Slashdot Mirror


Ophthalmologists, Physicists Design Bionic Eye

InfallibleLies writes "For the first time ever, those who have been blind since birth will have a chance to see the world. It's still in the early stages, but this is a giant leap forward in medical science." From the linked BBC article: "U.S scientists have designed a bionic eye to allow blind people to see again. It comprises a computer chip that sits in the back of the individual's eye, linked up to a mini video camera built into glasses that they wear. Images captured by the camera are beamed to the chip, which translates them into impulses that the brain can interpret."

82 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Nonvisible wavelenghts? by bird603568 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would it be possible to make it "see" infared. Then it would translated it to false color? It would be like the first upgrade in Rouge angent.

    1. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      What next, to be able to use your infra-red eye as a TV remote?

    2. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Nebu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no need for it to be translated into "false color". The brain would interpret infrared exactly as it would interpret any other color. What would infrared look like to someone using this chip? Well, that would be like describing what red looks like to someone who is blind.

    3. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hardly. TV remotes send infrared signals, but eyes receive them. So really, this is a major step-forward to having remote controlled people.

    4. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first upgrade in Rouge agent would be Covergirl or possibly Lancome.

    5. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would it be false? Our brains are capable of using the spectrum info, its our eyes that don't provide it.

    6. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Peaked · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you're talking about seeing heat, that's far spectrum infared. Our eyes can already see bright near spectrum infared, just as we can hear loud subsonics. If you filter out visible light on a bright, sunny day, you can see some infared. Check out http://www.amasci.com/amateur/irgoggl.html for a cheap interesting experiment regarding this. I tried it with mild success, I need to play around with it a bit more.

      But from what I can tell from the article, anything you can get to show up on some kind of display could probably be outputted to the bionic eyes. Heat vision would just require the same bulky and expensive equipment, just minus the screen. Most of the mass of heat vision infrared goggles comes from cooling the sensor so you can see things other than just the heat from the sensor itself at room temperature.

      The false colors in present day heat vision equipment may not be necessary. It would be interesting to see how the brain processed those signals.

    7. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Brianwa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Infrared covers a large range of EM frequencies. Thermal infrared, which is given off by heated objects, has a longer wavelegnth than what your camera can detect. What you can see in your camera is called near infrared, and is right below visible light.

    8. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Joe+Random · · Score: 3, Informative
      What would infrared look like to someone using this chip? Well, that would be like describing what red looks like to someone who is blind.
      Not really. It appears that this chip stimulates the layer of nerves below the retina. Thus, it can only stimulate what you can normally see: Red, green, and blue (and light/dark with the rods). No chip that stimulates the nerves under the retina can make us see anything that our eye can't normally see. There's no undocumented "infrared nerve" that would allow us to see something unique from our normal vision if it were stimulated.
    9. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Vengeance_au · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, if they were to use the chip to translate infared (or thermal, or anything else we can currently view with instramentation) into colours, they COULD see in that wavelength. Same as how infared goggles work - translate the wavelength into a "visible" wavelength.

    10. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Informative

      How would you describe what red looks like to someone who is sighted?

      FF0000

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    11. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by XMyth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great! Now my tinfoil glasses product might finally take off!

    12. Re:Nonvisible wavelenghts? by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not really. It appears that this chip stimulates the layer of nerves below the retina. Thus, it can only stimulate what you can normally see: Red, green, and blue (and light/dark with the rods). No chip that stimulates the nerves under the retina can make us see anything that our eye can't normally see. There's no undocumented "infrared nerve" that would allow us to see something unique from our normal vision if it were stimulated.
      I think the parent post's point was that color is an artifact of neural response to external stimuli. Change the stimuli to something new and the patterns that the brain will adapt to interpret the new stimuli will be as different as vision is from non-vision. I believe this is true and will probably be the case with this type of cyborg vision regardless of the frequency response. The technology simply will not stimulate the nerves in the same way that a working eye would. The result is that vision and visual perception will be very different for those with cyborg eyes.

      Red does not exist in the nerves; It is a learned pattern that results from red-cone nerve stimulation (which will not exist with this system).
      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  2. From birth? by puppyfox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not so sure that people bling from birth will benefit from any such device. That part of their brain is not even developed, you can't just "plug in" some video feed and expect them to see, do you?

    --
    The cookie told me to.
    1. Re:From birth? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? Does being blind from birth imply a brain problem, or just a problem with the data collection device?

      Or is it that not seeing the inside of the womb for 9 months damages your ability to process visual images for the rest of your life? Seems like a pretty big stretch to me.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:From birth? by isometrick · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not so sure that people bling from birth will benefit ...

      I think they will. After all, the rich keep gettin' richer, and the poor keep gettin' poorer.

    3. Re:From birth? by puppyfox · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Fact is, the brain keeps developing after the baby is born, so even if you're perfectly normal but blindfolded (or in the dark) for you first few years, you won't be able to ever see "normally". Same goes for some other complex brain functions, like using language. One of those funny facts that stick with you from college classes :)

      --
      The cookie told me to.
    4. Re:From birth? by audacity242 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sort of true, not entirely. How would you explain people who have cochlear implants? By all accounts, those work pretty dang well.

      Also, comparing it to language development is a big stretch, vision and language are vastly different, particularly since vision isn't "learned" like language is.

    5. Re:From birth? by Lux · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think so, either, and the actual article doesn't make any such claims. Just the /. summary.

      There is actually a similar (in concept) device that has already been tested in humans. IIRC, the guy walks around with a hefty wearable computer/power source.

      One drawback to the this approach (plugging into the eye) is that by interfacing with the optical system so close to the surface, you preclude the possibility of helping people who have damage to their optic nerve. But there's a lot to be said for the reduced invasiveness, too.

    6. Re:From birth? by duffahtolla · · Score: 4, Interesting
      No, this is true. Being in the womb is why babies are born with crappy vision. The neural pathways in the brain have not yet formed. As the baby tries to "see" things, the pathways map themselves to the signals. Thats why you can't leave an eye patch on a new born for too long.

      This goes on for about 6 to 9 years where vision stops development.

      There was a case where a mans vision was restored, (Lost durring childhood) where he simply could not deal with his new vision. He nearly killed himself trying to pick up the "toy" car outside his window. He voluntarily went back to blindness. (I have no references, sorry)

      Even the article specifically states: "US scientists have designed a bionic eye to allow blind people to see again."

    7. Re:From birth? by Lux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks. :) I went out and tracked down some linkage on this:

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.09/vision_pr .html

      It's a really fun read.

    8. Re:From birth? by RabidMoose · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So as soon as it's apparent that a baby has been born blind, fit them with the eye and glasses. It could be done around the same time a male baby would be circumcised (in the first year), and the child would not only never remember the surgery, but would never remember not being able to see. Of course, I'm no doctor, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.

    9. Re:From birth? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The thing is: It depends on having a viable set of optic nerves, etc'. Most people that (effectively) haven't had sight all their lives have functioning eyes (and in some cases even retinas) but due to infection during infancy, genetic defect, etc', either their optic nerves or parts of the brain are non-functional. (Case in point: Helen Kellar had meningitis as an infant and lost her hearing and sight before she was two years old.)

      Consequently, the article has no mention of people "blind from birth" (as the original post suggests). This will, however, greatly benefit the folks that incurred eye damage as a result of an accident, age, and so forth.

      The task of "rewiring the brain" isn't as much an issue as one might think.
      • There was an episode of Scientific American Frontier where a test subject was blindfolded and asked to interpret symbols (braille) by touch. The sight-area of the brain took on the task of interpreting the symbols (since it's used often for reading, etc') only after a few days without sight.
      • Adults learning to play music. I started piano lessons when I was starting high school and I suffer from some of the road-blocks of a late-starter. Nonetheless, I can do it.
      The brain is an amazing, dynamic machine. If there's one hard and fast rule about it, it's that it has no hard and fast rules.
      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    10. Re:From birth? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was an episode of Scientific American Frontier where a test subject was blindfolded and asked to interpret symbols (braille) by touch. The sight-area of the brain took on the task of interpreting the symbols (since it's used often for reading, etc') only after a few days without sight.

      You're right, but she had to give up the ability to see to do that. Her visual cortex adapted to not recieving any visual stimulus by making her tactile sensation stronger through a lot of braille exercises. Now, the obvious issue is that a blind person's visual cortex would be doing the person some other work. Wiping that away could be bad news, especially since it's not clear that the visual cortex only adapts by allowing stronger tactile experience. Or even that the brain would re-arrange the visual cortex and not some other region(s).

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  3. Eye in action by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    Look at distant car...

    Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da...

    See close-up view of its license plate.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  4. Re:All the European Homosexuals want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Certainly I hope it doesn't run windows... we don't want the blind people to see only a blue screen all the time, right?

  5. Not for those who have been blind since birth... by SkOink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I recall correctly, people who have been blind their whole lives can never really 'learn' to see, after age 3 or so. At least, not on anywhere near the same level that people can see naturally, even assuming that they had an absolutely perfect prothesis. Who this will benefit are people who have went blind at some point during their adult life due to injury, glaucoma, diabetes (yes, it can make you go blind), drinking too much rubbing alcohol, or something similar.

    --
    ---- I'll take you in a Hunt deathmatch any day.
  6. Not exactly true . . . by gcauthon · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may help people that were blinded later in life through an accident or cataracts. However, if someone is blind from birth then their visual cortex never develops and vision would be impossible even with an artificial eye. Many studies have been done. Click here here and here for more info.

    1. Re:Not exactly true . . . by SteelV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but if there is a BABY blind from birth they can give them these artificial eyes, and let them see *from birth*. Yes, it won't help people who are already older and blind from birth, but in the future there is a potential of no one ever being blind, is there not?

    2. Re:Not exactly true . . . by jtcm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, but if there is a BABY blind from birth they can give them these artificial eyes, and let them see *from birth*. Yes, it won't help people who are already older and blind from birth, but in the future there is a potential of no one ever being blind, is there not?

      I was about to mod you as "insightful" (...and you deserve it!), but instead I felt to need to respond.

      I _can_ see a future where no one is blind from birth, but not anytime soon.

      A baby grows at an enourmous rate, doubling in size every so-many months. Granted, the skull and brain do not grow in size at nearly the same rate; but my point remains valid. Will the chip that interfaces with the child's retina and/or optic nerve be able to adapt to a changing eye size? (For those about to reply that babies' eyes are already full-size, see this. Yes, I had to look it up myself 'cause urban legend says otherwise ;-)

      Can the "bionic eye" adapt to eye growth? My intuition says "no". If my intuition is correct, then the child would require repeated surgeries over the course of childhood, and probably adolesence.

      To replace or repair a child's eyes at birth (I think) requires a more "elegant" technology...a technology out of reach of current and near-future science. Of course, perhaps some non-computer-like biotechnology is the answer. Stem cells come to mind, as they can supposedly be coaxed into forming any type of body tissue.

      Note: I have worked with and spent a great deal of time with many blind adults. Most lead a very happy and normal life, and they will surprise you with how much they truely "see".

      Regards,
      jtcm

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
  7. ... but does it emit a sinister red beam? by pilkul · · Score: 2, Funny
    For once a story where the Bill-Gates-of-Borg icon would've been appropriate!

    Seriously though, I am impressed at this technology. ; I didn't think it was possible to do surgery precisely enough to connect into the optic nerve.

  8. Taking bets... by RootsLINUX · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, how long until someone is able to boot linux on it? >_>

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  9. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by Lux · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Who this will benefit are people who have went blind at some point during their adult life due to injury, glaucoma, diabetes (yes, it can make you go blind), drinking too much rubbing alcohol, or something similar.

    You forgot masturbation.

  10. a step in the right direction... by OneOver137 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but it kinda seems like cheatin' with the external camera. I wonder why they couldn't incorporate the simple optical train into the eye directly? The benefit is that you could see in UV, IR, etc. with a camera and software swap.

  11. Is it retina problems only by slobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like their chip is hooked up to the optical nerve, not directly into brain, so while it might help people with macular degeneration it won't do much for cases when optical nerve is damaged (like glaucoma). I hope I am wrong though.

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  12. Wait a minute! by nharmon · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not made into a stylish visor.

    How do we expect Star Trek to hold any weight if we do an end run around the technology!

  13. Son of P. Diddy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "I'm not so sure that people bling from birth "

    I'm sure that Puffy has a lot of little brats running about the mansions bedecked in bling.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  14. hmmm. by sugapablo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how long before upgrades make this "bionic eye" significantly better than a human eye?

    Will we reach a point where attaching this bionic eye becomes an elective surgery where someone wants to simply improve their eyesight beyond 20/20; beyond what a mere "human" can see?

    Breast inlargements, designer babies, bionic implants....where is it all going?

  15. Generations by Thunderstruck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My great grandmother could hardly see or hear for years before she died. My grandmother has a cochlear implant and can hear better now than when she could 10 years ago. She says its the single most amazing thing she's experienced, and she experienced everything from the great depression to the Patriot Act.

    The interesting question is, what is more important, being able hear and thus communicate with people around you, or being able to see?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  16. Sight by benpjohnson · · Score: 2

    When do they release the night vision/xray models?

  17. Something similar by MHobbit · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recall during my 4th grade year (about 4 years ago), scientists devised a method for an Indiana man who was blind to see again. What they did, IIRC, was create a pair of glasses that fed the digitized data through a wire to a processor worn around his waist, which in turn transferred the data as electrical signals into his brain directly (as you can guess, they had to drill a hole in his head; a small one though). This method allowed the once-blind man to see about 20 feet in front.

    Soon after, they ended up innovating that even more.

    Not really close to the bionic eye idea, but close; earlier in the generations.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
  18. Re:Windows I-C by kosmicki · · Score: 2

    And how would they know what blue looks like? ;)

  19. Didn't Wired report this in 2002? by wskellenger · · Score: 4, Informative
    They did. I remember the cover vividly -- the guy wearing sunglasses with the camera as a lens.

    They were stimulating nerves in the eye with tiny electrodes, although they had to ask the patient where in his field of vision he saw the phosphene as they stimulated him. From this they created a "mapping" of sorts.

    This sort of research was frowned upon on the US, and so it had to be carried out overseas. Check out the article -- more info than the linked BBC one.

    1. Re:Didn't Wired report this in 2002? by plastik55 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are several groups working on competing approaches. There are two groups in the US (disclaimer: I work for one) and one in Germany working on the epitetinal electrical stimulation approach; one US group working on a subretinal light-powered device; one US group working on an approach involving light-activated neurotransmitter chemicals, one group in Belgium using an optic nerve "cuff" electrode; a group using cortical stimulation (the main subject of the Wired article); and probably others, not to mention all the work being done on stem cell transplants.

      Some of the latest research results in the area have been collected in an issue of the Journal of Neuroengineering.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  20. A little goes a long way by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I once saw a recognisable picture of old Abe Lincoln in approx 16x16 pixels IIRC. This is not enough for pron or to driving etc, but is probably enough to make a vast difference to a blind person's life: being able to see some of the local environment can help a lot eg:Where's the coffee cup on the table? Where's the phone? Is the door open/shut? Am I about to fall in a hole? Is the lid up or down when I go for a pee?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:A little goes a long way by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. Your brain can do a lot of interpretation based on just a little input. For example, take this little flash quiz.

      http://www.onceuponadime.com/gold/12pixelheroes.sw f

      I think you'll be surprised at how well you'll do despite having only 12 pixels to identify a superhero's costume. However, I don't think a person who has been blind all his life can make the same interpretations a regular person can. We take for granted how much our brain fills in the gaps of what we can't (or don't) see. A person who hasn't learned to do this would probably have a great deal of difficulty doing this.

  21. This is OLD news! by nilbog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This news is so old it stinks. They have been expirementing with bionic eyes since the 70's. I remember watching 3,2,1 contact or some such show where they showed a guy with a bionic eye.

    This crops up in the news every once in a while but I haven't seen it go anywhere, the artificial eye is never good enough to go into mass usage.

    Another variety of eye bionics actually fuses microchips to the eye, but they found that eyes are much to sensitive to be able to withstand the heat generated from the IE chips.

    --
    or else!
  22. Mental imaging by liangzai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some people who have been blind since birth get very depressed when their vision is medically restored and they see the world as it actually is. It doesn't correspond at all to the colorful paradise their hardware has come up with in lack of sensors.

    I guess it's like realizing there is no god after having been brought up in a religious home, or finding out that W. Gates III isn't the saint he has been described to be after filling his pockets for twenty years.

    Or maybe it is like Neo finally seeing the rotting world after swallowing the blue pill.

    1. Re:Mental imaging by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably it's like seeing a science fiction movie after you have read the book.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
  23. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by RFC959 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, this jibes with what I've heard too. Google for "Parmelee Sigman kitten" and you find references to a study in which kittens were blindfolded from birth to adulthood; when the blindfolds were removed, they were unable to see and never gained the ability to see, despite the fact that their eyes were physically normal - their brains simply weren't wired for it. Still, we've discovered that the adult brain is more plastic than we used to think, so I wouldn't totally rule out the possibility. They mention macular degeneration in the article, and this is a big one, since it's a major cause of blindness in the elderly (my grandmother and great-aunt were both legally blind in their old age because of it). Something that can fix that would help make living longer better, instead of just longer.

  24. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by Clod9 · · Score: 2, Informative
    True. The article summary is just wrong, based on the incorrect assumption that the brains of people blind from birth are identical to those who have lost their sight.

    The development of the visual cortext that supports sight occurs considerably before age 3. If one were to develop a prosthesis for those born without sight, it would have to be introduced very early.

    You're right that the research mentioned in the article will help those who have had sight and then lost it through disease or injury, a huge group of people who I'm sure will welcome it when it becomes available. And I have hopes that future research might help those blind since birth to "see" in some way as well, though it will be a lot more difficult.

  25. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by leob · · Score: 4, Informative

    Masturbation can only possibly cause night blindness if your diet does not have enough zinc or vitamin A. Zinc is needed to transport vit. A to the retina, where it is needed for the rods that provide black-and-white night vision, but it is excreted in relatively high amount with the semen.

  26. I wonder... by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if it will make that cool boopity sound like Steve Austin's Six Million Dollar eye did?

    [For the record--I have no idea WTF that music is in that sound byte!]

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  27. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by Clod9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A simple description of visual system development in mammals might be interesting to some.

  28. Re:All the European Homosexuals want to know... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2

    Nothing like seeing the world for the first time, and all of the sudden a damn online casino pop-up ad fills your vision, blinking furiously.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  29. Re:I can see... by brjndr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently you don't see to well.

    Your bionic eye may need a firmware update.

  30. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by Chazmati · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll bet you win at Balderdash all the time.

  31. I don't know if the summary was edited... by NarrMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...but it does say, "U.S scientists have designed a bionic eye to allow blind people to see again.", implying that said blind people had seen once before.

    It's possible that the summary said differently, but there's no "edited" note.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  32. where it's all heading..... by rodgster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A human brain encased in a robot running linux?

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
  33. 2600 baby by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow! Finally my entire world will look just like the good old Atari 2600!
    That's not a duck... it's a dragon!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  34. yes, 5 mg each time by r00t · · Score: 4, Funny

    The US RDA (diet guideline) says you need 15 mg per day. Wikipedia says you lose 5 mg each time you abuse yourself. So, at a rate of 3 squirts/day, you'll have no zinc left for your eyes. You'll go blind, just like your momma told you.

  35. Re:Resolution... by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just to add a little perspective on this:

    Remember the first time you played pong? (if you're old enough) or the first time you played the Atari 2600? They were both wonders of modern technology and quite amazing... with the next step "light years" ahead of the last.

    I think the same can be expected here. Trouble is, the human brain can't be mapped with a great deal of certainty and when someone is blind from birth, there are going to be few if any pathways for that information to flow. It is nothing short of an amazing discovery that the brain's pathways are dynamic and continually updating. So to find that it is adapting and assimilating alien signals is nothing short of miraculous in my opinion.

    Not only is this a way for the blind to see, it's a way that our bodies can live in artificial bodies... and if we can learn to regenerate brain tissue, live forever.

  36. so to all the girls, get some free zinc! by cheekyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now a good excuse/reason to tell the girls
    "Have you had your zinc supplement today?"

    3 rations sounds good, morning, evening, late evening. :-)

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  37. correlary in Choclear implants by bigattichouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was an interpreter for some time, and learned one magic thing about implants adding abilities missing from birth or from accidents... it only works to the degree that the person accepts the information. If the blind person (from birth) *WANTED*, they would most definitely train their brain to use the data. maybe not perfectly, but they would have some sight. I knew deaf people who WANTED to hear with their implant, and could quite well after a few years of training.. others who never did get the hang of it. Its like trying to train someone to smell music... if some device provided the input, and you really wanted it, you'd learn. with much dammit and aggrivation, but you'd do it.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:correlary in Choclear implants by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not at all. The idea of a "critical period" is well established in regards to development of vision, hearing, etc. If the neurons in the visual cortex don't receive stimulation from the retina, they die back. For example, if a newborn has uncorrected cataracts in only one eye, they will NEVER be able to see out of that eye, even if the cataracts is fixed at a later date. The intact eye takes over the neural real estate that the other eye would have used. To imply that someone can simply "will" themselves to rewire their brain is completely unsupported by research.

  38. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by SB5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just another reason to swallow.

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  39. Re:All the European Homosexuals want to know... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Good idea. Free iballs, supported by adware. The liberals will complain, of course"

    They'll complain until the iBall manufacturer concedes and installs in each iBall a sort of advanced Foxblocker that blanks from your vision anything that Michael Moore would not want you to see.

    Ted Kennedy's rummy nose? Look while you can.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  40. Be like Marvin... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the world has gone to bed.
    Darkness wont engulf my head.
    I can see by infrared.
    How I hate the night.

    Now I lay me down to sleep.
    Try to count electric sheep.
    Sweet dream wishes you can keep.
    How I hate the night.

    - Marvin the Paranoid Android.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  41. Yes, but... by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...what causes the hair to grow in your palms?

  42. Bling? by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not so sure that people bling from birth will benefit from any such device.

    Bling from birth?! That's the shit fer shizzle, ma nizzle!

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  43. Geordi LaForge by Fussen · · Score: 2

    There.. I said it.

    One to beam up.

  44. WARNING! DONT CLICK ON PARENT LINK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It takes you to a star trek site

  45. Is this just more hype again? by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Informative
    They have been making brain implant vision systems since 1978

    In late 2002 this method was up to 68 implanted electrodes (which would be about equal to an 8x8 matrix)

    HOWEVER, you need more than 1000 (say 32x32 or 1028) or above for any really useful vision With 8x8 you might recognize one or two ASCII characters. A Face??? Only if it's an emoticon.

    Now granted these are implants in the retina and not the visual cortex, but I have seen other claims for retinal implants over the last five years.

    Why is this research taking so long to bear fruit? In 1978 progress was limited by the available CPU horsepower to translate images into usable grid stimulation patterns. Now it seems we are stalled out with our ability to put electrodes in organic systems.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying this is easy, but why doesn't this stuff scale like Moore's Law with integrated circuits? Given the state of research over a decade ago we should be up to VGA quality arrays of 640x480 by now.

    In general prosthetics systems always seem to be on the verge of some "Steve Austin" "Million Dollar Man" arrival and then never makes it. I assure you when we watched Lee Majors in the early '70s wha-na-na-na-na'ing all over the place we assumed such feats would be common place by the year 2000. What the hell happened? Is this just hard like AI, or under-funded and poorly organized?

  46. Semen does do that to women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now a good excuse/reason to tell the girls
    "Have you had your zinc supplement today?"

    3 rations sounds good, morning, evening, late evening. :-)


    You meant that as a joke, but serious medical studies have found that depressed girls who start swallowing are made less depressive from the semen intake. The hormones and zinc in the ejaculate counteract deficiencies and improve the woman's mood.

  47. Re:Anecdotal evidence by lightning01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, there is a scenario they have experimented with. Some people are born with severe cataracts. Surgery can remove those cataracts now, but 20 years ago when they started doing this, they found that if they did not remove the cataracts within a certain amount of time, the brain did not develop sufficiently for eye-sight to be restored. A friend of mine has this problem (she is legally blind). Her daughter was born with the same defect but this time they were able to operate quickly after birth, remove the damaged lenses and replace them with special contacts. When the child is 6 or 7 they will replace the contacts with new lens implants.

  48. Re:All the European Homosexuals want to know... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Certainly I hope it doesn't run windows... we don't want the blind people to see only a blue screen all the time, right?"

    A million Slashdotters called, they want their joke back.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  49. PS douches by UlfGabe · · Score: 2, Funny

    ps. if a baby was born blind, and this was an option for the baby to see (before the developmental limitation on vision), wouldn't you want the bionic baby in your home?

    19 year old son talking to his father.

    "hey son, quit looking through those girls clothes!"

    "yes dad...."

    "So, son?..."

    "ya?"

    "They lookin' good under there or what?"

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  50. Resolution by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, this is obviously pretty cool stuff, but what kind of images could you really get with 50-100 "pixels"? We're talking 10x10 resolution here... Hardly enough for face recognition... Or anything really.

  51. Re:Not for those who have been blind since birth.. by monocyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fun neuroplasticity story: In my biomedical engineering seminar we had a professor in who was involved with the development of a laser vision correction system. Their first human tests were safety and basic efficacy studies done in people who were 'brain-blind', meaning that their eyes were fully functional but they had some kind of damage to the visual centers in their brains that left them totally without sight. Oddly enough, following the treatment to their eyes, a number of them regained some proportion of their vision. The explanation? As best as anyone could tell, although they understood when they gave consent that the treatment wouldn't help them, they still unconsciously believed that something had been done... and their brains went along with it, remapping the input from their eyes.

  52. Blind Vision by macaroo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting comments on the development of vision from birth. Obviously, most of the readers did not see the movie " Terminator" with the cyborg's damaged eye. Another thought came to mind upon reading the comments. It is called blind vision. I saw on TV several years ago a segment on people who's Optic Nerve had stopped functioning and the normal pathways to the brain had cease to function. But, a primitive secondary path developed in the brain that allowed the detection of movement without visualization. This is what allowed the Dinosaurs to capture prey while not being able to real see. They just detected the motion of their prey. I learned that in the movie '" Jurassic Park ". See going to the movies and watching TV is educational!

  53. A matter of "taste" by marcus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some have argued that this is the very foundation of "taste". What you see as blue is not the same as what I see as blue. That is why blue is my favorite color and perhaps, not yours.

    Same can be said for smells, flavors, girls' figures, etc. All are the same to each of us, yet each of us is different.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO