Slashdot Mirror


A Peek at Personalized Google

Seoulstriker writes "Sci-tech Today is describing how Google will be offering customized homepages as seen here. Is this one step closer to Google becoming a web portal like Yahoo? Although it is not currently in Beta, it is only available through the Google Labs site. It definitely doesn't look like Yahoo yet, but I don't want my search site to be any more cluttered than it is now."

13 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Google by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny
    They just seem to be everybody's best friend. Google can do no wrong!

    I just hope they don't execute Order 66...

    1. Re:Google by PsychicX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm so confused:
      Google
      Yahoo

  2. So.... by xiphoris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It definitely doesn't look like Yahoo yet, but I don't want my search site to be any more cluttered than it is now.


    So don't use the personalized webpage, then? Or personalize it so it's simple?
    1. Re:So.... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. I happen to like the extra features. If I didn't I would simply switch it off. I don't get why people are complaining

  3. serparate from the homepage by Spydr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    as long as it's a separate page from the google.com homepage, i'm cool with it.

    it's when they stop offering the lightweight search page by default is when it starts to suck.

  4. Dupe! by sammykrupa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dupe anyone???!?!

  5. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by pdbaby · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know it's slashdot when we rely on our browser first to tell us that the story's a dupe before we bother using our memories

    --
    Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
  6. So far, so good by ShatteredDream · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried it out and actually like it for the most part. The thing that's particularly nice IMO is that all of the personalized content appears below the search feature so that the top looks more or less like the old Google. The interface seems to be the standard Google through and through and it does a pretty good job of showing you only the stuff you want when you take the time to customize it.

    The only thing that they really need to do is add a feature to let you add custom news feeds based on RSS you specify or by creating Google News searches. Good News already lets you add your own categories based on search criteria so My Google needs that too.

  7. It's all about choice! by Bifurcati · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Google's doing the right thing - some people (I presume!) actually like having everything together on the one page. And in many ways, it could be nice - if with a simple, uncluttered interface I can see the day's weather and some of the top news stories from my slected news site when I load up my browser to my default page, then that's good. It's only when the page starts being cluttered by dating services and offers for stuff that doesn't apply to non-U.S.ians that it gets annoyed.

    And, of course, if I decide I don't like it, I can simply revert back to the simple interface. As long as I can do that, I'm happy.

    Anyway, who has time to think about Google when there's Star Wars to think about?!

  8. Re:Clutter... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is exactly what it is.

    Google.com will remain as standard.
    Google.com/ig will result in custom versions.

    Its very nice, the custom versions simply occupy the otherwise blank google space below and are customisable enough for most users.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  9. Google from strength to strength... by RemovableBait · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The integration of their other services is what makes this a not-so-hidden gem. I like being able to have my Gmail, Google News and regular Google Search all viewable on the one page. The weather, Slashdot and other news options are an enormous bonus -- as yet, this is replacing my RSS aggregator as all my feeds are on the site.

    I like the fact that Google have not lost sight of their original focus: search. Many of the other web portals, like Yahoo or MSN, have all the graphics heavy customisation on the page and then throw their search box in as an afterthought (although this is becoming less obvious).

    Google has just a couple of additions to make in order to produce another winning solution: integrated RSS feeds (as someone has already suggested), international weather information (or international versions of the customised page) and the option to put customised search buttons (like the useful Search Linux and Search Uncle Sam) under the search box. That I would like to see.

  10. As noted in the original story: by steeef · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the FAQ:

    6. Why did you mess up the clean, crisp Google homepage?

    We didn't. If you want to keep using the original Google homepage, you can. In fact, we expect that many users will. The personalized homepage is for those users who want to see more of the information that matters to them in the same place. You can always switch back and forth between your personalized homepage and the original Google homepage by clicking "Classic Home" or "Personalized Home." ...

    If you don't like it, don't use it. Google isn't going to make this their default page.

  11. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    >For those who don't get it, firefox shows visited slashdot links as darker

    Welcome to the World Wide Web.
    Let me show you around a bit. Over here we have what we call a "Hyperlink". A hyperlink has a number of features.
    Hyperlinks are usually underlined, and usually a different colour to the rest of the text (blue by convention, unless the web site design specifies otherwise)
    When you click on a hyperlink, you web browser will take you to the page it references.
    If you have already been to that page, the hyperlink will be a different colour to one that refers to a page you have not visited (purple by convention or sometimes red, depending on the browser, unless the web site design specifies otherwise).

    This is standard behaviour in all graphical web browsers, and has been since HTML was invented, around about 15 years ago. I appreciate that you probably weren't born then, and so therefore may think this is a new feature, or one limited to Firefox.