Slashdot Mirror


New 640-Node Apple Xserve Cluster at UIUC

frostyboy writes "At the University of Illiois at Urbana-Champaign's Department of Computational Science and Engineering , a new high-performance computing cluster comprising 640 Dual G5 Xserves has completed benchmarking runs for the top500 list. The New Turing Cluster is a replacement for an old 208-node linux cluster. Preliminary results have it at about 4.6 teraflops, not too shabby. Slide Presentation and Photo Album"

12 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. NFS only by BSDimwit · · Score: 3, Informative

    The slide show shows that the only thing Linux about the cluster is the NFS server. Seems that OS X 10.3.5 nfs server maxes out at 50 clients.

  2. Re:Sweet Dreams Steve by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anyone know what sort of crazy discount they get? It must be pretty good PR for apple.

    While it might be good for PR to give UIUC a discount so that they would buy the system, remember that the cost per performance is already low. Virginia Tech built the X cluster for around $5 million whereas the computers next to it on the top 500 list cost $20+ million. There may have been a deal, but given the price tag is already low, it may not have been much.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  3. Re:Linux? by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ah, Slashdot. Where people reply to people who haven't read the article with assumptions based on nothing in particular, but make it clear that the person replying hasn't read the article, either.

    It's running OS X.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  4. Re:Sweet Dreams Steve by Stubtify · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or he could have dreams of this guy. I love the shirt... its almost too funny to be true.

  5. Re:Linux? by Enrique1218 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the slide presentation. On pg 9, it shows a picture of Mac OSX at the terminal and on pg 16 it lists OSX under the software. However, linux will still operate the NFS server because Apple's implementation of NFS server only allows fifty clients. I am not sure whether a XServe or an old computer from the previous cluster will run it.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  6. Re:Sweet Dreams Steve by prockcore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Virginia Tech built the X cluster for around $5 million whereas the computers next to it on the top 500 list cost $20+ million.

    Mellanox donated 1100 Infiniband adapters to Virginia Tech. At $3000 a piece, that's $3.3 million of interconnect hardware that Virginia Tech got for free.

    Virginia tech can never be used as a cost comparison because they got so much stuff for free or discounted.

  7. Re:4.6 seems low by CXI · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tech's machines each have dual 2.3GHz processors as opposed to UIUC's dual 2.0GHz. Tech also appears to have a much faster network, and I imagine custom software for developing and running simulations. I guess it all adds up and Tech did a better overall integration job.

  8. Re:4.6 seems low by Rhys · · Score: 3, Informative

    Worth a note: we don't have a 640-node cluster, it's really a 512 and 128 node clusters. Theoretical peak was I think 8 Tflop, and we got 4.6 or about 57%. VT's first entry only hit 54% if I remember what our parallel software expert told me right, so with more time to tune we'll probably get higher again for SC05's list. (VT's up to what, 61% or so now?)

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
  9. Re:What? No HAL-9000 jokes? by daeley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, they could just change the name slightly. You know, shift the letters one place in the alphabet....

    Of course, "GZK" is kinda hard to pronounce. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  10. Nice Shirt... by FlyingPostman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where did that Uber-Geek get that Star Wars T-Shirt? That guy is everything I picture when I think "nerd"

  11. Anyone else... by Electroly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone else getting sick of seeing all these stories with pictures of people assembling hundreds of Xserves into massive clusters?

    Yeah, me neither.

  12. Re:The FAQ is wrong by ThousandStars · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mac OS X also has a Carbon-native Emacs binary. See http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/unix_open_so urce/carbonemacspackage.html.