Slashdot Mirror


BBC Trial of TV Show Download Service

Little Hamster writes "Five thousand households with broadband access has been selected for a trial of the BBC's new interactive Media Player. The trial will run from September to December, and users can 'time shift' and download selected BBC TV shows, radio programmes, regional programming and feature films. After seven days, the content will be automatically deleted from the user's computers. BBC will use this trial to iron out any outstanding rights issues and resolve teething difficulties with the technology ahead of a full launch next year." The BBC Press Office has a release about this as well.

24 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Am I missing something? by frankthechicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the BBC essentially runs a public domain service anyway, why are the shows deleted after seven days?

    This ceratinly doesn't need to happen on a video recording.

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the BBC essentially runs a public domain service anyway, why are the shows deleted after seven days?

      I don't think it's that simple. For one, I believe that BBC doesn't own all the shows they broadcast. (Although they do own quite a few.) As such, they are licensed to provide public distribution of the shows, but are not necessary able to just give them away. This would seem to be backed by the article's mention of Hollywood and independent studios.

      In addition, it also mentions that the acting unions are "acting up"^H^H balking at the idea of Internet distribution. They don't give any details, but my guess is that actors are concerned that rampant piracy would result in lower wages and fewer acting jobs. It's probably pretty hard to convince them that if given a good for-pay alternative, the majority of people will use the convenient pay service. (The only reason why Napster ever appeared was that the music industry failed to respond to market pressures. What did they THINK was going to happen?)

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they didn't delete content, people's computers would crash. You seem to forget we're talking about the public here...

  2. From the BBC Press release by Alranor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The BBC's interactive media player (iMP) is a new application in development which will allow users to download tv and radio programmes from bbc.co.uk to their PC or laptop and watch or listen to them for seven days after the transmission date.


    Anyone wanna bet it'll be Windows only.

    Guess i'll probably end up sticking to bittorrent.
  3. Re:TiVo? by maharg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    yes, you don't get a free TiVo with a UK tv license

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  4. Re:TiVo? by taskforce · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes, you have access to the BBC's entire library Napster style, except it's *free* (As in TV Liscence, not beer.)

    TiVo I believe you can only record shows that were on and watch them later, or am I missing something?

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  5. BBC and DRM by tdvaughan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was disappointed at first to see that the BBC is implementing DRM but it's worth bearing in mind that not all the content broadcast by the BBC is owned by them. Much of it comes from independent studios who license it to the BBC. So I remain hopeful that the BBC will offer its own copyrighted material to UK license payers on more permissive terms.

  6. Call me weird by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    But with that headline, i first thought it was refering to a lawsuit. Trial and Music in the same headline, and it's not a lawsuit?! Expect a letter from the RIAA soon, guys!

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  7. Re:TiVo? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although this does raise the question of why the content is deleted at all. Since the license payers have already paid for it to be produced, why can they not do whatever they want with the content?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Time-shifting by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dr. Who fans will note that their house now looks a lot smaller on the outside than it really is on the inside.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  9. Quit Complaining - And Read My Journal ;) by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've had a decent idea for legal TV distribution online in my journal for a while now. Most of the posts I see so far about this BBC service are negative. Finally a media outlet is trying to embrace technology instead of calling their lawyers every 5 minutes, and all people can do is complain. Downloadable shows will probably never be free without the show including some form of DRM or advertising... get used to it. I'd much rather have DRM or ads than no downloadable shows at all.

    If you don't want the DRM or ads, get a Tivo or TV capture card and skip the commercials or edit them out.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  10. Re:TiVo? by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
    From TFA
    Unlike personal video recorders such as Sky Plus, viewers will not have to signal their chosen programmes in advance, allowing critically acclaimed shows to benefit retrospectively from a favourable review or word of mouth.
    Wow. It's almost as if you didn't RTFA.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  11. FTFA: by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Commercial rivals have already voiced fears that the BBC's substantial investment in iMP and the Creative Archive could damage their chances of making money from the concept.

    [rant]Well, maybe they should have been worrying about that for the last bloody decade then, instead of spending all their time & money trying to legislate the whole bloody concept out of existance!![/rant]

    *ahem*

    Yay, BBC! It's times like this I don't object to paying my license fee!

    --
    So.. it has come to this
  12. Re:The Office? by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I often read Americans saying they had to turn on subtitles to understand parts of The Office. As an English person I've always wanted to know which parts/characters Americans find hard to understand. Or is it just the slang terms used?

    From an English person's point of view, the accents are fairly standard mid-England/London accents. But then, having driven round rural Georgia, I know we are two countries divided by a common language.

  13. Re:Automatically deleted? by Pakaran2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The issue of Linux is that it simply won't be supported. Isn't that obvious?

  14. Re:The Office? by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The Benny Hill Show" started on the BBC in 1955, but transferred to ITV in 1969. The ones that are seen in the US are entirely from the ITV run, and with many of the ruder bits cut out.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  15. Re:TiVo? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where have you been?

    The UK TV licence fee is regularly moaned about on Slashdot!

    For info:

    In the UK you need to have a licence for each address which has a TV receiver (you can have dozens of sets in the same house and one licence if you want*)

    FWIW I'm happy to pay it for TV free from adverts disrupting the shows and with greater freedom to express ideas without worrying about business withdrawing advertising revenue. And don't worry about the 'tax' aspects meaning state direction - the Beeb regularly clashes with the government of the day - as both main parties seem to complain about it, it must be reasonably neutral. (BTW I have no connection with the BBC)

    Others may dislike the licence on philosophical / political / dogmatic grounds (esp if they like watching the commercial channels more) - I accept that I have to subsidise, through higher prices, the advertising 'industry' and through them the other channels.

    * actually there are some restrictions (eg multiple independent occupancy of a house split into flats) but the principle holds for most cases

  16. Re:UK has a yearly TV "tax" by NetNifty · · Score: 4, Informative

    "the BBC is supported by advertising and (are you sitting down?) a yearly television tax."

    Nope, just a yearly TV tax, no advertising.

  17. More info about the TV License (tax) by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    More information:

    One guy who doesn't own a TV, but gets harassed by the TV Licensing Agency (which is actually a private company contracted by the BBC, to the tune of a quarter billion pounds a year): http://www.marmalade.net/lime/

    Information about BBC revenue and expenditures, TVLA, etc: http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/international/bbc.htm l

  18. It is MY computer by rtkluttz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They still don't get it. DRM will still be unnacceptable.

    It is MY computer and it should only delete something when I tell it to. No one else. It should not police me. It should not tell me what to do, I should tell it what to do. If I break the law using my computer, then I should be held responsible, but I should NOT be limited if I choose to use the computer in a fashion that some short sited company didn't plan on.

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
  19. Re:Quit Complaining - And Read My Journal ;) by kingdon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, my local NPR radio station here in California is offering the radio SHARK as a premium you get for donating money. (The radio SHARK is a tuner which receives radio programs and records them to a computer; as far as I can tell from their website, there is no DRM).

    Don't know if the station had some heavy discussion about DRM, or even thought about it, but it would appear that not everyone in the content production and distribution business are as worried about pushing DRM as we assume.

  20. Re:TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They moan about a fee of £100 for a year for a load of channels free of advertising. Sky costs about half that much for a month of advert-ridden shit. I know which is better value.

  21. Re:TiVo? by gtkuhn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    An AC somewhere above posted...
    [BBC is] "the most important cultural institution in Britain and, arguably, the World" (ref. Modern British History, M. Garnett and R. Weight ISBN 1-844-13104-1)
    And you want season two of 'Buffy'? The world can be a sad place sometimes.
  22. Okay, trial period? Get your debuggers ready... by pla · · Score: 3, Funny

    BBC will use this trial to iron out any outstanding rights issues

    So remember, kids, even if you come up with a totally trivial means of defeating their DRM, don't release it until AFTER they have irreversably committed to this!