Slashdot Mirror


Rail Guns Closer to Reality

emtboy9 writes "Yahoo News is reporting that scientists at Sandia National Labs have created a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun) that can accelerate small aluminum plates at 34 kilometers per second, faster than the Earth travels through space. The accelerated plates strike a target after traveling only five millimeters, or less than a quarter-inch. The impact generates a shock wave -- in some cases, reaching 15 million times atmospheric pressure -- that passes through the target material turning matter into various states almost instantly (solids into liquids, liquids into gas, and even gas into plasma)."

78 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Shitty weapon in Counterstrike by CyberBill · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the knife has a longer range than this thing.

    They should use some of the technology for cold fusion to accelerate small metal plates into things... That would be hella fun!

    --
    -Bill
    1. Re:Shitty weapon in Counterstrike by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      They should use some of the technology for cold fusion to accelerate small metal plates into things... That would be hella fun!

      Or turn it around and try to use railgun technology to produce warm fusion. I'm not really sure if it would work (effective confinement is one *bleeping* hard thing to do), but it might offer the possibility of fusing a large amount of matter. Now how can we extract energy from the extreme neutron flux without losing the machine in the process?

    2. Re:Shitty weapon in Counterstrike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Point them at a country and demand their oil for power generation? :o

  2. Yeehaw! by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny
    One of them, a jug of whiskey, and a bunch of squirrels, and you got yourself a party!

    1. Re:Yeehaw! by pegasustonans · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come with me and be my Z Machine
      And we will plasma pleasures scream
      That hills and valleys, dale and field,
      And all the craggy mountains yield.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    2. Re:Yeehaw! by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or you could rig up a I.R. tracker, clock/timer and noise detector and if the that f**king dog next door went nuts at 5am in the morning again, it would be the last time he did it! Yippy Kay Ay, motherf**ker!

      --
      "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
  3. Quake by YOystick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like we have our Quake 4 in real life before it is released...

  4. faster, how? by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful
    faster than the Earth travels through space

    Faster, measured against what frame of reference? A marker on the equator versus the center of mass? As seen from the moon? Sol? Alpha Proxima? Vega? The center of Andromeda's galactic core?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:faster, how? by js7a · · Score: 4, Informative
      Obligatory Monty Python answer:
      Just remember that you're standing on a planet
      That's evolving
      And revolving
      At nine thousand miles an hour.
      It's orbiting at nineteen miles a second,
      so it's reckoned,
      'Round the sun that is the source of all our power.
      Now the sun, and you and me,
      and all the stars that we can see,
      Are moving at a million miles a day,
      In the outer spiral arm,
      at fourteen thousand miles an hour,
      Of a galaxy we call the Milky Way.

      Our galaxy itself contains a hundred million stars;
      It's a hundred thousand light-years side to side;
      It bulges in the middle
      sixteen thousand light-years thick,
      But out by us
      it's just three thousand light-years wide.
      We're thirty thousand light-years
      From Galactic Central Point,
      We go 'round every two hundred million years;
      And our galaxy itself is one of millions of billions
      In this amazing and expanding universe.

      Our universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding,
      In all of the directions it can whiz;
      As fast as it can go,
      that's the speed of light, you know,
      Twelve million miles a minute
      And that's the fastest speed there is.
      So remember,
      when you're feeling very small and insecure,
      How amazingly unlikely is your birth;
      And pray that there's intelligent life
      Somewhere out in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth!
      The Sun circles the center of our Galaxy at about 250 km/s, but the Local Group of galaxies moves at about 600 kilometers per second relative to the primordial radiation of the big bang.
    2. Re:faster, how? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clearly a solar centric frame of refernce, as (1 AU * 2 * pi) / (1 year) is roughly 29,700 m/s. Which is close to, but less than, the speed quoted.

    3. Re:faster, how? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Faster, measured against what frame of reference? A marker on the equator versus the center of mass? As seen from the moon? Sol? Alpha Proxima? Vega? The center of Andromeda's galactic core?

      Probably the Earth's orbital speed around the Sun.

      It's far too small to be in reference to the cosmic microwave background radiation. The temperature of the CMBR varies as a dipole across the sky, with a temperature difference of 7.7 mK, because the Sun is traveling toward the Leo constellation at about 370 km/s relative to the CMBR radiation itself. It would be traveling faster but the galaxy as a whole is moving at about 600 km/s in the direction of Centaurus.

    4. Re:faster, how? by OO7david · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is unneed pendantry. If you are not only able to list off these places as frames of referrence but also think of them in the first place, odds are you already know the answer.

      Most sensible people would take it as being the sun spinning around the sun, and leave it there.

      Since there is no pleasing you therein, the earth is more or less 149,668,992 km from the sun, which gives a circumfrence of around 940,398,011 km which over 365 days gives 29.8 km/second.

      So, there you go, it's around the sun.

    5. Re:faster, how? by thomasa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course it slows down for leap years.

    6. Re:faster, how? by g_arumilli · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, unneeded pedantry would be pointing out that the earth's velocity wrt the sun is roughly constant, therefore it's accelerating at 0 km/second/second. Not hard to 'accelerate' something faster than that.

      That's false. There's an acceleration because the velocity is changing in direction, even if it isn't changing in magnitude. This should be obvious from the fact that there's a force (the sun's gravitational force) acting on it. Basic physics, F = ma, yada yada yada.

      Although the article summary is wrong in saying that the plate was accelerated "at" 34 km/sec, perhaps accelerated "to" 34 km/sec may have been more accurate.

  5. Plates don't liquify people by cheesebikini · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plates don't liquify people. People liquify people.

    1. Re:Plates don't liquify people by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try the new Soylent Green Energy Drink!

      --
      Rod Taylor
  6. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you could maybe launch non-mil payloads into space, or perhaps use the technology in terrestrial transportation... Or make a really bitchin' chicken gun.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  7. Rail gun + Japan's robot suit = by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LAQ (Live Action Quake)?

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  8. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    RTFA. It's only 6 paragraphs. That's not too taxing, is it? Or do you prefer to post a dumb question and end up looking like an idiot in the hope that maybe you'll get an "insightful" mod and maybe even a first post?

    Second paragraph:

    Housed at Sandia National Laboratories, the Z machine attracted a lot of attention eight years ago when its energy output more than quadrupled - raising hopes that the reactions in the Z could provide a new source of clean, abundant power. To help further progress towards this end, the machine is getting a $61.7 million upgrade, officials announced recently.

  9. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by nrlightfoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a non-military use. They are using it to simulate conditions deep within giant planets. Also this isn't really a rail gun. For one it doesn't use rails, and the whole aim of this experiment is unrelated to rail guns.

    --
    what sig?
  10. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by OmegaBlac · · Score: 2, Informative
    are there any non-military uses for this?
    Sure is. Check the Wikipedia link posted in the summary or right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_gun
  11. Did you not do basic physics at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun) that can accelerate small aluminum plates at 34 kilometers per second"

    We were taught this at the age of 14 - what were you doing?

    Acceleration is measured in distance per second per second. 34 km/s is a velocity. So did you mean it accelerates it to 34 km/s? Or did you actually mean it accelerates at 34 km/s/s? This is /. were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN.

    1. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's accelerate to 34 km/s. I forget what the actual acceleration is, but I figured out that the flyer plate goes from 0 to 60 (mph) in something like 0.002 nanoseconds.

    2. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      34 km/s is a speed, not a velocity. Velocity is a vector and needs a direction component as well as a magnitude. What where you doing at 14?

    3. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if the aluminum slug accelerates linearly, which is almost surely not the case. Like any other inductor, the rails will need time to build up their magnetic field. This hysteresis combined with the potentially non-linear response from the capacitor bank they are likely using to power this thing, I'd imagine you could be off by just a hair.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    4. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is /. were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN.

      And as one such, I can't help pointing out that "were" should be "where".

    5. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by Tet · · Score: 2, Informative
      0 to 60 (mph) in something like 0.002 nanoseconds.

      Or in SI units, 2 picoseconds.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    6. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by johnw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, if we're going to be pedantic, 34 km/s is a speed, not a velocity.

      John

    7. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by mockm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "This is /. where pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN."

      lol! that should replace slashdot's current slogan.

      --
      "Ever have your heart shot out of season and strapped to the hood of a car?" -- Chopper Harley
    8. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by panic_smooth · · Score: 3, Informative

      inspection of the 'scientists' link in TFA reveals that the plate is accelerated at 1010g, taking the speed (sic) from zero to the reported 34 km/s.

      --
    9. Re:Did you not do basic physics at school? by bre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Acceleration is measured in distance per second per second. 34 km/s is a velocity. So did you mean it accelerates it to 34 km/s? Or did you actually mean it accelerates at 34 km/s/s? This is /. were pedantic nerds with nothing better to do hang out, not CNN.

      Shouldn't this be (34 km/s)/s or 34 km/(s*s) or 34 km/(s^2)?

  12. Re:Railguns, Exactly What We Need by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you can't get out of the way of the guy carrying a gun bigger than my house, I think it's probably best if your slow-ass organs die with you.

  13. Practical use for a rail gun by netrangerrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call it a "rail launcher" and fire satellite payloads into orbit. Of course you'll have to slow down the velocity or the payload will ionize in the atmosphere upon launch. Rail launchers are more practical in a vacuum, as there is no atmosphere to interfere with hypervolocity launches. Perfect for chunking mined ore from the Moon to Earth?

    I'll bet this railgun on fires a few millimeters because they have problems with longer magnetic "barrels" exploding from the shockwave produced by an object moving "at the speed the Earth moves through space".

    --
    "As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
  14. Re:How about a love gun by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 2

    I am a hippie. Voted against Bush and everything. But it ain't the science that does the killing.

  15. Tighten your tinfoil hat by StarCharter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because it's called a "railgun" doesn't mean it has military uses. The power supplies and support equipment necessary to power the Z-machine take up several rooms. It's far easier to kill with existing weapons design that it is to reduce the requirements for imparting vast amounts of energy to low mass objects. The chance to study high energy transformations in other-than-nuclear reactions open several potential basic science appliations. The article clearly cites some potential applications that aren't military.

  16. Re:How about a love gun by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call me crazy, but I'd rather make a friend than kill an enemy.

    Unfortunately, not every enemy feels the same way.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  17. Look at the possibilities! by H_Fisher · · Score: 3, Funny
    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those ... no ...

    How about this: In Soviet Russia the Railgun ... ummmmm ...

    No, I can't really see any easy beneficial (which is, I guess, to say "non-military") applications for this tech, unless you can tell me how this could aid in space exploration (a means of launching spacecraft, maybe?) ... or how it might help in the advancement of processing or data storage technology...

    Wait! I've got it:

    Railgun confirms: Tank crew is dying.

    Ahh, that's more like it. Now I can sleep. :-)

    1. Re:Look at the possibilities! by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Interesting
      No, I can't really see any easy beneficial (which is, I guess, to say "non-military") applications for this tech, unless you can tell me how this could aid in space exploration (a means of launching spacecraft, maybe?)

      Powering spacecraft or launching cargo or many other things...

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  18. not a rail gun, fer cripes sake by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Yahoo News is reporting that scientists at Sandia National Labs have created a magnetic pulse gun (rail gun)

    Let's hear it for reading comprehension! Between yahoo news and he submitter, we're somehow left with the impression that this is a rail gun. It's nothing of the kind. It's an implosion machine. As described in the LiveScience.com article linked: "The Z uses a short burst of intense electricity - only a few 10 billionths of a second long - that forces an ionized gas to implode." So we can stop the handwringing over the morality of this "weapon", as to use it as such would require luring the enemy into a chamber the size of a soup can and asking him to hold still while you blast him.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  19. Re:How about a love gun by Repton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nothing to do with rail guns. It's just a silly inflamatory headline (or maybe railguns are cool 'cause they're in Quake).

    This is all about generating massive shockwaves to examine the properties of matter in extreme conditions (without having to heat it up to enormous temperatures).

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  20. I'm already real. by RailGunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh - you said RailGun. I guess my brain just saw the additional three letters.

  21. Re:How about a love gun by image77 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Housed at Sandia National Laboratories, the Z machine attracted a lot of attention eight years ago when its energy output more than quadrupled - raising hopes that the reactions in the Z could provide a new source of clean, abundant power. To help further progress towards this end, the machine is getting a $61.7 million upgrade, officials announced recently.

    The fact that several mods decided that you post was insightful makes me very uncomfortable with the quality of mods lately. If you read ANY of the TFAs linked, you would see that in this case the gun in question has nothing to do with "maim and kill." In this case, the "rail gun" (it's not really even a rail gun, but that's a whole different issue,) has more in common with a staple gun than my trusty .45 ACP.

  22. better link by Evil+Willow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe this link better describes what the Z Machine has to do with rails guns.

  23. I wish you'd just stop your name calling ... by jasonhamilton · · Score: 3, Funny

    and think of the children for once.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  24. Wrong by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at Sandia, on this very topic. These are just flyer plate experiments, using the Z-machine's Marx Generators to isentropically accelerate small aluminum flyer plates up to high velocities, in order to better understand the behavior of metals at high pressures/densities/temperatures. This has been around for a while now. The only difference is they've recently attained these higher velocities by having the Marx Generators switch at slightly different times, rather than all at once.

    Nothing to see here, move along. (and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain)

    1. Re:Wrong by dnaboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      And to think I thought Marx generators only transferred energy from the bourgeoisie to the proletariat...

    2. Re:Wrong by pegasustonans · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, Marx energies appear to transfer energy to the proleteriat, but, in fact, they only spread noise among elite intellectuals. Lenin energies then convert the noise into energy useable by the proleteriat and Stalin energies then destroy all other particles in the vicinity.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    3. Re:Wrong by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 4, Funny
      ... and Marx energies, as any fule kno, are transferred by elementary particles called chicions, harpions, grouchions, gummions and zeppions.

      Sorry, couldn't resist. So mod me down.

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    4. Re:Wrong by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are you saying that In Soviet Russia energy converts YOU?

      Anyway, nice one, you should elaborate that into a treatise on marxistic-leninistic high energy physics.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
  25. I think I know how that sequence ends... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    solids into liquids, liquids into gas, and even gas into plasma

    Let me guess - it then turns plasmas into solids.

    So the war of the future will be an evere more complex version of Liquid, Gas, Plasma, Solid - far more sophisticated than the three state method of old including Rock and Paper.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. The perfect non military use by dnaboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This put's the Flux Capacitor to shame. No where did I park that Delorean?

  27. These are not the rail guns you are looking for by Moiche · · Score: 5, Interesting
    True, the Z Machine is not a gun -- it's a giant magnetic field generator. I guess referring to a giant magnetic field generator as a "gun" works better from a journalistic prespective.

    However -- rail guns are on the cusp of military viability. The University of Texas at Austin's Institute of Advanced Technology got 10 million dollars to develop viable rail guns. Just a month ago Janes reported that a prototype of the military rail gun had been tested, and that it was nearing viability.

    UT-IAT has devised a common low-cost projectile concept for both naval surface-fire support and army non line-of-sight (NLOS) engagements using an EM gun launcher. It has a flight mass of 15 kg and contains either multiple kinetic-energy flechettes or a smaller number of sub penetrators made of tungsten. In its naval guise it has a muzzle energy of 64 MJ; a muzzle velocity of 2,500 m/s; a maximum range in excess of 500 km and an impact velocity of 1,600 m/s. From a more size-constrained land tactical platform it would be expected to have a muzzle energy of 20 MJ; a muzzle velocity of 1,400 m/s and an impact velocity of 700 m/s out to ranges in excess of 100 km.
    That article really made me wish I had a Jane's subscription. Apparently, the limiting factor is the size of the capacitor -- if they can get this down than naval applications within a few years are plausible.

    Incidentally, a fun game, if you're ever bored, is to imagine what would happen to the human body if one were to hold and fire a rail gun (even a wimpy one that shot at a mere 1,600m/s and not at "near the speed of light"), and the law of conservation of momentum actually worked. Really! Try at parties!

    Fond wishes,

    Moiche

  28. Not quite that simple by Ranma21 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may have also seen aluminium egg rings fired off older rail-gun devices. The actual material doesn't have to be magnetic, it moves forward because of its own magnetic field induced by current flowing through it. Aluminim is a GREAT conductor of electricity and so makes a similarly great magnetic field. This field, when interacting with the rail gun's, makes it move, NOT the fact that the material itself has (unenergized) magnetic properties. Pretty simple really.

  29. Three times the velocity by Indianwells · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the huge tidbit that I haven't really seen discussed: "That's 50 times faster than a rifle bullet, and three times the velocity needed to escape Earth's gravitational field." A rail gun, of sufficient capacity to catapult raw materials into orbit, would be a gigantic breakthrough for the whole planet.

  30. Does not. by Larthallor · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article's title is extremely misleading.

    This does not bring rail guns any closer to reality, by which I mean it does not bring military rail guns any closer to reality.

    The Z-machine is a hanger-sized experimental device akin to a particle accelerator. This was an experiment designed to study extremely high pressures, such as those thought to have been important in Jovian planetary formation.

    Saying that this experiment brings rail guns closer to reality is like saying that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN brings PPCs closer to reality.

  31. "Small aluminum plates" is highly misleading by Goldenhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "small aluminum plates" are not just small... they're TINY. Others have already noted that "rail gun" is a big misstatement; the discs they're talking about here are merely 850 MICRONS thick. Let's get this thing in perspective, shall we? I know that "rail gun" makes many geeks twitch uncontrollably, but come on now, that's just karma whoring.

    Oh, and to link to a two-year-old image... with a caption of "have created" that implies it's brand new... PLEASE.

    Once again, the question must be asked: where's the moderation system for STORIES?

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  32. Draft dodger! by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well railguns are neat and all, but I'm still not joining the Army until they invent the respawn point.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Draft dodger! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm still not joining the Army until they invent the respawn point.

      Well...it's not so much the _point_ that's the hard part, but more the respawning mechanism itself.

  33. Re:Just what we need. by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Another incredibly powerful weapon for world's largest loose cannon to be playing with. Go America!

    While it's theoretically possible that a weapon might be derived from this research someday, but for a moment think about what this is really talking about.

    It's a machine that can accelerate a tiny disc of metal very quickly, but only for a short distance, and AFAICT, it's all happening down inside of a big machine so about the biggest thing you could kill with it might be a cockroach.

    Right now, as far as killing things goes, it's not a weapon -- it's just a $6+ million bug exterminator!

    Hmm...bug extermination for only $6 millon or so. Maybe MS should buy a few dozen!

    --

    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
  34. How long till we hear... by Brad1138 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Constitution guarantees us the right to keep and bear rail guns!!!" Later followed by "Mommy... Johnny liquefied the cat again!"

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  35. The uses for this: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Z machine (and it's earlier configuration called PBFA 2) have been on Sandia for a long time.

    As said above, it's not a rail gun. It's not really even particularly useful for rail gun research.

    What it's for is to put small amounts of matter at tremendous temperatures and pressures.

    There are a lot of reasons to want to do this. Some of it is just basic research. i.e. What happens to matter and the laws governing it at these extreme conditions?

    Another application is fusion power research. You can compress deuturium and tritium to the point they will fuse in this machine. Though it's not made to generate power, you can learn about the details of the fusion reaction.

    That said, the main reason why this machine was built was indeed for military research. But even that is in a grey area. The US hasn't conducted a nuclear test detonation in quite some time. The reason it was able to do this is that computer simulations and other methods got good enough that they were able to be used instead of actually setting off a thermonuclear or nuclear device. Indeed, many of the Department of Energy's most powerful computers were created specifically to do that sort simulation (ASCII White, IIRC, for example).

    When running computer simulations, you have to have some way of calibrating the simulation and checking that it's getting the right answer.

    In the case of a supercomputer run simulating a car crash, you can validate it by conducting crash tests, and seeing how closely it agrees with them. Wrecking a few of a given car model is acceptable in return for it.

    But, when simulating nuclear weapons, you would often run into cases where to validate the code, you'd, at first glance, have to set one off. The conditions in a nuclear blast are so extreme, that it's difficult to put matter into that sort of state. If you're trying to maintain a test moratorium, that kinda undermines the whole idea.

    That's a big reason PBFA 2 and the follow on Z machine were made. They let DOE check the computer simulations and do basic research that would otherwise require nuclear testing. One of the biggest areas of interest is what happens when the materials in a bomb age. A lot of those weapons are getting quite old.

    They have many other basic research uses, but a big one is making it possible to keep the nuclear test moratorium.

    So, it's grey area. On the one hand, it's used for weapon research. On the other, it helps keep the test moratorium. It also has a lot of basic research uses. So, just like a supercomputer, you have to make your own decision about whether it, on the whole is a good or bad thing.

  36. Bad link? by miquong · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh, was I the only one who got the wrong article on the "magnetic pulse gun" link? It should be here.

  37. Acceleration by eformo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just need to do some thinking on the screen here...

    Accelrates at 34 km/s?? I thought that was a velocity. If .5 (at^2) = .005 m

    And at = 34000 m/s

    ...then that makes the time about 3e-7 s. That would be something like 11.8 billion g's.

    Not bad. Even for such a small projectile, that's an impressive impulse.

    -ex

  38. Re:Space travel by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So many people here are saying things like this because of the stupid, erroneous "rail gun" description Slashdot gave it.

    This is not some projectile launcher. It's a massively expensive device that creates immense magnetic fields in a tiny region for fusion and shock wave experiments, of which one thing that you can do is propel miniscule items over short distances. It doesn't "scale" to rail gun applications, and it's not designed to - it's already a monstrously large device. Besides - when it operates, it produces the greatest source of X-rays on Earth. You want to scale that *up*? Next, the G forces in this thing are just plain ridiculous. Last, Earth's escape velocity is not the only thing you have to achieve - did you forget about Earth's atmosphere?

    Far, far, far more realistic is Gerald Bull's monstrous barbados gun, which actually would have been launching things to orbit given a few more months. However, using a crazy-expensive device designed for fusion and shock research with crazy levels of X-ray generation to propel projectiles to space an is a ludicrous idea. Why not just propose converting your average nuclear waste storage pool into a rocket because the radiation it emits is very high ISP?

    --
    Sigur RÃs: I didn't know that Heaven had a rock band.
  39. Futurama, of course by Olaserov · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try the new Soylent Green Energy Drink!

    "How is it?"
    "Well, it varies from person to person."

    --
    * Olaserov is in the process of thinking up a signature.
  40. Re:How about a love gun by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is all about generating massive shockwaves to examine the properties of matter in extreme conditions (without having to heat it up to enormous temperatures).
    ...using strong magnetic fields to accelerate aluminum plates to incredibly high speeds in a contraption that has a strong resemblance to a rail gun.
    The Z machine isn't a railgun at all.

    It doesn't accellerate the flyer plate linearly. A Z-pinch machine, which the Z-machine at Sandia is an example of, implodes a thin hollow cylinder of material, a fraction of a mm thick and about 1-2 cm in diameter and roughly 1-2 cm long. The Z-pinch effect causes the cylinder walls to collapse inwards at high speed, striking a target along the axis of the cylinder.

    See for example http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/ZP/

    High electrical current flows through the cylinder, which causes a magnetic field whose lines of force are circular around the wire. Basic electrical physics. Also basic physics, you get a force ExB (electrical field cross product with magnetic field). The sign of the force, from the direct electrical field and its induced magnetic field, is inwards towards the center of the cylinder.

    So at high enough currents, the cylinder implodes.

    There's no external magnetic field necessary. If you add one, then the implosion process is more even and stable, but that isn't necessary at all for the Z-pinch effect to work.

    You can even do fairly safe home experiments in Z-pinching. Take a bunch of thin wires and a couple of nonconductive disks. Put the disks on a pole, then string the wires from disk to disk so that they form a cylindrical array. Solder all the ends at the top to one electrial lead and all the ends at the bottom together. Connect up to a power source. Watch the wires move inwards.

    Z-pinch is just taking that effect, and putting the equivalent of the whole world's electrical power output through it instead of a small regulated power supply. A bit more force, eh?

    Calling the Z-machine a railgun is like calling a F-16 fighter a really cool drag racer. Just because they're both fast and burn hydrocarbons doesn't make them at all the same thing.

  41. Second amendment by wpiman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does the second Amendment protect our right to turn matter into plasma?

  42. And speaking of Quake... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... if you're running around being chased by someone with one of these, chanting, "I refuse to be railed! I refuse to be railed!" repeatedly at high speed will cause them to lose their nerve and not be able to hit the broad side of a barn.

    At least, it worked that way in Quake II at LAN parties.

    Though it sometimes caused the person with the gun to drop out of the game, reboot into Linux, and start denial-of-service attacking the guy who was chanting...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  43. Re:How about a love gun by 7Prime · · Score: 2

    I hate to say it, but the only way to get peace is with a knife. Men must continue to die in order to preserve peace.

    What about women? I think a fair share of them should die too.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  44. Equal and Opposite by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For every force there is an equal and opposite reaction. Making something go from 0 to 34 in the distance of a gun must produce one major recoil.

    Now I foresee a human-carried model! Shoulder rocket launchers let the rocket go on its own - no recoil but don't stand behind the tube. Well, let's replace the burning rocket fuel with a rail gun. The rail shoots out the back in slow motion and the payload goes out the front much much faster. Right? But we're talking magnetic fields at work so....the rail can be curved!! What does that mean?

    North and south. Poles that is - double barrel shotgun. As long as both barrels shoot at once one side balances the other as long as the force should cancel at the back end.

    Just in case some entrepreneur wants to build one now, remember Equal and Opposite. The rail has to be flexed. In other words, think sawed off shotgun, and even think crossbow. The rail has to be horizontal for the most part until the ends where the ammo is turned by the electromagnetism to shoot forwards. Almost all the force should occur in the horizontal portion while the forward pointing portion doesn't give any more force than a normal gun.

    Kind of scary, espcially if the high speed projectile doesn't want to turn the corner at the end, not to mention the long lever arm will make the rails flap. Automatic fire will have to be timed.

    The only problem left? electric power for something like this must be pretty big. Kinetic energy = 1/2 mv^2 so even a small m will require a lot of car batteries. I don't see 007 running around with this weapon protecting ski bunnies while his batteries freeze.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  45. Re:How about a love gun by Deanalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me crazy, but I'd rather make a friend than kill an enemy.

    Unfortunately, not every enemy feels the same way.


    So lets kill them before they kill us!..
    You realize how many conflicts could have been avoided if someone had stopped and realized that the other side is human too? Very few people actually want to kill, and even less people want to be killed. People kill out of fear, and killing people because you dont want them to kill you is the worst abuse of logic around.

    Im willing to bet that every enemy really does feel like they would rather make the friend. Don't get me wrong, I dont mind people running out and killing eachother, I just dont buy their justifications.

    Now that weve gone completely off topic (as the original article wasnt even about guns), heres a bash.org quote!

  46. Re:Wrong units by ch3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it should read accelerate to 34km/s, not at

  47. Re:Faster then the Earth? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what's your problem? Earth's orbital velocity is ~29.8km/s (thus Earth travels though space at 29.8km/s relative to the sun). those plates are travelling at 34km/s. is 34km/s not faster than 29.8km/s?

    That said, that's significantly slower than Earth's `orbital' velocity around the center of the galaxy: 300km/s (yes, 0.1% c) assuming the sun is 100000 ly from the center of the galaxy and it takes 100 millioin years to go complete an orbit.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  48. morality debate by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we can stop the handwringing over the morality of this "weapon", as to use it as such would require luring the enemy into a chamber the size of a soup can and asking him to hold still while you blast him.

    HEAR HEAR! I quite agree with the parent. This should be a discussion about the morality of lureing your enemies into soup can sized implosion chambers and asking him to hold still.

    (It doesn't sound cricket, if you ask me...)

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:morality debate by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't sound cricket, if you ask me...

      It does sound like Football , especially the kind a Arsenal Vs. Man United game is.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
  49. Railguns not for fusion by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ages ago, I used to work on this sort of thing too. Railguns as weapons were experimented with in the fifties - perhaps earlier for all I know (some Tesla fan will probably tell me he had one). You cannot make a shell go faster than the propellant's natural velocity, and you only get so many joules per gram with chemicals. To get close to this limit you have to stick the bangy stuff (tm) not only at the bottom of the barrel but at various intervals along its length, as in the V4 supergun. Driving a projectile with a magnetic field (energy but no mass, hooray) seems to offer limitless muzzle velocities. However, they have a history of throwing their breech into the ground at mach 2, rather than putting a bullet in the air when anyone over the rank of major is watching (I forget who I have to thank for this matchless description, but they worked on these, not I).

    Rail guns are unlkely to be useful for driving implosions. It would be very hard to focus a symmetric implosion with a railgun. However, you could use the same pulsed power to drive an implosion like a plasma gun. Get a thin gold tube, fill it with DT, and whack in a pulse. The pulse goes up the outside of the tube. The gold outside goes directly to plasma, stops conducting, and so the current can move inward. If you can get the shockwave reaction from the expanding plasma to approximately match the speed of the current penetration, then a nice, cylindrically symmetrical implosion should be yours, and the small burst of annoying penetrative radiation and the hair loss that goes with it.

    There is another effect - the Z-pinch - that is a bit railgun-ish. This gets a lot of mention in the Sandia webpage. People used to have great hopes for that - it was quite the thing in the seventies, when people could still use phrases like 'everlasting power from seawater' without laughing - but it is hard to get a symmetrical pinch before instabilities run riot.

    Don't take my word for it. Maybe, I'm too old, and things have moved forward since I last was in this field. Sandia is a seriously cool place, even if the people who write their webpages are a bit too keen now and then.

  50. Re:Just because we can do a thing... by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the linked Wikipedia article: Peaceful uses of railguns There is interest in using railguns as mass drivers for space exploration and mining. They would be useful for launching bulk ores into space, particularly from low-gravity bodies such as moons and asteroids; electrically powered from solar panels, they would not require any consumables such as rocket fuels. Rail guns have been proposed for use in delivering projectiles to space, especially from bodies without atmospheres (such as the Moon). Its main competitors are coil guns and ram accelerators. Also, railguns may be used to initiate fusion reactions, by firing pellets of fusible material at each other. The impact would create immense temperatures and pressures, allowing nuclear fusion to occur. However current railguns are not yet sufficient to achieve the energies required.

  51. Faster Than the Earth... by trongey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heck, I can throw a rock faster than the Earth travels through space - as long as I'm at the equator, the local time is near midnight, and I'm throwing the same direction as the Earth is traveling. And don't go trying to get relativistic on me.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.