Slashdot Mirror


Simple, Bare-Bones Motherboards?

basic0 writes "After my Windows box recently lost its life in a puff of awful smelling smoke, I tracked the fault to the motherboard. Now I'm in the market for a replacement board, but all the boards I find seem to be all-in-one models with on-board everything. I already have a good graphics card, NIC, USB audio device, etc. I just need a no-frills motherboard like I used to be able to buy. It seems like a waste to buy a board with all the built-in stuff (and probably pay extra for it) when I'm never going to use it. Has anyone else had similar experiences? Do a lot of people actually use the on-board stuff? Is it still possible to purchase a motherboard that's *just* a motherboard?"

45 of 627 comments (clear)

  1. You'll end up paying more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity.

    1. Re:You'll end up paying more by Trizor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And besides, there are all sorts of advantages to the redundancy the cards you already have will provide. Should something go bad, you'll have a back up, as well as a control set to compare against test results. I'd say get a board with onboard components and maximise yoru use. 2 NICs is especially nice if you find your self in a situation that requires odd network topology and weird on box configurations.

    2. Re:You'll end up paying more by morcego · · Score: 5, Informative

      You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity.

      Actually, it is a correct, if limited, summation.

      When you think on market scale production, one fact is simple: the more you produce, th lower the individual unity cost. That is why, today, a dot-matrix printer is more expensive than a laser one.

      Considering the great majority of motherboards produced are those "on-board" models, and the demand for "clean" boards is small (and getting smaller each passing day), the natural tendency is that the production cost pre unit for a clean board is higher.

      On the other hand, I do like clean boards better. The chances of a failure is reduced, since the number of components is reduced too. That can also lead for a higher durability.

      So, as far as I'm concerned, the "on-board" mobos are cheaper when you buy then, but clean ones tend to be cheaper on the long run. At least for me, since I never throw away a working computer. I just move it to other functions (disk server, firewalls etc).

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:You'll end up paying more by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity."

      I doubt there's much price difference anyway. The reason why mobos have on board lan, for example, is they can add it really cheaply.

      Frankly, I wouldn't want a mobo without the frills. Integrated Nic is nice. On-board sounds means there's a backup. On board video, provided you still have an AGP port, can also be used as a backup. When the machine's retired, it can easily be given to somebody else.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:You'll end up paying more by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      despite the onboard graphics, sound, usb, firewire, NIC, wireless, etc. I still see matrox and 3dlabs selling video cards, creative selling sound cards, 3Com selling NICs, and on, and on, and on...

      fact is, since the hardware side is based on well documented, open standars (PCI, USB, Firewire, ethernet, etc.) and the level of interoperability is high, replacing the onboard stuff by add-on parts is as easy as opening the case and sloting a card or simply pluging in a serial device.

      now, MS Office apps relies heavily on internet explorer to render HTML, even the controll pannel needs IE to work. wipe IE and all it's acompanying DLLs and the system breaks badly.

      show me a way to fully replace IE as the system's defacto HTML renderer by gecko, KHTML or opera in such a way that every aplication that embeds a browser to display hypertext recognizes and accepts the alternatives and i won't mind with MS's bundles.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    5. Re:You'll end up paying more by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is another aspect: Chip sets.
      To have a chipset being accepted by the motherboard manufacturers, it has to come with easy implementable reference designs and with a small board real estate, that is: a minimum of used area for the chips itself and for the connections to other functions. So chip sets tend to integrate as many functions as possible, because thus board manufactures need less additional circuits and wiring to put those functions at the boards. A large portion of the boards in turn are sold to assemblers anyway, which are keen on boards with many functions already builtin, because then they don't need to put additional cards and ports into the boxes they are assembling.
      So for a board manufacturer to get into the assembler business to sell boards he has to offer fully integrated boards, and he will choose fully integrated chipsets to deliver.
      And if he has once designed fully integrated board series, what's the point in designing stripped down versions again? He will use the same chipsets anyway, because he has all the testing equipment in place for those, he reuses the design of the wiring (once the masks for wiring are done, the manufactunging costs are the same, independent of the number of wires), so all he saves are the few cents for the actual sockets and the soldering of the sockets to the boards.
      Basicly a "bare" board then is nothing else than a board without the sockets, but electrically the functions are there. But to manufacture those boards intentionally you need another production process, another QA process, another packaging. It might be cheaper to just sort the boards according to their final testing results and then specify which functions are 'there' (those that work in the tests).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  2. Nah by hardburn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think they're sold anymore, and they're so cheep now that you wouldn't save much, anyway. Just ignore whatever extras come with the board.

    In fact, you just might save a few bucks in the long run by using the on-board stuff, since it may use less power than the equivilent slot-based stuff.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  3. Cheapness by cortana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Motherboards are so cheap nowadays that you may as well buy one and disable all the stuff you're not going to use. I guess it's because they are produced in such numbers, that onboard audio/network chips cost mere pennies. It would probably cost the manufacturer more to sell two products, one without the extras.

  4. all-in-one boards... by l33td00d42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... are cheaper in my experience, since they're geared toward the value market.

    quit yer whining and buy a motherboard.

  5. What you complaining about? by Agret · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I already have a good graphics card, NIC, USB audio device, etc.
    Well you don't want an on-board graphics card. Just ignore that. If you have an on-board NIC you can remove your PCI card and free up a slot. On-board audio is damn good these days. I paid $80 for a gigabyte board with all the on-board shit and I only use on-board NIC & Sound. They aren't very expensive and if you don't like the on-board stuff then don't use it!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:What you complaining about? by LordStraun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I'd love to just get a good-ol' barebones mobo too. The first thing I do when I buy a new one these days is disable _everything_ except for the NIC..

      Stay away from onboard video.. that's just common sense.

      The onboard audio these days is passable, if you're using a sub-$100 set of stereo speakers. But if you're an audiophile like myself with several thousand dollars invested in a nice 7.1 spkr setup, (or heck, even a $300 set of 5.1 speakers) then the onboard audio just doesn't cut it. I thought I'd give a couple boards a try, but their optical/digital outputs were a pain to configure, the sound "configuration" software was a joke, and 'equalizer' functionality only resulted in badly distorted and staticy sound.

      I've yet to encounter a current on-board audio chipset that didn't sound and perform like crap. Even the 4-year old SB I have in my test box sounds better.

      I will admit that compared to past products, the audio on today's boards is much better.. but it still cannot compare to a dedicated expansion card IMNSHO.

      --
      Your Sig Here ($10)
    2. Re:What you complaining about? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true. A decent processor with a codec like Realtek's ALC850 can handle 64 strems in hardware without issues.

      NVIDIA's SoundStorm, for example, is excellent and compares well with discrete solutions.

      VIA's "Vinyl" audio is also quite good.

      There's also an onboard Creative Labs chip that's excellent.

  6. YES by TechnologyX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Awesome story, again! Google gets DNS jacked and we get to help this fucknut find a motherboard, and it will probably be posted 4 more times this week by timothy and CowboyNeal HOORAY OFR /.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:YES by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right, that is a mistake. This isn't a news site, it's a site where entertaining tech-related stories get posted for people to read when they feel like taking a break for a few minutes. People post constantly about how slashdot isn't exactly what they think it should be. If someone posted about SETI, then you'd get a bunch of folks complaining that SETI is not important to them personally and therefore shouldn't be on Slashdot. There's filtering tools if you don't like ask /. stories, and if that's not satisfactory and you really can't deal with scrolling past stories you aren't intersted in then this (and the internet, and the entire un-filterable world) is not for you.

    2. Re:YES by sketerpot · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that's what happened to Google. I tried to search for news that might tell me why Google was down, but then I realized that Google was down. :-(

    3. Re:YES by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      Slashdot is a bit of an old news / duped news / anti-SCO site than a technical support site.

      What, Slashdot stopped being an anti-Microsoft site? When did that happen? I didn't get the memo! I'm not getting my memos!

      --
      John
  7. Finally... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 5, Funny
    After my Windows box recently lost its life...


    Thank god... one less Windows user out there now. I am sorry to inform you that they no longer make motherboards for Windows as you might as well install Linux or buy a Mac...
    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  8. Insignificant Cost Savings. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't imagine how much you think you would save with motherboards that support all this stuff going for $65.

  9. Its in the chipset anyway by atrus · · Score: 4, Informative
    Unless you go to server boards, the answer is no. The reason? Everything is integrated into the chipset. Once designed, it costs an insignificant amount more to build that way. All you have to do is add the right headers to the end of the board.

    Even in server boards, things still get integrated. Different sets of things (SCSI controllers, low-end video hardware). Reasons? It frees up slots (big +++ in 1U 2U rackmount land), and at the same time drops cost (may be hard to believe, but in the log run it does).

  10. Welcome to 1999 by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Its *VERY* cheap to integrate this stuff onto the motherboards. All of those functions are handled by one or two chips which probably costs on the order of 5 - 10$.

    Onboard video is usually pretty terrible (unless you're buying an nForce board), and if you are an audiophile like me, you'll want the 500$ sound card with the 120db DNR:) But in reality, it almost doesn't matter who made your NIC, your USB transcever, etc etc.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  11. Not Much Choice by ewhac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most of these peripherals are integrated into the North- and/or South-Bridge chips these days. The additional cost of these on-chip features has already been amortized out, so the cost savings of not having them integrated into the chips is effectively zero.

    If you are a 31337 g4m3r, integrated graphics is indeed a joke. However, it's good enough for 85% of the users out there, who will almost never run anything more intensive than Word, IE, and the occasional Flash-based game. Same deal with integrated sound -- for Windows event beeps and boops, it's more than plenty.

    10/100 Mb/s speeds are now common on integrated Ethernet controllers, and most of them have very little braindamage these days. 1Gb/s on-chip controllers are also already starting to appear.

    To put it another way: Parallel, RS-232 serial, and PS/2 mouse/keyboard ports used to require separate expansion cards. Today, they are integrated into the motherboard chipset, and no one thinks the worse for this. For those who need extra ports or special high-performance ports, third-party PCI expansion cards are still available.

    So, in short, the way systems are being put together these days, there's no cost savings to be had by breaking out the peripherals you don't need. If you feel a need to put the old parts to good use, donate them to a school, or use them to build a Frankenbox on which to do kernel or driver development :-).

    Schwab

  12. Are You Sure? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    After my Windows box recently lost its life in a puff of awful smelling smoke,

    Next time be sure to clean out the registry on a regular schedule.

  13. buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    sell the parts at a swap meet.

  14. No chance by mnmn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Companies like via, nvidia, intel produce chips which will tend to the largest market segment, which is how they produce chips with everything on board at a cheap price. If they produced chipsets of different types, the production runs will be smaller, support and testing costs larger and pricing higher. I actually expect the likes of AMD to release CPU+chipset chips with say the top 256MB of ram built-in, along with both the north and south bridge, nic phy, audio and usb and everything else in between. The resulting board+cpu will be cheaper than the current board+cpus.

    AMD actually currently integrates the north bridge in the athlon64 if I'm not wrong.

    Even if you want architectural simplicity and efficiency, its hard to find a simple ARM, m68k or ppc microcontroller without something built-in specialized for its market.Having just a no-frills set of parts was last seen in the 8086 and 6502 days in which each chip did only one thing. And it was expensive as hell.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  15. Re:then dont use it by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> And why do modern boards still have serial and Parralell ports? They aren't used by 75% of the rest of the world, why are they even included as standard on ALL boards? On Some us because they still have some value but ALL?

    My new (as of January) Dell at work doesn't have them. It just has 6 USB ports (8, if you also count the two on the front).

    Dell can remove them, because they are selling a complete system and know that customers don't need a PS2 keyboard slot, for example.

    The separate motherboard vendors still include them because it is cheaper to sell one motherboard version than it is to sell two, where one has a reduce featureset.

    In a few more years they will be phased out. It just takes time. ISA took forever to be phased out as well. PCI is obsolete now, too, but even you might hope that they keep a few PCI slots around for a few years until all your old PCI add-on cards have been replaced. (Assuming you don't use all motherboard built-in features.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  16. Onboard not that bad by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to reason exactly like you once and tried to use my software preferences when I choose hardware, no bloat etc, but eventually I found out that hardware "bloat" is not that bad, unlike the software kind. My most stable boxes are the ones that use the onboard components, whereas my old plain vanilla motherboard with a 3rd party soundcard hangs pretty frequently because of god-know-what compatibility issues. When you get onboard audio, at least you know it will work with the chipset.

  17. Good Barebone motherboard by Beuno · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ive had very good experiences with ABIT barebone motherboards, which I normally use on servers.

  18. More importantly... by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a good chance that the integrated stuff he's going to get for free anyway is actually BETTER than the expansion cards he's so insanely keen on continuing to use.

    Welcome to the reality of computer components - there's no value in trying to save old tech.

    1. Re:More importantly... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tell that to anyone with an NForce2 and SoundStorm audio.

      Quite frankly, there are people who go out of their way for it as it's the ONLY way to get Dolby Digital encoding on a PC. Just try to tell them that it sounds like crap. You need to update your views on onboard audio.

  19. Can of Smoke by malarkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's so often you let the smoke out of something and it doesn't work anymore. It's too bad you can't just buy a can of smoke, and refill the motherboard.

    1. Re:Can of Smoke by srhuston · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I did.

      Someone borrowed a Netgear switch from me, and said he had a power supply for it already. Silly me thought he knew what he was doing, and didn't first demand to see the PSU. Whaddya know, a Netgear switch prefers to have 7.5VDC@1A, not 15VAC@.3A

      He came back to my office in a panic, because I didn't have any other switches to lend out. Said he let out the magic smoke, something he'd heard me say about hardware before. I went down to the electronics lab with the switch and user in tow, found a 'lytic cap the same as the one that blew, and said "No problem, I'll just put in a new can of smoke. Gimme 15 minutes." Handed him a working switch (with the correct PSU) and I swear he thinks that little canister literally holds smoke inside it.

      --
      Three dits, four dits, two dits, dah!
      Radio, radio, rah rah rah!
  20. So get a passive backplane by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    If that's what you really want, you can buy a passive backplane and plug in CPU and peripheral boards, up to and including dual Xeons Passive backplanes are used in specialized industrial applications, and will cost you far more than a "loaded" motherboard. This is not something desktop users buy. But they do exist.

  21. A good reason to buy a no frills MB by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I see lots of advice that say buy a motherboard with extra stuff and if you need to disable it in the bios. But many new motherboards are making a choice to go with a non-standard IO layout. While usually this means it comes with the ATX plate you need, there are those of us who bought into cases that use an older style of ATX back plate, non-standard size ATX back plate, or in even more rare and cheaper cases no plate what so ever.

    For example... my case is an HP Vectra desktop with that Asus a7v333 motherboard. I'm odd I know. In order to get the provided plate to fit properly I'd need to cut the hole larger by about 10cm or so. Further, the audio jacks extend above the size of the hole making the top jack unuseable.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  22. Re:then dont use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's funny about that is this is one of the things I despise about Mac design. An RS-232 port is so ridiculously easy to make hardware for, you can build a serial interface to something in a couple minutes. Maybe you don't like doing anything with hardware outside your computer, but I have found it absolutely invaluable for that purpose.

  23. Device Driver Support if you're running Linux by billstewart · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you're running Linux, try to find out if the drivers are available for the built-in parts. They probably are - builtins tend to be pretty vanilla standard Southbridge parts, so enough other people often have them, and Knoppix can probably find them. But otherwise you may need to use your own boards.

    If you're running Windows, the integrated on-board stuff will work fine, and as another poster says, you could use the built-in graphics to run a second monitor, which you'll find very addictive. If you're a gamer, you'll probably want to use your own video card, but otherwise it's nice to have your system be cooler and quieter with the built-in video.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  24. Re:Just buy a new motherboard and STFU by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just buy a new motherboard and STFU

    Isn't that Abit's new marketing slogan?

  25. Try searching by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mwave, TigerDirect, Directron, Newegg....there are many sites that provide these barebones motherboards. I have never seen one for less than 80 dollars though. I have found all in one integrated boards for much cheaper. If you are looking for a barebones system though, try Tyan, MSI, or Giga-byte. ASUS tends to pack everything onto the board, soyo and abit are the same. I havent heard or had much experience with epox, dfi (they also have good reviews, and I believe the lanboy is fairly barebones but expensive). Do about 20 minutes searching and you can find what you are looking for. I personally recommend a Giga-byte board. I have had nothing but great luck with them.

    Best of luck in your search.

    --
    Stop signs are only Suggestions
  26. Re:pricewatch by irving47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Search this, search that... God forbid we get some actual discussion on a topic. If all you Google-worshipping goons had your way, we'd all have it as our browser home page and it would be locked.
    Seriously, that was an insightful topic and interesting answer...

    Mod away.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  27. Re:Check out Google's WHOIS info by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's the same for many major sites - check the whois data for Yahoo.com, Amazon.com, Altavista.com and others... All returning similar results seemingly centred around gulli.com, which appears to be a German (registered in Germany) hacking/cracking site. Pick a major search site and do a whois on it, they're all suffering.

    Also, my whois is now responding with a message saying VeriSign's whois server is down - maybe they're trying to fix it, or it's been flooded with requests from curious ./'ers (another story here.)

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  28. Big-name computers and motherboards by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I hate HP, I have to admit that they've done one thing right: many of their desktop PCs use Asus motherboards.

    I have one HP machine (no, I'm not stupid enough to pay money for one--my parents gave it to me when they got a new one), that has an Asus P4B266 motherboard inside it. It's currently in my closet being used as a server, and I have to say that the board's not bad...

    Another old HP machine that used to belong to my parents (which is currently sitting half-dismantled on my bed) also has an Asus board--specifically, a P2B-VE (hey, I said it was an old machine).

    There's one site that has a list of what motherboards come with what HP machines. A very large amount of them have Asus boards, and there are also quite a few machines that have MSI boards.

    Contrast this with Dell. Dell not only makes their own boards, but they use all sorts of proprietary form factors. A friend of mine, who has a shitty Dell PC, wanted to install a new hard drive. His machine has only one internal 3.5" bay and one external 3.5" bay (taken up by the original hard drive and floppy drive, respectively), so he decided to remove the floppy drive to put the new hard drive in. It turns out that Dell makes their own floppy drives and internal bays, which have their own proprietary screw arangement. Yes, I said proprietary screw arrangement of all things. No storebought drive will fit into that machine's drive bays because of that. To hell with Dell. Also, we found out that Dell uses some kind of oddball heatsink/fan--it actually attaches to the case and funnels air through holes in the case. It's like a CPU fan and case fan in one device. Freaky.

    As I said above, I hate HP, but I at least have some respect for them. I have no respect for Dell whatsoever.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Big-name computers and motherboards by kettch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dell makes their own floppy drives and internal bays, which have their own proprietary screw arangement.

      Several companies sell products specifically geared toward fixing this problem.

      Here is one of my favorites. There have also been certain times when exreme measures have been needed.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    2. Re:Big-name computers and motherboards by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also hate Dell machines with a passion, but i do have to disagree with your complaints about their processor fans.. That's the one thing they did right, a fan which draws air from outside the case and blasts it over the cpu and out the case again is good.. Much more effective than one which recirculates the already warm air from inside the case. A lot of highend machines use a similar fan arrangement to dell's, the only problem as i see it, is that standard sized motherboards don't put the cpu in the same place every time so it's not possible to setup the fan like this so easily.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  29. Re:Insignificant Cost Savings: So what? by (negative+video) · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What are you refering to with "top notch"? What are you looking for that you think should be better that the typical MB is lacking?
    Support for ECC memory, industrial-grade capacitors that won't dry out or corrode within a few years, power converters with plenty of safety margin so they can get covered with dust and still last forever without burning up, high-speed buses with with electrical reflections and crosstalk properly taken into account so they don't crap all over my precious data, a BIOS not written by a team of psychotic crack-monkeys in a Taiwanese dungeon, proper documentation for the chips so that drivers have a chance of working correctly, proper tests at the time of manufacture so that consumers never ever see a flaky board, cooling fans with bearings that are both quiet and capable of lasting more than two years, connectors in sensible locations, connectors with enough friction that the hard drive cables don't pull loose under light pressure, and so forth.

    I don't ask for much, really.

  30. On-board ain't that bad these days by jgarzik · · Score: 4, Informative
    Most onboard audio chipsets don't even support multiple audio streams in hardware.

    Completely false.

    Pretty much all of the new on-board audio supports multiple channels (OS drivers may be another story!). The bleeding edge on-board audio even supports High Definition Audio.

    Most of the high-volume motherboard chipset vendors -- Intel (the big fish), AMD, NVIDIA, SiS, ULi, VIA, ... -- all implement the same advanced features in their chipsets: SATA2 NCQ, USB 2, HD audio, gigabit ethernet, and more. Just wait 3-6 months, and a new-and-spiffy ethernet/SATA/USB/audio feature will appear for free on a modern motherboard. If its a mass-market feature, of course.

    Blindly choosing "no on-board devices" is rather silly. Today's mass market motherboard contains on-board devices, which means the cheapest motherboards give you that stuff for free. If the on-board device meets your feature requirements, use it. Sealed silicon interconnects are far more reliable than PCI slots anyway.

    ...speaking as the author of the [old OSS] VIA audio driver for Linux, and the sometimes-maintainer of the [old OSS] Intel/SiS/Nvidia/AMD audio driver for Linux, as well as other Linux drivers for on-board (and off-board) devices.

  31. mass market economics by pjrc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It seems like a waste to buy a board with all the built-in stuff (and probably pay extra for it)

    Not really.

    The fallacy is that these extra peripherals cost extra. They don't, really. The price you pay is determined by, more than any other factor, the economy of mass producing exactly the same product for such a large market.

    Especially in the chipset, those extra transistors come almost for free. It would cost MORE to make another version of the chips with a different configuration. Likewise, even with the same chips, it would cost MORE to make additional models without the extra connectors. There is tremendous savings in manufacturing only one model (or relatively few). Distribution and retail sales also saves costs only having to deal with fewer distinct models.

    So just don't use those extra bell and whistles. But don't imagine they're costing you anything extra. The PC motherboard market is extremely competitive, and many companies and individuals shop primarily for the lowest price. If there was an easy way, such as making a different model without some parts, to achieve a lower price, you better believe the manufacturers would do it in a heartbeat.

    And there are plenty of budget motherboards. If they could save even a small amount taking off more features, they certainly would. Because they haven't, you can have high confidence those extras aren't actually costing you anything extra.... in the reality of today's manufacturing, distribution and retail marketplace.