Slashdot Mirror


Vacuum-Controlled Elevator Developed

Aenox writes "Vacuum Elevators of Florida have released a one-man elevator system that easily slots into buildings. It has gone on sale in the U.S. for around $20,000 and uses only electricity to power vaccum-inducing suction turbines that can lift 204Kg several floors up. They claim it provides a smooth ride but from the video it looks like it could use some oil."

23 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Not too expensive... by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    The elevator costs between $20,000 and £22,000.
    Sweet. My new Prius gets between 812448 RPH and 48 MPG. I think I've saved enough on gas to get one of these...

  2. Vacuum Elevators? by Agret · · Score: 5, Funny

    Futurama here we come!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  3. developed by microsoft? by munehiro · · Score: 1, Funny

    it really sucks :)

    --
    -- "If A equals success, then the formula is A=X+Y+Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut." - Einstein
    1. Re:developed by microsoft? by JRIsidore · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it was developed by Microsoft it would probably not suck. ;)

      --
      :w!q
  4. It's like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the world's largest penis pump. Good grief, I can't believe I just said that.

    1. Re:It's like... by magefile · · Score: 2, Funny

      I swear, it's not mine - that sort of thing just isn't my bag, baby!

  5. The future makes me shiver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Mr. Johnson : WHere are the annual reports, Rick ?
    Rick : I think Richard Harrelson has them.
    Mr. Johnson : Get Richard in here NOW !

    Zoooooooof - plop

  6. Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are only 96 people in the US that it can actually lift....

    oops make that 74, McDonalds are doing an all you can eat special today.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by fbartho · · Score: 2, Funny

      kids are people too. if your mom somehow gave birth to you at >450lbs I'd shoot myself rather than face the monstrosity ;) :)

      --
      Gravity Sucks
  7. Re:For Us Americans... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then it isn't for us Americans, now is it? It may be able to move Brits or Canadians around, but certainly not us.

  8. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure, to prevent the capsule falling.

    This statement is actually correct. In the event of a sudden loss of pressure mechanical arms break some of the passengers limbs and jam them into the sides of the elevator to prevent the elevator from falling, so technically they are mechanical break brakes.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  9. Huh? Wha? by Skudd · · Score: 2, Funny

    An elevator that is sucked up a tube... I can feel my ears popping just thinking about it.

  10. Re:Failsafes by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

    But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate

    Oh shit, that sounds dangerous. I was hoping that it would brake.

  11. Hm... by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Funny

    They claim it provides a smooth ride but from the video it looks like it could use some oil

    Hmm I guess this elevator really sucks then...

    Thanks, I'm here until Wednesday, try the veal!

  12. Re:This technology was first used... by atomm1024 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aha, so there's prior art? Then I guess we won't see them succeed at patenting it, if they try.

    I've heard that many an inventor has been foiled by prior art in fantasy movies. I move that we declare fantasy movies illegal, in order to protect intellectual property. Fantasy/scifi movies are like pirating the future!

    --
    Signature.
  13. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...which is a far bigger problem than one or typographical errors in an article.

    "one or typographical errors"? *sigh*

    Your post proves my point more eloquently than I ever could. Thank you.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  14. well that sounds... by jayloden · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...like it would really suck.

  15. Re:Failsafes by drsquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, whilst in an elevator, which was having an accident. He decided to end the pain by cutting off the electricity to the building, which caused the elevator to immediately plummet to the ground, killing everyone inside, including Otis. He killed some innocent people, but the pain of dying by diptheria is so long and horrible, it was his only option.

  16. Re:For Us Americans... by Xarius · · Score: 2, Funny

    So that's, what? 2 passengers in America?

    --
    C17H21NO4
  17. Re:Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

    It could have been Microsoft powered ... because MS sucks pretty hard.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  18. Re:For Us Americans... by Cadallin · · Score: 3, Funny

    2?! HA! Try one american, bucko, and the pneumatic pumps will be straining the whole lift.

  19. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by fdobbie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does NewScientist.com have editors?

    If this upsets you, why are you reading Slashdot?!

  20. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by kd5ujz · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could store any noisy equipment inside the vacume, and take care of all the noise problems.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.