Slashdot Mirror


Google CEO Talks Business

prostoalex writes "InformationWeek interviews Google CEO on Google's enterprise strategy. No cool products announcements or anything related to personal technology - Eric Schmidt talks about Google's offerings for the enterprise market."

14 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. what is /. for ?? by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 3, Funny
    No cool products announcements or anything...

    Slashdot exist solely for this purpose ;)

    1. Re:what is /. for ?? by PopeAlien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speak for yourself, I come here for the great business news but I stay for the cowboy neal jokes.

    2. Re:what is /. for ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      pfffftttt /. exist for many reasons.

      Google luv
      SCO & M$ bashing
      roland pipquillle articles
      gnome vs. kde flame wars
      Best OS discussions

      those are just a few

  2. Hmmm... by Sheepdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's imagine you're a CEO and you're running a sales force. How can you get your sales force to generate more revenue?

    Tell them to call up CowboyNeal and ask them where the "Google Story for the Day" is and why it wasn't posted before 5:00pm EST.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be assured, there will be 3 dupes by morning as compensation.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  3. But do they offer solutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am looking for solutions for my enterprise level e-synergy. Can Google help me actualize this?

    1. Re:But do they offer solutions? by Muhammar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you have your vision fully conceptualized? Do you have defined clear go-nogo checkpoints on your flowchart to facilitate your decision-making process? You may need a consultant.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  4. Wrong, but thanks for playing. by Pheersome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Schmidt: Transparency is not necessarily the only way you achieve security. For example, part of the encryption algorithms are not typically made available to the open source community, because you don't want people discovering flaws in the encryption.
    I hope he didn't really mean that; I had a fairly good opinion of him, but that statement is (IMO) a pretty serious misunderstanding of The Way Things Should Be. We (the security-loving Internet elite) want maximal transparency for all of our systems, cryptographic and otherwise, so problems are found and fixed... right?

    --
    Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
  5. Who are Google? by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    I looked them up on MSN search I cant find anything about them. Why is Slashdot posting stories about piss ant little companies that no one has ever hear of?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  6. My request to Google... by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...is to synchronize the release of tools for major browsers including Firefox. That is, they (Google) should release their "add-ons" at once for all browsers. This is because if they for example released this for IE first, by the time that for Firefox is released, the steam is almost out.

    Next, my request is to make sure they go for M$ and Yahoo head on. I need GoogleBiz (to check my stocks), I need GoogleMusic, GoogleRadio and all that is possible.

  7. UW talk by Mtn_Dewd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eric Schmidt is really busy on showing just how progressive Google is right now. I just got out of a talk at University of Washington by him in which he addressed many interesting Google policy questions ranging from responsibilities, censorship, and corporate structure. They're really trying to establish that they aren't just another fad and are trying to find a way to meet the demands of an exponentially increasing task of information aggregation and retrieval.

    Interestingly, in our Computer Science department at UW, there is definitely an aura about Google. Everyone wants to work for them. They seem to defy all of the standard business models that we have grown to hate (ie: Office Space) and use a 70%, 20%, 10% rule that allows you to work on Google-related work, Personal-project-google-related work, and just personal work. I won't drag on about their structure, but I'm wondering if their business model and ideas will now spread into the mainstream corporate world.

    --



    My little sad piece of the internet: www.mtndewd
  8. The product *I* want to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A Google GMail [TM] Appliance.

    Being stuck using *shudder* Outlook at work makes me wish we had GMail mailboxes at work.

    Even if I could invite everyone in the company to use GMail, I'm sure they don't want our company data in a server we don't even control. But if there were some GMail Appliance, not unlike their search appliance...

    Oh well, who am I kidding? It's probably in the works already... I just need to convince the boss higher ups that Outlook sucks ass (not hard...) and one of those would be much nicer whenever Google finally gets them out of beta...

  9. Re:Google Strategy: by conchobar0928 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe you meant to say, "Resistance is futile. You will be indexed."

  10. Re:Gmail Lockdowns?! by sabat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gee, Chris, do you think calling your customers "putz" is a good idea?

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.