Slashdot Mirror


VIA Epia SP 13000 Review

Nehemiah writes "Epiacenter.com just published a review on the brand-new VIA Epia SP 13000 mini-itx mainboard. It's the first VIA Epia board with the CN400 chipset and, together with the new epiOS Linux distribution that is announced in the review, it seems to have a very good performance during MPEG2/MPEG4 playback."

46 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Re:#$@#$ fans by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is because the chip design hasn't changed much at all between the 533 and the 1300. In order to clock it higher with the same design and manufacturing techniques, the processor needs more power, and therefore leaks more as heat.

  2. Re:#$@#$ fans by newbie65536 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The VIA EPIA MS10000 Fanless is the 1 GHz fanless board that is available at mini-box.com. These have acutally been available for quite some time. Guess you haven't looked too hard for it.

    --
    Profanity is the language all programmers know best.
  3. Why epiOS? by woah · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can anyone please enlghten me on what so special about epiOS linux that other distros can't manage?

    Or, more to the point what the hell is it anyway?

    If it is what I think it is, which is a distro that is taylored toward EPIA, why make a whole distro and not just a tarball of linux drivers and tools?

    1. Re:Why epiOS? by isolationism · · Score: 5, Informative
      There are some pretty "heavy" changes to get the EPIA working well -- Kernel patches, a Unichrome (graphics) driver for Xfree86 (none for X.org yet, sadly :( ), etc.

      There are also some "positive" things that come out of the VIA -- Like the CLE266 being one of the best-supported video cards by the DirectFB project. That said, I'm actually very, very happy that there are places like the EPIA Wiki to walk you through how to get all of this stuff working on your own distribution instead of being railroaded into using VIA's. Mine runs Freevo on Gentoo, which suits me just peachy.

      I'm sure VIA just baked everyone else's Linux patches into a single distribution to roll out with their hardware -- Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course -- But I would undoubtedly have preferred VIA to have spent more time contributing to the success of existing, frequently-used projects (similar to how they did for Xine to get it to run with their mpeg4 acceleration, I guess, although preferrably in a more package-neutral manner) for their hardware than building their own distribution on the backs of all of the fine folks that have worked so hard to make these adorable little boxes go.

    2. Re:Why epiOS? by pavon · · Score: 5, Informative

      This information is a little out of date and only what I picked up while setting up a Mini-ITX MythTV box (I'm not involved in the EPIA development) so there may be inaccuracies, but is mostly correct for the most part.

      The driver situation for the EPIA boards has been less than desirable. The VIA engineers were very supportive of linux and wrote drivers for all the chipsets on their boards, including accelerated XFree86 drivers, video out, hardware video encoding, etc. They were even cool enough to release the source to everything the were allowed to (some stuff was restricted because of third parties). But they did a poor job of keeping the binary driver packages up-to-date, and couldn't seem to decide which distros they were going to support, so you had the situation where this driver was packaged for these three distros, and that driver was packed for these other 4 distros.

      Eventually, some people got frustrated and forked the code, vastly improving it - this is the Unichrome project. But they also considered it to be in development, and so only made the source available. And there was still the hassle of dealing with the few closed source drivers. The best distro by far for EPIA became gentoo, probably because it was easier to maintain and use an up-to-date source package than a binary one, and most of the EPIA community gravitated over there.

      I don't know why the other distos didn't include unichrome drivers - perhaps they were just waiting for them to stop being beta. (Some may include them now, it has been at least 6 months since I checked). Anyway this appears to be a simple gentoo live-CD with the drivers in question. And that kicks ass. An OS that works out of the box will save newbies all sorts of time - I spent a couple weekends just figuring out where to find the newest versions of all the various drivers. And it really isn't a whole new distro - it is just a live-CD of existing distro. Considering how easy people have made it to roll your own live-CD, it makes a heck of a lot of sense for somone to do this.

  4. Re:#$@#$ fans by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    >Why aren't we seeing 1 GHz+ fanless systems in the
    >Mini-ITX form factor?

    That's a very good question. I've been on a quest for some years now, for a system that can be mounted in a shallow 19" rack form factor, that has no fan whatsoever but enough power to run audio applications. I can't even find good compromises, although I make do with my Antec Sonata, Zalman coolers, etc.

    Shuttles are *way* too noisy, which was upsetting because they were recommended to me on the basis of them being very quiet, so I bought one, yuck.

    Dell desktop machines are surprisingly quiet, I've discovered.

    The Antec Sonata case is still not quiet enough to be called "silent" but it's pretty good. The hardest part of putting my system together has been finding a fanless 1.5v AGP video card. ASUS PxPN00 boards have no fan on the bridge chip, which is nice. Seagate SATA drives with the SNXXXX model numbers are pretty quiet, especially in the Antec case.

    But as far as Mini-ITX, except for the 533 C3 boards, they all have fans.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  5. Re:Is this the best you can do? by Jameth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not designed with longevity in mind? What are you talking about? I'm still running the cheapest piece of crap I could find four years ago. An entire system (minus the video card, I reused my Voodoo3 2000) for only 200 bucks and it still works. My mother still has her fully working PC from back in 1997, without problems (although she's upgrading this month because she wants something a bit faster).

    And anything newer than that, how do you know it won't last? For that matter, do you not realize that most of the components are identical? Apple doesn't usually make their own hardware, they buy it, and they buy it from the same people the PC manufacturers buy it from.

    Stop spreading stupidity.

  6. Re: proscribed mac minis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    . . . I'd most definitely proscribe a Mac Mini . . .

    [grammar Nazi mode=ON]
    From Merriam-Webster online:
    One entry found for proscribe.
    Main Entry: proscribe
    Pronunciation: prO-'skrIb
    Function: transitive verb
    Inflected Form(s): proscribed; proscribing
    Etymology: Latin proscribere to publish, proscribe, from pro- before + scribere to write -- more at SCRIBE
    1 : to publish the name of as condemned to death with the property of the condemned forfeited to the state
    2 : to condemn or forbid as harmful or unlawful : PROHIBIT
    - proscriber noun

    [/grammar Nazi]

    Thanks for the warning, I'll stay away from them.
  7. Because... by PrimeWaveZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    MPEG2/4 playback is the first benchmark any informed computer buyer should look at.

    1. Re:Because... by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Informative

      A small quiet machine will most often be used as a media-computer, something to play DVD, MP3's etc etc.. Thats why. These arent going to be the killer gaming rig that conquers all.

    2. Re:Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, since one of the major uses of mini-itx boxes is for homebrew PVR solutions, it's pretty reasonable for them to provide that benchmark. I doubt anyone would recommend an EPIA for number crunching.

    3. Re:Because... by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's an article? ... since when?

      This is news to me.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Because... by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, obviously, different folks will want to see different benchmarks, but how many people concerned with SPEC, Linpack, or Doom3 are even in the target market for this type of system? Seriously, the only useful benchmark is whatever you want to do with a system. Anything else is just bragging rights. Since a lot of people want to play media on these systems, media playback is a logical benchmark.

    5. Re:Because... by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the VIA boards have hardware assisted decoding of MPEG2/MPEG4, as well as hardware AES.

      It is a strong selling point for these boards and one of their main draws.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  8. Re:Is this the best you can do? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    proscribe, 1: To denounce or condemn.

    Here's a quick hint for you, don't use words you can't spell. Maybe you meant to say prescribe, to set down as a rule or guide; enjoin, to order the use of (a medicine or other treatment).

    Now that I've gotten that over with: Mac minis are expensive and proprietary. The memory is not even a user-serviceable part, in terms of your warranty. (Look it up!) The ONLY good thing about it is the cool form factor. It has very limited expansion (even down to having only 1 1394 port) and is only $499 with the most limited hardware and no peripherals. If you want a machine for the looks, buy a mini. However, most of the software that most people want to run out there runs either on Linux, in which case there is no benefit to the Mini beyond the aesthetic, or on Windows, in which case the Mini can't help you.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:#$@#$ fans by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

    epia800 is fanless, and some Epia1000s are fanless.

    You can also get a fanless 30W PSU for both. 30W is enough to drive the motherboard, the cpu, and a harddrive.

  10. Legacy Ports by stupidcomputers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why oh why on these new small form factor devices do they insist on keeping legacy ports such as serial or the old PS2 style mouse and keyboard? Either make it small and get rid of them or put something useful such as firewire there instead.

    1. Re:Legacy Ports by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Informative

      No way man, we must KEEP The PS/2 keyboard port... Where else are you going to plug in your vintage IBM Model M clicky-keyboard?

      Not available in USB!

      -Z

    2. Re:Legacy Ports by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I use standard DB9 rs232 ports as well as parallel ports for all sorts of testing, debugging, and even deployment applications. I've deployed epia boards in energy management systems more than once utilitizing the serial and parallel ports.

      Yes i know that you get get usb->serial converters and usb->parallel converters. And for notebook/desktop applications that makes sense. However these boards are obiously not mainstream. They are often used for development/prototyping and for low power applications. The needs for that market are different.

      At least that's my take on it. I for one am glad to see not EVERYONE is going "legacy free."

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    3. Re:Legacy Ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because embedded systems use a lot of legacy hardware! How many industrial devices have you seen that used the firewire that you mentioned? I work full-time with embedded systems, and I've never seen one. Serial is still king.

      We build about 20 different products using the Via EPIA CL ITX motherboards, and on every single one of them, we use four RS232 serial ports and the parallel port. The OS, like a lot of real-time OS's, we use doesn't support USB keyboards so we have to use PS/2-style keyboards. If you want to remain compatible with PC software, you must have a normal keyboard port.

      To put it a different way, the embedded world revolves around interfaces that don't change.

    4. Re:Legacy Ports by w8300v-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because people still use those ports. Until the rest of the world throws away all their PS/2 keyboards and mice, and their UPS, RAID box, etc. with RS-232 serial port, these ports are going to keep appearing on motherboards. Would you believe there are still people using ISA cards? ISA cards! Oh, the horror..

    5. Re:Legacy Ports by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I admit - I love the Model M. I've only had to replace one so far. I intend to keep using one as long as is technologically possible.
      It's more than just a keyboard, it's a weapon of self defense!

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:Legacy Ports by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most old IBMs Model M had some problems with the serial cable signals - namely, the signals are supposed to idle at +5VDC and be "pulled down" by either end (computer or keyboard), yet they float at a lower voltage. This generates problems with some keyboard adapters and motherboards.

      It can be fixed easily with a couple of pull-up resistors on both data lines. The site also mentions some motherboards & USB adapters that work fine without the mod.

  11. Re:#$@#$ fans by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does one tell what voltage an AGP card is? What do you expect of the AGP card in terms of speed? Radeon 9200 cards seem to be available in fanless form. I have an ATI branded 9500 which has a fan that is practically inaudible, to me at least.

    I do agree Shuttles are pretty noisy. They went to the trouble to using a heat pipe system and then attach a noisy fan to the exhaust end of the heat pipe and call it "quiet", while I can easily hear it ten feet away.

    I think the Mac mini is pretty quiet, maybe not quiet enough for audio use though.

    Maybe your next best bet is to assemble a hush box to put a computer into.

  12. Re:#$@#$ fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get 1000 MHz VIA machines that are fanless, and you should be able to replace the heatsink on the 1200 MHz and probably these 1300 MHz CPUs with larger ones to make them passively cooled.

  13. Re:#$@#$ fans by owlstead · · Score: 5, Informative

    If it has the "Eden" or "E" name in it, it is fanless. Pretty easy browsing once you notice this. It is not explained anywhere visible on the VIA sites though.

  14. Re:#$@#$ fans by owlstead · · Score: 3, Informative

    But as far as Mini-ITX, except for the 533 C3 boards, they all have fans.

    This is simply not true. Besides, you can make them fanless by applying a Zalman northbridge cooler (as seen on the net). I haven't done any burn in testing with mine though. One hint: putting them in a wooden enclosure like a wine-box does not do any good. If you need to do stupid things like that you *need* a fan. And a fire-alarm (though you can get the motherboard/cpu to shut down, it has temperature sensors). Yes, I tried.

  15. What's the fanless obsession anyhow? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a new 1Ghz VIA in place right now, only fan is a teeny one that makes less noise than the drives, etc.

    Sure, dust is a consideration over time, but even without the fan too much dust tends to impair the heatsinks' dissipation rate as well...

    1. Re:What's the fanless obsession anyhow? by quintesse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It might be one tiny fan but I assure you that if it sits below your TV if you use it as a media center you _will_ notice the noise it makes (unless you only see action movies of course ;-)

    2. Re:What's the fanless obsession anyhow? by cpghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the fanless obsession were really more widespread, it would put pressure on CPU makers to invent better heat dissipation mechanisms, and to generate less heat in the first place!

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  16. Mac Mini vs EPIA by tomRakewell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have installed Linux on a dozen Mini-ITX boards during the past two years. I love the low power consumption, and the low price.

    But, by just about any standard (MPEG playback, video performance, processor speed, form factor size), the Mac Mini beats the Mini-ITX hands down. Okay, I put nicer hard drives in the Mini-ITX boxes than I get in the Mac Mini.

    After using both systems as desktop PCs, I can say that the Mac Mini feels like a Ferrari, while the Mini-ITX boxes feel like a Ford Focus. Apart from the fact I actually *like* the Gnome desktop better than OS X, I can still use the Mini to run all of my favorite Unix apps. And, unlike the VIA Mini-ITX boards, where there's a ton of hardware that I can't get to work right (CLE-266 chipset with MPEG decoding), everything on the Mac Mini JUST WORKS.

    I don't know. I'm thinking my days running Mini-ITX boxes is over. The Mac Mini has really won my heart, and I can't see why anyone wouldn't consider it for their small form-factor computing needs.

    I'm a bit tempted by the promise of a Linux distro tailor-made for the EPIAs, but I kind of have a distro (OS X) tailor made for my current-favorite SFF box.

    1. Re:Mac Mini vs EPIA by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

      Careful. The drive in the mini is not rated for continuous use. It's a notebook drive, so you should run it as little as possible. (It's rated for many sleep/wake cycles, but not continuous use).

    2. Re:Mac Mini vs EPIA by dublin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Careful. The drive in the mini is not rated for continuous use. It's a notebook drive, so you should run it as little as possible. (It's rated for many sleep/wake cycles, but not continuous use).

      Horseapples! Where are you getting this stuff? Notebook drives are tougher in every way than their desktop counterparts - they have to be. I suppose that some super-cheap notebook drives that aren't rated for continuous use may exist, but I'm not aware of any, and that certainly doesn't apply to the reputable brands. I've got several tiny little servers that have been running laptop drives for years with no problems. (One's an Epson "cash register" 486, another's a Toshiba Libretto 50J, and others are even stranger.)

      And although hard disks aren't my specialty, I know more than a little about them, having been a program manager for both Latitude and Inspiron at Dell, and spinning up a company to build high performance storage-over-IP solutions based on high-end commodity RAID controllers a few years ago. The only real downside to Notebook disks is their relatively slow transfer speeds, since the disk mfrs for unfathomable reasons don't put serious controllers on the notbook mechanisms for a year or two. In many cases (especially if you're RAIDING them) this is more than made up for by their lower seek times - the heads don't have to move very far, and because they're smaller and less massive, they respond quicker.

      I'm looking at building a custom small, low-power, super reliable RAID array for a client right now, and I'm actually looking even smaller - at the 1.8" mechanisms like the ones in a lot of the new MP3 players. The result will be *far* more reliable than any desktop drive could ever be - I could not possibly neet this customer's requirements with desktop drive hardware...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    3. Re:Mac Mini vs EPIA by realkiwi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      CLE266 does not do MPEG 2 decoding it does MPEG 2 acceleration.

      I am about to begin work on a ubuntu derivative that has CLE266 support built in. Hang out on the unichrome list for more help on getting your working.

      --
      realkiwi
  17. Re:ADDITIONAL INFORMATION by winkydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank you.

    The mirror concept is similar to (but different from) mirrordot. Hosted servers cost bucks (this isn't sitting on the end of a dsl line to my mom's basement :).

    However, unlike merely copying somebody else's work and presenting as my own, I'm providing a service to reach sites that are responding slowly when slashdotted.

    It's all still very experimental.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  18. Re:#$@#$ fans by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to have a fanless Radeon 9600. Sapphire makes it, try Newegg.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  19. Re:Is this the best you can do? by martinbogo · · Score: 3, Informative


    Quick correction Re: Mac Mini and memory upgrade. Opening the case does not void the warranty. Also, installing memory does not void the warranty if you use an Apple approved memory part.

    I'm in agreement overall with your assesment, if you are comparing the mini with a general purpose computer. On the other hand, I think the mini should be viewed primarily as no more than a particularly powerful console box.

    I honestly wonder what would happen if .. say .. Dell were to create a similar computer. Closed form factor, 256Meg ram, 2.8Ghz processor, etc in a pretty case.

    --
    "Don't worry about the problems you have in mathematics, I assure you mine are much greater." - Einstein c.1919
  20. An audio workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've built four fanless VIA boxes - not Mini-ITX, though.

    I got VIA 866 MHz cpus, topped 'em with a respectable sized heatsink (with fans) on a full size 370 motherboard, mounted each in mid-size tower case with a seagate barracuda 80 gig drive and a 150 Watt power supply. Now assuming that the CPU might get enough cooling from convective air flow in the case, and that the power supply would never be taxed (at full speed, the system draws maybe 30 Watts), I wired in a switch to cut off the cpu and power-supply fans if so desired.

    Once built, I ran some screensavers that pushed the cpu to 100% usage for eight hours (using slackware bootable cd) with no fans whatsoever. All the boxes survived without problems.

    Since building them (2-3 years ago now), I eventually used one as a firewall/router - running openBSD. That one suffered a cpu/motherboard burnout after ~4 months of running 24/7 fanless. I dropped the hard-drive in a sibling, and left the fans running - up for ~6 months now without incident.

    Another is currently being used to do audio recording with a Demudi install. Having burned out one of the boxes, I am more cautious, running the fans except when recording with microphones. With the fans off and ~6 feet between the box and the microphones, thermal noise from the pre-amps and electromagnetic noise from the radar station on the mountain is louder than the noise from the spinning barracuda.

    The 866 MHz VIA is fast enough to handle about 12-14 raw tracks in ardour before running out of cycles (without extra effects). I plan to do final mixing and mastering on a faster dual-pentium box once all the raw tracking has been done.

    This may not be adequate for a living-room media center, but it works for me as an audio workstation. I thought others might want to know about it.

  21. Re:Some notes for editors and submitters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, well, well, another nerd on Slashdot complains about its editors but reads anyway. How is this "interesting" anymore? There should be a mod category called "expected". ;p

  22. Re:#$@#$ fans by johnMG · · Score: 2, Informative

    > How does one tell what voltage an AGP card is? You go by the gaps in the end of the AGP card that slides into the AGP slot. See http://www.ertyu.org/~steven_nikkel/agpcompatibili ty.html

  23. Re:PVR? Really? by spagetti_code · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've spend considerable time on this, so allow me to share my pain...

    I created a mythtv box from an EPIA MII12000 (1.2GHz). I put it into a georgeous Silverstone LC06 case. I switched the fans with silent ones, chose silent optical/HD drives. The end result is just awesome. In fact the 12000 is way overpowered for what I am doing - thanks to onboard encoding in the Hauppauge PVR card I use, and decoding in the EPIA motherboard - and the CPU sits at 10% most of the time. The 800MHz CPU would have been a better pick, and then I would have had less heat = 1 less and slower fans.

    Thats the good side...

    Behind the scenes there were months of trying to debug random crashes. There is a known issue in the DMA on the MII12000 and others. VIA have refused (scroll to bottom) to respond, even on bulletin boards where they often frequent. They know about the problem because they have fixed in windows driver updates released late last year.

    There was a happy ending, for me anyway. If I rebuilt the kernel with CPUFREQ off and only i386 code (a real pain with Fedora Core 3 because it defaults to i686) then everything seems stable.

    But I have serious reservations about their support for linux, and would have reservations about dealing with them again.

  24. Mini-ITX (and ATX!) with no fans by unixj · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.hushtechnologies.net/ has lots to choose from with no fans. I would have paid the price premium a couple years ago if I'd known how noisy my Shuttle would be.

    1. Re:Mini-ITX (and ATX!) with no fans by cpghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hush are much too expensive, IMHO. My EPIA board with fanless 12 V DC-DC converter and brick transformer is absolutely silent, and costs less than 400 bucks, including 512 MB RAM. It's not the fastest platform out there, but as a non-gaming desktop box, it's perfectly usable.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  25. Re:Is this the best you can do? by cwg_at_opc · · Score: 3, Informative


    here's a quick hint for you: don't offer 'facts' if you can't check out your facts first before blathering on.

    about Apple's warranty:

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=300 572/ note that they say "...should be installed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider." that's "should" not "only" by an AASP.

    and http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=250 97/ "...Adding DRAM, VRAM or other user-installable upgrade or expansion products to an Apple computer is not considered a modification to that Apple product."

    of course, that doesn't mean they _want_ you to do it; the case is difficult to open but it can be done if you're patient and careful: http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008276.htm l/

    [rant] it's NOT just about looks: the mini target audience is for "adders" and "switchers" who want a computer that just works, i.e. they want their software to work - iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, iDVD, GarageBand, Safari/Mozilla, as opposed to learning how to be a systems admin to care for their Windows computer. sure you can get a PC for less, but then you still have to buy XP and all the other software. and it's still XP. They're buying the whole ball of wax for the "computing experience", a consistent, friendly, useful experience, so your statement, "...most of the software that most people want to run out there runs either on Linux..." is crap, since there's no decent equivalent to the iLife suite in Linux(or Windows, provide links if you can.) and due to the nature of Open Source, there will be differences(some significant) in UI for linux apps.
    don't forget, all macs COME WITH iLife - you don't have to buy it, install it and learn five different ways to do the same thing(i'm thinking of the OS file browser provided to all apps and navigating directories in Explorer)...

    you do non-technical readers/users a disservice by not providing proof of your statements - and your lack of experience with the Mac shows. the mac "experience" is something you realize when the computer and the software don't get in the way of what you're doing. i've got a dual-boot windowsXP/gentoo machine i built myself and several Macs. I've been using, programming, designing and destroying software professionally since 1985; i've used punch cards, TTYs, mainframes, supercomputers, PCs, i've designed my own user interfaces when there wasn't even X/OpenGL(remember the Sun1? the DEC Gigi? character graphics on a vt100? i do.) - so i have a lot of choices, my opinion? the user experience in windows is abysmal(sp?) when compared to the mac, so i'll take the mac every time. when you can get a complete, consistent set of programs that do what is included in iLife for Linux/FOSS, it _will_ be a great day indeed. until then you're saddled with inconsistent applications user-interfaces for both linux and windows. ( p.s. i like MythTV, Gimp(especially with the recent UI hacks...), blender, firefox/thunderbird and use fluxbox, but they're just short of the integration achieved on the mac.)[/rant]

    here's a review of the mini that i feel is fair and balanced:
    http://www.sfftech.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=659

    to sum up the mini-memory issue: there are _many_ reviews elsewhere and it has been discussed at length in many forums that you can install your own memory, it's just if you break the lid doing it they won't replace it.

    back on-topic: the EPIA series are able performers if you're not a demanding user(the dual cpu board displayed at Cebit looks promising); OK, yet another flavor of linux, why?.

    a great place for EPIA info is: URL:http://mini-itx.com//

    --
    "...that's as white as it gets; all the bits are on..."
  26. I'd rather a Epia DP review by ozbird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Epia SP is okay, but it isn't exactly a big step up from its precedessors. The Epia DP is a far more interesting beast - dual processors extends the potential uses of these boards much further than a clock speed or chipset upgrade.

    I'll also believe them when I see them: despite much fanfare, the Nano-ITX boards are still largely vapourware.

  27. Re:Flaky LAN drivers under FreeBSD? by cpghost · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm using FreeBSD 5.X on an old EPIA 5000 board with VIA VT6102 Rhine II chipset and the vr driver. Yes, I get sometimes vr0: rx packet lost messages on the console. This was only a problem for me while using NFS in UDP mode (I'm running diskless, so NFS reliability is pretty important!). Switching to TCP NFS solved all problems for me. The problem is not so bad as it sounds.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.