Slashdot Mirror


A Peek at Personalized Google

Seoulstriker writes "Sci-tech Today is describing how Google will be offering customized homepages as seen here. Is this one step closer to Google becoming a web portal like Yahoo? Although it is not currently in Beta, it is only available through the Google Labs site. It definitely doesn't look like Yahoo yet, but I don't want my search site to be any more cluttered than it is now."

35 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Google by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny
    They just seem to be everybody's best friend. Google can do no wrong!

    I just hope they don't execute Order 66...

    1. Re:Google by PsychicX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm so confused:
      Google
      Yahoo

  2. You know it's a dupe when... by The+Hobo · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the links on the story shows up darker than the rest. (For those who don't get it, firefox shows visited slashdot links as darker)

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    1. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by pdbaby · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know it's slashdot when we rely on our browser first to tell us that the story's a dupe before we bother using our memories

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    2. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

      I restarted my computer between that story and this one, so it's not in my memory anymore...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Next we'll be having /. stories covering the /. stories about the /. stories about the /. stories...

      A good point, though, is that since the rise of Google, most of the other search engines have de-cluttered their search pages, removing almost everything from them.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    4. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >For those who don't get it, firefox shows visited slashdot links as darker

      Welcome to the World Wide Web.
      Let me show you around a bit. Over here we have what we call a "Hyperlink". A hyperlink has a number of features.
      Hyperlinks are usually underlined, and usually a different colour to the rest of the text (blue by convention, unless the web site design specifies otherwise)
      When you click on a hyperlink, you web browser will take you to the page it references.
      If you have already been to that page, the hyperlink will be a different colour to one that refers to a page you have not visited (purple by convention or sometimes red, depending on the browser, unless the web site design specifies otherwise).

      This is standard behaviour in all graphical web browsers, and has been since HTML was invented, around about 15 years ago. I appreciate that you probably weren't born then, and so therefore may think this is a new feature, or one limited to Firefox.

    5. Re:You know it's a dupe when... by ginotech · · Score: 4, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot...over here we have a pedant...and over there, too...and there. oh wait, there's another one.

  3. Cluttered search engine? How about crap editors? by furiousgeorge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would you want it cluttered enough so it could spot the dupe story? I could see that being useful to the lazy editors.

  4. So.... by xiphoris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It definitely doesn't look like Yahoo yet, but I don't want my search site to be any more cluttered than it is now.


    So don't use the personalized webpage, then? Or personalize it so it's simple?
    1. Re:So.... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. I happen to like the extra features. If I didn't I would simply switch it off. I don't get why people are complaining

    2. Re:So.... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I agree. I happen to like the extra features. If I didn't I would simply switch it off. I don't get why people are complaining"

      Complaining earns you karma and it makes you look smart. I know that's why I do it. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  5. Clutter... by oneiron · · Score: 3, Informative

    It definitely doesn't look like Yahoo yet, but I don't want my search site to be any more cluttered than it is now.

    Fortunately, you can edit all of the clutter out of the interface, if you want to.

    1. Re:Clutter... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly what it is.

      Google.com will remain as standard.
      Google.com/ig will result in custom versions.

      Its very nice, the custom versions simply occupy the otherwise blank google space below and are customisable enough for most users.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Clutter... by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact, I never go to google.com. I use the "Quick Search" feature of Firefox to do all my searches (g for google l for google/linux img google images def for google define fm for freshmeat man for man pages cpan for perl modules w for wikipedia and so on..)

      There's also a handy extension that allows me to select text and open a right-click menu with all those searches for that text.

  6. Greasemonkey oportunity by Jesse_132 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I know several people are already working on adding stuff to this using Greasemonkey!
    • Have your persistant searches there
    • Delicious popular
    • Integrate TadaList
    It is using tables and shouldn't be to hard to monkey up.
  7. Depends. Define "web portal" by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If by web portal you mean your first stop on the way to doing something useful, then it already is.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  8. serparate from the homepage by Spydr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    as long as it's a separate page from the google.com homepage, i'm cool with it.

    it's when they stop offering the lightweight search page by default is when it starts to suck.

  9. Dupe! by sammykrupa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dupe anyone???!?!

  10. Fixing dupes... by The+Hobo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps we should all be trying to submit stories that have already appeared on the front page in an effort to force the editors to scrutinize harder, and maybe, just maybe, it'll stick....

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    1. Re:Fixing dupes... by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps we should all be trying to submit stories that have already appeared on the front page in an effort to force the editors to scrutinize harder, and maybe, just maybe, it'll stick....

      We've been doing exactly that for over a year and see where it has gotten us so far?

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  11. So far, so good by ShatteredDream · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried it out and actually like it for the most part. The thing that's particularly nice IMO is that all of the personalized content appears below the search feature so that the top looks more or less like the old Google. The interface seems to be the standard Google through and through and it does a pretty good job of showing you only the stuff you want when you take the time to customize it.

    The only thing that they really need to do is add a feature to let you add custom news feeds based on RSS you specify or by creating Google News searches. Good News already lets you add your own categories based on search criteria so My Google needs that too.

  12. It's all about choice! by Bifurcati · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Google's doing the right thing - some people (I presume!) actually like having everything together on the one page. And in many ways, it could be nice - if with a simple, uncluttered interface I can see the day's weather and some of the top news stories from my slected news site when I load up my browser to my default page, then that's good. It's only when the page starts being cluttered by dating services and offers for stuff that doesn't apply to non-U.S.ians that it gets annoyed.

    And, of course, if I decide I don't like it, I can simply revert back to the simple interface. As long as I can do that, I'm happy.

    Anyway, who has time to think about Google when there's Star Wars to think about?!

  13. Advertisements by Bifurcati · · Score: 3, Interesting
    An interesting question will be whether Google will ever put ads on its main page. Clearly that would be a sought-after position, but also goes against the beauty of Google's AdWords system, where I actually find Ads relevant.

    But perhaps if I select certain personalised info for my home page, they would have enough information to justify attempting to target ads to me? I actually think it pretty unlikely - it would be an unpopular move, and Google really does no evil. But it must be tempting!

    1. Re:Advertisements by jotux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why would they ever need to put ads on their main page? How many people go to google.com just to see the google logo? 99.999999% of people that go to the google site probably go with the intent of searching(which will display ads), or to use another service with similar ads.

  14. Google from strength to strength... by RemovableBait · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The integration of their other services is what makes this a not-so-hidden gem. I like being able to have my Gmail, Google News and regular Google Search all viewable on the one page. The weather, Slashdot and other news options are an enormous bonus -- as yet, this is replacing my RSS aggregator as all my feeds are on the site.

    I like the fact that Google have not lost sight of their original focus: search. Many of the other web portals, like Yahoo or MSN, have all the graphics heavy customisation on the page and then throw their search box in as an afterthought (although this is becoming less obvious).

    Google has just a couple of additions to make in order to produce another winning solution: integrated RSS feeds (as someone has already suggested), international weather information (or international versions of the customised page) and the option to put customised search buttons (like the useful Search Linux and Search Uncle Sam) under the search box. That I would like to see.

  15. As noted in the original story: by steeef · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the FAQ:

    6. Why did you mess up the clean, crisp Google homepage?

    We didn't. If you want to keep using the original Google homepage, you can. In fact, we expect that many users will. The personalized homepage is for those users who want to see more of the information that matters to them in the same place. You can always switch back and forth between your personalized homepage and the original Google homepage by clicking "Classic Home" or "Personalized Home." ...

    If you don't like it, don't use it. Google isn't going to make this their default page.

    1. Re:As noted in the original story: by rm999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I fail to see how making that the default page helps them at all (and therefore why they would ever do it). It only uses more bandwidth and computing power, and offers them *no* revenue. They will never make money off the front page becuase if they ever start to put ads on their default front page people will flock away.

  16. Wow by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Funny

    I certainly hope the word of the day is harder than 'aficionado' in the future. I think word of the day should come in four difficulty settings:

    1. Unwashed Masses
    2. Smarter than average
    3. I'm a fucking genius
    4. I read /.

    1. Re:Wow by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      (4) should go between (1) and (2)

      --
      The cake is a pie
    2. Re:Wow by uchi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since when are /. readers and "unwashed masses" not one in the same? I could have swore that being unwashed was part of the conditions you agreed to by reading this site.

    3. Re:Wow by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny
      4. I read /.
      In other words, the non-fucking geniuses.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  17. does anyone even use the front page anymore? by rebug · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know with keywords in Safari and Firefox I haven't intentionally visited google's front page in ages.

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  18. The comment on evil by cspring007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, google is either perfect or really really evil.
    Not the big blundering stupid kind of evil that microsoft is, but the creepy really really bad kind of evil.
    Like the kind of evil in that story 'event horizon' where everyone rips their eyes out.

    ...or they are just really really good at internet programming

  19. try it before you don't like it by yagu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I set up my personalized Google home page. I like it a lot. I don't know if I'll keep it because generally I like the uncluttered look of the standard Google Home page. But, take a look, your mileage may vary!

    Some of the nice features:

    • from "Search, and I'm Feeling Lucky" up it's basically the same old Google page you were used to! No sweat!
    • at the top are convenient links to logout (pretty standard fair) and go to your search history (a nice feature if you've never yet tried that!)
    • modules which are handy (e.g., stock quotes, your google mail account) and
    • modules which are customizable (e.g., add your favorite stock symbol, collapse, uncollapse your google e-mail previews), and
    • very much like the dynamic miracle of drag and drop Google Maps, you can reaarange the order and placement of the modules simply by dragging and dropping the title bars of each module. I still don't know exactly how they're doing that, but compared to the clunky "customizable" personalize sites elsewhere, Google's is a joy to work with.
    • opt in or out of the various modules

    Since this isn't even really Beta yet, I'm guessing (am almost sure) there'll be lots of improvements to this -- and probably most of the improvements address many of the "complaints" posted thus far. (I've found Google to be amazing in their willingness to listen to and respond to and take action on feedback from the consumer community.)

    So, before you go ranting about the corruption of what was simple and is now crass, take a look... you may find it useful.