Slashdot Mirror


Labs Scramble to Destroy Deadly Flu Samples

An anonymous reader submits "According to this Yahoo! news story, a deadly strain of the Flu virus was mistakenly sent out to thousands of labs, mostly in the U.S., as samples for routine testing. The samples were sent starting last year, but the rush to destroy them began shortly after the WHO raised an alert last Friday following its discovery by the National Microbial Laboratory Canada on March 26. It was not immediately clear why the 1957 pandemic strain, which killed between 1 million and 4 million people -- was in the proficiency test kits routinely sent to labs."

74 comments

  1. Famous last words by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Oops."

    1. Re:Famous last words by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      more like: "cough, cough, gasp, oops."

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    2. Re:Famous last words by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't it really be the other way around? More like

      "Huh? Oh, crap! Oops! Hey... Cough, cough, gasp, whease, vomit, hurk, blek."

      Unless this really is the Uberflu, it's not gonna infect and show symptoms that quickly.

    3. Re:Famous last words by Curtman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As someone who lives 15 minutes away from the National Microbial Laboratory, I hope not.

      BTW, I'm really surprised that this story didn't get more attention.

    4. Re:Famous last words by storm916 · · Score: 1

      You Know it...

  2. Well... by ResidntGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was not immediately clear why the 1957 pandemic strain, which killed between 1 million and 4 million people -- was in the proficiency test kits routinely sent to labs.

    You'd have to be pretty freaking proficient to kill it, I guess, so it's a good test.

    --
    ResidntGeek
  3. this is the way the world ends by Leontes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This scares the living shit out of me. I really appreciate all the work that scientists do to protect, understand and appreciate deadly virii in the name of humankind, but for the love of god, people, don't be foolheardy with these biological agents. I think what I dread the most is some alien discovering this world a thousand years from now, a corpse planet, a slow hour long series of flashbacks and a slow fadeout to, "they were destroyed by their own hubris!" I mean, talk about cliche. If you find yourself in possession of a deadly virus, be extra careful and don't send it out to your grandmom by accident, just a tip.

    1. Re:this is the way the world ends by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Of all the Slashdotters I know, if any of them happened to be in posession of a deadly virus, I would be honestly terrified. The ones that aren't crazy are probably stupid enough to let it free in the wild anyways.

    2. Re:this is the way the world ends by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd pour the vial of the good stuff into some Coca Cola and yell, "You wanna piece of this, YOU WANNA PIECE OF THIS?!?! HUH?!?! HUH?!?!"

      Then drop dead.

    3. Re:this is the way the world ends by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The plural of 'virus' is not virii. I can't remember which declension virus is in, but the plural for virus is most likely 'viri' (if masculine), or 'vira' (if neuter). Some third declension nouns end in 'us' but I highly doubt virus is one of them (it would be 'vires' in that case, I believe). Knowing the the genetive singular would solve it all, but I don't know of any decent online latin dictionary.

      I seem to recall the proper latin plural being 'viri,' but honestly in English I think we should all just say 'viruses.'

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    4. Re:this is the way the world ends by Leontes · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are, of course, correct, and I shall no longer make such silly mistakii.

    5. Re:this is the way the world ends by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I know you used the word 'virii' in your post, but I fail to see what the flu has with a discharge from a donkey's penis. That's right, virii means 'donkey semen'. Google it for yourself, or you will look ignorant.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey, douchebag, how bout shut the fuck up and RTFFAQ? All you said plus more has ALREADY BEEN SAID.

      by the way: viri is plural of vir. "virii" IS FACETIOUS PARODY!!! vira is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS!!! documented genitive plurals are ambiguous (one points to the fourth declension, which you wisely forgot to mention in your scholarly analysis).

    7. Re:this is the way the world ends by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      I don't really care. I usually avoid being a grammar nazi (read my sig if you don't believe me), because in most cases people know the proper grammar they're just typing quickly and not double-checking their posts (which is fine).

      In this case, though, most people are just ignorant on the matter.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    8. Re:this is the way the world ends by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Silly me--forgot about vir. Did I say genitive plural? Meant genitive singular.

      Anyway, since you seem to know better than me, could you tell me what the Latin plural should be?

      What faq are you talking about?

      Anyways, I'm glad you could use my post to experience a moment of trimumph and self worth. I hope it lasts...

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    9. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This scares the living shit out of me.

      You had living shit inside you?

    10. Re:this is the way the world ends by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do speak Latin, and virvs, atleast in my dictionary, is indeclinable, like nil / nihil. Also, when the word is used in english, as a loanword, it is pluralised as viruses, not virii, which is just plain stupid, as for a latin word to end in double i it has to end in -ivs.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    11. Re:this is the way the world ends by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      as for a latin word to end in double i it has to end in -ivs.

      I knew that much :P

      Also, when the word is used in english, as a loanword, it is pluralised as viruses,

      Yeah I said that in my original post.

      Thanks for the info, though :)

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    12. Re:this is the way the world ends by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      I like to help you young folks out. Makes my sub 120k user number heart feel young again. Also, I take every opportunity I can to plug Latin. I find it very sad that so many High Schools around the country are no longer offering Latin. My knowledge of Latin enables me to get a great insight into English, and an ever better one into Spanish and Italian. Latin should be everyone's second language, if only so they can know themselves.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    13. Re:this is the way the world ends by Leontes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since it is organic waste, and since until excreted it remains part of my digestive system, one could argue that since as digestion occurs, the extraction of nutrients is a biochemical function that it is indistinct from the organic life that houses that interaction, so therefore, shit, until completely expunged, is living. And since this story gave me a anxiety induced feeling (technically known as the willies), my sympathetic flight routine extended not only throughout my nervous system but also throughout the entire biochemical structure of the human body. Hence, the living shit, the organic excrement, being part of the terrified self.

    14. Re:this is the way the world ends by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      I've been studying latin via correspondence; really interesting stuff.

      Makes my sub 120k user number heart feel young again.

      Honestly, with uids in the high 800ks these days, I'm middle-aged :)

      I can at least remember the Silver Age of Slashdot. Much like Roman art/literature, this was after the Golden Age. Good articles were still coming out, but the quality of the posts started seriously dropping.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    15. Re:this is the way the world ends by cicho · · Score: 1
      I was reminded of this /. discussion we had 2003. Back then most /.ers were a-ok with military bioresearch in lethal shit that hadn't even been invented yet.

      Now, this case today concerns medical research, but I wonder if people still think that labs are safe and there's no chance of an outbreak.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    16. Re:this is the way the world ends by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Oh really? How about putting an ebola-like strain into Anthrax spores and encasing it in plastic so it can travel in air?

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/bioweapons/biowa r_timeline.html

      Look near mid 1980s.

      If the flu scares you, this will shit your pants. Now, did US really end its development of bio-weapons or did their program just go underground (like in USSR)?

    17. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case it has no plural forms at all (I think). One of those uncountables.

    18. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like to help you young folks out. Also, I take every opportunity I can to plug Latin.

      Podex perfectus es!

    19. Re:this is the way the world ends by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      I think what I dread the most is some alien discovering this world a thousand years from now, a corpse planet, a slow hour long series of flashbacks and a slow fadeout to, "they were destroyed by their own hubris!"


      Now you've gone a bit to far. The 1957 virus strain didn't destroy mankind in 1957, and it's not going to in 2005 either. It's terribly dangerous of course, but no virus is going to destroy humanity. The viruses have been trying to kill us for millions of years. We've been able to survive all this time despite them.

      --
      AccountKiller
    20. Re:this is the way the world ends by 63N1U5 · · Score: 0

      Slashdot - the only place a discussion of deadly biological agents turns into a discussion of Latin noun constructs.

      --
      There are alot of people who would like to be me. I just haven't met them yet.
    21. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This scares the living shit out of me.
      I must say that I'm somewhat surprised, if you are so scared, that you should take the time to distinguish between the shit that is living and the shit that is dead, and then subsequently expell only the living shit, while presumably keeping the dead shit in reserve.
      However, I'm also surprised when bullies do the same thing to their victims by beating them, so perhaps shit discrimination is more common than I had heretofore assumed.
    22. Re:this is the way the world ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The plural of 'virus' is not virii.
      "Virus" itself is plural.
      See the "s" on the end?
      It means that it's plural.
      The singular form is "viru".
      So you should say, "I caught a viru. It's one of the many virus going around.".
      It's like how "data" is singular, and "datas" is plural.
      So you would say, "I have a data.", and your mother would say, "Is she a nice girl?", and you would say, "No, I mean I have a data on my computer. In fact, I have lots of datas on my computer.", and your mother would say, "Well, here's a box of tissues. Make sure that you clean up afterwards."
    23. Re:this is the way the world ends by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    24. Re:this is the way the world ends by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      The one thing in Slashdot's favor is that we atleast, don't all use lead pipes, goblets, plates, and other utensils.

      Now, if we could just cut back on all the free beer, we might be able to do something.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  4. so a private firm made lots of it to send out by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when they were asked to pick a strain themselves to test people with, and it took the WHO to tell them they screwed up and shouldn't have done it?

    How many private firms have stockpiles of old virus strains we no longer have immunity to? And are they really that stupid?

    1. Re:so a private firm made lots of it to send out by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would really help to RTFA this time, because, while this is a serious screwup, it's not what a lot of people are thinking after reading the poorly worded summary.

      In response to your misunderstanding, the sample was distributed in a kit intended for testing sample-identification equipment. Not for testing on people, or even for making vaccines.

      PLEASE, people, RTFA this time. The last thing we need is for people to jump to conclusions.

      /me larts "An anonymous reader"...

    2. Re:so a private firm made lots of it to send out by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In response to your misunderstanding, the sample was distributed in a kit intended for testing sample-identification equipment. Not for testing on people, or even for making vaccines.


      I did read it... did you miss the following quote?

      The risk is relatively low that a lab worker will get sick, but a large number of labs got it and if someone does get infected, the risk of severe illness is high and this virus has shown to be fully transmissible," WHO's influenza chief, Klaus Stohr, told The Associated Press. (emphasis mine)


      He's not talking about the strain in general. He's talking about what was sent out in all those kits to all those labs. And about real people now, not back in the 50s. That indicates people could actually catch this from the test kits if mishandled, etc., does it not? It wasn't a dead virus sample. Now, remember that a lot of these kits were sent overseas. Some people overseas may have an interest in not destroying their kits, but attempting to culture from the live sample they have.

      It would really help to RTFA this time, because, while this is a serious screwup, it's not what a lot of people are thinking after reading the poorly worded summary.


      Please do. I don't know what you think I'm thinking, but I'll bet it wasn't what I really was thinking: they wouldn't be so hastily incinerating something if it was dead, would they?
    3. Re:so a private firm made lots of it to send out by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The way I read it, "fully transmissible" means that if a person gets infected he's contagious through a variety of vectors. I don't think they're saying that merely being near the contained sample will cause someone to be infected.

    4. Re:so a private firm made lots of it to send out by radtea · · Score: 1

      Some people overseas may have an interest in not destroying their kits...

      And that is different from some people in the U.S. how? Google on anthrax if you don't know why I'm asking.

      --Tom

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:so a private firm made lots of it to send out by buxton2k · · Score: 1
      Some people overseas may have an interest in not destroying their kits, but attempting to culture from the live sample they have.


      Not just overseas... Some people here may have a similar interest.
  5. Good morning, Captain by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Captain Trips? So soon? Go back to sleep. Your time is soon enough.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Good morning, Captain by generalleoff · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. Damn me and my sleep.

  6. This can't be good. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but the rush to destroy them

    If it gets in the wild and outside of a controlled lab, all I can say is "Good Luck."

    1. Re:This can't be good. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      We have the new and perhaps ultimate form of virus prevention now though... it's a pretty complicated concept so they created a simple short form, they call it T.V.

    2. Re:This can't be good. by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The biggest problem is that they HAVE been in a rush to destroy them. That's a remarkably efficient way of ensuring accidents happen and that samples get missed.


      A bigger concern is that the shipments went out in November last year, including to countries in the Middle East. A sympathizer in the wrong place could easily have recognized it and produced more by now.


      However, the biggest concern of all is that this is a sample that was caught. Is it possible that other deadly viruses have been sent out, in other packs, in error and have NOT been spotted? This one got sent to so many, that it was bound to be seen sooner or later. But there must be other times when specific labs request random samples of stuff. In a situation like that, a mix-up might easily go undetected.


      If you've ever read "The Hot Zone", you'll remember a chapter describing how a lab using monkeys sent one that had died under unknown conditions, in a totally unprotected container. Turned out the monkey had died from an airborne strain of Ebola. The researchers were VERY VERY lucky it wasn't a strain humans could catch, or about 90% of America would be dead by now.


      This is one reason why people have to be bloody careful with medical samples of any kind. We've been lucky, so far, because the mistakes have - for many reasons - not broken out. Luck has a nasty habit of running out.


      Or maybe I watched Terry Nation's "Survivors" series too many times. (That was the theme in the series - a lab accident results in a virus wiping out most of humanity, with those few survivors basically stuck in a hybrid high-tech/stone-age environment.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:This can't be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, after all, we figured out how to destroy them in 1957, and technology hasn't improved at all since then.

    4. Re:This can't be good. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Watch 28 Days Later sometimes.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:This can't be good. by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      What, like say every saturday evening at 9?

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:This can't be good. by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 1
      If you've ever read "The Hot Zone", you'll remember a chapter describing how a lab using monkeys sent one that had died under unknown conditions, in a totally unprotected container. Turned out the monkey had died from an airborne strain of Ebola. The researchers were VERY VERY lucky it wasn't a strain humans could catch, or about 90% of America would be dead by now.

      One small nitpick. While humans don't become ill from Ebola Reston (that's the strain from the primate lab here in the states), eight individuals have developed antibodies to Ebola Reston. This document has a list of all the Ebola outbreaks. There are five listed for Ebola Reston, with no cases of humans becoming ill. If I recall correctly, Preston had two of the workers from the Reston facility going to the hospital with a high fever and soreness, but otherwise no effect from Ebola Reston.

      Oh, and if you think "The Hot Zone" is a chilling tale, read Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World--Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran It by Ken Alibek. I would also recommend "The Demon in the Freezer" by Preston.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

  7. All a big misunderstanding.... by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was not immediately clear why the 1957 pandemic strain, which killed between 1 million and 4 million people -- was in the proficiency test kits routinely sent to labs.

    Yeah, I'll bet the guy who leaked it is sorry, it was supposed to be the 1918 strain.

  8. Who to blame by drakethegreat · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this time South Park got it right huh... Blame Canada might be accurate.

    1. Re:Who to blame by Nos. · · Score: 1

      You didn't even have to read the article.... the summary said Canada alerted WHO to the mistake. The mistake was caused by a US firm. The Canadian lab detected the virus and traced it back to the sample kit sent from the US.

    2. Re:Who to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg that first identified the H2N2 virus.
      I live just down wind of the place (cough.. cough)

  9. Just Like Outbreak... by blatantdog · · Score: 1

    This was less expensive then sending 3,747 ebola laden monkeys around the the world.

  10. This is so not cool by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Funny

    A week after I get over a nasty nasty flu, this article pops up. Thanks slashdot for fueling the little hypochondriac inside us all.

  11. Couple of issues raised.... by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Through there are obvious ethical questions, what legal responsibilities are their for scientits domestically and under international law to protect the public from releasing (intentionally or unintentionally) these types of strains.

    My hope is that the scientist(s) responsible for this accident, are at least, fined for this incident. I hope if there is gross incompetence, that they not work as a scientist in a medical facility ever again.

    2) If this is such a dangerous flu virus, and it hasn't been innoculated against since 1957 or 1960, why were the innoculations stopped?

    I think its similar to small pox, where unfortunately, it was supposed to be "destroyed". But like nuclear weapons, its a "Well, if you're keeping it, so are we." mentality.

    3) After seeing problems with SARS evolve internationnaly (particually where I live, in Canada) what measures are being taken to seclude and isolate potential travellers, who move about with flu-like symptoms?

    I raised this with gov't officials at Health Canada about two years ago during the SARS. They said the airplanes were throughly 'cleaned' after each flight. How? When? With what? They really couldn't give me details ... because they didn't have any. What about the U.S., Europe? The problem is international contamination of viruses now because almost any country is witin a 10 to 15 hour flight.

    1. Re:Couple of issues raised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "2) If this is such a dangerous flu virus, and it hasn't been innoculated against since 1957 or 1960, why were the innoculations stopped?"

      Assumably since it's no longer "in circulation." The flu mutates rapidly. So you can immunize someone against, say, smallpox, but not the flu (just a particular strain of it - they have to guess which strain will be the primary strain that season when they make the flu vaccines).

      "I think its similar to small pox, where unfortunately, it was supposed to be "destroyed". But like nuclear weapons, its a "Well, if you're keeping it, so are we." mentality."

      They keep the stock so if there is an outbreak (natural or otherwise) they can quickly make vaccines for it. Sounds reasonable...

    2. Re:Couple of issues raised.... by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      My hope is that the scientist(s) responsible for this accident, are at least, fined for this incident. I hope if there is gross incompetence, that they not work as a scientist in a medical facility ever again.

      Doctors kill over 100,000 patients a year through negligence or incompetence. Health professionals (including doctors) kill around 250,000 people a year through negligence, incompetence, or malice. They aren't held accountable. Why should we hold a scientist more accountable?

      --
      Here come da fudge!
  12. We want the BEST by gnovos · · Score: 1

    It was not immediately clear why the 1957 pandemic strain, which killed between 1 million and 4 million people -- was in the proficiency test kits routinely sent to labs.

    Because now, through the magic of natural selection, we will have only the BEST biotech engineers and doctors. In college it's often called the "weeding out" process.

    <snicker>Intro to Biology is a real killer this year.</snicker>

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  13. All I have to say is... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Funny

    And the 2005 Ig Nobel Prize in the field of medicine goes to...

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  14. Sounds sensationalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife works in a hospital lab that got one of these. They're just regular QA kits run by regular lab techs. If they were really so dangerous, they wouldn't be sending these things out to these kinds of labs (just your friendly local hospital lab), especially since the labs are literally surrounded by patients (in the same building).

    1. Re:Sounds sensationalized by gnovos · · Score: 1

      f they were really so dangerous, they wouldn't be sending these things out to these kinds of labs

      That's kind of the point. You see, it's like this... I send a box full of suitcase-nukes to walmart, because I THOUGHT I was sending the box of boring old samsonite deluxe suitcases...

      It gets posted on slahdot and you respond, "My wife works in a walmart that got one of these. They're just regular suitcases sold by regular employees. If they were really so dangerous, they wouldn't be sending these things out to these kinds of storess (just your friendly local walmart), especially since the stores are literally surrounded by rednecks (in the same building)."

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:Sounds sensationalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant! Since so many walmarts are laid out the same, you know exactly where the suitcase will be placed, so you can plan the blast to take out the walmart and not extend beyond it (much).

  15. diversion by gnarlin · · Score: 1

    I guess it wasn't those 12 monkeys after all!

    --
    A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
  16. Natures way of telling us by smeg · · Score: 1

    Think of this as nature's way of saying that there's too many humans. A good pandemic is just what we need.

    If it does get out, what better way to ensure that the majority of survivors will have antibodies for this particular strain? We're not going to fall for it twice!

  17. They're lucky they didn't play with lasers by dragisha · · Score: 1

    In that case they would get prison and half a million fine.

    Luckily, they only sent deadly virus to thousands of labs. Virus that once killed 1 to 4 million people, but at least nobody got distracted while flying a plane.

    --
    http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
    1. Re:They're lucky they didn't play with lasers by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Even more lucky that they didn't have a wardrobe malfunction at the same time; it would have doubled their fine.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  18. how high by PipoDeClown · · Score: 1

    i couldnt find any bid on ebay yet.

  19. Necessary Danger by Detritus · · Score: 1

    If you want to test the proficiency of pathologists, you are going to have to send them live samples of real diseases. The trick is to not select samples of diseases that have an excessively high risk of starting a deadly epidemic if accidentally released.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  20. Super Flu by generalleoff · · Score: 1

    Captain Trips?

  21. "Scientists" are morons. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1

    I really appreciate all the work that scientists do to protect, understand and appreciate deadly virii in the name of humankind, but for the love of god, people, don't be foolheardy with these biological agents.

    Your average, garden variety "scientist" is an utter and complete moron.

    I know - I've been working on a big LabVIEW database thing, and, trust me, these people couldn't find their way out of a paper bag if you gave them a flashlight. [And you wouldn't believe the potential safety catastrophes I encountered - time and time again I was warning them about things that could catch on fire and things that could explode; quite frankly, I'm surprised they haven't blown themselves to smithereens by now.]

    The fellows who frequent Slashdot typically come from a compsci/physics/math kind of a background, and would be rather shocked to see what passes for a "scientist" these days - you don't need an IQ much higher than a doorknob to get a job working in one of these biology labs. And if the inherent absence of rigor in the "biology" profession weren't bad enough in its own right, the government magnifies the problem almost infinitely by pouring billions of dollars of grant money into the "biology" cesspool every year.

    Frankly, I'm at the point where I'd take the word of a good auto mechanic before I'd trust anything a "scientist" had to say.

    1. Re:"Scientists" are morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Whereby it is revealed by shocking first hand research that scientists are, in fact, ordinary people (i.e. morons) who happen to be doing science. Brilliant! Obviously any mistake made by a biologist means all of biology is hogwash. Proven! Which reminds me, I have this recurring multiple-antibiotic resistant strep infection I've been meaning to get checked out but my *(&* auto mechanic is booked solid this week.

    2. Re:"Scientists" are morons. by sdstowell · · Score: 1

      I guess I am one of the morons you speak of. I spent 5 years in college learning to test blood and body fluids. I have degrees in engineering as well as medical technology. The common graduate of a medical technology has to be well versed in several fields to include hematology, chemistry, immnohematology, microbiology, immunology, optics, hydraulics, electronics, and the list goes on. I spend over 60 hours each year in continuing education that is state mandated. The mistake was made by a corporation out to make a killing selling us material federally mandated for us to prove proficiency in testing. I would prefer not to work with materials that can kill me but by public out cry I am forced to. If you want call someone morons take a look at the company who decided our health was worth taking a risk so the could push a fast growing cheep virus out the door and make more $$$$$$$$$.

  22. One hell of an exam question... by Leadhyena · · Score: 1
    FTA:
    The test kits are used for internal quality control checks to demonstrate that a lab is able to correctly identify viruses or as a way for labs to get certified by the College of American Pathologists.

    The kits involve blind samples. The lab then has to correctly identify the pathogen in the vial in order to pass the test. Usually, the influenza virus included in these kits is one that is currently circulating, or at least one that has recently been in circulation.

    I bet the test designer is pissed that his "trick question" got blabbed to the press. Scientists can be so absent-minded sometimes.
  23. Alarmist and inaccurate story by hung_himself · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At first I thought it was an April fool's joke when I saw "National Microbial Laboratory Canada" which does not exist - "Health Canada National Microbiology Laboratory" does exist though. But, unfortunately, it's just another example of poor reporting and maybe some CYA politics.

    The article implies that because this is an old virus, people born after 1968, the last time it was in a vaccine, have no immunity to it. What she was probably told was that it was unlikely that anyone born after 1968 would be immune to it which is quite different. Influenza vaccines are (somewhat) effective because although the viruses mutate rapidly, they are related and exposure to a related virus can confer resistance. If the reporter had done a Google like I did http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/pandemics/flu3.htm, she would have found that the same family of flu resurfaced in 1978 and a member of this family was included in vaccines after that.

    Finally, according to the article, this kit has been floating around for a year with that sample and most countries only require level 2 facilities to handle it. Scientists value their lives as much as the next guy - so it's apparent that noone thought much of the risk. Makes me wonder whether the viruses were even infective. The recommendation for the virus in the kit to be destroyed only came about when the Canadian lab found it in another sample - meaning someone got sloppy and everyone went into CYA mode. Anyway, it probably is a good idea not to have that virus in the kit, if only to avoid articles like this - which was probably the thinking at WHO, rather than this being a real risk.

  24. Lab Worker Comments by sdstowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in a hospital lab as a med tech. We were sent this sample for testing. We get blind samples every 6 months from CAP to check our methodology. We only test for type A and B but don't serotype the sample of virus. I have treated these samples as capable of transmitting disease. I must admit some of my peers are not quite as careful. I had seen the info on the news but didn't think we had received this test kit. I came in to work and asked if we had received a notice from CAP and was told yes. Scared the hell out me because of knowing my peers don't take the same precautions I do. I really don't think the general public have a clue what happens in a modern (well kinda modern) hospital laboratory. I have handled petri dishes with enough sterp bacteria to infect a small city or blood samples capable of infecting half the country with HIV. We handle samples that will kill you before you know has happened. In collage we proformed a little experiment, We took a common bowl flora E.Colli and in 10 days made it resistant to ever antibiotic but Cipro (just in case we needed to be treated for it). Docs are doing this experiment every day due to peps demanding the magic pill to cure all that is wrong with them. Just think about this ... It would only take one really pissed off person, a few petri dishes, very little knowledge, a little time, and the right opportunity to make the world a very nasty place to live.

  25. Followup.... Some Samples LOST! by Zakias · · Score: 1

    Okay I know people probably aren't still following this thread but I found an interesting followup to this discussion on CBC.

    Apparently two countries: Lebanon and Mexico were likely sent this sample kit but their labs did not recieve it. Intercepted or lost in transit? Fishy...