Slashdot Mirror
World Intellectual Property Day
Dotnaught writes "The Business Software Alliance wants everyone to know that today is World Intellectual Property Day, 'an initiative to educate young people about how intellectual property rights foster innovation, creativity and economic opportunity.' To mark the occasion, CopyNight, a monthly gathering of people interested in restoring balance in copyright law, is hosting a get-together tonight in various cities throughout the U.S."
Hmmm....
WIPD (whipped).
Sounds about right.
Not even subtle.
Oh well.
Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
It was just recently reported that 6 of those cities events were cancelled by an injunction filed by national porn chain, Copy Night.
** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
So, who wants to be the first to give us a list of all those wonderful inventions that would have never been invented if it wasn't for the copyright law?
CopyNight, a monthly gathering of people interested in restoring balance in copyright law, is hosting a get-together tonight in various cities throughout the U.S.
Cool! Does that get-together include a CD/DVD swap session?
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
has anyone here seen the online ads where they ask if you want to get back your old employer by reporting them to the BSA?
This guy is way out there
Software, particularly OSS, is very different. Much of the value in software is derived from all the testing etc that is done to prove the software and flush out the bugs. I have heard of this being compared to the "stone soup" story. Throw out any (sometimes crappy) software and let people give you feedback. Copyright only protects the interests of the authors - not of those who do all the testing etc. Often the value added by the testers etc is many times the value added by the original authors.
Engineering is the art of compromise.
The BSA.... aren't they the ones that terrorize small businesses and threaten to audit their software licenses? (And without a glimmer of a search warrant, either.)
I Celibrated by downloading some music and a couple movies.
*Cheers*
Amazing! This is almost exactly the opposite of Software Freedom Day!
Strange, I thought "CopyNight" referred to the legendary obscene things people do on the Xerox after returning drunk from the office Xmas party...
...
The far more creative method of human thinking is to express ideas to as many people as possible and have those people alter and improve upon the original. One person sitting in a box alone will come up with boring ideas (unless they are crazy).
Don't mod me up.
By signing up with allofmp3.com. Wish I had done it sooner, it's absolutely fantastic.
Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
World Intellectual Property Day Was My Idea!
Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
Let's celebrate!
There's so much to celebrate.
Laws that allow others to lock their ideas away so no one can use them.
Laws that allow organised price fixing.
Laws that allow people to own ideas that should belong to everyone. Everything down to your own DNA has some form of IP on it.
Rejoice world.
Gimme a break!
These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
WIPD is a protest-magnet, and the CopyNight people have simply used WIPD's big-money marketing of the event against them. It will be interesting to see if WIPD is "quietly" discontinued next year.
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
Can we also have a "jail BSA executive day" as well?
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
32 different companies filed law suites stating that this was infact a violation of something they had patented earlier.
Personally, I would love to see a worldwide Libre (Free) Software Developer Appreciation day. The authors of free software have given all of us so much, that some thanks and recognition would seem to be the least we could do for them.
Notice how they made it DURING EXAMS?
That way, all those free-spirited, pirates will be too busy studying their asses off to give a hoot about it. "intellectual property day". LOL.
You mean all that innovation that comes from 1-Click software patents, the Happy Birthday song, Winnie the Pooh, etc.
If you look at the Constitution, copyright covers: "[o]nly the writings and discoveries of authors and inventors...and then only to the end of promoting science and the useful arts."
Original ideas should not become commodities that are transferred to purchasers and assignees - which is the problem with all the examples above.
We already have a World Cancer Day and a World AIDS day, why shouldn't we have a World Intellectual Property Day too? I'd like to give my support to all the victims of Intellectual Property and I'm sure a lot of other people would too.
We have to recognize, and incorporate into our dialogue, that these concepts are better termed IP conventions; ie, things which are adopted because they are convenient in practice.
Only then will we be able to cogently argue against them when they cease to be convenient for the public as a whole, and decide how to adjust them to maximize their convenience.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. License a man to fish using your technology and you eat for the rest of his life.
Positing that "Proerty is Theft."
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
"We must continue our shared public-private efforts to deter piracy and promote intellectual property rights in every corner of the globe. Our children's ability to learn, create and innovate must be protected now and in the decades ahead."
A classic maneuver; stating two unrelated topics in the same paragraph deceiving lay readers into drawing nonexistent conclusions between them. This is especially prevalent with statistics, where correlations between two data sets are often shown (which do exist), but where any actual connection between the two is purely happenstance. For example: "After using product X for 2 weeks Rob's weight dropped 25 pounds." At first glance Rob's use of product X and his weight seem to be related, but their not. The real reason for his weight drop was he stopped having his hourly burrito during that time period.
- Piracy and children have nothing in common, and this man's an asshole for even implying such a connection exists.
I think you are confusing patent terms and copyright terms.
Patent term in the United States used to be 17 years from the date of issue, now it's 20 years from the date of filing.
Copyright term in the U.S. was originally 14, extendable for another 14. Subsequent developments have lengthened the term to what it is today.
See this website for the history of copyright http://arl.cni.org/info/frn/copy/timeline.html
P.S.: apologies for the very US-centric map which makes Toronto appear not to be on dry land - I'd welcome pointers to any usable (public domain or Creative Commons) maps that include Canada. - David
What a surprise, they don't want to pay for intellectual property either.
Interesting. Please share your definition of "rapid" with the rest of us.
Well I for one intend to celebrate by reposting this ....
A Bitter Protest Against Copyrights
If they said there was no incentive to do good things unless the government could choose your religion ... or they said there is no
incentive to grow food, unless farmers
could rip up your garden ... most people would
see these as the awful values that they are.
But if they say that there is no incentive to
make beneficial or creative works without the
power to restrict what people copy (copyrights),
then all too many people just take it on
faith. They don't even question it, as if
incentive makes rights, as if society would fall
apart without them. But just as much of the
Renaissance happened without copyrights so
should the information age.
Calling copyrights "intellectual property" is intellectually dishonest. The moral and historical foundation of property derives from mutual respect and the fact that not everybody can posses something at the same time. The foundation of copyrights derives from kings who granted publishers monopolies in return for not publishing bad things about the monarchy. Copyrights are about control, censorship, and not a free market property. In fact, they cheapen property rights by treating things that have natural limits in supply such as food, shelter, and medicine like information that does not.
Worse, is how people who copy are slandered with names such as "thief" and "pirate", as if copying was akin to boarding a ship and murdering people. They are even accused of stealing food out of the mouths of starving artists. Yet these verbal assaults hide a cold and calculated lie, the one that says "copyrights benefit creative people". The truth is that for every artist or writer that has made it "big", there are unmentioned thousands whom copyrights haven't helped a bit, hindered, or even destroyed. Some are even barred or sued from sharing their own creations in public, while others die with the world never truly knowing their artistic genius as the mass media drowns them out. Most creators are far better off sharing and distributing their creations freely to make a reputation for themselves. Copyrights not only cause them to be drowned out in a sea of hype, but do so deceptively.
However, these aren't the only problems related to copyrights. They are just a sample of many that are constantly blown off, glossed over, or ignored. Like the failures of Hollywood culture, the failures of big media to offer quality material, the failures of the market to offer competitively priced books for college students while tabloids are dirt cheap, and massive anti-trust behavior in the software industry to name a few. Their hypocritical pleas like, "how will we make money without copyrights?" is like a mobster asking "how will I make money with out victims to extort?"
The burdens of imposing copyrights might have been bearable a quarter century ago when the biggest issue was copy machines. But today in the information age there is no technical distinction between copyright content and free speech content. Information is so easy to copy and manipulate, there can be no "middle ground". Our society must make a choice: Our communications will either have to be monitored or free, our privacy will either have to intruded or protected. Our speech, writing, and free expression will either have to be abridged or unabridged. Any institution that has the power to control one, must have the power to control all. Copyrights are like a vine that will never stop growing to choke off our freedoms until we cut it off at the root!
Consider parallels to other periods of transition like the industrial revolution:
History teaches that during the 1800's there were many people who believed that the entire meaning and purpose of the industrial revolution was to leverage inventions like the cotton gin to expand their plantations for unlimited growth and profit. Ironically just the opposite was
If you buy music from allofmp3.com, none of that money goes to the artists.
That's why you follow up by tipping the artist directly at allofpaypal.com, short-circuiting the vulture-capitalist labels.
Turk - in this instance - is used as a generic term for Musulman or Moslem. This was a common usage from the 14th through 18th centuries. It is not nominative of the Turkish nation-state, arising in the late Ottoman times, nor does it refer to the dominant ethnic population of Anatolia.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
On the surface David, it looks like you're someone who wants their hands on everything for free. If you want to replace this system -or any system of ANYTHING- you're going to have to replace it with something better. Maybe it's true what you say that the copyright system has its roots in evil but that isn't good enough. WHY?! Because man we don't live in the Past. We're in the Here, the Now. My first copyright I was real poor. I wrote a small instructional booklet that I would later market in the National Enquirer Classifieds. My wife & I were separated. Her and my 2 kids lived with her Mom. I talked her out of her share of our income tax return that year to pay a professional printer close to $400.00 to help me in the pre-print re-write and printing of several hundred initial booklets. The first one off his press, WOW, I was really proud of it. And we walked over to the Mall in Richmond VA to get some film for his camera to take pictures of me to use in the marketing as I needed. I was hopeful of getting my family back together on its feet. I showed my booklet to the saleslady. WOW. She liked it so much she asked to show it upstairs, or at least that's what I THOUGHT SHE WAS GOING TO DO. The b^tch took my booklet to the upstairs COPIER and brought it back... Since then I've become an inventor. I've gotten my websites copyrighted mostly, but not for Copyright protection as I realize that is an illusion. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PROTECTION FROM A WIRED SOCIETY. I copyrighted my sites because I released several of my inventions there and I wanted legal Proof of Invention, using my Copyrights as "documentation", what's called a "Record of Invention". And even that didn't save me. Oh, it would IF I had money to hire a lawyer and contest the rip-offs, which I don't because I'M STILL POOR. And my family had the wonderful experience of learning to buy their clothes at the Goodwill Store because I pursued my course. Oh yeah, we also became the buying poor who buy stuff at flea markets and yard sales. Seems to me that your long diatribe there would put the World's creative people in my shoes, living my life, and staying poor. I don't think you're going to be successful selling that LIFE PROSPECT TO ANYONE. But, like I said, if you had a better system where people still got paid, might would work. However, for that to happen you'd have to GET ALL THESE CREATIVE, IDEA-RIDDLED PEOPLE TO AGREE WITH YOU "ACROSS THE BOARD". How are you going to accomplish that?! Do you have ANY IDEA HOW HARD IT IS TO SELL PEOPLE ON ANYTHING?! I fixed an engine that runs on 2 energies (hot/cold energy riding in on two inert elements of steam & liquified air) instead of one (gasoline, diesel, fossil fuel), a non-polluting engine. After 21 Months of telling it freely, word of mouth has refused to kick in, AND THE VERY IDEA OF AN ENGINE THAT DOES NOT POLLUTE IS SO CONTRARY TO WHAT PEOPLE CAN DIG DOWN INTO THEIR SOULS TO ACCEPT THAT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WILL NEVER BE PICKED UP AND BUILT. I can't do it because I'm on disability, never getting paid for my creations (at least not yet eh?). I MAY HAVE JUST AS WELL SLIPPED FROM MY MOM'S WOMB YESTERDAY. But, I'm learning. I have what I imagine to be my last great invention. I combined some aspects from 16 years of inventions to put together an engine that accomplishes an over-gravity force. A "Space Engine" that overcomes Gravity, reaches Earth orbit without needing to hurl people at 18,000 mph for "Escape Velocity"... and once such a craft (yes, I've designed the craft also) gets out far enough to be free of Earth's gravitational field it should go EXTREMELY FAST. Possibly close to Light Speed. But this time I've put a modest price tag to it instead of freely printing it online. After a few months, nothing. Imagine, an engine that could raise a person's car above an earthquake or tsunami, an engine that -attached to each floor of a building- would yield a building that no earthquake could bring down because it would be floating. EACH FLOOR WOULD BE INDEPENDENTLY FLOATING INSIDE A PAPERLIGHT FRAMEWORK, MAKI