Slashdot Mirror


Intel Seeking Moore's Law Original Publication

ackthpt writes "Gordon Moore's famous prediction, labeled Moore's Law, was originally published in the April 19, 1965 issued of Electronics. Sometime since, he lent out his copy and it has never been returned. Intel would like an original copy of the now defunct magazine and is offering $10,000 for a copy, presumably in good condition. The story is carried on Reuters, and if you happen to have a copy (of your own, not stolen from a museum or library) you may contact Intel via eBay's WantItNow."

3 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Re:whoever, not whomever by powdered+toast+dude · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Um... in the phrase "for whomever", the latter word is indeed an object -- in fact, one of the prepositional variety.

    We have enough trouble here with pedantry against legitimate grammar fouls... let's try to leave the correct ones alone shall we? :)

    $0.02,
    ptd

    --
    I'm an animal lover -- they're delicious!
  2. I love it... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't you love the smell of self-immolating grammer nazis in the morning?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  3. Re:whoever, not whomever by Aruthra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would have thought that it's a subject of the noun clause (whoever attempts), with the whole clause being the object of the preposition, not just the "whoever"