Slashdot Mirror
U.S. Rejects Canadian Rejection of DMCA
P Starrson writes "
Slashdot readers may recall that last
month Canadian policy makers rejected the DMCA for Canada.
Not so fast apparently -- the U.S. Trade Representative has released
the annual Section
301 report which each year tells the rest of the world that they
need stronger intellectual property protection. This year Canada is a
particular target -- the U.S. plans to conduct a special review of
Canadian policies and explicitly rejects Canada's rejection of the
DMCA. A good summary on what this means from Canadian law professor Michael Geist."
Is it like moderation and meta-moderation in Slashdot? In the end nothing matters.
Rock that crushes, Paper & Scissors that don't matter.
I reject U.S.'s rejection of Canada's Rejection of DMCA.
...that Canada qualifies as a circumvention device?
Uh oh
I thought we settled States Rights during the civil war, and agreed no state could reject federal law ;)
I want you to assume that all spelling and grammar errors are intentional. Thank You.
Canadian DMCA rejects YOU!
all this rejection is reminding me of high school....
Miss Canada: "Uncle Sam, Don't prod your nose where it don't go. Three times before I tossed you out in the snow. If you keep hacking, you'll get a darned good whacking"
Uncle Sam: "Oooohhhh - I like being whacked! Whack me here, Whack me there. Whack me on the bed, and under the chair. Whack me by whip, Whack me by stick. Whack me in Nam, Whack me in Iruq. Now I'll get whacked from little miss Canuck!
>> The USA can suck my balls
Careful there Anethema. There are 295,734,134 people down there - you'll get a seriously chapped bag.
http://request-header.info
The USA can suck my balls if they want us to adopt the DMCA.
So I take it you reject the U.S. rejection of the Canadian rejection of the DMCA?
You do realize that U.S. IP holders would reject your rejection of the U.S. rejection of the Canadian rejection of the DMCA??
Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
You can reject a rejection? Sweeet! I'll keep this in mind when I some day apply for a job.
Dear Professor Millington,
Thank you for your letter of March 16. After careful consideration, I regret to inform you that I am unable to accept your refusal to offer me an assistant professor position in your department.
This year I have been particularly fortunate in receiving an unusually large number of rejection letters. With such a varied and promising field of candidates it is impossible for me to accept all refusals.
Despite Whitson's outstanding qualifications and previous experience in rejecting applicants, I find that your rejection does not meet my needs at this time. Therefore, I will assume the position of assistant professor in your department this August. I look forward to seeing you then.
Best of luck in rejecting future applicants.
As a Canadian, I'd put forth that we reject the US's rejection of our DMCA rejection.
.
"The USA can suck my balls if they want us to adopt the DMCA."
Well you know what Condeleeza Rice would say to that, don't you?
"Present them", thats what she'd say.
In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
But he only has to worry about chapping from 295,734,133 because I won't be participating.
;) well you could look at it like this , America is unable to handle the girth of Canadian Wood..
*Awaits down moderation for tastelessness*
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
That's freaking brilliant! I MUST try this. The chances of this actually working are much higher than me legitimately landing a good job.
Thank you for the idea, now I'm off to the patent office.
1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
As an American, I support your rejection of our rejection of your rejection.
Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
Shortly after 9-11-2001, Dubya was quoted as saying
"If you aren't with us, you are with the terrorists."
This world view has been applied to the liberal
press and opposition politicians (anthrax letters), as well
as the American people (USA Patriot Act(I)).
The Bush administration equates violations of the
DMCA as "acts of terrorism" as well.
Between trade conflicts over soft wood products and
beef cattle imports, Canada is on the "short list"
to join the "axis of evil". Or to quote a more liberal
Republican president with an accidentally "live"
microphone, "Bombing starts in 15 minutes."
I sincerely hope our neighbors to the north have
"dug in", because I suspect things are going to get
dicey there this summer. (Canada DOES have oil,
after all.)
shhhhh....
it's talk like this that gets other countries bombed, and quite frankly that's not something I want to see happen.