Quark CEO Abruptly Resigns
stonydell writes "According to News.com, Quark CEO Kamar Aulakh is no longer with the company. Company spokesman Glen Turpin also said, 'We hope to find a new CEO as soon as possible. It's very important we bring in some professional outside leadership to the company.' Does Quark still have a future or is the future Adobe and Macromedia?"
Quark CEO eh...?
Maybe they're better off without him?
Strange.
I did when I was reading their website:
Paving the way for custom publishing in a multiple-channel environment with industry-leading design, page layout, publishing, enterprise workflow, personalization, and content management software.
--Greg
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
to hear that Quark was still around. It is not a name I have heard in about 5 years.
'Same speed C but faster'
Quark is the proprietor of Quark's. RTFA?
With Quark out of the way, his brother Rom can take over.
http://www.dmwright.com/html/ferengi.htm
rules of acquisition
If this is true (or even if it isn't), why the hell would you broadcast that to the planet? I'm sure he wants to keep this discreet. It's nobody else's business.
Maybe he wanted to announce it while he still had the balls&&&&SAD_#()%#$^^^^[STRUCK BY LIGHTENING NO CARRIER]
Christ on a cracker, I'm so glad I use TeX instead of any of these things.
After all, I am strangely colored.
Weak.
The Grand Nagus will be displeased.
The only good Quarks are the one that owns the bar on a space station, and the one that captained a space garbage truck and had identical blonde twins (okay, one was a clone of the other one) as crew. Any other Quark with a capital Q is dead to me. Dead, I tell you.
I guess he got tired of Deep Space 9 and is going to open another bar in the gamma quadrant...
and what does Adobe... oh, you're talking of THAT quark
Sorry
Quark is gonna come back! Quark has great people working, with tremendous talent. But the problem with quark was/is that its been managed by a guy who knows best to run a construction. The management fail to create an ambiance which a product company should have - but the people in Quark try and do it. I guess they are trying hard - just hope that the dirty people at top make room for some one who knows about passionate product creators!
The cd label said "FINAL FANTASY", but only until she selected a bolder typeface.
I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
.. if the company does not make a profit, then the Executive staff does not get paid.
Thereby forcing an even stronger focus on quarterly profits at the expense of long-term strategic planning - 'If I don't make my profit target, I won't get paid, so I better cut costs by firing people and doing more outsourcing - future be damned!'
I agree, tho, that the rest of your comments are right on target.
I once was head of MIS for a consortium of companies in Baltimore. The MIS department shared facilities with the telemarketing company. After the telemarketing company president resigned, it took two and a half months for the board to find a replacement - meanwhile, the company was completely headless. It was a small company of less than 50, with no other management besides an accountant and two senior telemarketiers. The employees started coming to work in jeans, shorts and t-shirts! Our consortium was mostly a banking company so this was 'unthinkable'. They were literally having parties in the office almost every day. On their own initiative, the employees instituted flex-time and other shocking innovations. But they were still working.
I was generating the sales reports for their company - profits for the telemarketing company increased by over 40% for this period!
It all came to an end when the wife of the chairman paid a visit and saw the 'chaos'. I recommended that they do nothing about it, given the profit numbers, but I was laughed at (of course). The board's reasoning: Think how much better profits will be once they get strong management again!
Strong management was hired, and profits quickly sank to their normal levels. The board was predictably mystified by this development.
There is not nearly enough love in the world, but there is far too much trust.