by adoll · · Score: 5, Informative
    I run sites for bands: 1 2. The single most important thing for them is getting signed to do live performances. This means the site is promoter friendly, as well as fan friendly. Tell them when you are playing and where. Fans and festival promoters like to know when you are in their area.

    Have your promo pack on the site. Only one of my Clients does, but that gives them an advantage over the competition. Make sure the promoters know who you are, what you play, and what you need on stage for plugs and boards.

    And photos! Fans love em. Promoters need em. Find yourself a good PHP type package like yappa-ng and smile for the birdie!

    My $0.05 about music online: consider it your radio play. Release a few "singles" to your website (and wherever else you can) and don't skimp on the quality. The promoters are listing to a dozen MP3s a day and if yours doesn't stand out, then you won't be on stage.

    -AD
    Shameless link to my own template

  26. Easy by NachoDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1)Dump the concept of the album.
    2)Songs are released over time as they are conceived and recorded.
    3)Music on the website is free, however copyrighted and owned by the band.
    4)You can order a custom compilation on DVD or CD for $5 plus shipping.
    5)Band's main revenue stream is from performing their music, and merchandise at the venue and on the website. Tickets cost $50-$200, depending on the artist.

    Remeber that music is a performance art. Most of what you pay for and not ironically the biggest whiners about downloading, are the distributors/middlemen in the music business.
    With this model, the artist end up making more money, and creativity is rewarded by direct market forces.

  27. Hard work, time and of course good music = success by rinkjustice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was in a local band eons ago - called "Acid Toad Secretion", named after an incident when a teen licked a toad to get high and went into convulsions - and I personally did much of the booking and advertising. The reality is, whether your a recognisable band or not, club owners and journalists will not seek you out. There's enough demos and promo kits falling on their laps to keep them busy till the next millenium. Bands (ATS included) need to pound the pavement and make the cold calls for interviews and gigs. Networking with similar bands and share billings is also important. Make friends. Lot's of them. I found at least 50% of my time was spent on the promotional/networking aspect of being in a band, another (extremely annoying) 20% was spent on technical issues like soundchecks, soundmen, equipment... the remaining was the good stuff: actually jamming, rehearsing and making music.

    It wasn't easy for us, but after a few years of hard work and patience we had our own following who supported us and dug our music. If the music is good, people will eventually hear about you. Posters and other schwag (no matter how polished and professional it looks) won't go very far nowadays. Word of mouth is the best form of advertisment, the rest will have to be done by lot's of gigging (which will make you better and tighter) and making those phone calls to any entertainment publication that will listen. Create a positive "buzz" where you live, and keep booking those shows. Don't ever let people forget about you. You'll find your band's rep is bigger and better than you actually are!

  28. song in torrent+(creative commons)=donations+tour by poningru · · Score: 2, Informative

    basically the buisness model is,
    1)put out your songs in (cc) licencing with your choice of rights
    2)Make it availble through your website by torrent (not much server fees)
    3)Advertise your site and licensing method (in your local-bands website etc.)
    4)Ask for donations
    5)As your popularity grows due to heavy usage of ,good songs which anyone can share, you are asked to give performances, where you pass out free cds (for a donation ofcourse)
    6)Profit

    P.S to the readers when I was reading the article it was at 270 comments, so if this idea was given before, I apologize for the added garbage.

    --
    Calm down people, its a religion not an operating system.
  29. Re:Define "not evil" by Urzumph · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://magnatune.com/info/terms

    WRT Royalties :
    "50/50 gross revenue split on music: our main revenue sources are selling your music to consumers (at a price between $5 to $18 per album) and sublicensing your music for things such as games, ads and the web. We split the amount we collect 50/50 with you."

    and

    "50/50 net profits split on merchandise: for physical goods (Posters, T-Shirts, etc), we split the profits (i.e.: sale price minus expenses) 50/50 with you. Physical goods are a split on profits because we have to invest money in creating them."

    Much better than what most record labels give their artists

  30. Re:Source Please? by Squozen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Courtney Love's article on the subject

    Producer Steve Albini's take

    Long story short: Stay the fuck away from major labels. Even if 'nobody has heard of you' as an independent artist, you're still more likely to make money than by being shackled to the RIAA.

  31. Don't try to do it all yourself by iabervon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless you're actually interested in running a business, you should avoid having a business model. Running a successful business, regardless of the model, will take several people working full-time on overhead, and this is likely to eat up your band.

    The right path is really to find someone else (such as Magnatune) who has a business model which leaves you ownership of your music, gives you a return that you feel is fair, and involves business practices you think are ethical. There's nothing inherently bad about signing with a label, just like there's nothing inherently bad about getting a loan; it's just that the well-known labels are scams.

  32. New Model in development by zeroweb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is an exciting time for musicians! Digital signal processing has brought semi-pro recording to the masses and the internet has provided the opportunity for next-to-nothing-cost for world-wide distribution. iTunes is providing a nice model middle-gound, bridging the crumbling and desperate existing industry with the ease of use and selection of the web. However, the iTunes model cannot last the test of time. The Audience is playing along for now, but they are aware (future audiences will be even more so) that distribution is free. If it effectively costs the same amount to give 1000 people the music as it does 10000, what artist in their right mind would opt for the smaller distribution? You may say: the artist must get paid, and I will agree with you. However, the "pay per item" model is what is dying, not the abstract "record industry." Subscription services are arriving and competition is driving the $1/song price down. Next up? Quality control! The artist websites out there, even on Mangnatune or other mp3 labels cannot survive unless they start informing the audience on what to purchase. Bad-mouthing the record industry crooks is valid, but they still provide a service - they tell the listeners where to spend their money. Is someone else going to step up and fill that role? I would agree with most of what I have read here about putting out decent music as being the first priority. For the up and coming musician I would work hard on that, and trust that new models are arriving every day. Just watch out - there are a lot of bandwagons to jump on!

  33. This is actually a thing I know quite a lot about, by soliptic · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...but of course I only see the article after it's "old news", and my post will probably remain unseen by the hordes.

    Anyhow, I'm in an independent band, keiretsu. As our members have a lot of side-projects, we started an organisation d:art recordings to oversee things. However, the name is a con really - we're not a record label, it's just a device for common publicity and branding.

    How do we use the internet? Well, many different ways:

    • Mailing list - obvious, but essential. Harvest email addresses on a clipboard after gigs, then you can remind people who liked you when you next return to that city.
    • Gigs listings - let people know when they can see you
    • MP3 downloads - we've had tons of listeners from people thousands of miles away, where we have never and maybe will never do a live gig. Although nothing has come off yet, we have even had promoters contact us about tentative international dates.
    • CD Sales - We provide free MP3 clips of every track of our album, and a full download of one of the tracks. I also share this album preview pack on P2P clients like Soulseek. If you like what you hear, you can buy it, via Paypal (or the good old fashioned of snail-mailing me UK currency). I've despatched dozens of CDs across the pond to America.
    • Running a forum so fans can chat with us.
    • Getting interviewed on genre-orientated websites, and getting our downloadable tracks featured on genre-orientated websites and MP3 Blogs to further boost our online profile.
    It goes hand in hand with the real-world, of course. Our CD booklet prominently features our URL, as does the large banner we display behind or above the band at gigs, wherever possible.

    My overall verdict: the internet is an invaluable marketing tool, and you can't neglect the online facet of operations when trying to push an independent music act. It's too big these days. On the other hand, you have to be very unique and special indeed to turn "the internet" alone into a profitable business model. Without continuous gigging, which is still the most effective way of getting yourself heard and building up a fanbase, our online CD Sales would probably not amount to much.

  34. Re:I've figured it out. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But does the term "debt" really apply is the artist is not legally obligated to pay it back? I mean, it's not like it's really debt.

    Yes it is real debt, yes they have to pay it back or their own label starts to sic collection agencies on them and many end up having to go through bankruptcy.

    If the first album didn't sell well, I think it's safe to say the label isn't worried about the competition.

    There are plenty of reasons that an album does not sell well, for example poor to non-existant marketing. In that article I linked to, the band being interviewed complains that their label spent just enough money on marketing to get a few posters printed up, and no more.

    You seem to think that music labels wish to make as much possible money from all of their acts. That would probably be true in a free market, but they have an oligopoly market which means all the standard free-market assumptions go out the window. For the music labels, in the long run maintaining monopoly control of the market is more important than maximizing revenue from each act because monopoly control means they can make hugely out-of-proportion money on a few acts instead. Much more money in total than they could make in a free market scenario, and with a lot less work. Kind of the biz equivalent of "put all your eggs in one basket, and then watch that basket very carefully."

    Same thing with books, ever wonder why so many books go out of print today when we have the technology to do stuff like print-on-demand? They may not be bestsellers, but they are competition, and taking them off the shelves at the retailers makes it that much easier for the latest big hit by Clancy or King or whomever to sell even more copies.

    I wasn't talking about the authors not complaining, I was talking about all those "music wants to be free" morons not complaining.

    A) Well, that must make it OK, then.
    B) You may call them "morons" I say they are people who have figured out that the net makes copying a zero-cost operation and that business models based on prohibitive marginal costs are no longer feasible and have historically been abusive to their customers and their suppliers. Just because the "morons" may not be able to propose alternative business plans does not mean their initial observation that music, and really all information, "wants to be free" is any less valid. The net is the net and trying to deny it is like denying that water is wet.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.