Slashdot Mirror
'Lower Rights' IE 7.0 Coming
blacktop writes "eWeek has official confirmation from a Microsoft vice president that the upcoming Internet Explorer 7.0 browser upgrade will ship with reduced privilege mode turned on by default to help thwart browser-based attacks. In addition to anti-phishing and anti-spoofing features, IE 7.0 will add support for IDN (International Domain Names), built-in RSS and seamless search that will include choices of search providers."
...just some of the key features of Firefox and Safari?
Butthead Vendor
I was wondering when IE would be able to support the Unicode URL spoofing attacks!
I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
"We've re-architected it to defend against exploits," Mangione said
architect IS NOT a verb!!
great laugh to start the day though.
The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-Oscar Wilde
Microsoft may be a bit slow to get there, but they'll get there in the end.
So what will Microsoft be offering in IE7 that is new, and not just a take on Mozilla/Firefox/Opera?
It seems to me that Microsoft is only playing catch up, has invention died over in Redmond?
Why would people move back to IE even after the release of IE7? I'm guessing they won't and this is for those that won't or can't move from IE.
You can use msn! Or, maybe you'd prefer msn!
Or, if those two options don't suit you, you can use MSN!
Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
People will notice that all of MS's "New Features" have been in OSS for years.
Hmm let me guess, this 'less-priviledged' IE "user" will be unable to install 3d party apps & addons (let's call them "plug-ins").
...... you guys know the rest of the story.
Idiot #1: I want to install these smile-themes and weather app, but IE won't let me. It says that these "plug-ins" are unsafe and operate at a higher priviledge level. I don't know what that means BUT I WANT MY SMILES!
"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
I remember about 6 or 7 years ago when I was switching from Netscape 3 to IE 4 that there was a huge argument over whether Netscape 4 or IE 4 was the better product. The step up from versions 3 was significant.
Lately, having switched to Firefox to avoid rampant security issues, I feel fairly comfortable with this browser. There are some things that I wish were better like better Googlebar and better plug-in handling, but am pretty happy with it.
So with IE7, what's the draw? What features will it have that will encourage me to jump ship again? The feature list doesn't impress me as much as the jump from Netscape 3 to IE 4 did. And security is not an issue with Firefox, so that's not a good enough reason.
I guess I'll just have to download the mandatory Critical Update and try out the browser for myself.
The other way that this will be fun is watching all of the *really* bad ISVs who assume that IE is a complete solution for their apps and will of course be able to alter the system config when they use it as a component.
And you thought SP2 broke things? *laughs evily*
"To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
From TFA: "Nine months ago, we started hearing from partners like Dell that spyware was a major issue."
Hmm, let's see. (5 years-9 months) times the speed of sound... this means that Dell's headquarters are 46 million kilometers from Redmond.
The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Too little, too late, perhaps? Why has it taken Microsoft over 5 years (and counting) to release an upgraded version of IE? Oh well, I want to thank Microsoft, because the only browser I used on my WinXP boxes was IE...then FireFox came out.
Yes, I admit it, I used to be an IE user...but now, I will never go back. For once when you see the great bird that showers fire and thunder at the masses, then you know that the forces of Mammon will never succeed at world domination.
about:mozilla
IGB: More fun than eating oatmeal!
when you type in "google" Clippy pops up and asks you "It looks like you want to do a search, we will take you to a far superior search engine" and will redirect you
If IE came pre-loaded with the most popular plugins (Flash, Quicktime), so that the majority of people would have no reason to ever turn off the reduced privledge mode, as opposed to turning it off several times soon after they have gotten their initial installation, it may work. If people are immediately conditioned that turning off reduced privledge mode is something that you need to do in order to get your browser to work right, then this will do nothing.
/cookies-and-bookmarks on a kernel-level might help too
Of course, simply never allowing write-access to anything but
-- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
The conundrum is that so many sites now require ActiveX that if IE were to ship with it disabled, Joe Sixpack's favorite websites wouldn't work.
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
Recently, Microsoft already lowered the rights of gays and lesbians by dropping support for a major state anti-discrimination bill. Based on that wildly popular success (with right wingers at least) we'll be dropping the rights for everyone in the next release of Internet Explorer; trust us, we know what's good for you. And for those anxious about what the future holds, worry no more; coming with Longhorn, we'll offer new digital rights management features. Just remember, all your rights are belong to us.
Who the hell titles these articles? Lower rights and Lower permissions mean completely different things...
_ test/
If MS is adding support for IDN, I'm really going to stick with Mozilla. Does anyone remember the IDN spoofing exploit from Firefox on February 7, 2005? http://secunia.com/multiple_browsers_idn_spoofing
Let's hope MS caps this hole before it happens. Unfortunately, MS has a reputation for adding bugs along with new features.
-- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
"The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
Here are just a few references pointing out the real percentage of computers infected with spyware:
80%
8 out of 10
88%
Or, just search it.
So, 5 years to admit to the problem as it was 3-ish years ago.
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
Had to have been ;-)
Yep, it's funny. But it's Bill Watterson. Give credit where credit is due.
By extension, you should have a separate computer that is connected to the internet with no hooks whatsoever to the computer you use to run your tax form preparation program, write your letters, balance your checkbook, etc. Oh, what's that? You want to e-file? You want to send e-mail? You want to bank online?
Integration may be scary, but it isn't something you should intellectially shy away from. Convenience and security have always been at odds, and I don't see that changing any time soon. The balance beteween them isn't a zero-sum-game, however, and the solution, IMO, isn't to discard all notions of integrated solutions, even if they are less secure in the short term. We need to keep moving forward, not idolize some rose-colored past that never existed.
This Sig Kills Fascists
"...and seamless search that will include choices of search providers."
MSN.com
MSN.co.uk
MSN.co.fr
MSN.co.de
MSN.co.kr
MSN.co.ie
MSN.co.jp
and so on...