Slashdot Mirror


Forty Years of Moore's Law

kjh1 writes "CNET is running a great article on how the past 40 years of integrated chip design and growth has followed [Gordon] Moore's law. The article also discusses how long Moore's law may remain pertinent, as well as new technologies like carbon nanotube transistors, silicon nanowire transistors, molecular crossbars, phase change materials and spintronics. My favorite data point has to be this: in 1965, chips contained about 60 distinct devices; Intel's latest Itanium chip has 1.7 billion transistors!"

25 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. The Lesser Known Part 2 of Moore's Law... by Arcanix · · Score: 5, Funny

    The amount of articles mentioning Moore's law will double each year.

  2. Slashdot corollary by panaceaa · · Score: 4, Funny
    What about the Slashdot corollary? That is:
    Despite the fact that Moore's Law has been around for 40 years, and widely known about for almost as long, Slashdot will report about it at least once a month.
    It's almost as prevalent as the popular media corollary, which is:
    Popular media will always say that Moore's law is ending now, while ironically citing examples where such earlier predictions were premature.
    1. Re:Slashdot corollary by alatesystems · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or the other popular geek corollary:
      BSD is dying.
      Sometimes followed up with by another corollary:
      Each slashdot story is repeated within a small time of the original posting, leading to a doubling in the amount of Moore's law stories.
  3. Is there already a Law that says... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Funny
    at each iteration the time until the next "Death of Morre's Law" article is halved?

    If not I herbey proclaim it Goat's Law.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  4. Data point? No, two points! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite data point has to be this: in 1965, chips contained about 60 distinct devices; Intel's latest Itanium chip has 1.7 billion transistors!

    Uh, wouldnt that be two data points?

  5. 1.7 Billion? by OAB_X · · Score: 3, Funny

    Intel's latest Itanium chip has 1.7 billion transistors!"

    No wonder they call it the Itanic! Both were big and huge and failed miserably.

  6. Re:Keeping Count by rayde · · Score: 4, Funny

    they are just very, very small. ;)

  7. Re:law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Gordon's theorem"

    Ah yes, the theory that at any given moment on the space-time continuum, you will always have just enough processing power to play the current release of Half Life...

  8. Michael Moore's Law? by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Michale Moore has a law now? Great, and I haven't even seen his film Rescue 911 yet. Now I understand why Disney tried to crush him and his law-making ego.

    1. Re:Michael Moore's Law? by Infinityis · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you've got it backwards...Michael Moore's law is about how his ego doubles every 18 months.

  9. Moore's Law is Dead by snuf23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's buried right next to BSD, adjacent to the freshly dug grave for World of Warcraft.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  10. Re:Typical /. Subject. by wahsapa · · Score: 4, Funny

    no, Murphys Law is eventually one day someone will make a cyborg police officer.

  11. Re:Keeping Count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They left out one of the s's in transistor to get all of them to fit.

  12. Re:Keeping Count by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    I still find amazing that they managed to fit 1.7 billion transitors in a chip.

    they are just very, very small. ;)

    Actually they're rather large, but cleverly Intel have found a way to story them in an alternate universe using Portable Blackhole Technology(TM). Cross your fingers and hope nobody in that alternate universe stumbles across them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. Austin Powers by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see Dr. Evil now...

    "I demand the chip have...SIXTY TRANSISTORS!" (pinky lightly touches corner of mouth).

    The guys at Intel start laughing hysterically...

    "I've changed my mind...I demand the chip have...ONE POINT SEVEN BILLION TRANSISTORS!" (pinky lightly touches corner of mouth)

    Intel guys gasp in shock...

  14. Tracing it back... by 8tim8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rather than calculating this forward in time, didn't someone trace this backwards in time, i.e. that you can see it halving every 18 months going back to the nineteenth century? I can't find a link on Google but I swear I saw it somewhere...

  15. Re:law? by Taladar · · Score: 2, Funny

    People are questioning Copyright Law and it is not called theory because of that either.

  16. Re:Keeping Count by CmdrTostado · · Score: 1, Funny

    Score:-1, Flamebait

    Get yourself a barbeque

    Now that's funny. But if it gets modded as funny then it won't be funny anymore

  17. Gates Law by xs650 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gates Law: MS Code bloat will double at the same interval as Moores law.

  18. Re:Keeping Count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Portable Blackhole Technology(TM).
    Not to start a flamewar here, but AMDs Micro Singularity Architecture(TM) is vastly superior to intel's PBT.

  19. Re:Keeping Count by Sayan · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Itanium story

    Number of transistors= 1.7 billion
    Number of units sold = 1.7K
    Money invested= gazillion dollars

    Tasting dirt from your puny competition (read AMD)= priceless

    --
    resurrect my .sig
  20. 007 by Rixel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somehow, sometime, Moores law will fail.

    Then you will have Lazenby's, Connery's, Dalton's, then (perhaps) Brosnan's law fail as well. Some laws can be.....broken, and twisted, and....um suckey. That last illiterative is mine....all mine, Mr. Bond.

    --
    Never play chicken with a passive aggressive.
  21. I bet there were a lot of nerds celebrating... by ockegheim · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...in 1956, when they managed to fit one component on to a device.

    --
    I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  22. 40? by Chainsaw+Messiah · · Score: 4, Funny

    40th anniversary? That's weird, I swear just about a year and a half ago it was the 20th anniversary.

  23. Re:Keeping Count by Aumaden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just never, ever, ever put the chip in backwards. I lost a living room, half a dining room, and 3 cats that way.