Slashdot Mirror


Serenity Trailer Out Tuesday

SiliconEntity writes "Joss Whedon's movie Serenity, based on his much-loved but short-lived TV series Firefly, will have an official trailer out on Tuesday, according to an announcement from Joss: 'EXCLUSIVELY on Apple movie trailers (and linked through this site as well of course) will be a small, medium, large or FULLSCREEN trailer for Serenity the major motion movie. Yeah, THE trailer. And the following Friday said trailer hits theaters. Which theaters? Until I get confirmation you'll have to guess, but I'm betting you can.'"

18 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sorry by RalphSouth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Firefly was the best scifi series on tv since Babylon 5. Fox canned it to concentrate on reality shows... Great characters, great stories, and a cool blend of cowboy and tech.

  2. Movies a better medium for Joss now? by CCelebornn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He created Buffy then its spinoff Angel: both doing well, especially the former. Now every TV exec will be expecting him to produce shows that pull in the kind of audiences the likes of Buffy did. Firefly was a victim of that: here at least, the first few episodes didn't bring in the ratings, so the rest of the series got put together in a muddled order and just wasn't given a chance. After being burned by this experience, at least with a movie he gets to write a script and a story that WILL get shown in its entirety.

    1. Re:Movies a better medium for Joss now? by carlhirsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say comics are a better medium for Joss. I mean, have you read Astonishing X-men?

      --
      . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    2. Re:Movies a better medium for Joss now? by NOLAChief · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Firefly didn't pull the same audiences as buffy for 4 major reasons, none of them having to do with the skill of Joss Whedon: 1. the Friday night timeslot it was put in virtually guarantees a lack of audience to begin with. Granted there are some examples of shows that survived such slots (like X-Files), but coupled with: 2. the intense lack of promotion that Fox gave the show, 3. the fact that they began airing and promptly preempting it for the MLB playoffs, and 4. the fact they decided to show it out of order, FOX pretty much made sure it was DOA. The first I'd ever heard of the show anywhere was here on /. I watched the first episode and liked it, though, try as I might I couldn't always catch it because it was a crapshoot as to whether it was on (I missed "Jaynestown" the first time around that way.)

      For what I think he has in mind for the story of Firefly, he won't be able to tell it properly in a movie or even a handful of movies. IIRC, he's said himself that he hopes the movie will cause some (non-FOX) exec to realize, "Hey, this will make a good TV show."

  3. EXCLUSIVELY by saboola · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's EXCLUSIVELY in FULLSCREEN this SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY. THE trailer. Get your tickets now.... TO THE MAX, EXTREME!

    1. Re:EXCLUSIVELY by CrackedButter · · Score: 4, Funny


      "You'll pay for a whole seat but only use the edge"!
      Thats what I remember from the advert which I pissed my pants over when watching the Simpons and that was the words to hype up a show for Truckasorous or something.

  4. Space Western by Torgen · · Score: 4, Informative

    The short (and not very detailed) explanation is a "Space Western." But that's not doing the series justice. Like so many other innovative series, Firefly was sandbagged by network execs that have the same level of comprehension as Paris Hilton. They nixed the pilot that explained who everyone was and set up the situation, so everyone was confused as hell. The suits then used that as justification to kill the series in favor of Queen Latifah's latest vehicle, or whatever. Google for it, and you'll find plenty of info.

    1. Re:Space Western by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firefly was a western set in, what, the future? I mean they used revolvers, had train robberies and all of the characters were predictable and pedestrian. I mean, c'mon - the ship's preacher is named Shepherd Book?

      Right. Just like now in our modern times no one uses horses, or swords, or lives in farming communities.

      Read up on the anachronisms of the present day (Mongolia, The Amazon, etc.) and you won't be surprised if guns are still a cheap way of killing in the future. The modernized alliance forces (and rich people) had futuristic laser guns and non-lethal stun guns. Just like...forever, people with nothing get by with what's cheap or available.

  5. I doubt it. by eddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really doubt it, I do.

    Joss likes to tell stories about people, and the interesting thing is people who change. I've never found movies to be the best medium for that. There's just not enough time to get the audience to bond with the character at A and experience the complete transistion to B. I like series where it sort of starts out slow and change come creeping up on you.

    I loved it in Angel how Wesley moved from being this uptight unintentionally (from his PoV) funny character, to a dark and gruesome killer, ready to do whatever it takes -- pretty much apexing with him taking an axe to the body of his former lover.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  6. Caution: Trailer has SPOILERS by Exp315 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Joss also warned in that post that the trailer has major spoilers for Firefly fans who are familiar with the TV series and would prefer to see the movie unspoiled. For what it's worth, Firefly is one of the better SF series ever made. For one thing, spaceships don't make whooshing or rumbling sounds - scenes in space are completely silent. :-)

  7. Re:Sorry by eddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, you really didn't get what it was all about, did you?

    One of the points of the Firefly universe, if I may be so bold, was that things wouldn't be too different from what they are here and now! There's still good and evil, there are still hierarchies, things are dirty, messy... and the old motivator of wealth is still driving people on...

    And as always with Joss, it's about people. So yes, if your only reason to watch a show is to experience hi-tech gadgets, then Firefly isn't for you. It never was.

    If you're going to evaluate something, at least do it in it's proper genre.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  8. Say it together now by rechelon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shiny!

  9. Artsy-fartsy losers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't see him produce a tv-series though. Kinda "lose by default" on that one.

  10. Re:Can't wait for the movie... by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or know criminal psychopaths by name. Or can identity guns used by analyzing their burn patterns. Or know a lot about a lot of shady things.

    You know that Book was probably a made-up on the spot name right? When Kaylee asks him his name he looks at the book in his hand and says, "Book...yes, my name is Book." Kind of odd. He's probably someone in law enforcement, except that I don't think even cops get that kind of treatment. So my favorite theory is that he's an alliance general (or high military), specifically one that orchestrated the battle for Serenity Valley. After the war he checked into the Abbey to start a life of peace. Then got to feeling that he needed to make some kind of amends. At the spaceport on Persephone he was looking at the ships, but he was searching for Serenity.

  11. Re:Can't wait for the movie... by jmelloy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the commentary for Objects in Space, Joss Whedon comments that the bounty hunter takes people out in the most efficient way possible for their characters. (Something he didn't realize until his wife pointed it out.)

    So
    He beats up Mal.
    He threatens to rape Kaylee.
    He uses logic on Simon.

    And the clincher ...

    He comes at Book from behind, when Book is distracted, and knocks him out as fast as possible. He also comments, "That's no Shepherd."

    Answer your question?

  12. Re:Sorry by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People use what's cheap and does the job. Did the four wheeler hinder them? Guns kill people and don't require expensive batteries and care like laser guns did in the show.

    I keep saying this, but read about people living in Mongolia or the Amazon. In our age of cars they still horses to pull things? In our age of construction equipment they still build houses by hand? They still use machetes to clear brush?

    There are people that live long and happy lives (even in the US or other modern countries) without ever personally using a computer. On a present day tv show do you complain that some people still do their taxes on paper?

    I guess people like to hope that in the future we will all be in the future. Sorry, as a species we will never all be at the same technological level. Print out that prediction and read it every fifty years, it will always be true.

  13. Re:Complaint about the writeup by magarity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've heard that Firefly is the Sci-fi fan's latest wet dream

    Yes, because it is:
    1. Black box. There is no rambling techno-babble. Fixing the ship in Firefly is no more technical than Han Solo wrestling with some kind of wrench in a bundle of wires while telling Chewie to put "that one here, that one there."
    2. Same goes for driving the ship, how the ship gets from one solar system to another in a reasonable time frame, how one model ship goes faster than another, etc. The pilot just pushes on the controls and the characters just walk down the loading ramp on a new planet in the next scene. Sometimes the Captain worries about affording enough the (apropriately generic named) "fuel".
    3. Good sci-fi is not about techno-babble in repairing the ship or moving the characters from one place to another. Good sci-fi is about human society in new situations. What other genres offers more variety of places in which to imagine humans trying to get along than sci-fi since the entire galaxy (universe) can be used? It's when sci-fi focuses on the people that it becomes excellent. There are no aliens, no bumpy forehead people, bored omnipotent beings, etc, etc in Firefly. Good sci-fi doesn't need those things, if done properly. And Firefly is exceptionally well written in that regard.

  14. Re:Can't wait for the movie... by NOLAChief · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That's pretty much what I was thinking. He either commanded the Alliance forces at Serenity Valley or was involved in action immediately after. Maybe he ran a prison camp. That might make an interesting connection to Mal and Zoe. We know they were ordered to "lay down arms." What we don't know is if they were captured and treated as prisoners of war or as "enemy combatants." If Book's a war criminal who found God, well, that could be an interesting day when Mal and Zoe find out.

    Good eyes, BTW. I did not pick up on him looking at the book. Here's one for you to look for. In "Trash" when Kaylee's reprogramming the garbage drone, the screen looks like it's displaying a Windows 9x install with a wizard open. Coincidence? Cost savings? Or is Joss a Linux/Mac geek? I can see their slogan in 500 years. "Windows...It Just Works...As A Garbage Disposal."