John Cleese To Write Next Aardman Film
Anonymous Coward writes "The BBC has news from the Cannes Film Festival. First, the previously announced Curse of the Were-Rabbit Wallace and Gromit short is due in Autumn, and a Trailer is available. Second, John Cleese is currently writing a pre-historic comedy for Aardman Entertainment. From the article: 'It will be great comedy adventure about a pre-historic culture clash between two tribes, one comparatively evolved tribe, and one un-evolved tribe...Some might consider one tribe might be the English, and some might consider that the other to be the French, the Gauls...Let's just say it's the start of the Entente Cordial and it explains why the English Channel is there.'"
Let's invent a time machine and send John Cleese back 30 years so he can write it when he's still funny.
Grommit! we forgot the cleese!
air and light and time and space
That's all well and good, but what about the rabbit?
So, there will be three tribes?
Everything that man touches turns to gold. Brilliant, hilarious, bring it on.
Video Phone Blogs send video messages straight to the web.
Declaration of Revocation
by John Cleese
To the citizens of the United States of America, in the light of your failure to elect a competent President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective today.
Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths and other territories.
Except Utah, which she does not fancy.
Your new Prime Minister (The Right Honourable Tony Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a world outside your borders) will appoint a Minister for America without the need for further elections.
Congress and the Senate will be disbanded.
A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:
1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up "aluminium." Check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it.
The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'favour' and 'neighbour'; skipping the letter 'U' is nothing more than laziness on your part. Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters.
You will end your love affair with the letter 'Z' (pronounced 'zed' not 'zee') and the suffix "ize" will be replaced by the suffix "ise."
You will learn that the suffix 'burgh' is pronounced 'burra' e.g. Edinburgh. You are welcome to re-spell Pittsburgh as 'Pittsberg' if you can't cope with correct pronunciation.
Generally, you should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. Look up "vocabulary." Using the same thirty seven words interspersed with filler noises such as "uhh", "like", and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication.
Look up "interspersed."
There will be no more 'bleeps' in the Jerry Springer show. If you're not old
enough to cope with bad language then you shouldn't have chat shows. When you learn to develop your vocabulary, then you won't have to use bad language as often.
2. There is no such thing as "US English." We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take account of the reinstated letter 'u' and the elimination of "-ize."
3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents. It really isn't that hard. English accents are not limited to cockney, upper-class twit or Mancunian (Daphne in Frasier).
You will also have to learn how to understand regional accents --- Scottish dramas such as "Taggart" will no longer be broadcast with subtitles.
While we're talking about regions, you must learn that there is no such place as Devonshire in England. The name of the county is "Devon." If you persist in calling it Devonshire, all American States will become "shires" e.g. Texasshire, Floridashire, Louisianashire.
4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as the good guys. Hollywood will be required to cast English actors to play English characters.
British sit-coms such as "Men Behaving Badly" or "Red Dwarf" will not
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
On a side note, does anyone know about W & G's Cracking Contraptions? It was annouced long ago but while the site is up I can't seem to watch them anywhere, and I can't seem to find a DVD of the shorts either. I'd love to see 'em.
Also, if you don't have it, Aardman put out a book all about what they do and how they do it. You can find it on Amazon and it's really good. It explains some of their tricks, stories behind things, and how to make your own little "3D" films as they call them (refering to the fact they are actually 3D objects, as opposed to CGI which is simulated 3D).
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
Because somebody forgot to drain the tub!
...]
[oh, darn, should have put SPOILER in the title, now everyone knows the punch line for John Cleese's new movie
.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
It's the best video to watch on a first-second date. It's only 25 min (I usually watch "The Wrong Trousers") and she'll love it and laugh. Score big points :)
Will probably be just fine entertainment so long as he gets some Yank humor in there as well. How about it John. Recruit Luger Axhandle and Rebus Knebus as migrants from a tribe across the sea to help sort things out....
This is unlike any Cleese I've ever tasted.
Being a nerd should only mean you support transhumanism. I'm sorry, but I care not for Tolkien, python, star wars and such.
Transcend Humanity. Please.
Some might consider one tribe might be the English, and some might consider that the other to be the French.
In this one, which nationality discovers that coconuts are *not* migratory?
http://www.rit.edu/~smo4215/monty.htm
GUARD #1: Where'd you get the coconut?
ARTHUR: We found them.
GUARD #1: Found them? In Mercea? The coconut's tropical!
ARTHUR: What do you mean?
GUARD #1: Well, this is a temperate zone.
ARTHUR: The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter yet these are not strangers to our land.
GUARD #1: Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
ARTHUR: Not at all, they could be carried.
GUARD #1: What -- a swallow carrying a coconut?
ARTHUR: It could grip it by the husk!
GUARD #1: It's not a question of where he grips it! It's a simple question of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound coconut.
ARTHUR: Well, it doesn't matter. Will you go and tell your master that Arthur from the Court of Camelot is here.
GUARD #1: Listen, in order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings 43 times every second, right?
ARTHUR: Please!
GUARD #1: Am I right?
ARTHUR: I'm not interested!
GUARD #2: It could be carried by an African swallow!
GUARD #1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow, that's my point.
GUARD #2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that...
ARTHUR: Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court at Camelot?!
GUARD #1: But then of course African swallows are not migratory.
GUARD #2: Oh, yeah...
GUARD #1: So they couldn't bring a coconut back anyway...
[clop clop]
GUARD #2: Wait a minute -- supposing two swallows carried it together?
GUARD #1: No, they'd have to have it on a line.
GUARD #2: Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!
GUARD #1: What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
GUARD #2: Well, why not?
one comparatively evolved tribe, and one un-evolved tribe...
Wasn't this done in caveman? Still, I loved that cheesy movie.
If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
Excuse me now while I blow my brains out with a shotgun
Now that might well be funny, but it's a bit more Rowan Atkinson that Python.
KFG
WMA was only one I could get
e _and_Gromit_Trailer_330k.wmv
http://screenrant.com.nyud.net:8090/images/Wallac
Did anyone else hear John Cleese's voice as they read the quote about the new comedy?
What could possibly go wrong?
It will be great comedy adventure about a pre-historic culture clash between two tribes, one comparatively evolved tribe, and one un-evolved tribe
Let me guess: one evolved to walk upright, and the other evolved to walk in a much sillier way.
Everything that man touches turns to gold.
I beg to differ. He wrote a "comedy" take on Superman called "True Brit". In this alternate take on the story, Superman lands in England, and his parents raise him to hide his powers and he ends up working for a London tabloid.
Guess what? It sucks! I really wanted to like it, but it just wasn't funny!
I like John Cleese, and thought it would be good. I'm not really sure what he was trying to do, but it didn't work.
My stupid web site
Sounds a bit like Gogs, another set of claymation shorts which had a feature length edition.
I'll come in again.
John Cleese did not write this. It is an urban myth.
You can tell, because it is not funny.
Snopes.
That wasn't by Cleese either, but you'll find this to be more relevant.
*whew* For a second I swore the headline said, "John Cheese"
I've been waiting for an animated film featuring Mr. Cheddar and his nefarious enemy, Dr. Swiss...
Lucas - the reason Brits like warm beer.
as they say: FFS
NO MORE FISH CALLED WALLACE
Heres a hint Cheese OLD BOY
TRY FUNNY
Yeah FUNNY WORK
Expensive tarts impressed by your tounge may well please you, but leave me limp!
Try and pull the chat-show bull and BT will FUCK your arse
Hey CHESSE who paid for the Bently? YEAH ME!
That's all well and good, but what about the rabbit?
What does the scripture say about the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch working on Were-Rabbits? Then thou must count to three . . .
And thanks for posting more insight in my journal, Mr. Boldface.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
He likes us. He's a masochist too.
MY POSTS ARE THAT IMPORTANT.
That must be the one who goes around sodomizing boys. I think I've got the tribes clear now.
I thought Curse Of The Were-Rabbit was a feature-length film. According to IMDB.COM it's 94 minutes. That's quite the long short.
Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
It will be great comedy adventure about a pre-historic culture clash between two tribes, one comparatively evolved tribe, and one un-evolved tribe...Some might consider one tribe might be the English, and some might consider that the other to be the French, the Gauls...Let's just say it's the start of the Entente Cordial and it explains why the English Channel is there.
;p
so which one's the evolved one?
HD Trailers
its a troll thread so I can post stuff like this
I saw a French film a few months ago that sounds remarkably like what this new film of Cleese's is described as. check it out. It's actually about the discovery of murder, if I remember correctly, but it also has a major subplot involving one tribe that is evolved (that is, has shampoo) and another which is unevolved (no shampoo = dirty and ugly). Extremely over the top stuff.
I thought it was pretty funny, though I don't speak much French so it might have been funnier (or less funny, who knows) if it were in English.
Looks like the server is (predictably) slashdotted. Here's the torrent link:
Wallace And Gromit - The Curse Of The Were-Rabbit - Trailer 1 (WMV)
Here is the 330k wma version http://www.waytoblue.com/media/video/wallace_&_gro mit_trailer2_330k.asx
Eeak!?
It was wrong of me to troll your journal. It isn't right to fuck with someone's personal space like that, and I apologize.
But really, are you a homogay?
To allow the English to say on foggy days: "The continent is isolated"...
Like, duh.
We don't care the 'mericans are doing a bit of Brit bashing and the Brits are bashing back. It's all in good fun and as a Canadian I've done my best to incite both camps. If we could just get our Ozzie cousins involved we'd have a good 'ol time, but they seem to spend their time preoccupied with thunder farts and compiling enough meanings for the word piss to fill a fair sized dictionary.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/dreamworks/wallace_a nd_gromit/featurette/I'm not sure it's the same movie, because the BBC-server does not accept anymore connections.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
Oh joy, more hilarious french bashing by anglos. He did this before. In his otherwise good wine-school program for TV, he put on an "outrrrrrrrageuos" phony french accent when he was talking about the terribly wine snobbery that existed.
I remember when Cleese jokes were daring and original, and not just easy crowd pleasing by pandering to popular prejudices. Sorry to be harsh, but like Clive Barker, he seems to have lost his creativity and originality when he moved to the US. Or maybe it's just age.
Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die
You're american, you can tell, because you don't get it.
As opposed to Rugby Football (written rules 1845) , including the first football (rugby) club, "Guy's Hospital Football Club", formed in London in 1843.
Tom Baker narrated the trailer. Cool beans.
No, he's right. It's obviously not something by Cleese because the entire thing contains only one thing that could be called a joke (the JFK thing), and it doesn't actually make any sense. The only thing that makes it even vaguely humorous is imagining it read aloud by John Cleese, but he could read a grocery list and make it sound funny. No, if Cleese wrote it, it would be much sillier and not contain pointlessly dull items like the one about petrol prices (yawn).
If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
You just basically admitted that you are American, and you didn't get the joke either. What's wrong with you guys? Why does everything have to be funny for everyone? I bet most Europeans who read this were laughing pretty hard, so the jokes a success. Who the fuck cares that Americans don't like the joke?
While it's not on a par with Cleese's wit, most non-Americans would probably find it quite humourous.
Of course if you insist on taking it personally then it's unsurprising that you won't find it very funny.
. . . not a "short."
For slightly more in-depth reviews, see, e.g.:
Comics in Context #66: A Christmas Potpourri (starts about halfway down the page)
Mild Mannered Reviews - Specials
blogcritics
and for a list of additional 'It sucked!'/'I liked it!' comments: Comic Book Resources
Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
And Warm too!
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooo
Hi. I'm a dumb American and I also am missing out on that "historical perspective" thing. I'm starting to form one now but it only goes back to about 2000 or so. That's not nearly long enough.
I've seen both of the recent M. Moore movies. I liked them, but IMHO M. Moore is a jackass and very, very far away from being even remotely objective. The one thing that realy got me in Bowling For Columbine was when Moore went through listing all the dictators and coups the U.S. has supported over the years.
My point: I feel that if I and other Americans had some clue as to our recent (last 20-30 years) history of foreign policy and various wars, it might be helpful in forming intelligent opinions about our country's leadership.
So. Can you recommend any good books or websites that objectively list out all the icky policies the U.S. has supported over the last 30 years?
Thanks in advance.
Furry cows moo and decompress.