Slashdot Mirror


Rail Guns Closer to Reality

emtboy9 writes "Yahoo News is reporting that scientists at Sandia National Labs have created a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun) that can accelerate small aluminum plates at 34 kilometers per second, faster than the Earth travels through space. The accelerated plates strike a target after traveling only five millimeters, or less than a quarter-inch. The impact generates a shock wave -- in some cases, reaching 15 million times atmospheric pressure -- that passes through the target material turning matter into various states almost instantly (solids into liquids, liquids into gas, and even gas into plasma)."

30 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Yeehaw! by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny
    One of them, a jug of whiskey, and a bunch of squirrels, and you got yourself a party!

  2. Quake by YOystick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like we have our Quake 4 in real life before it is released...

  3. Plates don't liquify people by cheesebikini · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plates don't liquify people. People liquify people.

    1. Re:Plates don't liquify people by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try the new Soylent Green Energy Drink!

      --
      Rod Taylor
  4. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by nrlightfoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a non-military use. They are using it to simulate conditions deep within giant planets. Also this isn't really a rail gun. For one it doesn't use rails, and the whole aim of this experiment is unrelated to rail guns.

    --
    what sig?
  5. Re:faster, how? by js7a · · Score: 4, Informative
    Obligatory Monty Python answer:
    Just remember that you're standing on a planet
    That's evolving
    And revolving
    At nine thousand miles an hour.
    It's orbiting at nineteen miles a second,
    so it's reckoned,
    'Round the sun that is the source of all our power.
    Now the sun, and you and me,
    and all the stars that we can see,
    Are moving at a million miles a day,
    In the outer spiral arm,
    at fourteen thousand miles an hour,
    Of a galaxy we call the Milky Way.

    Our galaxy itself contains a hundred million stars;
    It's a hundred thousand light-years side to side;
    It bulges in the middle
    sixteen thousand light-years thick,
    But out by us
    it's just three thousand light-years wide.
    We're thirty thousand light-years
    From Galactic Central Point,
    We go 'round every two hundred million years;
    And our galaxy itself is one of millions of billions
    In this amazing and expanding universe.

    Our universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding,
    In all of the directions it can whiz;
    As fast as it can go,
    that's the speed of light, you know,
    Twelve million miles a minute
    And that's the fastest speed there is.
    So remember,
    when you're feeling very small and insecure,
    How amazingly unlikely is your birth;
    And pray that there's intelligent life
    Somewhere out in space,
    'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth!
    The Sun circles the center of our Galaxy at about 250 km/s, but the Local Group of galaxies moves at about 600 kilometers per second relative to the primordial radiation of the big bang.
  6. Did you not do basic physics at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun) that can accelerate small aluminum plates at 34 kilometers per second"

    We were taught this at the age of 14 - what were you doing?

    Acceleration is measured in distance per second per second. 34 km/s is a velocity. So did you mean it accelerates it to 34 km/s? Or did you actually mean it accelerates at 34 km/s/s? This is /. were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN.

    1. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is /. were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN.

      And as one such, I can't help pointing out that "were" should be "where".

  7. Re:Railguns, Exactly What We Need by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you can't get out of the way of the guy carrying a gun bigger than my house, I think it's probably best if your slow-ass organs die with you.

  8. Re:faster, how? by OO7david · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is unneed pendantry. If you are not only able to list off these places as frames of referrence but also think of them in the first place, odds are you already know the answer.

    Most sensible people would take it as being the sun spinning around the sun, and leave it there.

    Since there is no pleasing you therein, the earth is more or less 149,668,992 km from the sun, which gives a circumfrence of around 940,398,011 km which over 365 days gives 29.8 km/second.

    So, there you go, it's around the sun.

  9. not a rail gun, fer cripes sake by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Yahoo News is reporting that scientists at Sandia National Labs have created a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun)

    Let's hear it for reading comprehension! Between yahoo news and he submitter, we're somehow left with the impression that this is a rail gun. It's nothing of the kind. It's an implosion machine. As described in the LiveScience.com article linked: "The Z uses a short burst of intense electricity - only a few 10 billionths of a second long - that forces an ionized gas to implode." So we can stop the handwringing over the morality of this "weapon", as to use it as such would require luring the enemy into a chamber the size of a soup can and asking him to hold still while you blast him.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  10. Re:How about a love gun by Repton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nothing to do with rail guns. It's just a silly inflamatory headline (or maybe railguns are cool 'cause they're in Quake).

    This is all about generating massive shockwaves to examine the properties of matter in extreme conditions (without having to heat it up to enormous temperatures).

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  11. Wrong by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at Sandia, on this very topic. These are just flyer plate experiments, using the Z-machine's Marx Generators to isentropically accelerate small aluminum flyer plates up to high velocities, in order to better understand the behavior of metals at high pressures/densities/temperatures. This has been around for a while now. The only difference is they've recently attained these higher velocities by having the Marx Generators switch at slightly different times, rather than all at once.

    Nothing to see here, move along. (and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain)

    1. Re:Wrong by dnaboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      And to think I thought Marx generators only transferred energy from the bourgeoisie to the proletariat...

    2. Re:Wrong by pegasustonans · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, Marx energies appear to transfer energy to the proleteriat, but, in fact, they only spread noise among elite intellectuals. Lenin energies then convert the noise into energy useable by the proleteriat and Stalin energies then destroy all other particles in the vicinity.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    3. Re:Wrong by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 4, Funny
      ... and Marx energies, as any fule kno, are transferred by elementary particles called chicions, harpions, grouchions, gummions and zeppions.

      Sorry, couldn't resist. So mod me down.

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  12. I think I know how that sequence ends... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    solids into liquids, liquids into gas, and even gas into plasma

    Let me guess - it then turns plasmas into solids.

    So the war of the future will be an evere more complex version of Liquid, Gas, Plasma, Solid - far more sophisticated than the three state method of old including Rock and Paper.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. These are not the rail guns you are looking for by Moiche · · Score: 5, Interesting
    True, the Z Machine is not a gun -- it's a giant magnetic field generator. I guess referring to a giant magnetic field generator as a "gun" works better from a journalistic prespective.

    However -- rail guns are on the cusp of military viability. The University of Texas at Austin's Institute of Advanced Technology got 10 million dollars to develop viable rail guns. Just a month ago Janes reported that a prototype of the military rail gun had been tested, and that it was nearing viability.

    UT-IAT has devised a common low-cost projectile concept for both naval surface-fire support and army non line-of-sight (NLOS) engagements using an EM gun launcher. It has a flight mass of 15 kg and contains either multiple kinetic-energy flechettes or a smaller number of sub penetrators made of tungsten. In its naval guise it has a muzzle energy of 64 MJ; a muzzle velocity of 2,500 m/s; a maximum range in excess of 500 km and an impact velocity of 1,600 m/s. From a more size-constrained land tactical platform it would be expected to have a muzzle energy of 20 MJ; a muzzle velocity of 1,400 m/s and an impact velocity of 700 m/s out to ranges in excess of 100 km.
    That article really made me wish I had a Jane's subscription. Apparently, the limiting factor is the size of the capacitor -- if they can get this down than naval applications within a few years are plausible.

    Incidentally, a fun game, if you're ever bored, is to imagine what would happen to the human body if one were to hold and fire a rail gun (even a wimpy one that shot at a mere 1,600m/s and not at "near the speed of light"), and the law of conservation of momentum actually worked. Really! Try at parties!

    Fond wishes,

    Moiche

  14. Three times the velocity by Indianwells · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the huge tidbit that I haven't really seen discussed: "That's 50 times faster than a rifle bullet, and three times the velocity needed to escape Earth's gravitational field." A rail gun, of sufficient capacity to catapult raw materials into orbit, would be a gigantic breakthrough for the whole planet.

  15. Does not. by Larthallor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article's title is extremely misleading.

    This does not bring rail guns any closer to reality, by which I mean it does not bring military rail guns any closer to reality.

    The Z-machine is a hanger-sized experimental device akin to a particle accelerator. This was an experiment designed to study extremely high pressures, such as those thought to have been important in Jovian planetary formation.

    Saying that this experiment brings rail guns closer to reality is like saying that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN brings PPCs closer to reality.

  16. "Small aluminum plates" is highly misleading by Goldenhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "small aluminum plates" are not just small... they're TINY. Others have already noted that "rail gun" is a big misstatement; the discs they're talking about here are merely 850 MICRONS thick. Let's get this thing in perspective, shall we? I know that "rail gun" makes many geeks twitch uncontrollably, but come on now, that's just karma whoring.

    Oh, and to link to a two-year-old image... with a caption of "have created" that implies it's brand new... PLEASE.

    Once again, the question must be asked: where's the moderation system for STORIES?

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  17. Draft dodger! by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well railguns are neat and all, but I'm still not joining the Army until they invent the respawn point.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  18. The uses for this: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Z machine (and it's earlier configuration called PBFA 2) have been on Sandia for a long time.

    As said above, it's not a rail gun. It's not really even particularly useful for rail gun research.

    What it's for is to put small amounts of matter at tremendous temperatures and pressures.

    There are a lot of reasons to want to do this. Some of it is just basic research. i.e. What happens to matter and the laws governing it at these extreme conditions?

    Another application is fusion power research. You can compress deuturium and tritium to the point they will fuse in this machine. Though it's not made to generate power, you can learn about the details of the fusion reaction.

    That said, the main reason why this machine was built was indeed for military research. But even that is in a grey area. The US hasn't conducted a nuclear test detonation in quite some time. The reason it was able to do this is that computer simulations and other methods got good enough that they were able to be used instead of actually setting off a thermonuclear or nuclear device. Indeed, many of the Department of Energy's most powerful computers were created specifically to do that sort simulation (ASCII White, IIRC, for example).

    When running computer simulations, you have to have some way of calibrating the simulation and checking that it's getting the right answer.

    In the case of a supercomputer run simulating a car crash, you can validate it by conducting crash tests, and seeing how closely it agrees with them. Wrecking a few of a given car model is acceptable in return for it.

    But, when simulating nuclear weapons, you would often run into cases where to validate the code, you'd, at first glance, have to set one off. The conditions in a nuclear blast are so extreme, that it's difficult to put matter into that sort of state. If you're trying to maintain a test moratorium, that kinda undermines the whole idea.

    That's a big reason PBFA 2 and the follow on Z machine were made. They let DOE check the computer simulations and do basic research that would otherwise require nuclear testing. One of the biggest areas of interest is what happens when the materials in a bomb age. A lot of those weapons are getting quite old.

    They have many other basic research uses, but a big one is making it possible to keep the nuclear test moratorium.

    So, it's grey area. On the one hand, it's used for weapon research. On the other, it helps keep the test moratorium. It also has a lot of basic research uses. So, just like a supercomputer, you have to make your own decision about whether it, on the whole is a good or bad thing.

  19. Bad link? by miquong · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, was I the only one who got the wrong article on the "magnetic pulse gun" link? It should be here.

  20. Futurama, of course by Olaserov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try the new Soylent Green Energy Drink!

    "How is it?"
    "Well, it varies from person to person."

    --
    * Olaserov is in the process of thinking up a signature.
  21. Re:Shitty weapon in Counterstrike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Point them at a country and demand their oil for power generation? :o

  22. morality debate by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we can stop the handwringing over the morality of this "weapon", as to use it as such would require luring the enemy into a chamber the size of a soup can and asking him to hold still while you blast him.

    HEAR HEAR! I quite agree with the parent. This should be a discussion about the morality of lureing your enemies into soup can sized implosion chambers and asking him to hold still.

    (It doesn't sound cricket, if you ask me...)

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  23. Re:Look at the possibilities! by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Interesting
    No, I can't really see any easy beneficial (which is, I guess, to say "non-military") applications for this tech, unless you can tell me how this could aid in space exploration (a means of launching spacecraft, maybe?)

    Powering spacecraft or launching cargo or many other things...

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  24. Railguns not for fusion by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ages ago, I used to work on this sort of thing too. Railguns as weapons were experimented with in the fifties - perhaps earlier for all I know (some Tesla fan will probably tell me he had one). You cannot make a shell go faster than the propellant's natural velocity, and you only get so many joules per gram with chemicals. To get close to this limit you have to stick the bangy stuff (tm) not only at the bottom of the barrel but at various intervals along its length, as in the V4 supergun. Driving a projectile with a magnetic field (energy but no mass, hooray) seems to offer limitless muzzle velocities. However, they have a history of throwing their breech into the ground at mach 2, rather than putting a bullet in the air when anyone over the rank of major is watching (I forget who I have to thank for this matchless description, but they worked on these, not I).

    Rail guns are unlkely to be useful for driving implosions. It would be very hard to focus a symmetric implosion with a railgun. However, you could use the same pulsed power to drive an implosion like a plasma gun. Get a thin gold tube, fill it with DT, and whack in a pulse. The pulse goes up the outside of the tube. The gold outside goes directly to plasma, stops conducting, and so the current can move inward. If you can get the shockwave reaction from the expanding plasma to approximately match the speed of the current penetration, then a nice, cylindrically symmetrical implosion should be yours, and the small burst of annoying penetrative radiation and the hair loss that goes with it.

    There is another effect - the Z-pinch - that is a bit railgun-ish. This gets a lot of mention in the Sandia webpage. People used to have great hopes for that - it was quite the thing in the seventies, when people could still use phrases like 'everlasting power from seawater' without laughing - but it is hard to get a symmetrical pinch before instabilities run riot.

    Don't take my word for it. Maybe, I'm too old, and things have moved forward since I last was in this field. Sandia is a seriously cool place, even if the people who write their webpages are a bit too keen now and then.

  25. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the linked Wikipedia article: Peaceful uses of railguns There is interest in using railguns as mass drivers for space exploration and mining. They would be useful for launching bulk ores into space, particularly from low-gravity bodies such as moons and asteroids; electrically powered from solar panels, they would not require any consumables such as rocket fuels. Rail guns have been proposed for use in delivering projectiles to space, especially from bodies without atmospheres (such as the Moon). Its main competitors are coil guns and ram accelerators. Also, railguns may be used to initiate fusion reactions, by firing pellets of fusible material at each other. The impact would create immense temperatures and pressures, allowing nuclear fusion to occur. However current railguns are not yet sufficient to achieve the energies required.