Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Taps Bloggers to Promote Longhorn

Tim writes "With Beta 1 of Longhorn less than two months away, Microsoft is looking at a new marketing tool to help promote its new Windows: bloggers. According to BetaNews, Microsoft's "Team 99" evangelism effort will be composed of bloggers that will become Microsoft's voice to the masses. Robert Scoble said Team 99 was once secret, but has been revived and Microsoft is now accepting nominations. It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

6 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. Shills by teiresias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whoever is part of this "Team 99" will be consider shills and rightly so. There's one thing using the Internet to express your point of view. It's quite another to extol a companies product for their backing.

    If this group was treated as an unbiased reviewers, I'd have more sympathy but as it is, it seems just another corrupted media.

    --
    -Teiresias
  2. Likely? by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

    That's a safe bet - MS could release a patch for XP that cured cancer and they'd still be accused of doing something underhanded. ;)

  3. Re:Free Advertising by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's not free advertising, and it's not opinion.

    It's paid-for advertising maskerading as opinion. It's misleading and unethical, and incredibly stupid of them to admit they're going to do it.

    I, for one, after reading this, wouldn't trust the opinion of anyone who says in their blog that they like Longhorn; who's to say whether they actually used it and thought it was good, or if Microsoft paid them to lie about it?

    All this does is create an environment where you can assume that bad reviews are probably objective, and that good reviews are quite possibly just advertising.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  4. Is this the same Microsoft... by hazee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that just the other day was reported as threatening people who posted screenshots of Longhorn?

    Which is it to be? Do they want it publicised or not?

    No, let me guess; only favourable publicity.

  5. Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "It's nice to see Microsoft recognizing the power of blogs, but the move is likely going to draw accusations that Redmond is trying to buy off bloggers to hype Longhorn."

    Blogging was nice while it lasted. Corporations are quickly going to flood the channel with paid content. If you think the PR machine is powerful in major media, which has lots of people looking for bias, has some regulation, and which does not see $10,000 as any more than pocket change, think what's going to happen to blogs over the next five years.

    Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump? Do you think he would care if the story is true? And if he did, would he have access to the resources to find out if it's true? Suppose news.google.com is running 200 links to other bloggers who didn't take the time to fact check - our honorable Joe Blogpack checks his facts against the tainted stories and even thinks he's doing the right thing.

    1. Re:Time of Death: 10:30 AM EST, 2 May 2005 by faust2097 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Suppose Coca-Cola offered to pay Joe Blogpack $2,500 to do a column talking about a dead rat found in a storage container at a Pepsi bottling facility, how quickly do you think he would jump? Do you think he would care if the story is true? And if he did, would he have access to the resources to find out if it's true? Suppose news.google.com is running 200 links to other bloggers who didn't take the time to fact check - our honorable Joe Blogpack checks his facts against the tainted stories and even thinks he's doing the right thing.

      And this, kids, is the difference between 'reporting' and 'journalism'. We've just had our standards lowered by the willingness of our mainstream media to report anything - rumors, opinions, lightly edited press releases, as "news" and run on to the next hot topic and pray that you don't change the channel during the ads.

      Blogging isn't going to replace journalism because of these exact problems. Blogging might do a lot of harm to the mainstream US news media but it's their own damn fault for abandoning true journalism and resorting to showing the same video clip everyone else has, just 2 minutes earlier and with more sensationalistic or opinionated commentary.

      "The news is just a TV show, get past it" - Dilated Peoples