Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Promo Videos

sebFlyte writes "Last week Mozilla Europe launched some extremely funny promotional videos for Firefox and ZDNet is reporting that they're spreading across the net like wildfire." From the article: "This is just the beginning -- I only posted it on my personal blog and it's already spreading nicely...We wanted to start small as we were concerned that servers wouldn't be able to handle the load."

24 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Can't handle the load? by jobeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "we were concerned that servers wouldn't be able to handle the load" -> Slashdotted already. :(

    1. Re:Can't handle the load? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some of us have jobs, and at some of those jobs they have things called corporate computer use policy, and believe it or not, a lot of folks are not allowed to do bittorrent. I know that the last guy around here who was using BT to download anything was met at his cubicle by out information assurance team and securty where he was asked to hand over his machine and was escorted from the building for violation of company computer use policy.

  2. Got my father switched today by BronxBomber · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Which got me thinking - I wonder if its possible to push more marketing toward the older generation who are too afraid to switch from "tried and true" MSIE/Outlook?

    A lot of the older generation has no idea what ActiveX is, how harmful it can be... it would be swell to see Firefox maybe try to get the attention of more casual, not-so-savvy PC users.

    --
    ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    1. Re:Got my father switched today by BronxBomber · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why is easy bad?

      This is a common misconception. If Firefox expects to make any serious inroads, then they must address the casual user. Word of mouth is powerful, but not that powerful. Saying it would mean everything would have to be too easy is, to me, a copout.

      Strictly speaking this has little to do with security. It has to do with prevention of scripts and executables being launched without user permission. This is one of the many things FF does well. IE does not. All a casual user has to do is install FF - default settings work fine for 99% of their surfing requirements. Cant get much easier than that.

      --
      ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    2. Re:Got my father switched today by mjh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder if its possible to push more marketing toward the older generation who are too afraid to switch from "tried and true" MSIE/Outlook?
      Good grief! When *I* think of the "older" generation, I think of people who amazed that an entire computer could fit into a single room. How wonderful that we've come far enough that we're worried about the distributed software that the "older" generation is using on their *personal* *computer*!

      (BTW: I use firefox and mutt. I just look old.)

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    3. Re:Got my father switched today by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And ActiveX is harmful how exactly?

      The whole point of ActiveX in the MS HTML control is to allow a remote site to load and run a native executable without you having to decide whether to run/install/download/whatever.

      Of course that has turned out to be a horribly bad idea, and they've wrapped ActiveX in so many layers of protection that downloading and installing a program is INFINITELY easier than figuring out how to configure IE to let you use ActiveX the way it was intended.

      The problem is, all those layers of protection don't include "making ActiveX disabled by default", because it's *also* how Windows implements a lot of the features of Windows Explorer. So if someone can figure out how to convince the HTML control that their remote exploit's really an ActiveX applet installed by Windows Explorer, locally, it'll happily run it. then they can do anything.

      Microsoft regularly fixes this, usually in a way that breaks someone's software or adds another annoying dialog to train you to ignore annoying dialogs. And just as regularly someone finds another hole, and Ad-Aware or Symantec has to figure out another signature to detect another virus or spybot...

  3. ugh by AIX-Hood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mentioning "video" without the subsequent "torrent link" is asking for trouble.

  4. Cool ads, but I don't think they promote Firefox by norfolkboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The adverts are certainly cool, I enjoyed watching them.

    BUT, although they mention FireFox, they don't give much clue as to what it does, other than "it's something to do with computers".

    I can't see this converting anyone.

    Sure, there is a link to download FF at the end, but users these days really should be discouraged from downloading something just because "the advertiser says so". Aren't we working against that culture?

    I really think the adverts need to make more noise about what firefox is and does.

  5. Anyone got a torrent up? by gte910h · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is screaming at the top of its lungs for a bittorrent

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  6. Re:Cool ads, but I don't think they promote Firefo by norfolkboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    sorry - that sounded a bit harsh. I think it's great that people are trying to promote FF.

    I just don't feel the "blank and mysterious" adverts of the dot-com-bubble era are the right way to do it.

  7. Not funny? by AaronD12 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Um... am I the only one that thought those were not funny? Good special effects but special effects don't make things funny. Content makes things funny.

    Yawn.

    /Firefox user on PC; Safari on Mac

    1. Re:Not funny? by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I thought they were all rubbish. A clear case of someone trying to be far too smart for their own good. The population at large does not know the brand firefox, does not know what it does and more importantly does not really care. A couple unamusing and totally obscure videos are not going to change that.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  8. For or against FireFox? by skoda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I watched these movies a few days back, and found them amusing, but I didn't understand their message. Are they suggesting that using e.g. IE is so devastating to the user that his head will pop off? Or is using Firefox so horrible that he scream in horror? Or are these good things, to show how remarkably different Firefox is from the competition?

    Cute videos, but I have no idea what they're trying to communicate.

    1. Re:For or against FireFox? by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is, you're trying to recieve a consise message from an advertisement that does not have one. There is no underlying message, and they are suggesting very little.

      The whole idea of this kind of advertising is to get your attention, and then show you a brand name. It's called brand exposure, and it's surprisingly effective. That's it, nothing more.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  9. Re:Cool ads, but I don't think they promote Firefo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see the hype. They were vaguely amusing at best, certainly not the hilarity people are talking about. I suspect it's just the novelty of seeing a fairly polished video advert for an open-source project that is impressing people. Really, if they were promoting any other product, would people even bother talking about it?

  10. Re:Grr... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or does firefox seem to get promoted/mentioned by Slashdot everyday?

    So does MSFT, now that you mention it.

    Why oh why do they insist on discussing web browsers when we're just trying to upgrade our web browsers?

    Um, irony, this is earth, we have another post.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  11. Re:Cool ads, but I don't think they promote Firefo by MartinG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they don't give much clue as to what it does

    That's not neccesarily a bad thing. It's an old advertising trick to deliberately miss out some information in order to stimulate curiosity.

    Admittedly, this could be leaving out too much.

    I think what this might do it hurry those who do know what firefox is into getting round to trying it. I know I would if it made me eat telephones.

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
  12. Re:Cool ads, but I don't think they promote Firefo by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like you don't know much about marketing. You don't want to give the viewer much clue as to what something does. If you say up front "It's a web browser", people will think "oh ok i already have one, goodbye". If you make them think "what the hell is firefox?", they will click on the link and read the sales pitch on firefox.org (and quite likely download and try it). Much more effective.

  13. They're awful by PickyH3D · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Maybe I do not get the humor of a person screaming, or a persons head falling off (I guess I grew out of that when I passed my teenage years??).

    Stupid modern marketing and going for shock value instead of features. The notebook and office ones do not even show Firefox, aside from the link at the end. Oh ya, some rediculously stupid ad for it is going to intrigue me into downloading something.

    Feel/Taste/See the difference? TASTE? These are some of the worst "ads" I have ever seen.

    1. Re:They're awful by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would have to agree. They are atrocious. Whoever is helping promote Firefox/Mozilla doesn't know what they are talking about. First, a full-page ad in the New York Times won't be read by that many people. That money could've been used to get some stories or PR to be run in AP and a thousand small local papers in the "technology" section. The NYT ad was a waste of money.

      These ads, on the other hand, are even worse. They don't explain what Firefox is, they don't talk about it's advantages, and are therefore completely irrelevant. (Compare this to the AOL with Spamblocker buffet line ad, which is a lot better, even if the product isn't). Worse, they're not even funny. And then to top it all off, you try "viral marketing" them on a bunch of blogs --- these are people that already know about Firefox.

      I can guarantee that infomercials running in the morning advertising Firefox for $4.95 would be loads more succesful than this crap.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  14. Re:Totally offtopic.... by Laxitive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll add one to that: writing your first serious application.

    I annotated my entire collection which I traded on IRC. Since many fserves wanted certain things, and not others (no low-qual pics, no b&w pics, only lesbians, etc.).

    I wrote an app in python that parsed a manifest file that described all the files in a particular directory, and then let you trawl it using arbitrary boolean queries over boolean, integer, and string fields.

    The exact usage of the app went like this:
    reset (reset the set of working files to all files)
    men = 0 (remove any pic with men)
    women >= 2 (remove any pic with less than 2 women)
    hc = true (remove softcore pics)
    dump (dump working set to screen and pipe it through more)

    That's how you searched for HC lesbian pics :) You could also use 'or' to delimit multiple queries on the same line. No 'and's, though, since you could just simulate that by typing out the queries on successive lines.

    Oh man. I was so proud of myself when I got that written. I was 15 years old, just learning python. It was the first time I had programmed something that was of actual use to me.. that helped me in some real, tangible, immediate way. My IRC fserve efficiency went up an order of magnitude after that. Porn is a more powerful motivator than you can ever imagine. Especially for 15 year old boys with a lot of time on their hands. Ah, good times... good times.

    -Laxitive

  15. Re:Coulda been better... by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These ads are just NOT funny.. frankly, they suck!
    where is the connection to Firefox in any of these ads?

    Perhaps I just have no sense of humor. I came away scratching my head and saying "huh?"

  16. Classic problem with bad advertising by RomulusNR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These guys clearly either haven't really done much work in advertising... or else they have, and failed miserably.

    What must be the number one problem with a lot of advertisements over the past couple of years, especially for new products, is that the advertisers spend too much time being weird, funky, shocking, and funny, and COMPLETELY FORGET ABOUT THE FRICKIN' PRODUCT.

    At any given moment I can rattle off a commercial I've seen whose content really stuck with me, but I couldn't for the life of me tell you what the hell they were advertising.

    Like that Dodge Ram commercial where the middle aged guy is making the two salespeople turn the truck back and forth.

    Wait a minute, that's not a Dodge Ram commercial at all, it's a Vehix commercial. Well, at least we were close with this one, it's car related somehow.

    Or what about those commercials about the company with the tech support department that is so good it can tell you if something is funny? Wait, that's for TBS. Who doesn't actually provide that service at all.

    And these ones are for that website thats so crazy and shocking that it makes your head explode. Right?

    These ads don't say anything - I mean, nothing at all - about what's good about Firefox. All they say is that it'll make you scream, or decapitate you. A little balance with some message of benefit might help.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  17. Something that would REALLY be funny. by StreetChip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Show the guy in the office again but this time show him surfing using IE. Then show him hitting a malware page that replicates a virus to his computer , the virus while running also plays an audio clip "You have been infected by GayPornLover.exe, Internet Explorer victims are so easy!" Now have him screaming over that while in the background you see all of the other networked computers in his entire building catch the same virus from him as the building begins to crack and crumble to the ground. Have him still screaming while the entire building breaks up and falls to the ground, him included. Flash forward to the guy in a full body cast in the hospital, 1 leg up, where he says: "My company would still exist today if I had only used Firefox." The existing ads are crap BTW, not funny, not even interesting. They are just dumb.

    --
    LeoPolus Web Design: http://www.leopolus.com