Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Make Bendable Concrete

karvind writes "PhysOrg is reporting that scientists from University of Michigan have developed a new type of fiber-reinforced bendable concrete. The new concrete looks like regular concrete, but is 500 times more resistant to cracking and 40 percent lighter in weight. Tiny fibers that comprise about 2 percent of the mixture's volume partly account for its performance. Also, the materials in the concrete itself are designed for maximum flexibility. Because of its long life, the Engineered Cement Composites (ECC) are expected to cost less in the long run, as well." Michigan roads must make the perfect test cases for this stuff, and I look forward to their improvement.

15 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. Buildings by antivoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now finally we can see buildings that bend and shift better under harsh weather conditions such as wind and rain.

    The benefits of this extend greatly beyond that as well however.

    It will be intresting to see where this goes...

    1. Re:Buildings by Velk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How do you know that ? The article makes no mention of what the fibres are actually made of, let alone what their temperature response is. And how would they catch on fire if they are inside the concrete ? It would have to crack open to expose them to oxygen before that could happen, presuming that they are even flammable in the first place.

  2. Roads by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Michigan roads must make the perfect test cases for this stuff

    Except that roads crack because water infiltrates under the surface and freezes over. I don't know many material, even 500x stronger concrete, that can withstand the force of expanding freezing water.

    I think the material is more targeted toward seismic-proof constructions.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. concrete submarine by nounderscores · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if this new concrete may enhance the concrete submarine programme for deep submersibles.

    Being in something with a bit more toughness, and better tensile strenght might be more reassuring. A little less like going to sea in an eggshell.

    1. Re:concrete submarine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're misinterpreting the Popular Mechanics article. These are not deep submersibles. The advantage of a concrete submarine, like the advantage of a WWII Liberty ship, is that it is cheap. That's it. Cheap. It doesn't perform better, it doesn't last longer, and if you're a civil engineer, you'd probably laugh at the idea of crawling into one and diving into the deeper depths of the ocean.

      The WWII Liberty ship had a design life of 5 years and a "positive" ROI if it managed to survive its first (outbound) trip to deliver cargo to Europe. The entire vessel could be completed in an average of roughly 60 days. You could build them quickly using forms, you could build a lot of them using cheap materials, and they couldn't be sunk quickly enough to cut off the British from the American industrial complex. Now imagine the concrete submarine. Same principle, different wartime purpose.

      Now the nerdly part. From a materials perspective, you're dead wrong.

      To start with, the nit: Concrete has practically no tensile strength in comparison to steel - reinforced concrete design assumes that all tensile strength is provided by the embedded steel rebar.

      Next, the myth: Concrete has good compressive strength - high strength varieties can have crush pressures exceeding 140 megapascals. Steel has much better compressive strength - high strength varieties can have crush pressures exceeding 2500 megapascals. Steel is stronger, but vastly more expensive. Concrete is weaker, but, literally, dirt cheap. Reinforced concrete is a practical compromise that optimizes economy versus loads for a particular design envelope (notice that modern skyscrapers do not have loads of reinforced concrete incorporated into their design).

      Next, the mechanical nit: unless you've designed a perfect sphere, your concrete submarine will not only have to resist compression. Various parts of the structure will experience "tension" in response to bending moments and shear forces that resist the spreading tendency that will occur in a non-spherical, hollow form subjected to a pressure differential (tension is in quotes because I'm referring to subelements that are being pulled apart, not to the entire cross section as is normally the case). You can mitigate this problem by using pre-stressed concrete, so that the entire structure is under compression, but you will have spent a portion of your compression resistance to eliminate that problem. Steel makes your life much, much easier.

      Finally, the materials problem: Concrete is porous and breaks down in marine environments as the salts attack the calcium hydroxide matrix, dissolving the cohesive minerals, depositing non-cohesive minerals, and splitting the crystalline structure like ice and the Old Man of the Mountain. Concrete is used in marine environments, but it deteriorates comparatively quickly. Now cycle your concrete though tens or hundreds of atmospheres of pressure in a marine environment. Your concrete will deteriorate even more quickly. Coatings will help, but they will have to be inspected frequently because of the frequent depressurization.

      In conclusion, it would be a bad idea. The depth limitations of current deep submersibles are not caused by the pressure hull, but instead by more practical considerations like transport and life support. See http://www.unols.org/committees/dessc/replacement_ HOV/new_hov_brochure.pdf (PDF link).

  4. freezing water by Soulfarmer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the material won't bend/stretch at all, it might shatter, this new elastic concrete supposedly kand bend at least a little, so it could withstand the freezing expanding water. At least I think that the freezing expansion is not enough to stretch the new concrete to it's limits.

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  5. Re:A keyboard? by Punboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be SO much funnier if this were the right time period, if the article had to do with transparent aluminum, and if you had a scottish accent.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  6. concrete trampoline? by wcitech · · Score: 5, Funny

    why? because nobody makes the first jump. (shameless matrix refrence)

  7. Like most of life's problems... by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

    this one can be solved with bending - Bender Bending Rodriguez

  8. Plastic or Elastic Bending? by zeromemory · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article fails to state whether the ductility of the concrete results in elastic (returns to its original shape when load is relieved) or plastic (stays in the shape you bent it) deformation.

    One would hope for the former, since structures made out of this material may look strangely 'bent' over time if it readily undergoes plastic deformation.

    And one last note: is this material going to be more cost-effective than steel?

  9. Re:Remember asbestosis? by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why is this modded up?

    Fiber reinforced materials have been around for years. Carbon and glass fiber reinforced polymers are used in many everyday applications without harm. The problem with asbestos was its crystal structure and cleavage planes, which enabled it to break down into very small (micrometer scale) fibers that were easily inhaled.

    The above comment is about as insightful as saying "Cotton fiber? That seems eerily reminiscent of asbestos, better not wear clothes!" or "AIDS medicine? Wasn't thalidomide also orally available in pill form? Better not give it to pregnant women..."

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

  10. Re:Yes but... by cablepokerface · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...can it withstand the impact of a jet airplane?

    No, but because of it's bendability, it can actually dodge incomming plains.

  11. "the bridge is 40% lighter..." by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    because the concrete is thinner, not because the concrete is lighter. This discerned from RTFA. We poured a pad for a picnic pavilion at the yacht club using concrete that is reinforced with polyethylene fibers. It allowed us to pour a large pad that will not crack without having to use tiebacks. Which brings to mind something I've often wondered about...

    With concrete, when it's pre or post stressed in compression, it's much less likely to crack. Traditionally this is done by tensioning the steel prior to pouring or tensioning cable or rod 'tiebacks' after partial curing. Now this is very nice but... It should be possible to engineer a fiber that will shrink as it ages and bonds well as an aggregate. If the shrink time could be matched up reasonably well with the cure time of the concrete it would simplify many types of construction.

  12. Re:Concrete Roads by RipTides9x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Concrete was the first material that was used in the construction of mass use roadways back in the early days of the automobile as asphalt hadn't been discovered yet. Theres a very good chance that the concrete roads you drive on today were laid back in the 40s and early 50s. But concrete was always expensive to use, and required extensive preperation of the ground in order to pour it. So it was a slow and tedious proces, and not many cities could not afford to have more than one crew going at a time.

    When it was discovered that Asphalt, a by-product of oil refining, could be mixed with a small sized aggregate *gravel* and basically smooshed ontop of any roughly prepared surface to create a roadway, well that was the end of using concrete. Most concrete projects were abandoned overnight and roads started being laid at a fraction of the price and at triple the speed.

    The one caveat is that in Northern Areas it was discovered that asphalt roadways were not holding up as long as their concrete breathern. Many asphalt roads were having to be torn up and replaced every other year due to extensive freeze damage. Many cities went back to using concrete for their roads, until better techniques of preparing the roadbeds were discovered. Which were to compress and smooth the roadbed as much as possible, then lay a barrier layer of aggregate *gravel* on top of that to help with drainage and settling, then to finally slope the finished road from the middle to the edges for increased water run-off.

  13. The look... by skander · · Score: 5, Funny

    World Trade Center made of bendable concrete: 262m $US
    747: 5m $US
    Razor Blade to hijack plane: 2.95 $US

    The look on Osama's face as the plane bounces off the building: priceless.