Slashdot Mirror
New 640-Node Apple Xserve Cluster at UIUC
frostyboy writes "At the University of Illiois at Urbana-Champaign's Department of Computational Science and Engineering , a new high-performance computing cluster comprising 640 Dual G5 Xserves has completed benchmarking runs for the top500 list. The New Turing Cluster is a replacement for an old 208-node linux cluster. Preliminary results have it at about 4.6 teraflops, not too shabby. Slide Presentation and Photo Album"
The slide show shows that the only thing Linux about the cluster is the NFS server. Seems that OS X 10.3.5 nfs server maxes out at 50 clients.
While it might be good for PR to give UIUC a discount so that they would buy the system, remember that the cost per performance is already low. Virginia Tech built the X cluster for around $5 million whereas the computers next to it on the top 500 list cost $20+ million. There may have been a deal, but given the price tag is already low, it may not have been much.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
It's running OS X.
Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
Or he could have dreams of this guy. I love the shirt... its almost too funny to be true.
Read the slide presentation. On pg 9, it shows a picture of Mac OSX at the terminal and on pg 16 it lists OSX under the software. However, linux will still operate the NFS server because Apple's implementation of NFS server only allows fifty clients. I am not sure whether a XServe or an old computer from the previous cluster will run it.
You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
Are we forgetting the other supercomputer born in Urbana, Illinois?
Virginia Tech built the X cluster for around $5 million whereas the computers next to it on the top 500 list cost $20+ million.
Mellanox donated 1100 Infiniband adapters to Virginia Tech. At $3000 a piece, that's $3.3 million of interconnect hardware that Virginia Tech got for free.
Virginia tech can never be used as a cost comparison because they got so much stuff for free or discounted.
Tech's machines each have dual 2.3GHz processors as opposed to UIUC's dual 2.0GHz. Tech also appears to have a much faster network, and I imagine custom software for developing and running simulations. I guess it all adds up and Tech did a better overall integration job.
Why no Xwindows Support for Emacs? /usr/local/bin, which should now be in the default path on all head nodes.
Mac OS X does not come with Xwindows, but it does come with emacs. So, by default, emacs is not built with Xwindows support. On Turing, we use xemacs for windowed, x-enabled emacs. You can find it in
Mac OS X does in fact come with Xwindows. It may be that the default version of emacs doesns't use it, but to say it's not there is simply wrong.
Of course Slowaris 10 only runs on Opterons, and Sparcs. not PowerPC.
Advantage Linux. It runs on more platforms than you can remember.
Note x86 support is there but i wouldn't bet your hardware is supported completely. Between that and Sun's management telling the F/OSS community that the GPL developers don't matter they should get's lots of help.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
No, really. This should be almost powerful enough to run next years (cr)applications from Macrodobe.
Okay, seriously, it is impressive and another good illustration of the strengths of OSX over every horrible thing Apple called the Macintosh OS before they went over to the *nix base.
Oh yeah, that Star Wars t-shirt guy reminds me of what I looked like before I became older, grayer, and crustier. I'm so glad I stopped wearing shirts like that.
If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
Worth a note: we don't have a 640-node cluster, it's really a 512 and 128 node clusters. Theoretical peak was I think 8 Tflop, and we got 4.6 or about 57%. VT's first entry only hit 54% if I remember what our parallel software expert told me right, so with more time to tune we'll probably get higher again for SC05's list. (VT's up to what, 61% or so now?)
Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
Well, they could just change the name slightly. You know, shift the letters one place in the alphabet....
;)
Of course, "GZK" is kinda hard to pronounce.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
Where did that Uber-Geek get that Star Wars T-Shirt? That guy is everything I picture when I think "nerd"
Actually the desktops were the only ones for sale at the time. The G5 Xserve was not announced until after VT's system was installed.
Anyone else getting sick of seeing all these stories with pictures of people assembling hundreds of Xserves into massive clusters?
Yeah, me neither.
Did they really 'invent' that much of the technology, or did they just implement the stuff invented at CERN?