Slashdot Mirror


Simple, Bare-Bones Motherboards?

basic0 writes "After my Windows box recently lost its life in a puff of awful smelling smoke, I tracked the fault to the motherboard. Now I'm in the market for a replacement board, but all the boards I find seem to be all-in-one models with on-board everything. I already have a good graphics card, NIC, USB audio device, etc. I just need a no-frills motherboard like I used to be able to buy. It seems like a waste to buy a board with all the built-in stuff (and probably pay extra for it) when I'm never going to use it. Has anyone else had similar experiences? Do a lot of people actually use the on-board stuff? Is it still possible to purchase a motherboard that's *just* a motherboard?"

94 of 627 comments (clear)

  1. You'll end up paying more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity.

    1. Re:You'll end up paying more by Trizor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And besides, there are all sorts of advantages to the redundancy the cards you already have will provide. Should something go bad, you'll have a back up, as well as a control set to compare against test results. I'd say get a board with onboard components and maximise yoru use. 2 NICs is especially nice if you find your self in a situation that requires odd network topology and weird on box configurations.

    2. Re:You'll end up paying more by morcego · · Score: 5, Informative

      You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity.

      Actually, it is a correct, if limited, summation.

      When you think on market scale production, one fact is simple: the more you produce, th lower the individual unity cost. That is why, today, a dot-matrix printer is more expensive than a laser one.

      Considering the great majority of motherboards produced are those "on-board" models, and the demand for "clean" boards is small (and getting smaller each passing day), the natural tendency is that the production cost pre unit for a clean board is higher.

      On the other hand, I do like clean boards better. The chances of a failure is reduced, since the number of components is reduced too. That can also lead for a higher durability.

      So, as far as I'm concerned, the "on-board" mobos are cheaper when you buy then, but clean ones tend to be cheaper on the long run. At least for me, since I never throw away a working computer. I just move it to other functions (disk server, firewalls etc).

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:You'll end up paying more by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "You end up paying more for a bare-bones motherboard because of their rarity."

      I doubt there's much price difference anyway. The reason why mobos have on board lan, for example, is they can add it really cheaply.

      Frankly, I wouldn't want a mobo without the frills. Integrated Nic is nice. On-board sounds means there's a backup. On board video, provided you still have an AGP port, can also be used as a backup. When the machine's retired, it can easily be given to somebody else.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:You'll end up paying more by philipgar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I don't think its possible to have more than one active AGP bus. Thats one of the reasons PCI express is a much nicer solution than AGP. So the onboard video on boards does in fact tend to be useless. However onboard video is not standard and normally adds $5-$15 to the cost of the motherboard (unlike onboard sound and LAN which tend to be in the chipset). phil

    5. Re:You'll end up paying more by kyouteki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the newest AGP standard (AGP 8x) supports two AGP devices on one bus, but I don't think any mobo manufacturers have taken advantage of this.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:You'll end up paying more by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, yes. The two situations are exactly the same.

      Oh, except for that on the hardware side there are several roughly equal competitors, while while the software side is essentially a monopoly.

      But yeah, other than that, it's exactly the same!

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    7. Re:You'll end up paying more by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      despite the onboard graphics, sound, usb, firewire, NIC, wireless, etc. I still see matrox and 3dlabs selling video cards, creative selling sound cards, 3Com selling NICs, and on, and on, and on...

      fact is, since the hardware side is based on well documented, open standars (PCI, USB, Firewire, ethernet, etc.) and the level of interoperability is high, replacing the onboard stuff by add-on parts is as easy as opening the case and sloting a card or simply pluging in a serial device.

      now, MS Office apps relies heavily on internet explorer to render HTML, even the controll pannel needs IE to work. wipe IE and all it's acompanying DLLs and the system breaks badly.

      show me a way to fully replace IE as the system's defacto HTML renderer by gecko, KHTML or opera in such a way that every aplication that embeds a browser to display hypertext recognizes and accepts the alternatives and i won't mind with MS's bundles.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    8. Re:You'll end up paying more by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is another aspect: Chip sets.
      To have a chipset being accepted by the motherboard manufacturers, it has to come with easy implementable reference designs and with a small board real estate, that is: a minimum of used area for the chips itself and for the connections to other functions. So chip sets tend to integrate as many functions as possible, because thus board manufactures need less additional circuits and wiring to put those functions at the boards. A large portion of the boards in turn are sold to assemblers anyway, which are keen on boards with many functions already builtin, because then they don't need to put additional cards and ports into the boxes they are assembling.
      So for a board manufacturer to get into the assembler business to sell boards he has to offer fully integrated boards, and he will choose fully integrated chipsets to deliver.
      And if he has once designed fully integrated board series, what's the point in designing stripped down versions again? He will use the same chipsets anyway, because he has all the testing equipment in place for those, he reuses the design of the wiring (once the masks for wiring are done, the manufactunging costs are the same, independent of the number of wires), so all he saves are the few cents for the actual sockets and the soldering of the sockets to the boards.
      Basicly a "bare" board then is nothing else than a board without the sockets, but electrically the functions are there. But to manufacture those boards intentionally you need another production process, another QA process, another packaging. It might be cheaper to just sort the boards according to their final testing results and then specify which functions are 'there' (those that work in the tests).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    9. Re:You'll end up paying more by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Informative

      TSMC and UMC are not a monopoly per se, but their owners do get to dictate the direction of the industry.

      That makes them a "cartel," like the MPAA, RIAA, OPEC, et al. They are still as corrupt to the bone as a monopoly, but have a low chance that a cartel member will break ranks.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  2. FP by zelphior · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could it be?

    Anyways, I'm in the same boat. I havnt had any luck finding a good motherboard that supports my ram (184 pin RIMM).

    --
    If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
  3. Nah by hardburn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think they're sold anymore, and they're so cheep now that you wouldn't save much, anyway. Just ignore whatever extras come with the board.

    In fact, you just might save a few bucks in the long run by using the on-board stuff, since it may use less power than the equivilent slot-based stuff.

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:Nah by xSauronx · · Score: 2, Informative
      indeed, if you want a cheap mobo, get a used name-brand one. Id gladly pick up a used Epox or Asus board if the Asus Im using right now died on me, and I wouldnt have a complaint about price, or concern about quality.

      Anything made in the last few years is usually thoroughly reviewed on at least one hardware site, if not several; and checking support forums for something old will let you know what to expect...how to fix it...or if its problem free. The Asus I have (A7N8X iirc) has been stable and trouble free since the day i bought it, and the Epox I had before that was the same until i tried overvolting...but that was my fault :)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  4. Cheapness by cortana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Motherboards are so cheap nowadays that you may as well buy one and disable all the stuff you're not going to use. I guess it's because they are produced in such numbers, that onboard audio/network chips cost mere pennies. It would probably cost the manufacturer more to sell two products, one without the extras.

    1. Re:Cheapness by Cecil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed.

      Although it's not so much the selling, it's that it would cost them more to *develop* two products. As FSB, memory and CPU speeds have exploded, the margin of error for motherboards has decreased accordingly. Even tiny changes to the physical layout of a motherboard can make the difference between a rock-solid stable machine and one that crashes every 10 seconds. Lots of QA goes into testing board designs thoroughly. It's easier to simply drop all the ridiculously cheap, commonly used components (LAN and Audio definitely) onto the board right from the get-go, and as a bonus they only have to develop one BIOS setup, one manual, one box, and one set of drivers. And yes, they really are ridiculously cheap.. I assure you that when you buy a $10 PCI ethernet card, you are paying much more for the packaging than you are for the ethernet chip, for example.

      Quite simply, it's not worth the hassle. And it's not worth saving the theoretical $10 either. If you ever end up needing a backup ethernet port, or want to use it as a hardware firewall, you'll appreciate little things like having onboard video and ethernet.

  5. all-in-one boards... by l33td00d42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... are cheaper in my experience, since they're geared toward the value market.

    quit yer whining and buy a motherboard.

  6. extras by prurientknave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea that zemtobit internet is such superfluous addition.

  7. What you complaining about? by Agret · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I already have a good graphics card, NIC, USB audio device, etc.
    Well you don't want an on-board graphics card. Just ignore that. If you have an on-board NIC you can remove your PCI card and free up a slot. On-board audio is damn good these days. I paid $80 for a gigabyte board with all the on-board shit and I only use on-board NIC & Sound. They aren't very expensive and if you don't like the on-board stuff then don't use it!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:What you complaining about? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably because onboard graphics usually stink.

      In contrast, Onboard NICs, USB and firewire controllers, and even audio cards (the SoundStorm stuff on nvidia boards, before they copped out of sound, is absolutely superb) on motherboards are generally all top notch.

    2. Re:What you complaining about? by LordStraun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I'd love to just get a good-ol' barebones mobo too. The first thing I do when I buy a new one these days is disable _everything_ except for the NIC..

      Stay away from onboard video.. that's just common sense.

      The onboard audio these days is passable, if you're using a sub-$100 set of stereo speakers. But if you're an audiophile like myself with several thousand dollars invested in a nice 7.1 spkr setup, (or heck, even a $300 set of 5.1 speakers) then the onboard audio just doesn't cut it. I thought I'd give a couple boards a try, but their optical/digital outputs were a pain to configure, the sound "configuration" software was a joke, and 'equalizer' functionality only resulted in badly distorted and staticy sound.

      I've yet to encounter a current on-board audio chipset that didn't sound and perform like crap. Even the 4-year old SB I have in my test box sounds better.

      I will admit that compared to past products, the audio on today's boards is much better.. but it still cannot compare to a dedicated expansion card IMNSHO.

      --
      Your Sig Here ($10)
    3. Re:What you complaining about? by maraist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For servers, I've found that having onboard video isn't too bad; especially if you can reduce it's system-memory to 2, 4 or 8 meg.. On a 1+ gigabyte system, the last 8 meg shouldn't be much trouble. If we're talking a budget server ($300 or so), then the money savings can often be worth it.

      --
      -Michael
    4. Re:What you complaining about? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most onboard audio chipsets don't even support multiple audio streams in hardware. Onboard audio is not good.

    5. Re:What you complaining about? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true. A decent processor with a codec like Realtek's ALC850 can handle 64 strems in hardware without issues.

      NVIDIA's SoundStorm, for example, is excellent and compares well with discrete solutions.

      VIA's "Vinyl" audio is also quite good.

      There's also an onboard Creative Labs chip that's excellent.

    6. Re:What you complaining about? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the 'avoid onboard video' thing is a bit silly. When NForce2 was new, its onboard video was perfectly acceptable for a low-midrange system. Hell, for anyone that doesn't do much gaming, it's still fine.

      Add to that the fact that ATI's RS480 chipset includes X300 equivalent graphics, and it seems pretty silly to say 'onboard video sucks.' The X300's not a screamer by any means, but onboard video that'll run Far Cry at an acceptable framerate is fine by me.

    7. Re:What you complaining about? by Kazymyr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Newegg and most companies that advertise through pricewatch etc. don't accept international orders - and those that do charge an arm and a leg for shipping.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  8. YES by TechnologyX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Awesome story, again! Google gets DNS jacked and we get to help this fucknut find a motherboard, and it will probably be posted 4 more times this week by timothy and CowboyNeal HOORAY OFR /.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Curious what you would consider a legitimate question? Are we down to only posting obscure questions about code writing or networking? I had the nerve a while back to post a query about ram speed and operating systems related to render farms for 3D rendering. I was interested in $ verses performance. It's hard to get real world information on the subject yet I was given a similar reaction by several posters. Unless you've had a chance to try every combination out there it's a legitimate question.

      As to the current poster I had researched the same subject and had come to the same conclusion everyone else, just ignore the redunadant features. For basic tasks most are adequate anyway. Video Cards obviously being the dodgiest thing on most boards. The built in networking and sound are decent and I don't miss having to configure them. It may not be the most brain or experience taxing question but it definately seems to have provoked discussion since you found it worthy of whinning over.

    2. Re:YES by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right, that is a mistake. This isn't a news site, it's a site where entertaining tech-related stories get posted for people to read when they feel like taking a break for a few minutes. People post constantly about how slashdot isn't exactly what they think it should be. If someone posted about SETI, then you'd get a bunch of folks complaining that SETI is not important to them personally and therefore shouldn't be on Slashdot. There's filtering tools if you don't like ask /. stories, and if that's not satisfactory and you really can't deal with scrolling past stories you aren't intersted in then this (and the internet, and the entire un-filterable world) is not for you.

    3. Re:YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard the aliens were pretty pissed.

    4. Re:YES by sketerpot · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that's what happened to Google. I tried to search for news that might tell me why Google was down, but then I realized that Google was down. :-(

    5. Re:YES by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      Slashdot is a bit of an old news / duped news / anti-SCO site than a technical support site.

      What, Slashdot stopped being an anti-Microsoft site? When did that happen? I didn't get the memo! I'm not getting my memos!

      --
      John
  9. Finally... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 5, Funny
    After my Windows box recently lost its life...


    Thank god... one less Windows user out there now. I am sorry to inform you that they no longer make motherboards for Windows as you might as well install Linux or buy a Mac...
    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  10. They're Out There... Look harder by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeh, there are a lot of "all-in-one" motherboards out there but a lot of highend ones aren't that bad. Personally I was in a similar boat, I had a great soundcard, video card, network card, etc. I settled on an ASUS who's only integrated component was sound. Finding one without integrated video is pretty easy, just look at the companies websites, reviews, etc. However most are the high-end boards, but they're at most $30 or $50 more than the cheaper modes. Ethernet, SATA, and in some cases sound are a little tough to avoid, but it's not big deal. You can disable the components you don't want, but SATA is nice (if you want/need it) and the Ethernet is just nice to have in general. In any case, it's not that bad. I'm sure by now people have posted a lot of models.

  11. Insignificant Cost Savings. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't imagine how much you think you would save with motherboards that support all this stuff going for $65.

  12. Its in the chipset anyway by atrus · · Score: 4, Informative
    Unless you go to server boards, the answer is no. The reason? Everything is integrated into the chipset. Once designed, it costs an insignificant amount more to build that way. All you have to do is add the right headers to the end of the board.

    Even in server boards, things still get integrated. Different sets of things (SCSI controllers, low-end video hardware). Reasons? It frees up slots (big +++ in 1U 2U rackmount land), and at the same time drops cost (may be hard to believe, but in the log run it does).

  13. Welcome to 1999 by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Its *VERY* cheap to integrate this stuff onto the motherboards. All of those functions are handled by one or two chips which probably costs on the order of 5 - 10$.

    Onboard video is usually pretty terrible (unless you're buying an nForce board), and if you are an audiophile like me, you'll want the 500$ sound card with the 120db DNR:) But in reality, it almost doesn't matter who made your NIC, your USB transcever, etc etc.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Welcome to 1999 by Reziac · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a crappy old IBM P2 that I dragged to the local old-games meeting and we hooked it to the LAN... and it instantly turned everything connected into 386s. Its onboard Intel NIC apparently is not only chatty but downright verbose.

      Needless to say, said machine is now in the barn awaiting a ripe moment to gut it for parts.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  14. Look at the MB's chipset; Don't get on-board Video by SlashMaster · · Score: 2, Informative
    The one thing that I wouldn't dare get on-board is video. If you have on-board video, the manufacturer usually leaves off the AGP Slot or other appropriate Connector that allows you to install in a decent high-end graphics card. Historically these boards are also notoriously difficult to disable the on-board video on. These types of MBs appear to be destined for terminal work (...rather not high-end graphics, gaming, or CAD work ).

    I just purchased a socket 775 PCI Express MB with the 915 chipset. It only has 3 PCI slots with 2 PCI express slots. However, about the only thing that it doesn't have is on-board video.

    I plan to use the onboard ethernet, perhaps audio, and such.

    While Tom's Hardware Guide has a comparison chart: http://www.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20020422/c hipset-01.html

    it appears to be somewhat dated.

  15. You can shut the stuff off you don't want by foonf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The core functionality for most of the onboard components is now built right into the chipset. It costs at most a couple of bucks to add the connectors and the rest of the hardware (a sound codec, ethernet transciever, etc.) needed to fully support it, and the added value is more than that.

    A lot of stuff that is now integrated on literally every motherboard used to be an add on card. 10 years ago you would be whining "why do I have to get a motherboard with an IDE controller and onboard parallel ports, I already have a multi-IO card". But things change and for the most part the integrated hardware is adequate, and it isn't economically viable to not provide it.

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
  16. Re:then dont use it by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because the more you have the more things that can go wrong.

    running dual video cards and disabling one of them works, but you never really know what's going on. maybe the driver required to disable that onboard card is what goes puff and loses it's magic.

    You should be able to build a computer without extra's if you so choose.

    And why do modern boards still have serial and Parralell ports? They aren't used by 75% of the rest of the world, why are they even included as standard on ALL boards? On Some us because they still have some value but ALL?

    I am damn glad Mac's have eliminated all the old hardware ports that don't play nice.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  17. Not Much Choice by ewhac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most of these peripherals are integrated into the North- and/or South-Bridge chips these days. The additional cost of these on-chip features has already been amortized out, so the cost savings of not having them integrated into the chips is effectively zero.

    If you are a 31337 g4m3r, integrated graphics is indeed a joke. However, it's good enough for 85% of the users out there, who will almost never run anything more intensive than Word, IE, and the occasional Flash-based game. Same deal with integrated sound -- for Windows event beeps and boops, it's more than plenty.

    10/100 Mb/s speeds are now common on integrated Ethernet controllers, and most of them have very little braindamage these days. 1Gb/s on-chip controllers are also already starting to appear.

    To put it another way: Parallel, RS-232 serial, and PS/2 mouse/keyboard ports used to require separate expansion cards. Today, they are integrated into the motherboard chipset, and no one thinks the worse for this. For those who need extra ports or special high-performance ports, third-party PCI expansion cards are still available.

    So, in short, the way systems are being put together these days, there's no cost savings to be had by breaking out the peripherals you don't need. If you feel a need to put the old parts to good use, donate them to a school, or use them to build a Frankenbox on which to do kernel or driver development :-).

    Schwab

    1. Re:Not Much Choice by Matimus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its true, I work for a major chipset manufacturer and all of the integrated features are on the ICH, with the exception of video which is on the MCH. They don't really sell dumbed down chipsets because the interest is in getting the highest $$/area of Si. Just get one with lots of features and disable them if you don't need them.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  18. Re:Better to get the loaded MB & disable funct by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    But considering that even good motherboards that are loaded can be found for roughly the same price as loaded motherboards

    So much for my proofreading skills. Oh, well. You know what I meant.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  19. Are You Sure? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    After my Windows box recently lost its life in a puff of awful smelling smoke,

    Next time be sure to clean out the registry on a regular schedule.

    1. Re:Are You Sure? by Epsillon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next time be sure to clean out the registry on a regular schedule.

      Yes, specifically HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Hardware\Capacitors\Self_Destru ct\Lifetime.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  20. buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    sell the parts at a swap meet.

  21. No chance by mnmn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Companies like via, nvidia, intel produce chips which will tend to the largest market segment, which is how they produce chips with everything on board at a cheap price. If they produced chipsets of different types, the production runs will be smaller, support and testing costs larger and pricing higher. I actually expect the likes of AMD to release CPU+chipset chips with say the top 256MB of ram built-in, along with both the north and south bridge, nic phy, audio and usb and everything else in between. The resulting board+cpu will be cheaper than the current board+cpus.

    AMD actually currently integrates the north bridge in the athlon64 if I'm not wrong.

    Even if you want architectural simplicity and efficiency, its hard to find a simple ARM, m68k or ppc microcontroller without something built-in specialized for its market.Having just a no-frills set of parts was last seen in the 8086 and 6502 days in which each chip did only one thing. And it was expensive as hell.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:No chance by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative

      AMD actually currently integrates the north bridge in the athlon64 if I'm not wrong.

      It's actually the memory controller, I believe. Which is why Athlon 64's haven't rolled out DDR-2 support - the type of ram is tied to the processor.

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
  22. Re:then dont use it by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> And why do modern boards still have serial and Parralell ports? They aren't used by 75% of the rest of the world, why are they even included as standard on ALL boards? On Some us because they still have some value but ALL?

    My new (as of January) Dell at work doesn't have them. It just has 6 USB ports (8, if you also count the two on the front).

    Dell can remove them, because they are selling a complete system and know that customers don't need a PS2 keyboard slot, for example.

    The separate motherboard vendors still include them because it is cheaper to sell one motherboard version than it is to sell two, where one has a reduce featureset.

    In a few more years they will be phased out. It just takes time. ISA took forever to be phased out as well. PCI is obsolete now, too, but even you might hope that they keep a few PCI slots around for a few years until all your old PCI add-on cards have been replaced. (Assuming you don't use all motherboard built-in features.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  23. Re:Look at the MB's chipset; Don't get on-board Vi by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another problem with on-board video is that more they almost always use the system's RAM for their memory. Unless you have a lot of RAM (512 MB+) that can really impact the system because the memory is taken away from the operating system. More than that, lag of having to go through system circuitry instead of through its own on-board memory could also be a factor, especially if you don't have really fast system memory.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  24. Onboard not that bad by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to reason exactly like you once and tried to use my software preferences when I choose hardware, no bloat etc, but eventually I found out that hardware "bloat" is not that bad, unlike the software kind. My most stable boxes are the ones that use the onboard components, whereas my old plain vanilla motherboard with a 3rd party soundcard hangs pretty frequently because of god-know-what compatibility issues. When you get onboard audio, at least you know it will work with the chipset.

  25. Re:As long as you arent addicted to sucky x86, YES by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless you consider USB a frill...

    Real men get their USB on a PCI expansion card.

  26. Good Barebone motherboard by Beuno · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ive had very good experiences with ABIT barebone motherboards, which I normally use on servers.

  27. Extra features? So what? by amightywind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The mobo market is intensely competative. So for $120 you can something loaded! How much cheaper do you expect your mobo to get? The mobo is the sacred heart of you machine! Get a good one. If you already have a sound or ethernet card, run 2 interfaces! Its all in good fun! The Linux kernel will surprise you with what it can do. Whats wrong with having 10 USB's? SATA RAID? Muliple DVD's? Get an ASUS, MSI, Abit, Soltec, DFI, AOpen, Chaintech, Gigabyte, Foxconn, Epox ... They're all good. Get something that looks good through your side panel. Get cool cables. What no glass side panel, no LED's? You have a modest machine indeed.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  28. Use everything no, eventually most of it by amcdiarmid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am collecting a bunch of older hardware that I no longer have a use for due to the inclusion of everything on the motherboard. I have been finding that I, and my clients, do not use everything when it's new. Eventually, most stuff does get used.

    Further, unless you are rebuying good modern *everything* every few years - the on board stuff is probably as good as what you are using.

    What am I talking about integrated on the motherboard:

    On board USB:
    I avoided USB stuff like the plague for several years. Mostly a question of having legacy equipment around. Now that the drivers have been stable (for a long time), all the slots get used.
    If I need a faster USB (due to a newer spec, or I want to do faster data xfer) I can use a PCI slot.
    Your two year old USB 1.1 card is slower than my onboard USB2.0 ports anyhow. By a lot.

    Firewire:
    This was not really used in the PC world. Except for video transfer. Now it's also good for data transfer for portable/external hard disks. This may be the least used included item, but worth it for video. Since the HDTV cable boxes are going to have to have a firewire port, I imagine that everyone will be happy that the manufacturer put them in. Now about those ieee1394 800/400 converter cables...

    Ethernet Port:
    Yes: Almost always needed, it costs the manufacturer what $2 to add? Yes there are better cards than the cheapo NICs, but if you buy a real server it will have a Gb and a 10/100 NIC anyhow.

    RAID:
    OK, I wish more manufacturers included it. But it is not used enough except for fanboys. If you really set up a server, you need hardware raid and not this pissant software *&(*& However, if you just want data redundancy it's nice. I like the fact that many SATA raid sets seem to be floating around. Most likely item not to be on a new motherboard with the kitchen sink included.

    Sound:
    I don't give a *&( about sound for some machines, and for others, basic sound is good enough. Worth $2. It's good enough. I only need one machine with a good sampler, everything else can be crap. Most computers don't really need good sound anyhow.

    Onboard Video:
    I use it, but it's not good enough for anything graphics intense. Consider this a "For business" feature. Despite the fact that modern on board graphics processors are faster than my entire pile of ancient ATI all in wonders combined. Also, this is the item most likely to be left off a motherboard, after raid.

    To conclude:
    Not everything gets used at first, but eventually most of it will be. Also, after a few years (the life of a good motherboard) the items included on the kitchen-sink motherboard are prob. better than your old kit anyhow. For example, within ten percent, a NIC is a NIC is a NIC (with few exceptions). Your good NIC from a few years ago is not likely faster than the onboard version. As a second example, your two year old USB card is slower than the on-board USB2 slots.

    So you will not use everthing now, but you may eventually. Also, often what is on the motherboard is as fast as your old kit - if not faster. If you use the integrated motherboard, you save the extra cost of the kitchen sink items by sparing the two minutes it would take to install each item of your old kit.

  29. Re:FP by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you try this ?

  30. More importantly... by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a good chance that the integrated stuff he's going to get for free anyway is actually BETTER than the expansion cards he's so insanely keen on continuing to use.

    Welcome to the reality of computer components - there's no value in trying to save old tech.

    1. Re:More importantly... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative


      That's exactly true. My new motherboard, an Intel-based board with a 915G chipset, sports onboard audio that's better than my old-skool soundblaster live. It's possible that it uses a few more cpu cycles to do the sound, but hey, that soundblaster used to be in an 800 mhz P-III, and this one's a 2.8Ghz P-4. Extra clock cycles i've got.

      So, I ditched my soundblaster live. Doesn't bother me a bit.

      Also: Onboard video today is perfectly suited to basic desktop usage. To put it in other terms: "There is no reason to buy a separate video card unless you are gaming or doing graphics-workstation cad design".

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:More importantly... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tell that to anyone with an NForce2 and SoundStorm audio.

      Quite frankly, there are people who go out of their way for it as it's the ONLY way to get Dolby Digital encoding on a PC. Just try to tell them that it sounds like crap. You need to update your views on onboard audio.

    3. Re:More importantly... by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sound on the NForce chipsets is actually stealing much less
      CPU time than an SB LIve! or Audigy 1. It's right on par with
      Audigy 2 in that respect, which was mentioned a lot on techsites
      back when NForce 2 was new. Since the sound seems to be using some
      Intel 8xx derivative driver under Linux, I wouldn't be surprised
      if the 915G chipsets have something similar.

      You can get 5.1 sound from an onboard chipset through reversal of
      one of the inputs, but EAX 4.0 support is probably not going to work.

      Onboard graphics steal RAM from the total system memory, but if
      you're going to use it in a server, you can adjust it down to use
      just a couple of megs of it. Linux nd BSD isn't picky when you're
      in text mode ;)

      The major chipsets nowadays also use 3Com, NVidia and Intel NICs
      built-in. Only the NVidia has been problematic for me (and I'll
      whine for hours about that on a bad day), but for some reason,
      NVidia's deluxe sets with two NICs have 3Com+their own NIC. You're
      bound to get at least one working, and they come in gigabit flavours :)

    4. Re:More importantly... by tooth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Welcome to the reality of computer components - there's no value in trying to save old tech.

      I've seen this argument put forward for buying macs (and it's pretty much won me over). PCs no longer have an upgrade path... New MB, new chip, new power supply, new RAM to match the bus speed, new SATA disks with the new MB... My oldest components are my kb and monitor (~9 years old, It's been worth the mad coin i spent on it at the time!). I don't think the kb will ever die but the monitor is getting ready to retire (and has been for three years now...)

  31. Power usage by Nakarti · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well if you do happen to use all the integrated junk(although some of it is less junky, such as the ATI or nVidia integrated video) you tend to use less power. And yes, lots of people do use the integrated stuff, because they don't know about the better audio quality, video clarity, network performance(mainly moot on that one), and system performance they can get with dedicated hardware.
    That and it is nearly as cheap to get integrated systems than bare mainboards(especially microATX, which is often cheaper because of the massive OEM market for them.)

  32. Can of Smoke by malarkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's so often you let the smoke out of something and it doesn't work anymore. It's too bad you can't just buy a can of smoke, and refill the motherboard.

    1. Re:Can of Smoke by srhuston · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I did.

      Someone borrowed a Netgear switch from me, and said he had a power supply for it already. Silly me thought he knew what he was doing, and didn't first demand to see the PSU. Whaddya know, a Netgear switch prefers to have 7.5VDC@1A, not 15VAC@.3A

      He came back to my office in a panic, because I didn't have any other switches to lend out. Said he let out the magic smoke, something he'd heard me say about hardware before. I went down to the electronics lab with the switch and user in tow, found a 'lytic cap the same as the one that blew, and said "No problem, I'll just put in a new can of smoke. Gimme 15 minutes." Handed him a working switch (with the correct PSU) and I swear he thinks that little canister literally holds smoke inside it.

      --
      Three dits, four dits, two dits, dah!
      Radio, radio, rah rah rah!
  33. So get a passive backplane by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    If that's what you really want, you can buy a passive backplane and plug in CPU and peripheral boards, up to and including dual Xeons Passive backplanes are used in specialized industrial applications, and will cost you far more than a "loaded" motherboard. This is not something desktop users buy. But they do exist.

  34. A good reason to buy a no frills MB by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I see lots of advice that say buy a motherboard with extra stuff and if you need to disable it in the bios. But many new motherboards are making a choice to go with a non-standard IO layout. While usually this means it comes with the ATX plate you need, there are those of us who bought into cases that use an older style of ATX back plate, non-standard size ATX back plate, or in even more rare and cheaper cases no plate what so ever.

    For example... my case is an HP Vectra desktop with that Asus a7v333 motherboard. I'm odd I know. In order to get the provided plate to fit properly I'd need to cut the hole larger by about 10cm or so. Further, the audio jacks extend above the size of the hole making the top jack unuseable.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  35. Re:then dont use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's funny about that is this is one of the things I despise about Mac design. An RS-232 port is so ridiculously easy to make hardware for, you can build a serial interface to something in a couple minutes. Maybe you don't like doing anything with hardware outside your computer, but I have found it absolutely invaluable for that purpose.

  36. Device Driver Support if you're running Linux by billstewart · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you're running Linux, try to find out if the drivers are available for the built-in parts. They probably are - builtins tend to be pretty vanilla standard Southbridge parts, so enough other people often have them, and Knoppix can probably find them. But otherwise you may need to use your own boards.

    If you're running Windows, the integrated on-board stuff will work fine, and as another poster says, you could use the built-in graphics to run a second monitor, which you'll find very addictive. If you're a gamer, you'll probably want to use your own video card, but otherwise it's nice to have your system be cooler and quieter with the built-in video.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  37. Re:Just buy a new motherboard and STFU by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just buy a new motherboard and STFU

    Isn't that Abit's new marketing slogan?

  38. Try searching by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mwave, TigerDirect, Directron, Newegg....there are many sites that provide these barebones motherboards. I have never seen one for less than 80 dollars though. I have found all in one integrated boards for much cheaper. If you are looking for a barebones system though, try Tyan, MSI, or Giga-byte. ASUS tends to pack everything onto the board, soyo and abit are the same. I havent heard or had much experience with epox, dfi (they also have good reviews, and I believe the lanboy is fairly barebones but expensive). Do about 20 minutes searching and you can find what you are looking for. I personally recommend a Giga-byte board. I have had nothing but great luck with them.

    Best of luck in your search.

    --
    Stop signs are only Suggestions
  39. Are you fucking kidding me? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    You can get a motherboard with SATA, ATA, RAID, onboard audio, NIC, etc, for like 60$ CDN. Maybe back in the days when motherboards were 180$ CDN for a barebones, and 250$ for the one with terrible AC'97, was this an issue. Nowadays you buy based on what features you want, and disable the rest.

    I use Intel EEPros in all my machines because they are well supported and in every OS I can load. I just disable the onboard NICs. I've noticed, though, that recently onboard audio has become high enough quality that I can move the mouse and not "hear" it on my speakers.

    Suck it up!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  40. Insignificant Cost Savings: So what? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about a bare bones board that cost around $100 - 200, but comes with TOP QUALITY components?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Insignificant Cost Savings: So what? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about capacitors that don't leak, eh?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Insignificant Cost Savings: So what? by (negative+video) · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What are you refering to with "top notch"? What are you looking for that you think should be better that the typical MB is lacking?
      Support for ECC memory, industrial-grade capacitors that won't dry out or corrode within a few years, power converters with plenty of safety margin so they can get covered with dust and still last forever without burning up, high-speed buses with with electrical reflections and crosstalk properly taken into account so they don't crap all over my precious data, a BIOS not written by a team of psychotic crack-monkeys in a Taiwanese dungeon, proper documentation for the chips so that drivers have a chance of working correctly, proper tests at the time of manufacture so that consumers never ever see a flaky board, cooling fans with bearings that are both quiet and capable of lasting more than two years, connectors in sensible locations, connectors with enough friction that the hard drive cables don't pull loose under light pressure, and so forth.

      I don't ask for much, really.

  41. Re:pricewatch by irving47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Search this, search that... God forbid we get some actual discussion on a topic. If all you Google-worshipping goons had your way, we'd all have it as our browser home page and it would be locked.
    Seriously, that was an insightful topic and interesting answer...

    Mod away.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  42. At this point you'd pay extra _not_ to get..... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    .... integrated stuff.

    Finding a mobo without integrated video is cake, but lots of these integrated components are part of the newer chipsets themselves. So, unless you're doing pro audio, a chipset's Dolby Digital S/PDIF out should do fine. And unless you have one of those slick aggregating 4 port ethernet boards, the onboard network (which is likely gigabit copper) should do fine. Ditto USB2, and even firewire (mine's got FW800 and SATAII). Just buy a board with stuff that supports whatever OS(es) you wanna run on them.

    I just built a system based on the GV-3D1 bundle set (screw Apple's lousy Powermac refresh!) that includes a 2x6600GT one-board SLI. All I needed was RAM and media, and a Viewsonic VP201. And when NVidia releases support for SLI in Linux, I have a 20G part waiting for a gentoo build.

    Unless it's pro-spec, put your old stuff on eBay or donate it to someplace that can give you a tax writeoff.

  43. Buy this board by gukin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I realize that ponying up the extra $16 bucks to get a $56 dollar motherboard from your typical $40 dollar motherboard is quite a strech but if you get this board, you'll be able to play virtually every game made before 2003 and, if your patient, some stuff afterwards.

    Not to sound like a snot, but if you become a u83r 1337 g4m3r, you can always give the system to your sister.

  44. Re:How about better components? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hold on there, cowboy...

    How much do you actually think you spend for the stuff you disable? If you think about it, you'll realize that the marginal cost of that stuff on the board must really be quite small: OEMs care about differences of a few cents, plus or minus. In some cases, in fact, it would cost money to take the functionality off the board: if the "net card" is part of a multifunction gate array chip, then it will be cheaper per unit, overall to make twice as many with the extra funtionality than it would be to make one unit of each, one with the functionality and the other without.

    (If you think I just implied that the system is cheaper with the net functionality than it would be if it would be without it, you're right. The wonders of mass production, eh?)

    You aren't going to get very much for the few scraps of extra silicon.

  45. Re:Check out Google's WHOIS info by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's the same for many major sites - check the whois data for Yahoo.com, Amazon.com, Altavista.com and others... All returning similar results seemingly centred around gulli.com, which appears to be a German (registered in Germany) hacking/cracking site. Pick a major search site and do a whois on it, they're all suffering.

    Also, my whois is now responding with a message saying VeriSign's whois server is down - maybe they're trying to fix it, or it's been flooded with requests from curious ./'ers (another story here.)

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  46. Big-name computers and motherboards by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I hate HP, I have to admit that they've done one thing right: many of their desktop PCs use Asus motherboards.

    I have one HP machine (no, I'm not stupid enough to pay money for one--my parents gave it to me when they got a new one), that has an Asus P4B266 motherboard inside it. It's currently in my closet being used as a server, and I have to say that the board's not bad...

    Another old HP machine that used to belong to my parents (which is currently sitting half-dismantled on my bed) also has an Asus board--specifically, a P2B-VE (hey, I said it was an old machine).

    There's one site that has a list of what motherboards come with what HP machines. A very large amount of them have Asus boards, and there are also quite a few machines that have MSI boards.

    Contrast this with Dell. Dell not only makes their own boards, but they use all sorts of proprietary form factors. A friend of mine, who has a shitty Dell PC, wanted to install a new hard drive. His machine has only one internal 3.5" bay and one external 3.5" bay (taken up by the original hard drive and floppy drive, respectively), so he decided to remove the floppy drive to put the new hard drive in. It turns out that Dell makes their own floppy drives and internal bays, which have their own proprietary screw arangement. Yes, I said proprietary screw arrangement of all things. No storebought drive will fit into that machine's drive bays because of that. To hell with Dell. Also, we found out that Dell uses some kind of oddball heatsink/fan--it actually attaches to the case and funnels air through holes in the case. It's like a CPU fan and case fan in one device. Freaky.

    As I said above, I hate HP, but I at least have some respect for them. I have no respect for Dell whatsoever.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Big-name computers and motherboards by kettch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dell makes their own floppy drives and internal bays, which have their own proprietary screw arangement.

      Several companies sell products specifically geared toward fixing this problem.

      Here is one of my favorites. There have also been certain times when exreme measures have been needed.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    2. Re:Big-name computers and motherboards by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative
      How about using a drill bit that is less than 2 inches long?

      Or - better yet - get a bit of metal tubing that fits over the drill, and cut it to length so that the bit will only penetrate the metal you're drilling by a few mm.


      If you use a good, sharp bit, and use the drill properly, you should be able to drill through the sheet in a controlled manner without using a guide.

    3. Re:Big-name computers and motherboards by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also hate Dell machines with a passion, but i do have to disagree with your complaints about their processor fans.. That's the one thing they did right, a fan which draws air from outside the case and blasts it over the cpu and out the case again is good.. Much more effective than one which recirculates the already warm air from inside the case. A lot of highend machines use a similar fan arrangement to dell's, the only problem as i see it, is that standard sized motherboards don't put the cpu in the same place every time so it's not possible to setup the fan like this so easily.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  47. PCI obsolete? Not yet by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There aren't many widely-available alternatives to PCI right now. AFAIK, there's PCI-X and PCI-Express. PCI-X is only viable in the server market, and PCI-Express cards that aren't video cards are practically nonexistant.

    PCI-Express will replace PCI one day, but it will be a long time before PCI-Express is even a viable alternative for anything except video cards. Even in the mid-late 90s, when ISA was still around, there were plenty of PCI cards. Now, no one uses Serial and Parallel ports, and USB devices are all oer the place, but you still see Serial and Parallel ports on most boards. PCI Express is still in its infancy--PCI ain't gonna be obsolete for a long time. AGP, on the other hand, will die very soon, as the only area in which PCI Express has made progress is video cards.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  48. On-board ain't that bad these days by jgarzik · · Score: 4, Informative
    Most onboard audio chipsets don't even support multiple audio streams in hardware.

    Completely false.

    Pretty much all of the new on-board audio supports multiple channels (OS drivers may be another story!). The bleeding edge on-board audio even supports High Definition Audio.

    Most of the high-volume motherboard chipset vendors -- Intel (the big fish), AMD, NVIDIA, SiS, ULi, VIA, ... -- all implement the same advanced features in their chipsets: SATA2 NCQ, USB 2, HD audio, gigabit ethernet, and more. Just wait 3-6 months, and a new-and-spiffy ethernet/SATA/USB/audio feature will appear for free on a modern motherboard. If its a mass-market feature, of course.

    Blindly choosing "no on-board devices" is rather silly. Today's mass market motherboard contains on-board devices, which means the cheapest motherboards give you that stuff for free. If the on-board device meets your feature requirements, use it. Sealed silicon interconnects are far more reliable than PCI slots anyway.

    ...speaking as the author of the [old OSS] VIA audio driver for Linux, and the sometimes-maintainer of the [old OSS] Intel/SiS/Nvidia/AMD audio driver for Linux, as well as other Linux drivers for on-board (and off-board) devices.

  49. mass market economics by pjrc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It seems like a waste to buy a board with all the built-in stuff (and probably pay extra for it)

    Not really.

    The fallacy is that these extra peripherals cost extra. They don't, really. The price you pay is determined by, more than any other factor, the economy of mass producing exactly the same product for such a large market.

    Especially in the chipset, those extra transistors come almost for free. It would cost MORE to make another version of the chips with a different configuration. Likewise, even with the same chips, it would cost MORE to make additional models without the extra connectors. There is tremendous savings in manufacturing only one model (or relatively few). Distribution and retail sales also saves costs only having to deal with fewer distinct models.

    So just don't use those extra bell and whistles. But don't imagine they're costing you anything extra. The PC motherboard market is extremely competitive, and many companies and individuals shop primarily for the lowest price. If there was an easy way, such as making a different model without some parts, to achieve a lower price, you better believe the manufacturers would do it in a heartbeat.

    And there are plenty of budget motherboards. If they could save even a small amount taking off more features, they certainly would. Because they haven't, you can have high confidence those extras aren't actually costing you anything extra.... in the reality of today's manufacturing, distribution and retail marketplace.

  50. Re:then dont use it by TERdON · · Score: 2, Informative
    And why do modern boards still have serial and Parralell ports? They aren't used by 75% of the rest of the world, why are they even included as standard on ALL boards? On Some us because they still have some value but ALL?

    Because the 25% of the world that DO use them think they're quite useful. And as explained in other parts of this thread, it's easier to build one mobo with them, than one with and one without.

    For the uses:

    Quite many people still have old, parallel printers. I for one do, and I'm not planning to throw my nice (though old) laser printer away anytime soon. Yes, it's possible to connect them with a mini print server, but why?

    It's also quite common to connect homebrew electronics to the parallel port. For example, it's quite usual to connect a LCD to the parallel port. As an amateur, it's the easiest. Second shot I think is serial. Third one is USB - and believe me (I have tried to find a cheapish possible solution - a friend asked me if it was possible to connect a LCD by USB) - that one is complicated, and expensive! USB was never intended to be a standard used for homebrew circuits, it's far too complicated (of course that doesn't stop the most advanced amateurs, but for the rest of us?).

    For uses of serial ports: I use mine for connecting to my TI-86 calculator, with a home-soldered cable. It's also quite common to give chip programmers etc serial interfaces. Also some industrial equipments as PLC:s and PT:s normally have serial interfaces. For everyday devices - modems! Sure, you can get a new modem with USB, but you're probably switching to broadband in a year anyway. Or you just use the modem for faxing, so the old one works just fine. Serial stuff seems to be more uncommon than parallel though, so just having one serial port is ok, I suppose.

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  51. Re:then dont use it by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that is interesting how are you using the serial ports as an emulator, for local connections?

    Also since most people here noticed I said most not all. I know serial is still used by some, and at work we have 3 parralell printers dot matrix printers. but personally I haven't owned a dot-matrix in 10 years. My only serial toy is my UPS. everything else is USB.

    I noticed this when shopping for mini-itx boards. there is a total of two models without all the other connectors. If I am trying to make a cool small shape, why do I have to ruin it by cutting out such a huge block at once?

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  52. Re:then dont use it by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yea right.

    I disabled several video cards and sound cards via my motherboard over the years guess what.

    Windows installs drivers for them anyway and reactivates them.

    I spent an hour one day trying to figure out what was wrong with win 2k, I finally plugged my network cable into the on board jack and things worked for a minute. Windows had reactivated the barely functioning built-in jack (not sure why but it wouldn't hold a connection)

    Windows Plug and play does more than just ask the bios for hardware specs, it does a deep hardware scan sometimes.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  53. You're going about this all wrong. by adolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't start looking for a new item based on what you don't want, but instead try to find one that includes what you do want.

    I had a few requirements for the last motherboard upgrade that I bought for my own personal use, so I made a list:

    Support for the last of the Socket-A CPUs
    Dual-channel DDR
    4 DIMM sockets
    At least 5 PCI slots
    Two regular IDE ports
    Two SATA ports
    AGP

    I plugged some of these requirements into newegg's search engine, and found several that included all of these features.

    It turns out that it was cheaper to buy one that also included on-board audio and a gigabit ethernet jack, than to buy one without.

    So, I went with the cheaper one. I've been ignoring the on-board audio since day 1, and decided to just go ahead and use the built-in LAN and free up a NIC for better uses.

    I might've chosen one that included Firewire, and on-board video, too, for all I care. I don't have a use for those functions, and I don't foresee having a use for them. But would it piss me off to have paid less for their inclusion, were that the case? Absolutely not.

    I know how you feel. I got upset in the 90s when companies irrevocably started putting IDE, floppy, serial, and parallel ports onto motherboards. "What am I going to do with all of these expensive VESA local bus multi-I/O cards?"

    Something similar also happened to me in the 80s I realized that the ISA clock card in my XT had been obsoleted by a part on the motherboard.

    Needless to say, I got over the trauma of those transitions pretty quickly. You will, too, once you figure out what you're going to do with all those expensive 3c905 and genuine DEC Tulip cards...

    [Hint: Local schools, libraries, friends-of-friends, and children-of-friends are all fine places to deposit good hardware which has been obsoleted by a motherboard upgrade. Just make sure you get it to them before time makes it completely fucking useless, and keep it appropriately packaged in antistatic bags or somesuch so it doesn't die all on its own before it gets a chance to be used again.]

  54. I agree for different reasons... Think green! by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The jump from AT to ATX motherboards was a step backwards environmentally. We used to have "Super I/O" cards with all our interfaces on them, and we could reuse that card when we switched motherboards to support a new processor.

    These days, with all the ports on the mobo, we throw away an extra pound of plastic every time we change chips. This stuff seldom changes -- the ATX port cluster still includes a parallel port, PS/2 ports, and USB ports like when it was introduced. How much of this stuff is sitting in a landfill now?

    I'd like to see most of that integrated with the case. Like the front-mounted USB and audio ports, why not put an actual USB hub and USB audio device, along with USB serial and parallel devices, perhaps a USB ethernet adapter, on a PCB inside the case? Let it connect to a single motherboard USB header.

    This would give case designers the ultimate flexibility in putting the ports where they want, since a lot of casemodding these days seems to involve port rearrangement. It would liberate the mobo designers from having to mount and support all that plastic, which would in turn allow motherboards to be smaller for those who don't need all those ports. And, for those of us who don't care to have it integrated into the case, we could stick our port cards or port bays into whatever slot or drive mountings we chose.

  55. False economy by Reziac · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with onboard video is that 1) it typically uses shared RAM, which is never 100% stable (or if not shared RAM, usually some very small amount -- like 8mb even in current machines!!) 2) in my observation the onboard video circuit is the most likely point where the magic smoke gets out; and 3) *sometimes* it doesn't disable cleanly even if it's otherwise dead, so you can't replace it with a proper AGP card anyway.

    Also, motherboards with onboard video are typically made cheaper all around, and are more likely to fail sooner, or not be upgradeable in general -- for every onboard function, typically at least one PCI slot goes away, and how much flexibility do you have in a board with only a couple slots?

    Onboard sound and NIC aren't so bad (except for the vanishing slots design thing) because you can have two NICs or two sound cards without the system getting confused, so if one doesn't disable cleanly, it's not a big deal (tho the chips used are usually bottom end/cheapest available). But because of the generally lower quality and other issues, I'd never buy a motherboard with onboard *video*.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  56. Warning for crap sound, plus bad Linux shop by Roger+Wernersson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't buy a cheap motherboard. I bought two AsRock because a Linux shop in London (geekstop.co.uk) sold them as the low-end mobo. I never got the NIC to work on one, Linux won't shut down properly,

    but the BIG PROBLEM is that whenever the CPU is busy, the sound is really crap, this includes playing games, and films. I can't run SETI and listen to music!

    By the way, don't buy from GeekStop.co.uk. They don't know what they are doing. They installed faulty memory which showed up on a simple memory-tester. They sell hardware with Linux-problems.

    --
    temporarily sigless
  57. ACME Motherboard Finder by JaF893 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not try the ACME Motherboard Finder