Morse Code Faster Than SMS

mentalflossboy writes "Engadget is reporting that Morse Code is actually faster than text messaging. According to the article, 93 year old Gordon Hill transmitted a message faster than 13 year old Brittany Devlin, despite Devlin's 'liberal use of texting slang.' And the fabulous quote they were they sending: 'Hey, girlfriend, you can text all your best pals to tell them where you are going and what you are wearing.'"

Comments

Newsflash!

[EnronHaliburton2004]

Newsflash:

Voice is faster then either Text Messaging or Morse Code, it's already included with your phone plan, and it doesn't make you look like an idiot.

Re:Newsflash!

[wahsapa]

NEWSFLASH:

Telepathy faster than speech... however it DOES make you look like an idiot

Re:Newsflash!

[DustyShadow]

- Texting is better when I'm in a situation where I don't want others to know what I'm talking about.

- Texting is better when I need to tell someone something but I don't want to have to have a full conversation with them.

- Since I travel a lot, I love using Google text (46645) when I'm looking for something like a restaraunt in the area

- Texting saves minutes.

Re:Newsflash!

[zeromemory]

it doesn't make you look like an idiot

Newsflash:

Most people would rather have you text than yap loudly on the phone in public places.

Don't get me wrong, voice chat is usually more efficient, but text messaging is a whole lot more discreet. My friends and I use it to schedule study-groups - that way, we can notify someone of a meeting later that day while they're still in class.

Re:Newsflash!

[PsychicX]

In other news, some bratty teenager just got owned by somebody 80 years her elder.

Re:Newsflash!

[soft_guy]

Hmmm. Most bands I've been in had bass players. I'd be interested to see your base player.

All your base are belong to us?

Re:Newsflash!

[Xugumad]

Texting is great for either messages that require no response ("I'll be in the pub from 6, feel free to join me", "It's 's birthday on Friday, thought you might want a reminder", "Arrrghh I hate Mondays/my boss/computers/the weather", etc.), or where a response is not time critical, and likely to be delayed ("Can you tell me ", "Are you free next week sometime"), this sort of thing.

In particular, you don't have to interrupt the other person to get your message across. I may notice a message arriving, and read it at the time, or I may leave it until I'm less busy, or more frequently I'll just not notice for a few hours. On the other hand, if someone calls me, I have to stop what I'm doing, respond to them, then go back to what I'm doing.

Re:Newsflash!

[Unknown Lamer]

Bullshit. I pay $10 a month for unlimited SMS. And I live in the US.

You can get 1000 for $7 from T-Mobile, $9 from Cingular. Verizon charges something like $20 a month for that (disclaimer: it's been a year since I had Verizon so they may have changed the prices now). You really only get screwed on SMS/data if you use Verizon.

And overage is usually $.05 per message ($.10 for Cingular, but incoming is free...so it balances out). That's way less than the $.40 per minute I pay for voice overage. For the same price, I could send eight text messages. You can say a lot in 1280 characters.

Sell me an open phone

[Sloppy]

This is another reason I would like to someday see "open" phones. I always thought it would be great to build protocols on top of the phone system (e.g. if your phone and your friend's phone both have some sort of GPG extension installed, then go ahead and encrypt end-to-end). But this article shows that the possibilities for innovation (if you can call Morse code an innovation ;-) even extend to UIs. If we had open phones, then within a few minutes of this article, some people would add a morse input interface to the text entry part of their phone. And when you think about it, it does seem pretty ridiculous that a handful of companies could possibly come up with whatever UI happens to be the best possible.

Electronics companies, go on making the hardware. But let us screw around with the software. If you remember a little something called "the internet" you'll realize that there are a hell of a lot of good ideas out there (as well as a hell of a lot of really dumb ones, but let's not talk about that).

Well...

[fitten]

I'm a touch typist and what I think just goes to my hands. It's actually harder (and takes longer) for me to type "u" to mean "you" than it does to type "you" because I have to throw my brain into idiot mode and override my normal typing skills to get idiot-speak onto the screen.

I'm sold on this idea !

[Adult film producer]

After I learn morse code I'll have exactly zero friends to morse with, sort of like my current contact list.

Re:I'm sold on this idea !

[jerometremblay]

You could use morse only for input, the phone can easily convert it to text and display it as a normal text message.

It might even be a good idea.

Allow me to be the first to say

[Brento]

-.. ..- .... .-.-.-

(Damn Slashdot's filters. Telling me to use less junk characters. Morse code isn't junk! It's top quality characters!)

Re:ewww

[nxtw]

Every time there's an article related to cell phone technology, trolls like these get modded Insightful. Simple phones still exist, and cell phone companies will continue to try to find more ways to make money. However, that doesn't mean you have to give them more money; most plans are still voice-only. While you may not find some features useful, others will.

Also, text messaging is *extremely* convenient at certain times.

Re:I think the US Navy stopped training

[Kaimelar]

But is Morse proficiency still required for amatuer radio licensing?

For the Technician class license (the lowest one), no. For others (Technician Plus, General, Extra) there are still Morse code tests. Test requirements start at 5 WPM, if memory serves.

More info at http://www.arrl.org/

Damn, now you've got me wanting to order some study materials and upgrade my license, which I've been meaning to do for years . . . plus I could finally use the "use the keyboard LEDs to show data in Morse code" trick.

Dit dit dit Dah dah Dit dit dit

[Guyle]

Has anyone else ever tried to tell someone that the beeping that their Nokia phone makes when they receive a text message is Morse code for SMS? I have yet to meet a single person who's known that. I swear, Morse code is a dying language that will soon go the way of languages such as Latin and Aramaic - famous, scholarly, the old guys like it, but no one else gives a crap.

Not for real men!

[Chemisor]

> Texting is better when I'm in a situation where I
> don't want others to know what I'm talking about.

Real men speak Klingon for this purpose.

> Texting is better when I need to tell someone
> something but I don't want to have to have a full
> conversation with them.

So call them, say it, and hang up. If it's important, they'll call back and use up their minutes.

> I love using Google text (46645) when I'm
> looking for something like a restaraunt

Real men aren't afraid of asking for directions.

> Texting saves minutes.

Sounds like you need to work on your words per minute. Some people speak very slowly at as little as 15 wpm. With a little practice you can work up to 175 wpm. Not only will that save you valuable minutes (although real men buy unlimited calling plans), but it works as an excellent device for winning arguments. Just imagine, being able to say ten words for each one your opponent utters! He'll never be able to come up with a counter argument before you completely devastate him with an astounding verbal barrage and move through seven topics before he gathers enough wits to reply to the first one. If he tries, just sneer and invoke the three-second rule.

Did I mention that women are really impressed by verbal prowess? Typing up these voluminous Slashdot comments is gonna pay off today!

Re:Not for real men!

[Xzzy]

I'm a guy, and I must admit I'm kinda turned on.

rowr.