Slashdot Mirror


MS Unveils Beta of New Image Editing Program

docdude316 writes "CNET is running a story about Microsoft's new photo editing software, Acrylic. The new program is based on Expression, which Microsoft purchased in 2003. From the article: 'Microsoft describes the software--currently available as a 77MB free download--as bringing together pixel-based painting and vector graphics features. These capabilities will put the product squarely in the market currently dominated by software maker Adobe Systems with its pixel-focused Photoshop and vector-driven Illustrator products. Acrylic appears to support opening and exporting to Photoshop and Illustrator file formats, as well as other standard graphics formats. In addition, the application appears to be able to export to Adobe's Portable Document Format, or PDF.'

40 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. M$ is really on a tear today... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny


    <sarcasm>
    First a music subscription service, and now this...M$ is a vertiable fountain of innovation.
    <sarcasm>

    Damnit, Microsoft! You're like that kid on the playground who always wanted someone else's toy, just because someone else had them.
    If you don't quit bullying the other kids, Microsoft, no one is going to want to play with you.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by Juvenall · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Taking one idea and using it yourself is a cornerstone of capitalism. So I don't understand why you're basing Microsoft for doing what every other business has done throughout human history. It's really like saying "Oh, don't buy a Ford because they didn't invent the car."

    2. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they keep going, MS will end up as a jack of all trades

      don't you mean jackin' all trades?

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    3. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought the general concensus on this board is that competition of software products is a good thing which makes *all* the products better, or am I mistaken? (At least, that's the viewpoint people give when others complain about Linux having a whole bunch of different widget libraries and thousands of text editors.)

      But as usual, it sums up as "if you don't like it, don't use it." Why insult Microsoft for making it? Why not think positively and stop being so cynical for once?

      Sure, maybe it can't compete with Photoshop, ok. What about Photoshop Elements? What about Corel Painter? Maybe it'll help make ALL those products better by introducing a new interface idea or unique type of filter. Who knows?

    4. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Damnit, Microsoft! You're like that kid on the playground who always wanted someone else's toy, just because someone else had them. If you don't quit bullying the other kids, Microsoft, no one is going to want to play with you.

      Right! Because, before PhotoShop came along, no one had ever produced a paint program before...

      The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So it's OK to rip other people's ideas off as long as you give them away? Interesting.

    6. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This is intriguing. Work with me for a second here, OK?

      Mozilla for example is based on ideas, technology and a codebase developed by Netscape. How does Mozilla innovate?

      Open source did not create IM, but they copied it to death. How does Jabber and the lot innovate?

      MySQL is "ripping off" established commercial databases now, putting in innovative things like stored procedures, views and UFDs. Does MySQL innovate?

      The GiMP is a Photoshop ripp-off, so much so that with every new version of PS the GiMP developers have rushed to provide their own substandard "alternatives" to some PS features. Does the GiMP innovate?

      KDE has always looked like Windows. They copied the taskbar, the start menu, the tray notification area and so on. Does that mean that KDE does not innovate?

    7. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by bonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't that descripe most oss apps?

      --
      I hope to die peacefully in my sleep like grandpa, not screaming like his passengers.
    8. Re:M$ is really on a tear today... by salesgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some software projects are new ideas. Otheres are implemenatations designed to solve the same problem as another package, but perhaps do it differently or to reduce a high price created by an artificial monopoly. You are not correct though to paint open source as "not innovative".

      Exaples of packages that owe their existance to economics:

      Linux - duplicates function of Unix at lower cost.
      Gimp - provides essential function of Photoshop for web designers and UI designers.
      MySQL - very good database without the bill.

      Examples of packages that innovate and carve out new ideas:

      Gnutella and other P2P software
      Sendmail, fetchmail, NNTPD, Apache, etc...
      PHP, Python, Ruby (sorry if I left out your favorite)
      EMACS and other editors
      Inkscape and other SVG tools
      Zope, Mambo and other CMS / Web application frameworks

      MySQL is "ripping off" established commercial databases now, putting in innovative things like stored procedures, views and UFDs. Does MySQL innovate

      Another open source product does have substantial capital in the creation of SQL... Postgress. Which leads to a simple comment: Open Source drives an incredible ammount of invention in the computer science field and in the software development tools arena - and always has.

      KDE has always looked like Windows. They copied the taskbar, the start menu, the tray notification area and so on.

      Incidentally, KED looks like windows if you want it too. KDE has always been spectacularly flexible in its ability to look like what the user wants. Like all desktops, KDE has borrowed the good and tried ways to do better. Other desktop/window managers have tried to be highly original like enlightment and blackbox.

      Software is as software does.

      --
      -- $G
  2. Nice by daniil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I downloaded the beta yesterday and installed it on my home box. I must say that I was quite impressed, especially with the usability (especially when compared to Gimp). It was a bit slow on my 800 mhz Pentium III, though. Even though I doubt that Microsoft will conquer this market, it's still nice to finally see some real competition to Photoshop, especially considering that the price of Acrylic will be much lower than that of Photoshop.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:Nice by computechnica · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's funny it requires Microsoft® Windows® XP with Service Pack 2. Sorry M$, GIMP and Photoshop run just fine on my WIN2k boxes.

    2. Re:Nice by bcattwoo · · Score: 3, Informative
      How can you call it real competition when the thing is being pushed, I mean, given for free? Doesn't this sound a bit like IE and every other market segment Microsoft crushes by baiting with free stuff?

      The free beta version "expires" October 1, 2005. Someone may figure a way around that, but it suggests that MS probably does not intend to give away the release version.

    3. Re:Nice by krelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So would you prefer them to put a price on it
      for the sake of being competitive ?

      Sometimes it seems to me that even if M$ will go out tomorrow and open up windows as OSS, people here will come and complain how this is some way bad and evil.

      I am not saying that M$ is jesus reborn but come on,
      put some sense into it.

  3. Adobemedia by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So maybe there's something to the notion that Adobe bought Macromedia (who also have an hybrid vector/bitmap graphics program) as a defensive move against Microsoft.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  4. Jumping to conclusions by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Competing with Photoshop because it does vector and raster imaging? Isn't that like saying a Skoda is competing with a Porsche because they both have wheels and an engine?

    1. Re:Jumping to conclusions by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't that like saying a Skoda is competing with a Porsche because they both have wheels and an engine?

      In the sense that a Skoda is not a Porsche, no.

      In the sense that the availability of a Skoda with four seats and a hatchback for $10K means you aren't constrained to buy a Boxster with only two seats and no luggage capacity for $50K just because it's the only car in town. . .yes.

      KFG

  5. Office by linuxci · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This can export to PDF? I'd have thought it more useful for them to add this feature to MS Office. Hopefully that feature will follow.

    1. Re:Office by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative
      This can export to PDF? I'd have thought it more useful for them to add this feature to MS Office. Hopefully that feature will follow.

      Any windows application can export to PDF via the miracle of PDFCreator.

      Not as fast as an Oo.o export to PDF, but export to PDF is hardly a world-shattering feature.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:Office by wfberg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Printing to PDF does NOT dump a bitmap image into a PDF container. Try it. Printing to PDF first prints using a postscript driver (driven bij Window's native GDI/EMF format), and then converts to PDF. This entire path is vector based, unless the printing application fucks up.

      And yes, PDFCreator will embed fonts, be they truetype, type-1 or opentype, and even subset.

      Also, if you DO want a bitmap, PDFCreator will print to JPG, PNG, etc.

      Note that if you have an Oo.o document that uses transparancy, Oo.o's export to PDF function WILL rasterize transparant sections, while PDFCreator will retain vectors. PDFCreator will even add metadata, encryption and stuff like that.

      Exporting directly to PDF will help in one area; if you're creating a file that isn't supposed to be in one of the standard paper size like Letter or A4. Also, it's faster than GDI->PS->PDF.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  6. Fark Acrylic Competition? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just doesn't have the same ring to it. I bet it's a trap.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  7. Not even JPEG by n0mad6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA:

    However, Microsoft noted Acrylic would not currently save pixel-type data to formats other than its native XPR file type.

    Being able to save as PDF is great and all, but it looks like this thing still has a ways to go before being useful.

    1. Re:Not even JPEG by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can save to JPG, GIF, TIF, etc by using the export feature. It would be nice to have them in the save as dialog, but it's not like they'r enot there at all. When you do a File/Save, all you get is XPR. Everything else is under export.

      I don't see the problem here.

      --
      "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
  8. Re:That's why it's called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right. The production version will be much buggier and have fewer features.

  9. Not exactly... by DigitlDud · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not a rival to Adobe products, definetly not Photoshop. It's primarily a vector graphics program with some unique features in that area. It was orignally a program Creative House Expressions which Microsoft bought in 2003.

    "Creature House Expression (formerly Fractal Design Expression) is a vector-based drawing tool featuring "skeletal strokes," a 2D drawing primitive which offers complete editability and scalability."
    http://graphicssoft.about.com/cs/illustration/gr/e xpression.htm

    This new Acrylic beta is essential version 4 of that program.

    Giving the timing of the release of a program that Microsoft had seemingly killed off years ago. I'd say they were planing to use it for vector creation in Avalon.

  10. GOLD from the product's forum by professorhojo · · Score: 4, Funny

    from unhappy almost-user
    - "what? this won't work under Windows 2000? :( it took me over 2 hours to download! oh well - maybe next time"

    from Annie, Beta Coordinator:
    - Well don't make this sound like good bye. This is still the Expression newsgroup so E3'ers can post too. Do I even have a chance at talking you into getting WinXP? :-) I love XP! It never crashes, never gives me grief, nothing. It plays nice!

  11. Does this mean ... by KSobby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean that Microsoft has finally thrown in the towel on further MS Paint development and innovation?

    --
    "It's difficult to meditate on amphetamines." - Joe Walsh
  12. Re:Support Free Software!! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny


    "convicted monopolist"...I love the sound of that.

    Makes them sound like sex offenders somehow...

    ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  13. What!? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft Paint ought to be enough for anybody!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  14. Sigh. Not All Software Has To Innovate by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of comments already about how MS isn't innovating. Of course they aren't. Neither was Open Office, Gimp, Firefox, etc. Not all software needs to be innovative to be successful. It just needs to be as good or better than alternatives, or fit a niche market that isn't filled already.

    Since the market for graphics programs is filled already, MS needs to make this at least as good as Gimp and Photoshop for it to be successful. Since this is only a beta, only time will tell if they've done that.

    Besides, I thought having choices was a good thing? Once MS starts unfairly competing in the graphics program industry, then start complaining about it. Until then, this is a good thing.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  15. Re:How does it compare to Paint Shop Pro? by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, I'm at work and the IT Nazis won't let me try it out.

    Dave, we need you to report to human resources before you leave today.

    Thank you,
    Bob Wyzygnoski
    IT Coordinator

  16. Portable by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's still nice to finally see some real competition to Photoshop, especially considering that the price of Acrylic will be much lower than that of Photoshop.

    True, if some competition brings the price of Photoshop down a few pegs then that would be nice. Still, one is left hoping that this isn't the beginnign of "Operation kill Adobe". Photoshop may be expensive but at least it is available on more platforms than just Windows.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Portable by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Photoshop may be expensive

      It is expensive. But it's not intended for Joe Bloggs cropping the crappy little images he makes with his £90 digital camera.

      I will be very surprised if this has significant impact on Adobe's core market.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:Thanks, M$-bloatware! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jesus, pretty soon you'll need a gig of RAM and 20 GB of free hard drive space to play Solitaire.

    Well, I am not Jesus, but I will jump in anyway: This time has already come. You also need a 19" LCD panel. Thanks goodness I talked to the Best Buy sales rep before buying, or I might have ended up with a cheaper system that wouldn't let me play solitaire. And my internet is so much faster now too!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  19. Non-passport Download by FullCircle · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  20. Re:But the real question is by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    `_
    / \
    O O
    |||/
    |\/|
    \__/

    Hey there, partner! It looks like you're trying to change your color balance!

    Would you like me to:

    1. Overwrite all pixels with #000000
    2. Overwrite all pixels with #FFFFFF
    3. Corrupt your image
    4. Save your image in our proprietary format that even we can't read
    5. Take you to the Gimp homepage

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  21. But will it run on OS X on Intel?!?!?!? by Thumpnugget · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but I think the question we all really want to know is: will this run on one of Apple's new Macs running on an Intel chip running on Windows inside of Wine via Mac OS X's BSD compatibility layer?

    Because even though the new Macs haven't been released yet, I just don't know if I can jump on board this Acrylic wagon unless they can promise me that kind of support.

    --
    Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
  22. It seems Acrylic does not require Win XP SP2 by zero0w · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you check the Yahoo! Expression3 mailing list (Yahoo! registration required), it seems that you can get around the installer by unpacking the file and install Acrylic on pre-SP2 machines including Windows 2000. Running the installer, however, would detect your system and prevent it from installing on pre-SP2 machines on purpose; so it may just be another lure for you to install SP2 =( .

    Also, Expression 3.3 (click the Previous Versions on the Acrylic project page) can run under Linux with WINE:

    http://frankscorner.org/index.php?p=expression3

  23. Re:Sigh. Not All Software Has To Innovate by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has features and methodology that make it an innovator, but it's still just a web browser with tabs and plugins. There were other tabbed browsers before Firefox came along.

    In the same way, Acrylic may have some interesting features that are innovations over what Photoshop or Gimp had, but it's still just a graphics program.

    If you want to consider Firefox an innovator, then you need to consider every Microsoft product one as well, since all of them have extended the features of their predecessors in some way. I'd prefer to refer to none of them as innovators unless the program as a whole is completely unlike anything before it.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  24. Re:Sigh. Not All Software Has To Innovate by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Lots of comments already about how MS isn't innovating.

    Anyone who says that has never been to SIGGRAPH. Microsoft's Graphics Research Group has some of the finest minds of CG in one place. Not sure who's there now, but at one time they had Alvy Ray Smith, Jim Blinn, Andrew Glassner, and a host of other top minds. They routinely produce as many or more papers on basic research as any commercial entity, SGI included. If I recall correctly, they hired Alvy by buying Altamira, which had a program that was doing amazing things with the alpha channel when Photoshop was pretty much useless for compositing.

    Since the market for graphics programs is filled already, MS needs to make this at least as good as Gimp and Photoshop for it to be successful. Since this is only a beta, only time will tell if they've done that.

    As good as? This assumes that one thinks Photoshop and it's open-source clone are all that good in the first place. As far as I'm concerned, Photoshop's popularity has stalled development in the image editing field. People think that the way things are done in Photoshop are the only way things should be done. The Gimp? It's nice to have a "free Photoshop", but like too many open source projects, it doesn't actually innovate, just immitate (yeah, go ahead...mod me down...you know it's true).

    I've been observing paint systems since the Quantel Paintbox and AT&T TIPS, and quite honestly, the rate of innovation in image editing and painting has been in a steady decline since the very first programs produced a flowering of innovations. It's taken new platforms like the Macintosh and the Amiga to produce change, and frankly we've not seen one of those since BeOS.

    I'm happy to see MS try something new. Somebody has to.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb