Slashdot Mirror


Mid-Range Wireless Deployment for the Home User?

ronin78 asks: "My father just bought a five-acre farm with multiple buildings. I am looking for a way to set up a WLAN that covers the entire property. All I have been able to find are commercial solutions from various providers, all of which are close to or above a thousand dollars and measure coverage area in miles. Do Slashdot readers know how to provide wireless access for more than one house without blanketing the entire neighborhood (hopefully for a reasonable price)? Are there single, high-powered routers that will do the job?"

69 comments

  1. New techology by madaxe42 · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:New techology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahahahahahahaha I don't get it.

      Why not use dinosaurs?

    2. Re:New techology by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Ethernet over Pwore between the buildings. As long as they're on the same service/panel.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. I've not yet implemented this, but... by rincebrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd just grab several WAP54Gs [or whatever your preference is in 802.11g APs], along with a single WRT54G [or whatever your preference is in 802.11g routers, again] and configure them for ad-hoc mode.

    If you want something more complicated, configure one AP in infrastructure mode and configure the rest as repeaters.

    --
    It's only an insult if it's not true.
    1. Re:I've not yet implemented this, but... by bird603568 · · Score: 0

      Get a wrt54g and put the clone of saevsoft's firmware on it i think its ddwrt. make a colinear omni and boos the power on teh router. If it has a good downtilt, most your land should be covered execpt for right under it.

    2. Re:I've not yet implemented this, but... by BilliamBlake · · Score: 4, Informative

      Forget linksys for this job - if you want coverage. Their radios are the worst in aspects of sensitivity and power output - *both* are very important. If you modify the firmware and up the power they tend to run hot - and still at only a third as strong as better ones. I don't know why the IT industry is so slow to wake up to this. Go with SMC Elite Connect or Senao/Engenious for your AP. You can get a Seneo for around $150 and with a good antennae it will probably cover almost the whole area. They are the legal maximum for power output and have better sensitivity than either cisco or orinoco. SMC is practically just as good. Don't even ask how they compare with linksys. They also do wds so if you want to expand or add later then you can. In addition the build quality of these things is excellent, much nicer than linksys and much more value for your money, IMO.

      But take my word for it, check it out for yourself or take a suggestion from seattle wireless. Ask the pros what they use.

    3. Re:I've not yet implemented this, but... by rincebrain · · Score: 1

      Advice duly noted. I'll have to try them, since I've had crappy experiences with D-Link [well duh] and SMC [old, old 802.11b device].

      --
      It's only an insult if it's not true.
  3. Previous "Ask Slashdot" by Mendy · · Score: 5, Interesting
  4. Five Acre Farm? by mrgrey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you just call five acres a farm? Hah! What city did you grow up in?

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
    1. Re:Five Acre Farm? by LazyBoy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      lol :)

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    2. Re:Five Acre Farm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is possible to make good money with a five acre farm.

      I think his problem is interference from all the fluorescent lights.

    3. Re:Five Acre Farm? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      At least I wasn't the only one that thought that. Heck, the 300 acres that my family has is still pretty small.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:Five Acre Farm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so fucking funny!!!!
      That is a GARDEN!

    5. Re:Five Acre Farm? by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
      Depending on the altitude and proximity to a large urban metropolis, it may be more like a suburban raised bed garden!

      Okay, serious on-the-cheap answer is the 802.11g AP's or routers linked together. A question for the OP: Aren't most of the buildings close together and what is out on the fifth acre corner that needs wireless access? Measurement equipment I could understand, but you don't need 802.11g for that...

    6. Re:Five Acre Farm? by ronin78 · · Score: 1
      I certainly did not expect my choice of words to spark such debate. As Cliff suggests, it would be more properly called an estate, although still a small one (we've been calling it a compound, but I didn't want anyone to think that we were a militia or anything). It is zoned agricultural and has some gardening space (probably sufficient for subsistence), but was subdivided out of being a commercial farm long ago. I am originally from Jersey, however, and I have seen some five-acre farms that are quite profitable.

      Thanks to jdray for the slice of farming information, although we are more interested in the barrier.

    7. Re:Five Acre Farm? by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      Use the words "mini-farm" to shut up the pendants.

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    8. Re:Five Acre Farm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's realtors call a "ranchette" here in CA :)

    9. Re:Five Acre Farm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 acres is quite small (and nearly impossible to profit from) for most farms (midwest US). 5 acres is usually someone's big yard that requires a beefier riding lawnmower. Maybe our poster runs a nursery or the like though.

    10. Re:Five Acre Farm? by aethera · · Score: 1
      What state did you grow up in? There are plenty of people in West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky still subsistence farming on less than five acres. A farm doesn't have to be measured in the hundreds (or thousands) of acres to provide food for the people who live on it. My grandfather plows his two acre garden with two Belgiums (really large draft horses). My inlaws live off of small gardens and orchards, keep sheep, pigs,chicken and bees. They preserve most of it, and sell their suplus for spending cash. They aren't Amish, just practical. If they need extra cash, they sell a car (yes, probably out of the front lawn), cut some timber, or work a few months in the mines. My mother and father in-law remember the when their holler first got electric, when they saw their first car, and when the highways were built, and they aren't in their 60s yet.

      Sorry for the rant, but five acres is plenty. Now that being said, none of my relatives know what wi-fi is either. :)

    11. Re:Five Acre Farm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's good land, 5 acres for a farm feeding a nuclear family is plenty. You could do it for less. 5 acres would probably feed 2 or 3 generations of a name, depending on family size.

  5. 5 Acres isn't all that big by Fished · · Score: 5, Informative
    An acre is roughly 40000 square feet, meaning a square acre is only 200 ft on a side. That means that your father's farm, if it's roughly square, is probably only 300 ft from center-to-edge. (Obviously, if the shape varies, that changes.)

    I have a five acre farm, and the wireless from my airport in the house makes it to my sheds, etc., about 100 ft. away - I do, however, have the external antenna.

    I strongly suspect that, if you simply put a standard, commodity wireless access point w/antenna on the top of a mast, that will give you most of the coverage you're looking for - at least as long as you have line of site to the mast.

    Alternatively, you can plant an access point anywhere there's power and link them together. But I doubt it's necessary.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:5 Acres isn't all that big by peragrin · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually I was think he would need two or three base stations and a couple of directional antenna's .

      Remember Trees's, buildings, block, and there is no garruentee that the property is square.

      One Access point for each large building connected by a directional antenna. As long as you can bridge the points together it would work.

      Maybe two Airport extreme base stations one with the extended omni directional antenna the other with a directional antenna pointed at the first. The second one would be set to extend the range of the first one.

      Of course that option isn't much cheaper at $600 or so.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:5 Acres isn't all that big by wintermute.turing.ai · · Score: 1

      And, the antenna will also make an excellent lightning rod!

    3. Re:5 Acres isn't all that big by rzebram · · Score: 1
      Alternatively, you can plant an access point anywhere there's power and link them together.
      So if he plants them, will new access points grow?
  6. cabling and wireless combined by bloosqr · · Score: 1

    why not just string cat6 or unidirection wireless from point to point and normal wireless in each building w/ the gateway in the main building... Everything will route itself out. As far as I can tell there is no other real way of doing it since you need some connection between the buildings so its either wireless or wired.. since you dont need to cover everything make it uni directional wireless or just spend the day burying some cable between each building..

  7. Controling where the RF goes by WonderSnatch · · Score: 5, Informative

    without blanketing the entire neighborhood

    This is the part of your request that you're going to have a bit of trouble with. RF energy is a bit like water: it goes where it wants.

    Sure, if you were spraying water instead of RF energy, you could put a different nozzle on the hose to change the spray pattern, change the flow rate to control how far you spray, dig ditches to direct the water, etc.

    With the RF all you can do is put a different nozzle (antenna) on the hose (access point) and adjust the flow rate (power output). Unfortunatly there are no easy ditches to dig for e-mag waves!

    The above only considers one approach to keeping your neighbors off of your network, which I assume is your end goal really. There are lots of other options that I don't know as much about. Things like WPA and captive portals.

    Hope this hepls some,
    Brett

    1. Re:Controling where the RF goes by wik · · Score: 1

      To push your analogy a bit further, a waveguide is the RF version of a ditch. A length of coax would also probably do.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  8. MM Fiber @ 100Mb/s by jaredmauch · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd follow the use the cheap LinkSys gear (or build something fancy with a Soekris box) but also pick up some old 100M MultiMode(MM) transcievers that have a FE on one side and fiber on the other. Since you've got 5 acres (not that big honestly), i'd stick to wired for everything possible, it will also provide you the best reliability. Use some pvc pipe or conduit to keep it weatherproof outside and you'll be done and have reliable networking that can be upgraded in the future to gigabit and faster as needed.

  9. Get one of these.. by huber · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=61816&item=5768462963&rd=1 we use them to cover the out side of out buildings. coupled with the correct airport they should go a couple of miles line of sight.

  10. AirPort + AirPort Express? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    I would probably put in a master AirPort base station and rim it with AirPort Express units. That has flexibility because you can put the Express units only where they are needed, and they will serve as repeaters for the network. I'm an Apple guy, so I don't know if the Express would serve as repeaters for a non-Apple network. It might be worth a try considering the price difference between the Apple gear and cheaper solutions.

    Also, the problem may be more inside your house than outside. If you have a large house and thick walls, as I do, the AirPort signal may have a lot of difficulty reaching every nook and cranny.

    I think this solution would have the advantage of giving you more control over the signal than a gigantic antenna.

    D

    1. Re:AirPort + AirPort Express? by akpoff · · Score: 1
      I've had good luck using Airport Express units with a Linksys WRT54G as the base station. WDS mode works fine with both the stock WRT54G ROM or with the sveasoft ROM. You can also use multiple WRT54Gs in WDS mode if you want to save money over the cost of the Airport units. The most significant advantages the Airport Express WAPs have over the Linksys is USB print sharing and the iTunes Express broadcasting (which REALLY sucks up the bandwidth!).

      The sveasoft ROM also allows you to up the power output of the wireless broadcast quite a bit (I think something like 700%). The WRT54G also has dual antennae that can be replaced with larger ones for better broadcast coverage. Overall the Linksys is a great option with or without the Airport Express units.

  11. long range wireless by mqx · · Score: 1


    This is a non-brainer.

    You should just need long-range 802.11 equipment to link buildings, especially as you probably have line-of-sight, or simply trees. In the latter case, and possibly in the former case as well, you probably want an external and top-of-building antenna. All of these are commodity items, so should be buyable off the shelf.

    For example, most standard 802.11 gear is 18dbm. The long-range gear is 22-23dbm. One PCCARD I looked at quoted an outdoor range at 1200-2300 feet, and that's obviously without any specialised antenna. One specialised antenna I looked at claimed up to 12 miles outdoor!

    Searching for "long range 802.11" in google produces plenty of results to get you started.

    Depending upon the topology, you may need to use differing channels and set up intermediate hops for the fixed network. You may need to allow your roaming clients to use the different channels, so they get best coverage as they move around.

    The work you're about to take on requires a bit more than the usual degree of technical ability and competence: you should you have easily been able to find and research long-range 802.11 equipment.

    1. Re:long range wireless by chuckra · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's all in the antenna. Try the TurboWave stuff - I've seen miraculous results - they're circularly polarized.

  12. Wow, is this a first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dupe in Ask Slashdot? I'm impressed, they've reached new lows. I'm glad my subscription dollars are well spent.

  13. 802.11g and WDS by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    WDS seems to be what you want. You just get WDS-compatible access points (Apple comes to mind, but there are others that escape me) and sets you up to use the Wireless Distribution System.

    1. Re:802.11g and WDS by TsEA · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've currently set up a network in my neighbourhood with 4 other houses, distances of about 50-100m (I'm only capable of using the metric system), with walls and such, and have succeeded quite easily using WRT54G's in every apartment, using a custom firmware (sveasoft) with both WDS capability, and ability to alter the transmission power (I have doubled it to about 50mw), and this works like a charm with speeds varying from 1 - 2Mbs. The whole thing is rather cheap (~70$ for each WRT54G) and works like a charm for 8 months now, and with WDS you can build a grid of access points...

      --
      ---- Fear the mighty TsEA
  14. Pre-N by pg133 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to check out some of the Pre-N wireless comming on the market.

    Pre-N Wireless Router Model WGM124 NETGEAR's Pre-N Wireless Router is the best performing router based on Airgo True MIMO(TM) available with up to 8x the wireless coverage and speed than standard 802.11g.

    Belkin Wireless Pre-N Router 800% greater coverage than standard 802.11g - Belkin Pre-N provides the industry's best wireless coverage, extending your range with improved reliability and fewer drops.

  15. some thoughts by max+born · · Score: 2, Informative

    The FCC limits 802.11 power so buying expensive access points isn't going increase your range.

    soekris boards, if you can afford them, have the advantage of "power over ethernet" and no moving parts, plus they fit nicely into a weather proof boxes so can be mounted high up. If you don't need these advantages any old sub $50 access points should work.

    If you're really on a budget you can build your own.

    Mostly, it's all about the antennas. In some experimetns I've read about, directional antennas have enabled signals to broadcast and receive across several kilometers (line of site). Check out these guys to see what's available as far as antennas go.

    Also, sign up for the bay area wireless mailing list while you're building this. This is one of the better lists I've been on. There are some people that really know their stuff and you'll get lots of help and advice.

    Hope that helps.

    1. Re:some thoughts by WonderSnatch · · Score: 1

      The FCC limits 802.11 power so buying expensive access points isn't going increase your range.

      Power isn't the only thing money can buy. It can also buy a receiver with better sensitivity which translates into being able to close a radio link with a weaker signal.

      Mostly, it's all about the antennas. In some experimetns I've read about, directional antennas have enabled signals to broadcast and receive across several kilometers (line of site). Check out these guys to see what's available as far as antennas go.

      Related to this the FCC regulates EIPR. Effective Isotropic Radiated Power. Using a more directional antenna will increase your EIRP, so that's not really a legal answer. See FCC Title 47, Part 15.247. This does (perhaps incorrectly) assume you live in the US.

    2. Re:some thoughts by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      The FCC limits 802.11 power, but what are the regulations in other countries? When I installed my 802.11g hardware, it asked me what country I was in and threatened a severe penalty if I lied. Of course, this just means it must be hiding the GOOD STUFF. Can I increase the signal power or range of my 802.11g hardware by choosing a less regulated country??

    3. Re:some thoughts by ronin78 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the antenna information and especially for the mailing list. I'll need all the advice I can get!

    4. Re:some thoughts by chris234 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, the US has the most liberal rules as to allowable power in the ISM bands that 802.11b/g uses. Most equipment, even the "high-power" devices, don't come close to the limit, 1 watt.

  16. You just need some ethernet cable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eom

  17. OT:Five Acre Farm? by jdray · · Score: 4, Informative

    While five acres is small by almost any standard for a farm, a lot of a farm's productivity has to do with where it's located. Having grown up in the (very fertile) Willamette Valley in Oregon, I can tell you that a five acre "gentleman's farm" can be productive enough to generate a meager income if managed right, and certainly is large enough for sustinence living. Three acres in alfalfa (hay), an acre for small livestock (goats, chickens, sheep, pigs, etc.), half an acre in vegetable garden, and the remaining half an acre for living space and outbuidings is a good model for income (mostly on hay, eggs and vegetables). Carve another two acres out of the hay field for more garden and/or livestock area, and you've got a sustinence farm that will support two or three families quite well.

    OTOH, five acres in the Eastern Oregon high desert makes for a good barrier between you and your neighbors and not much else.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
    1. Re:OT:Five Acre Farm? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Having grown up in the (very fertile) Willamette Valley in Oregon

      And as a typical Willamette Valley resident, are still quite ignorant about what the Eastern Oregon high desert is like, as evidenced by statements like this:

      OTOH, five acres in the Eastern Oregon high desert makes for a good barrier between you and your neighbors and not much else.

      Apparently you have never heard of irrigation. You see, I grew up on a small-acreage "farm" in Central Oregon (another peeve, we differentiate into more than just "Eastern Oregon" over here), just outside of Redmond, and we've have plenty of water for plants an animals, including these "garden" things that you Valley folks think are unique to your area.

      What we don't have is mold, craploads of allergens, tree-sitters (an advantage to not having trees), and constant rainfall in the winter. All of which I never liked in the first place, and since I've attended the University of Oregon, have learned to *really* dislike.

      Now, back to the topic at hand. If you want to set up a wireless network, assumming the property is somewhat rectangular, you can make use of standard (read: cheap) wireless equipment. Make sure you get dual-antenna access points that can transmit on both antennas. Set up the network like this:

      ..Zone A..|..Zone B..|..Zone C..
      ...AP(4)..|...AP(1)..|...AP(7)..
      Link(->11)| ..AP(11).|Link(1<-).

      Note, I had damn good ASCII art going on before the lameness filter made me have to ditch it.

      So, client machines connect to AP on channel 4 in zone A, either 1 or 11 (maybe disallow most client connections on one of the two) on B, and 7 in zone C. Linking nodes in A and C would probably be a cantenna or other hooked up to a wireless bridge. Set up your router anywhere, but B is probably a good choice. Note that you can move things around, and extend this setup to cover more area.

      This setup has the advantage of maximum channel separation between each zone assuming there is fair coverage overlap. (It is also generally safe to use channels 1, 4, 7, and 11 without much degradation in overlap areas.)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  18. No wire, use fiber by bluGill · · Score: 1

    You don't want to mess with cables between buildings unless you are an electrical engineer qualified to deal with ground issues. This is much harder than you would think. Most network gear is not designed to handle this and will fry your computers. However it may work for a long time before trouble happens.

    There are some wired networks that can handle it, but CAT-5 is not one. The length limits on CAT-5 is enough that your network may not work between buildings anyway.

    There is any easy solution: glass fiber. You can get stuff on ebay cheap enough, and you won't have to worry, you know it will work.

    1. Re:No wire, use fiber by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That small of a property probably only has one main feed with any electrical wired outbuildings using subpanels fed from the main panel. The short of a distance is unlikely to have ground loops that will "fry any equipment", any more than running a wire from the basement to the third floor would.

      That said, fiber would be preferable, so long as the person installing the terminations knows what he's doing. That stuff's a pain.

    2. Re:No wire, use fiber by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Granted one feed is likely (though I have seen out buildings with separate feeds), but even still ground issues are not trivial.

    3. Re:No wire, use fiber by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      ethernet is balanced signal, with optoisolators on either end. Grounding is not an issue unless you're a dork and use STP. No issues.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    4. Re:No wire, use fiber by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, do you really believe that they would put a $.30 optoisolater on a $4 ethernet card?

      Thick ethernet (10base5) was designed for this situation. Thinnet (10base2), and 10BaseT was not. Nothing faster was either.

      Use wireless, or glass fiber. It isn't that much more, and it eliminates worries.

  19. Homebrew by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    Got any old digital TV dishes laying around? Some old soup cans? Sounds like some directional antennas are what you need for the point to point links.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  20. better antenna or multiple base stations by Polo · · Score: 1

    Many wireless access points allow you to connect an external
    antenna. This is the first thing to try.

    You may also be able to have wireless access points repeat to each other.

    Here's an article that clearly describes how to do this with apple airports:

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107 454

    (note that these work with PC's and macs)

  21. Point-to-point or blanket? by WarPresident · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "My father just bought a five-acre farm with multiple buildings. I am looking for a way to set up a WLAN that covers the entire property.

    Do you mean just around the buildings, or everywhere on the property? If it's the latter, use a handful of cheap WAPs and high tech Pringles can antennae on the out-buildings, pointed at the external antenna on the home.

    Do Slashdot readers know how to provide wireless access for more than one house without blanketing the entire neighborhood (hopefully for a reasonable price)? Are there single, high-powered routers that will do the job?"

    People are going to be able to snoop your RF communications if they want to. If you're worried about that, bury copper or fiber to the buildings. Otherwise, could I perhaps interest you in experimenting with laser communications? On the cheap? Now where did I stash those Laser Tag toys...

    --
    Here come da fudge!
  22. +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tis a shame that few people get the joke.

    1. Re:+1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tis a shame that few people get the joke.

      I think the ones that do are all sleeping off their last joint.

  23. Wi-Fi repeaters? by kansei · · Score: 1
    D-Link seems to have just the thing - the DWL-800AP+. They're Wi-Fi repeaters that talk to your main access point and extend range. They claim these will extend your range up to1,312 feet outdoors and up to 328 indoors.

    http://www.dlink.com/products/resource.asp?pid=18& rid=76&sec=0

    1. Re:Wi-Fi repeaters? by ronin78 · · Score: 1

      This sounds interesting. Where would I place it, and what particular advantages it would have over an antenna?

    2. Re:Wi-Fi repeaters? by kansei · · Score: 1
      Scenario 1: Building A has an access point and an external antenna.

      The further you move from building A, the less signal you have. Unless you have an external antenna for your laptop, you may not be able to connect if you go too far away.

      Scenario 2:

      Building A has an access point and an external antenna.

      Building B has a repeater and an external antenna.

      You now have Wi-Fi in both buildings and all points in between. The advantage over Scenario 1 is that you have a better signal if you go from building A to building B and then beyond building B. With the Scenario 1, you would not have signal behind building B. You can also install more repaters for better coverage in other buildings.

  24. Some Random thoughts and Solutions... by RedLeg · · Score: 1

    First, this is do-able.

    Second, What's the budget and what are the uses of this wireless LAN?

    - Budget directly influences what you CAN do, and how easily.

    - Purpose should drive the design.

    Specifically, if you are on the cheap, then the number and price of the APs, the infrastructure (interconnect, authentication servers, other....) are an issue

    The intended use is also critical. Do you intend to open this WLAN to the world, or do you want to keep it private?

    As others have mentioned, the Linksys WRT54G series is cheap, capable, and extendible, both in erms of firmware (to modify and extend the capability and security), hardware (external higher gain and/or directional antennas), enclosures (for outdoor deployment) and community, i.e. lotsa hax0rs are doing neat things with them.

    Now, as far as range, I personally know of a major chain of truckstops in the US providing wireless hotspots. Their standard (doesn't work in every case) deployment is a single (high dollar, from a large router vendor) AP with a properly positioned (read, up in the air on a pole, with Line of Sight to all potential clients) external antenna. This typically covers the parking lot of the whole truckstop, which is significantly larger than the area you're discussing. I can't think of any reason you couldn't do the same with a WRT54G and the right (non linksys) firmware and antenna(s).

    If you can't get sufficient coverage with one AP, if it's a WRT54G, grab the appropriate 3d party firmware (there are several to choose from), read up on either MESH or WDS and buy another one or two WRT54's to link together without stringing cables between buildings..

    It will wither work for you or not. If not, you haven't pissed away a lot on hardware.

    On the security front, do yourself a favor, and make sure everything you deploy is capable of supporting WPAII (the marketing name for IEEE 802.11i). You want AES (CCMP) as your cypher and IEEE 802.1X authentication back to an authentication server, but you may not be able to get there (software and driver wise) for a few months yet. Make sure any hardware you buy is capable. Authentication Server usually means RADIUS, and you can slay this dragon with MS IAS (if you have a windows server), or any of several free RADIUS servers on unix or winderz.

    If you run TKIP or CCMP with preshared keys (WPA personal, or passphrase authentication), choose your passphrase carefully, lest you be subject to an off-line dictionary attack on the passphrase.

    I hope this helps.....

    Red

    1. Re:Some Random thoughts and Solutions... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I'm partial to just assuming that the wireless network is unsafe, and setting up VPN connections to get to anything outside of the wireless. I trust several of the VPN technologies "enough", wheras I just don't trust anything wireless. The earlier post mentioning "captive portals" is right on, IMHO.

  25. Some Ideas for You... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm working on building experimental WiFi setups for long range. Since this is rural (read: mountians) area, I'm going to attempt 30+ mile shots on 802.11b.

    I last test (using a Linksys WAP11 at base camp) and a full desktop computer with a Linksys WMP11 PCI card hit 12.7miles. Top of a local mountian to the roof a building (let me stress, this was line of sight!).

    Of course this is not stock antennas of course, the rubber duckys sure is not going to hit any range. But I find Hyperlink Antennas are sweet. (www.hyperlinktech.com). I'm using the 8 degree beam parabolic grid antennas @ 24dBi gain. And these things are long range. But may i stress that these are highly directional for point to point.

    For your setup, I'd recommend setting up access points in all teh buildings and using the directonal papabolic gird or yagi's (Hyperlink has a very small and cheap backfire antenna i like too, $35 bucks.). The Linksys WAP11 (40 bucks at walmart) has ports for 2 antennas... Use one for the directional and one for a small omni antenna for each building and surrounding area. For your man Acess point use a wider beam parabolic or a the professional Omni antenna to connect to the building's Parabolics.

    This is serously do it yourself... but will end up about 500 bucks total. (Theres no need for the massive antennas here, the smaller, 35 buck parabolics are good for you in this application.). But you might get stuck on the one professional omni (around 60 bucks). After that the WAP11 are online or at staples, walmart, bets buy, etc... pretty cheap.

    Good Luck
    Digital-Madman
    www.digital-madman.com

  26. 800%??? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    if the house is dead center.
    and the land is perfectly round

    if a g router goes 100 ft
    thats 31,400 sq ft of coverage
    800% greater coverage is
    251'200 sq ft
    but that's only a point 282 from the house,
    or 2.82 times as far away as the G...

    (it's 5am, if my math is wrong, apologies to Mr. Nambu in LA-this fault is mine, not his)

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  27. something to check out by cwraig · · Score: 1

    this guy specialises in this in aust ive used him before he really knows his stuff http://www.freenet-antennas.com/ he uses 802.11 standards over longer range then your average d-link or netgear AP

  28. sans blanket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If for some reason you really want to keep your signals, for the most part, on the property, you could add some reflectors behind the antennas of whatever radios you end up using. They'll get you some increase in strength on the property and really cut down on 'escapee' radiation.

    If you did high school physics and remember raytracing and interference from the optics portion, you can easily design your own reflectors.
    If not, use your favorite search engine to find the hyperphysics book at gsu.edu I forget the exact link.

    Another option for keeping the signal on te property requires wire in the form of a 'leaky line' antenna. This is a transmission line that is designed to leak some portion of the applied power/unit of length. Some research will get you the design parameters.

    Here, I just run a wide open AP. Karmic balance sought as I make use of any opens I find when away from home.

  29. Thanks! Some ideas and clarification. by ronin78 · · Score: 1
    Thanks to everyone, and please forgive any of my ignorance in these matters. The experience I have so far with wireless is a single Linksys router to serve a two-story house.

    The favorite suggestions seem to be either 1) using a (roof-mounted, I assume) medium strength omni-directional antenna to boost the router signal (we currently have a WRT54G, but are open to upgrading) or 2) linking access points using WDS. To clarify, we want to blanket the entire property, including the outdoors. For those who asked, my father is a beginner roboticist, and we want a system that will let him take his creations for walks anywhere on the property using the network.

    The main house is close to the center of the property, so we think the single antenna has promise both for functionality and cost. This is the solution we will try first, as it seems to have worked for Fished, and RedLeg also suggests that this is feasible. The only problem we may have is with line of sight: we certainly want every part of the outer buildings to be covered, and these are full-sized houses with thick walls. I will look into, and would be interested in more input about, the likelihood that we can use AirPort for adequate indoor coverage.

    If we decide to use WDS, it seems that we would either have to get enough penetration into the buildings to hit a WAP or AirPort device (quite possible); or have a small antennae for each WAP, which would also boost the signal to the area around the houses (although we may not need it because of the central antenna). We could use the reflectors suggested by sans blanket to contain the signal if necessary.

    Does any of this sound reasonable? It certainly seems cost-effective and relatively painless (barring any unforeseen incidents regarding me and the ladder). Thank you to everyone for your valuable input, and in advance if you can make additional recommendations!

  30. Re:Thanks! Some ideas and clarification. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    Is there any chance you could put a rough map of the property and building online somewhere? People can probably give you a better idea of some strategies to use if they know the shape of the property, where the buildings are, etc. Also, if you can, diagram any terrain issues (hills, ravines, etc).

    Also -- are you adverse to running some cabling outdoors if necessary?

    The buildings are probably your first priority, particularily the main house. This is because you really have two main obstacles to your wireless range: walls inside the buildings, and overall distance.

    The best way to deal with the walls is by giving each building in which you know you'll need acccess its own access point. Personally, for this sort of use I'm also a fan of Apple's Airport Express, as it's a small box which plugs directly into the wall (think of it as a slim wall wart). It's small, out of the way, with no power cables or wall mounting to worry about. How you connect these to your main network depends on the distance from the main house: if they're close enough that you can get a wireless signal from the house, go with WDS and use them as wireless repeaters (with the added benefit that, if you find you need to, you can just unplug one and take it with you to a different location, plug it in and continue using it). Or if a wireless signal isn't feasible (some back-lot shed), run cabling to it to extend your signal. As an added benefit, if you use an Airport Express in either of these manners, you can plug a stereo system into them to permit you to broadcast iTunes playlists to any location you want to.

    A good powered access point with an external, roof-mounted antenna is probably best for the house -- but again, a lot of this really depends on how the property is set up, which is why a map, even a rough one, is helpful in such situations.

    Without a map, as very generic advice, go for a distributed set-up that uses a mix of wired and wireless (WDS) connectivity to your main router.

    Yaz.

  31. Senao look really good by new500 · · Score: 1

    Thanks, BilliamBlake, for the tip!

    This http://www.senao.com.sg/Products2.asp?EID=133

    ( SL-3054CB3 Plus Deluxe - 802.11g Client Bridge and Access Point with WDS capability

    * Wi-Fi Compliant to 802.11b and g (in AP mode)

    * 4 functions in 1 box: Access Point, Bridge, Client Bridge and Repeater

    * Supports both modes, Bridge and Access Point simultaneously with WDS (Repeater Mode)

    * Up to 54Mbps data transmission

    * DHCP Server/Client (in AP mode)

    * Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA)

    * Support Power-Over-Ethernet

    with a few of these

    http://www.senao.com.sg/Products2.asp?EID=132

    ( SL-5354AP Aries - Dualband Wireless Hotspot Access Point (Enterprise version)

    * Wi-Fi compliant to 802.11a,b and g

    * 3-way bridging for 802.4 and 802.11a/g networks

    * Supports up to 108Mbps data tarnsmission (in 802.11a and Turbo mode)

    * Up to 152-bit data Encryption

    * Supports Power-Over-Ethernet

    * Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA)

    * Supports DFS and TPC

    sounds like the ticket for a job i'm looking at as well.

    sorry if this post comes across like a plug, though it isn't but those are feature sets i don't see in many high end AP products from more recognisable names, so i thought to post it here for those who skimmed over the names, or who tried first to google for and couldn't find (as i couldn't, not quickly anyhow) a page detailing Engenious products.

    Cheers!

  32. Just use a CanTenna!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build one here: http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.ht ml

    Or buy one there: http://www.cantenna.com/

  33. Before you spend any money on an external antenna by Sad+Loser · · Score: 1


    At least look at these ideas
    wifi-base's cheap antennae

    I have a large old house with more than 5 acres and by putting the WRT54G reasonably high up with a 12dB parabolic reflector made from a dried milk carton (same foil lined cardboard as pringles cans, but bigger) I can easily get a good signal everywhere, and no dicking around with expensive baby coax cables.

    --
    Humorous signatures are over-rated.