Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Migrates Internal Servers to 64-bit

daria42 writes "Microsoft says servers running the company's website and MSN Search and Messenger applications have been migrated to the 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003. 'Our MSN search engine is actually built on several thousand systems running the x64 version of Windows,' a spokesperson said. In addition, 'the entire Microsoft.com site has been migrated, and we serve 30 million unique visitors every day.' According to the company, the Messenger servers handle about 70 million users."

9 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. 64bit is all you need by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You only need to port what's necessary," he said. "If you've got a little graphic interface and it looks real pretty and it's 32-bit, that's fine - it'll run. But when you need the 32-bit addressing, the bigger data space, certainly port that into 64-bit."
    This reminds me of some other famous quotes:

    "There are no significant bugs in our released software that any significant number of users want fixed." Source: Focus Magazine, nr.43, pages 206-212, (October 23, 1995) (http://www.cantrip.org/nobugs.html)
    "Microsoft has had clear competitors in the past. It's a good thing we have museums to document that" Source: Speech at Computer History Museum (http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/01/HNgates talksmuseum_1.html), InfoWorld magazine, October 2001
    "640K ought to be enough for anybody."

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  2. 64-bit hardware? by MadCow42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But are all those systems actually running 64-bit hardware? If not, the announcement is pointless.

    MS: "Yes, our brand new car has a beautiful high-tech hydrogen fuel cell in it!"

    Driver: "But it's a diesel car..."

    MS: "Well... yes.... it's actually just sitting in the back seat for now."

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:64-bit hardware? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, that would be like installing Windows NT on a 286.

  3. Re:from 250 to 25 servers by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny
    What are the "network limits" of linux, BSD, etc BTW?
    What do you want to program them to be today?
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  4. In other news... by Netsensei · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Lamborghini decided to get the engine of their next model be designed by kia

  5. Ha! by leathered · · Score: 4, Funny

    1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms neon.winchester.local [192.168.0.19]

    i now know ur IP adress, prepair 2 b h4x0red!

    i will pwn ur hard drv!

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re:Ha! by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 3, Funny

      he's hiding behind a NAT firewall, get him to turn it off. His real IP address is 127.0.0.1

  6. Re:Itanium! by roarl · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is just a 64bit extention to a 32bit extention to a 16 bit architecture...

    No, actually. It is a 64bit extention to a 32bit extention to a 16bit extention to a 8bit extention to a 4 bit architecture. The Intel 4004 was actually the first one of this family. I guess you are too young to know.

    --
    Welcome to the group of sentient observers that have reflected upon this statement
  7. Re:AMD or INTEL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So MS servers are now less Wintel, more WMD?