Slashdot Mirror


Extinct Wildflower Found In California

Del writes "A Berkeley graduate student found the pink wildflower Eriogonom truncatum, known as the Mount Diablo buckwheat. The flower hasn't been seen for 70 years and has been rediscovered on the flanks of Mount Diablo in Contra Costa County."

49 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. The headline is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not really extinct. It can be found in California.

    1. Re:The headline is wrong by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Flower Previously Known as 'Extinct'"
      Would be a much radder headline.

      --
      Anonymous Coward
    2. Re:The headline is wrong by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not really extinct. It can be found in California.

      No, submitter is right. By time you read the headline everybody will have been out to get one for themselves. It is indeed extinct now.

      It was doomed anyway by global warming and whatnot.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:The headline is wrong by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dateline California: Experts crap their pants when they discover the Mt Diablo Buckwheat growing on the side of Mt Diablo. To quote one horticologist, "We thought it was extinct, afterall in the previous 70 years we have not discovered a single one. Then all of a sudden our intern Steve suggested looking around its namesake mountain. Low and behold it was there after all, you should have seen the look on my face when I had to pay Steve that 20 bucks I bet him."

    4. Re:The headline is wrong by TRS80NT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good point, jimi. What are the odds of finding Mt. Diablo buckwheat ON Mt. Diablo? It's like what were the odds of Lou Gehrig getting Lou Gehrig's Disease.

      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    5. Re:The headline is wrong by dapyx · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be real-life slashdotting

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    6. Re:The headline is wrong by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does that mean that we slashdoted the flower? ;-)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  2. This just in by el_womble · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a rare interview Eriogonom truncatum states "Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated."

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  3. "Extinct" by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative

    You keep using that word, and I don't think it means what you think it does. This flower is self-evidently not extinct.

    Clue : the phrase you're looking for is "Wildflower previously thought extinct".

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  4. Why is this news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "When I took people out to see it, they just walked right by it," Park said. "They couldn't grok that the thing could be so small and dainty."

    Oh.

    1. Re:Why is this news for nerds? by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Uh, where is that buckwheat again?"

      "It's right over there, you ninny."

      "I still don't see it ..."

      "Careful, you moron! No!"

      *crunch*

      Slashdot headline: "Extinct Wildflower Found in California is Extinct Again."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  5. Is there anything we can do? by Council · · Score: 3, Funny
    Oh my God.
    Following a different routine from his normal survey, he stumbled across the plants - about 20 in all - in full bloom
    We must hope that these 20 are the only ones. I hope that they'll move quickly enough to wipe out this terrible scourge once and for all.
    "When I took people out to see it, they just walked right by it," Park said. "They couldn't grok that the thing could be so small and dainty."
    We never see these horrors coming because deep down, we're just too good to imagine these things growing in our own backyards. We've been blind for too long.
    "It was very exciting, and I've spent a few weeks being stunned over this thing," he said. "But I'll be glad when it's over."
    We all will, Michael, we all will. Our thoughts and prayers are with you and your family.
    "At this point, it is really tenuous. Here, it's still hanging on by its fingernails, and the publicity alone could be enough to wipe it out again."
    We can only pray.
    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  6. Oh the irony by Adrilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then the ivory-billed woodpecker thought to also be extinct ate it.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    1. Re:Oh the irony by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Funny

      and died because it is poisonous to ivory-billed woodpeckers. :}

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  7. keep it up by poor_boi · · Score: 3, Funny

    1 down, 831 to go.

  8. Quick! by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone make this a geocache spot so we can stampede it into extinction once and for all!

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  9. Re:New Headline: Wildflowers invent time travel!! by dbolger · · Score: 2, Funny

    You fool, John Titor brought them back on the soles of his shoes.

    Wait, how far back did he go again?

  10. Re:He found a *flower* by Reene · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what, botany nerds/geeks don't count?

    --
    "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
  11. hmm by davidmcg · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is now extinct again when scientists picked it and realised they couldn't keep it alive by putting into a glass of water.

    1. Re:hmm by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would seem that the scientists may have had something to do with it's extinction.
      First reported in 1862, there are only seven historical records of the plant, the last in 1936, when Bowerman, one of the first women to receive a Ph.D. in botany from UC Berkeley, collected a sample from Mount Diablo.
      So the last reported sighting of this plant was 70 years ago when a botanist picked some. And then apparantly didn't extract any seeds, or plant it in a garden. Hoorray for preservation!
      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  12. Same flower? by FriedTurkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do we know that the original flower isn't still extinct? A new flower could have evolved back to look like the extinct flower. There is nothing in the article about testing it with a 70 year old sample.

    1. Re:Same flower? by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow I don't see evolution doing the job in 70 years, that's pretty quick, even for a small plant and the odds of tracing the exact same evolutionary path twice are quite daunting. Especially in the case where apparently this flower had not much of an evolutionary advantage to begin with, as it was believed to be extinct

  13. Just goes to show by SimianOverlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I imagine plants must be incredibly difficult to "declare extinct", after all - how would you show for sure that none are present in a country the size of America? Whilst plants may seem to be local to a specific area because of their preference for a certain type of soil, pH or shade, it doesn't follow that, because the ones you know about are dead, then the plant is extinct. It's too easy to rush to judgement, especially when environmentalists have an interest in declaring loudly how many species are threatened or are already extinct. After reading "A State Of Fear" recently, and whilst I haven't fallen for all of Crichtons selective misrepresentations, I suspect their motivations a bit more than I used to.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
    1. Re:Just goes to show by abb3w · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I imagine plants must be incredibly difficult to "declare extinct", after all - how would you show for sure that none are present in a country the size of America?

      Not to mention, how many seeds still are scattered that might yet someday germinate?

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Just goes to show by dheltzel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I imagine plants must be incredibly difficult to "declare extinct", after all - how would you show for sure that none are present in a country the size of America? Whilst plants may seem to be local to a specific area because of their preference for a certain type of soil, pH or shade, it doesn't follow that, because the ones you know about are dead, then the plant is extinct.

      Good point. This is obviously a case where there was a rush to judgement 70 years ago. It also tends to be a self-fulfilling prophecy in that few botanists were looking for an "extinct" species. Perhaps that gave it the time to recover. It's also well accepted that seeds can survive for a long time under some pretty adverse conditions and restart a population that was thought to be long gone.

      You're also right about the motivations. An extinct species has a certain "cache'". I know because I breed tropical fish and I have 3 species that are "known" to be extinct in the wild. 2 of these are annual fish that lay eggs in the mud, then die when their pond dries out. They don't seem to have as much longevity as plant seeds, but the same principle could bring them back. Since they still exist in the aquaium hobby, we are happily breeding them and the tag "extinct in the wild" does make them more interesting. I'm honestly not sure how excited I would be to find that they were rediscovered. I think I would be pleased, but it's so cool to have such rare fish living and breeding in my basement. They are prolific too, I can assure you they didn't die out from low libidos.

  14. In other news... by xAXISx · · Score: 2, Funny

    the Berkeley graduate student's girlfriend was flattered with the flower her boyfriend gave her.

    1. Re:In other news... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny


      In other other news, studies show that any guy using "grok" as part of his normal vocabulary will not have a girlfriend.

  15. Re:He found a *flower* by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, I'm raising my kids to be geeks. Oh, they like computers, that goes without saying. But I'm teaching them to like biology too. Instead of teaching them to react with fear and revulsion when they see I spider, I have them look closely and count the number of pairs of eyes they can find. Once we found a daring jumping spider (Phidippus audax) in our garden. This spider is really cool. It's very active because it chases it's prey, leaping on it and killing it with it's chelicerae (fangs), which are a shiny metallic green. One of my entomologist geek friends (who likes other arthopods too), tells me they make good pets.

    Nature is cool, and I don't want them to miss out. But I also have an ulterior motive. Informatics was a great field to work in in the late 20th century. It still is. But the most exciting field in this century is going to be biology and its applications.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  16. Re:Was it rediscovered OR did it re-evolve? by juju2112 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's only been 70 years. Evolution does not work that fast.

  17. What are the chances? by aziraphale · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it amazing that, of all the places that Mount Diablo Buckwheat should turn up, it'd be on the slopes of Mount Diablo.

    It's funny nobody thought of looking there before...

  18. Re:He found a *flower* by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please tell us more facts about the future.

    Sure, no problem. Here's a couple:

    You still aren't going to be able to buy a flying car. You will, however, be able to invest in a company which intends to build one.

    Some time between 2015 to 2025, expect the cadre of kids now in pre-school to adopt a musical style that current fans of rap will find incomprehensible and offsensive.

    Perhaps they can be used to ensure that our kids don't have to work at all...

    Well, by the standards of my grandparents and even my parents, what I do hardly counts as work, because it doesn't involve the daily risk of death and dismemberment and is not brutally punishing on my body. I expect that by my grandchildren's time, work will look like hanging around in coffee shop and chatting.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  19. Re:Was it rediscovered OR did it re-evolve? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because some particular life has evolved away (become extinct) doesn't mean that it can't come back given the right conditions

    I have two problems with this.

    1) It suggests that HUMANS arnt responsible for mass modern extinction, just 'changes in the holes'. Thats nonsense. We are destroying the natural world, in such a way that we are removing these niches that plants and animals formerly occupied.

    2) once a plant is gone it doesnt 'rematerialize'. Its genetic advantages are lost forever. in the case of this flower, it didnt just 're-appear in a jiffy' to fill the old niche. it A) probably existed all along or B) formerly dormant seeds germinated and multiplied.

    What didnt happen is one plant, sensing the niche vacant, didnt 'give birth' to the SAME species as had been extinct.

    Its the same flower. not a newly created flower the same as the old one (?) or someshiat.

  20. I don't see the problem with extinctions. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Extinction is the history of the earth. If a species is unsuitable for it's environment it dies out and is replaced by something else. Contrary to popular belief, no species has a right to exist.

    It would only concern me if key species that humans depend on were dying out.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:I don't see the problem with extinctions. by ElAurian · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is, we usually don't know which species are the important ones until they are gone.

      And who'd have thought that you could find disease cures or amazingly advanced painkillers in rainforest plants?

      Biodiversity is one of the most valuable resources humans have, and we're burning it. Like burning the library of Alexandria, but a thousand times worse.

    2. Re:I don't see the problem with extinctions. by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Contrary to popular belief, no species has a right to exist.

      How you frame a problem determines your policies and actions. This is the most incredibly misguided way of looking at this issue imaginable.

      What we are talking about can be framed in terms of human welfare, in the short, mid and long term.

      The loss of species is a loss of information; not just the information that is contained in the germ plasm, protein and anatomical structures, but information that is inherent in how that species fits into the ecological systems it has evolved. The relationship is two way -- loss of species decreases the information in the systems it is embedded in, loss of systems complexity leads to loss of speices.

      Leaving aside issues of bioprospecting, you might ask what this has to do with human welfare? The answer is, a lot. When species composition changes, ecosystems find a whole new set of equilibria. Sometimes this benefits people, sometimes it hurts. More often it hurts because the opportunistic species are seldom economically valuable, and in many cases pose the potential for harm.

      I'll give you a concrete example that covers both these cases. A friend of mine's family own an island, that has been in the family for well over a hundred years. Up until the 1980s, humans were the only major predators on the island, which meant there was a large deer herd -- a good thing. On the other hand, there was a large population of small rodents like meadow voles. The deer population is kept somewhat in check by human predation, but there is no such check on the rodent population. Since everything must be in the end food for something else, this meant dieases organisms and parasites: Borrelia spirochetes and ticks on the scale of a biblical plague. As a result, his family has had a decades long history of health problems: palsy, myalgia, fatigue, join pain etc., that was unexplainable until 1975. Lyme disease.

      Shortly after the rediscovery of Lyme disease, it also happened that the Eastern Coyote made it out to the island. As a result the deer herd dropped, which was bad, but the population of rodents and ticks crashed as well. You can now visit the island for a week or more, tramp through the grass and woods and not find a single tick. The thing is, the coyote is filling in ecological niche that was formerly filled by wolves, extinct in this range for centuries. In fact Eastern Coyotes are relatively more wolf-like than their wester cousins, all the better to take the mantle of number one top tier predator.

      It may well be the case that the reason that Lyme disease was so poorly characterized before, and so common now, can be explained by the biological impovershment of suburban and non-old growth forests.

      Similar issues surround hanta virus and other "emergent" infectious agents. Why do the emerge? Well, they emerge because human progress is not undertaken with sufficient sophistication to minimize unintended consequences. People get their nose bent out of shape because they'd rather not think that their actions have unintended consequences. Well, in the long term and maybe not so long term, knowing the consequences of your actions is smart.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:I don't see the problem with extinctions. by sfjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Contrary to popular belief, no species has a right to exist. ... including homo sapiens.

      Before you so blithely dismiss extinction, let me pass along an analogy the late Carl Sagan used to use. Our earth is like an airplane and each one of the species is a rivet in the airplane. Losing a few here or there makes no discernible difference. A rivet may be lost in the natural course of events and then can be replaced. If humans begin casually popping rivets out, however, there will eventually be a big problem. One moment the airplane is fine and, at some point, one too many rivets are removed and we have catastrophic failure.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  21. Re:Was it rediscovered OR did it re-evolve? by Matt+Edd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's some evolution for you... blah blah

    That is not evolution. That is adaptation.

  22. Re:Whoa! by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd say thats a bigger discovery.. a fly that looks like a bee!

    A bit late for that:

    Bee Fly

    You can tell it looks like a bee because it's fat and fuzzy, unlike the insect in the flower picture, but here's one that looks like a wasp:

    Wasp Fly

    Sorry, but science has already been there and done that.

    KFG

  23. Re:Was it rediscovered OR did it re-evolve? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Adaptation is a change in behavior.

    Evolution is a chage of genetics.

    With the example of your birds, think: Do baby birds get born with the advantage? If no, it's adaptation (And they are certainly not born knowing lawnmowers = food. That is learned behavior)

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  24. Re:News Update by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You must be kidding! This is California. Most likely, environmentalists would displace all residents within 100 miles of a buckwheat plant and raze their homes to make sure it isn't threatened. Next, they'll lobby for a "Mount Diablo Buckwheat Awareness Week" and "Mount Diablo Sensitivity Training" in all grade schools and corporations.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  25. You don't "see" it, but it's coming up behind you by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It would only concern me if key species that humans depend on were dying out.

    Please give us an example of a past mass extinction in which the dominant species on earth continued to be so after the extinction occurred. You can define "dominant" fairly loosely and still not find such an event in world history. (If you'd like to get as far as "sharks and turtles are the dominant forms of life on earth," or "bacteria rule the earth," then I guess you'll find this looming new mass extinction reassuring...)

    The completely obvious point that heads-in-the-sand "it doesn't concern me" types refuse to hear, despite every environmentalist for the last 30 years making it, is that there is a massive danger to human beings in a drastic reduction of biodiversity. It threatens us, as a species.

    Earth will come through it. Earth has sustained life at much higher temperatures than at present, for example. That doesn't mean global warming wouldn't radically destabilize human civilization. It's a question of whether we would live through those changes. It's self-interest.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  26. The headline is right by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny
    No, it's extinct

    And delicious (burp).

  27. Call for Plant Geeks by pfafrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If there are any Geeks out there intrested in all things plant like and informatics then they might be intrested in the permaculture.info project. Were hoping to build a community driven online database of plants and their relationships, together with a host of related information and features. Theres been quite a lot of interesting ideas floating around with visual representation of data, distributed events and link systems. Theres a good few chalanges ahead especially in the relms of knowledege representation. Email me or see the website for details.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
  28. ivory-billed woodpecker was rediscovered too by karvind · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Few weeks ago Cornell orinthologists rediscovered ivory-billed woodpecker in Big Woods of Arkansas. It was believed to be extinct as well. More than 60 years after the last confirmed sighting of the species in the United States they found at least one male ivory-bill still survives in vast areas of bottomland swamp forest.

    Story here

  29. Re:He found a *flower* by Maul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to mention the fact that people can barely drive the cars that don't fly.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  30. Don't be so sure... by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't be so sure this is actually the once-thought-extinct flower they say it is, because fact-checking doesn't seem to be this article-writer's strong point: notice that the caption on the picture of what is clearly a bee sitting on the flower says that it is "a fly".

    Of course, that may be the rare and once-thought-extinct beefly, who mimicks bees the same way a viceroy butterfly mimics monarch butterflies...

    I have rediscovered the beefly! Hooray for me!

  31. Re:messing with evolution by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Funny

    once they get to the sea, they better have good stamina because after that much longer run to the water they still have to elude marine prey.

    I think you meant predators. As eluding prey would mean hiding from your food source.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  32. Already Covered by Red+Rocket · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Come on all you natural philosphers. What do you say?

    The best words on this issue have already been spoken. Charles Williams Beebe says:

    "The beauty and genius of a work of art may be reconceived though its first material expression be destroyed. A vanished harmony may yet again inspire the composer, but when the last individual of a race of living beings breathes no more, another heaven and earth must pass before such a one can be again."

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  33. Re:He found a *flower* by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Agreed...but jumping spiders are probably a bit too agile and quick to be kept in a container even such as an aquarium. Perhaps if you were keeping them only for a few days for observation, then maybe, but for longer than that, I'd suggest any of the funnel weaving species (or the wolf spiders you mention) that you'd find in your basement first. They're already aclimatized to your indoor temperature, and they're used to living long periods without food.

    Orb weavers (the spiral web weavers) are best kept outdoors, but they tend to have fairly permanent homes that you can feed and observe every day in the same spot.