Slashdot Mirror


7-Year Old Prequel Fan On ANH

Random BedHead Ed writes "It is a subject often pondered by Star Wars fans: what is it like to watch the six films in order with a fresh perspective? From the Desk of Ghent, On one of the Star Wars blog site's many journals, answers this question in a recent blog entry about the writer's 7-year old son, who recently watched A New Hope for the very first time. Some enlightening quotes: 'Look... Obi-Wan is pretending he doesn't know R2-D2,' and 'Why don't those ships need Hyperspace rings?' It's a pity the end of Empire has been spoiled."

43 of 937 comments (clear)

  1. Re:why the new series sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed. My children will see them in the proper order: 4,5,6, then 1,2,3, then 7,8,9,10,11,12...

    (Say what you will, but history will prove me right.)

  2. Pity..Spoiled by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can enjoy a production of Hamlet
    knowing that the prince goes mad. I don't think
    it spoils anything to know the surprise in Empire.

    I was not surprised -- not saying I saw it coming, exactly, but it was one of the possibilities that had crossed my mind. I thought it was more likely that Obi-Wan *was* Vader. That was the twist I was expecting. I had a whole argument for it and everything, back then. I was a little bummed to find out I was wrong.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Pity..Spoiled by iamatlas · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First: Shakespeare compared to Star Wars/George Lucas's writing? Not cool man, not cool. I think thou must be geeked too much ;)


      Second, Hamlet doesn't much go mad as act the way a son might if he thought his uncle killed his dad and wasn't sure. (This issue debated endlessly though in Ph.D Dissertations and random other blatherings) Opelia's suicide or Pelonius's accidental murder, now those are things that knowing could spoil, or not, the enjoyment.

  3. Yeah, so hard to cheer for Rebellion anymore.. by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If one thing I found was that I was more bound to side with the Empire simply after seeing how inept the Republic truly was.

    The new perspective gained from watching the first three puts the whole series in a new light. The Empire really became what it was simply because the Republic and Jedi had become so egocentric and inept they had to be replaced to move forward.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Yeah, so hard to cheer for Rebellion anymore.. by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      FWIW, when I played x-Wing vs. Tie Fighter long ago it was fun to work through the ranks as an Empire pilot. Being indoctrinated, bringing peace, stability, and law-and-order to the galaxy. A different perspective added a lot.

    2. Re:Yeah, so hard to cheer for Rebellion anymore.. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still waiting for an epic space opera based more on _Beyond Good and Evil_ and _Either/Or_, than on Zoroaster's 3000 year-old poetry. Not just because Evil looks so cool, and Good so dull - but because I'm not a 10-year old going to see Star Wars anymore. I need a more complex representation of nonlinear ethics, because both Good and Evil, and their opposition monopolizing ethics, are all dull. Evil isn't getting any cooler, even though I am.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Yeah, so hard to cheer for Rebellion anymore.. by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Evil isn't getting any cooler, even though I am.

      No, not really.

      Good and Evil are the bright and dark edges of morality. ALL drama is fundamentally a question of where the characters stand on the middle ground.

      Bitching about this simple human truth isn't cool; it's just a sign of foolishness.

      (Now, there are two or three better ways to get the point "SW morality is too simple" across, but dening the difference between Right and Wrong isn't one of them.)

      (Oh, and your complex nonlinear space opera would be Babylon 5.)

  4. That seals it by portforward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When my three year old is old enough to watch the movies, I'll just show him IV through VI and skip the others. Finding out about the family relationsips, (as well as who Yoda is) is just too important, and the whole series suffers way too much. I liked episode III better than I or II, but watching Darth throw out his arms and arch his back screaming "NNNNOOOOOOOOOO" was terrible. As I left the theatre, I thought, "that is the last bit of new Star Wars I'll see. And it ended with a "NOOOOO!!!".

  5. Storm Troopers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At what point did the Emperor decide that it was time to change Storm Troopers into a zesty new outfit and cut back on the accuracy training budget?

    And when did they all get a new accent?

    1. Re:Storm Troopers? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kind of like comparing an AK-47 to an M-16/M-4 in the skill required to effectively use and maintain the weapon on a daily basis.

      I'm not a soldier, but I have shot an AK-47, and my understanding is that, in many peoples' opinions (except for people in the US military), the AK is a superior battlefield weapon by most measures.

      First, the AK has a larger calibre (7.62 vs 5.56 mm), so it's more effective against armor and vehicles.

      Second, it was specifically designed by its Russian inventor to be very tolerant of poor manufacturing and insufficient cleaning. Basically, you can treat it like crap and it won't misfire. The M16 has much more precise machining, but it must be cleaned religiously so that it operates correctly. That's fine for a high-accuracy rifle you use at a firing range or maybe for hunting, but in a muddy battlefield this is the last thing you want in a weapon. Of course, the side effect is that the M16 is more accurate, but again, this isn't very important on a battlefield. This is an assault rifle, not a sniper rifle. It's meant for ground troops to use in close-in combat conditions. These ground troops, I might add, are ones which are not expert marksmen. It's more important for them to have a weapon which is supremely reliable, and is "good enough" in accuracy at short-to-medium ranges.

      More accurate weapons have their uses, such as by snipers, but that's not the mission of the M16 or M4.

      Even worse, the M4, being just a short-barrel version of the M16, has much worse accuracy, but still has the M16's other problems. What's the point of this weapon? But it's still too long for use in situations where you're sitting in a Humvee and have to jump out and shoot at someone. This is why the US military is dumping these crappy weapons and moving to German-made HK assault rifles and submachine guns. A more modern assault rifle with a "bullpup" configuration will provide good accuracy and very short length.

    2. Re:Storm Troopers? by rjh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First, the AK has a larger calibre, so it's more effective against armor and vehicles.
      False. The penetration of a bullet is closely related to its sectional density. A small round traveling at high velocity, such as the 5.56mm round, will have superior penetration over a large round traveling at a slow velocity, such as the 7.62mm Soviet.

      In fact, after the 1993 Mogadishu debacle, one of the things learned was the 5.56mm round overpenetrates human targets significantly. Somali insurgents were shot several times at close range with little effect, since the rounds were traveling clean through with little tissue damage.
      The M16 has much more precise machining, but it must be cleaned religiously so that it operates correctly. That's fine for a high-accuracy rifle you use at a firing range or maybe for hunting, but in a muddy battlefield this is the last thing you want in a weapon.
      False. The M16 needs daily cleaning in hostile environments, but as long as it receives that cleaning it's a quite reliable weapon. The original Vietnam unreliability was the product of the Army not sending cleaning kits to troops in the field, and substituting inferior ammunition for the stuff the factory specified. American troops are the best-trained, best-equipped in the world, and part of their training has always been religious attention to weapons care.
      Of course, the side effect is that the M16 is more accurate, but again, this isn't very important on a battlefield.
      False. The Soviets knew that the M16 had about 250m of effective range on the AK-47 and AKMs (550m versus 300m), and so every Soviet army fireteam was equipped with an SVD Dragunov designated marksman's rifle. (Contrary to popular belief, the Dragunov is not a sniper rifle; it was equipped to regular line troops, not snipers.) The Soviets would not have done this unless they were scared shitless of the 250m range advantage the M16 offered.
      Even worse, the M4, being just a short-barrel version of the M16, has much worse accuracy
      It loses about 200m of effective range, still managing to have a marginally greater effective range than the AK-47/AKM family. But it's still too long for use in situations where you're sitting in a Humvee and have to jump out and shoot at someone. False. The M4 has received a fabulous reception from line users because of its compact nature. It, along with the Canadian-made Diemaco clones, is the close-quarters weapon of choice for Western armies. The biggest complaint about the M4 is the 5.56mm round has anemic penetration when fired from the short barrel of the M4; it penetrates less than a 9mm. Perversely, this complaint is actually a virtue for close-quarters fighting, where overpenetration is a major concern.
      This is why the US military is dumping these crappy weapons and moving to German-made HK assault rifles and submachine guns.
      The USMC has abandoned the HK MP5N in favor of the M4 SOPMOD system. The XM8 is currently a hotly-contested weapon, and several educated observers don't think the XM8 has much chance of acceptance.
      A more modern assault rifle with a "bullpup" configuration will provide good accuracy and very short length.
      Modern weapons design is moving away from bullpup configurations. Field experience has shown that it takes significantly longer to reload a bullpup than it does a weapon of conventional layout. The German army abandoned the (bullpup) G11 weapons system for the (conventional) G36 weapons system. The British have re-equipped their paratroops away from the (bullpupped) SA80 and towards the Diemaco clone of the M4. French Foreign Legionnaires are abandoning the (bullpupped) FAMAS for the M4.
  6. Always in the order written by DrRobert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always read things and watch series in the order they were written, not in the order of the books. It is better to watch Star Wars this way, read the Foundation series this way, and just about anything I can think of. In this way you follow the natural creative process of the writer rather than an artificial storyline; you grow with the writer and the story, the last three Star Wars movies certainly don't flow like Lucas wrote them all at the same time, maybe he had a vague treatment...

  7. Re:why the new series sucks by utuk99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was much happier with the mystery that the originals left of the past. Then again I tend to like anime, which usually pick up in the middle of a story too. Things do not have nice neat beginnings in life, why should they in movies.

  8. Children and RotS by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slightly off topic, but this guy mentions that his kid has watched RotS twice (I think it was).

    My four year old girl has started expressing a MAJOR interest in all things Star Wars since seeing, for some reason, a Darth Vader poster (I hope that doesn't say something disturbing about her bugeoning subconscious).

    I have sat with her and watched A New Hope, which she thoroughly enjoyed, but having seen Sith myself, I think the scene of Anakin's "disfigurement" was a wee bit much for a child of her age, and I don't know how mature this guy's seven year old is, but is ANY child of that age ready for something like that?

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:Children and RotS by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the scene of Anakin's "disfigurement" was a wee bit much for a child of her age, and I don't know how mature this guy's seven year old is, but is ANY child of that age ready for something like that?

      After Episode One, my 12-year-old daughter really got into the series, watching Episodes IV, V & VI over and over again. These remain her favorites. The month before Episode III she watched them all in the order they were made.

      The part that was hard for her was the slaughter of the Jedi. She cried and was so upset we had to leave the theater for a while.

      She was sad and angry enough to want to kill Anakin, and she was frighteningly glad Anakin got his legs burned off. She said, "he deserved worse than that for those kids," and she didn't say a word else the rest of the day.

  9. I call shenanigans by AnswerGil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sound like awfully sophisticated thoughts for a 7 year old. Maybe kids have gotten better at understanding these things, or maybe it's a particularly intelligent 7 year old, but I'm doubting this is for real.

  10. Re:And from Empire Strikes Back by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On a more serious note, 20 or so years of cloaking his existence from the Emperor and Darth Vader may have taken a serious toll on him.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. That's what I was saying. by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    'Look... Obi-Wan is pretending he doesn't know R2-D2,'

    I recenetly rewatched Episode 4 and was struck with the same thought. I guessed that Obi Wan was just pretending he didn't know R2D2 since he's supposed to be keeping a low profile and Luke obviously knew nothing of Ben's role as a Jedi knight in the Clone Wars.

    R2D2 could have had his memory erased, could be reprogrammed as an Imperial spy, ect. So until he saw the message from Leia and knew it was not a trap of some sort, he had to maintain his cover.

  13. Vader means Father by polar_cap_miner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The word vader would be pronounced "FAH-DHER" in most languages of a germanic lineage including Middle-English. FATHER is basically the result of a few hundred years of regional dialect changes. In Afrikaans, Darth Vader would have said "Ek is jou vader (I am your father)". So the big *surprise* in Empire is only to those who speak modern English

  14. Best order by darnvader · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the best order dramatically is IV, V, I, II, III, VI. You still get the surprise in Empire, and then treat the prequels as an extended flashback, which adds much more weight to the scenes with Luke, Vader and the Emperor in Jedi.

  15. Viewing in numeric order is a travesty! by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm currently introducing my nine-year-old daughter to Star Wars and am showing her them in release order, not numeric order. We watched A New Hope last weekend and she was blown away. She loved every minute of it and I can't see any benefit to showing her the prequels first.

    To me, one of the greatest thing about Star Wars is the Big Revelation in Empire. Why spoil that? I will be watching Empire tomorrow night with my daughter and I can't wait to see her jaw hit the floor just as the jaws of the collective audience in 1980 hit the floor. If any of you out there have children coming of age and want to show them these films, PLEASE show them in release order. They don't need the prequels to appreciate the original trilogy

    Don't get me wrong. I am one of the few who think the prequels kick ass from start to finish, but why spoil one of the greatest surprises in movie history just to give a lot of back story that doesn't matter much until you've see the originals anyway?

    Besides, for a new viewer, the prequels still contain the surprise of Palpatine being the Emperor so it's just fine to end your viewing of the films with Sith. Palpatine isn't referred to by name in Jedi so there is still a satisfying build-up and climax in the prequels with that revelation (most of us hardcore fans might not realize that because we already knew who he was. New, younger viewers won't.)

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Viewing in numeric order is a travesty! by anakin876 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      second? The original order (as published) was
      1. Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe
      2. Prince Caspian
      3. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
      4. The Silver Chair
      5. A Horse and His Boy
      6. The Magician's Nephew
      7. The Last Battle
      When I was younger (and lacking new things to read) I read all 7 books 7 times in a month (yeah - I read fast and was about 10 or 11 - not much to do at the time). I tried both the publishing order and a Chronological order - I found the original publishing order to be the best. Of course - Mr. Lewis did express a "mild preference" for the newer ordering - but I will be reading them to my children (if they want me to) in the original order in which they were published.
      check out this page for more info on published/chronological/order in which the books were written.
      http://www.aslan.demon.co.uk/narnia.htm

  16. Re:And from Empire Strikes Back by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "How did Yoda go so senile so quickly?"

    He didn't seem so senile after he told Luke who he was. The impression I got was that he was playing a tard to wind Luke up. Testing his patience, so to speak. I'm not interested in defending the consistency of the prequels, but I didn't have any real qualms with Yoda.

    It is interesting thinking about Yoda's motivations now, though. Was he helping Luke to deal with his father, or was he using him to take out Vader? I hope it's the latter. I like the idea of Yoda being self centered.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  17. Re:While we are on the subject. by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The endings of both tESB and RotJ had a new spin for me after watching Sith recently. By the end of Empire, Vader has figured out that the Emperor lied to him and his son was alive all along. What does he do? Try to get Luke's help to muscle the old man out and run things himself. Now it comes off not just as greed for more power, but as hoping for revenge for being lied to and otherwise manipulated.

    Similary, the end of Jedi seems totally different to me now. Vader realizes his hopes of taking over as the new Emperor aren't going to happen because Luke just isn't good enough to pull it off, and he cracks. He gets pissed off and the old reflexes to kill the person responsible kick in, so he offs Palpatine in a rage the same way he routinely used to kill people in his younger days. It's not to atone for his sins or even to save his son. He's been getting pushed around by this guy for twenty years, looking for a weak moment to off him, and finally he gives up hope on a better ending and just finishes him off while there's a good window to do it.

  18. Re:It's all about the droids by h3llfish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The kid is correct. Lucas has said in the past that the original trilogy is told from the point of view of the droids. That's not nearly as true of the prequel trilogy, but nevertheless, the droids are the only characters to figure prominently in all six movies, especially Artoo.

  19. Re:the death star by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, maybe the station itself didn't take that long to build (say, 3-6 years to finish it completely). What if the big delay before revealing the first one was R&D of the superlaser? Without its primary planet-killing weapon, the Death Star is just an oversized, inefficient resource-sucking TIE carrier.

  20. Re:Ah ... by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When bicycle racing I like to find some really big guy who obviously isn't that experienced, and continually bolster him up with how great he's doing, while drafting him the whole time.

    Come to think of it, I used to do much the same thing while playing dodgeball in grade school.

    Same deal I guess.

    KFG

  21. Re:the death star by h3llfish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The same thing occured to me, and I think there are two ways out of it. One, no one ever said that construction on the second deathstar began right after the first one was destroyed. They could have started much earlier, just to have a backup. Also, it's possible that the first one was delayed by unforeseen engineering challenges. No one had ever built such a device before. But once they had made one, they were experienced deathstar builders, and so were able to built the second much faster.

  22. Re:Darth Vader's prosthetic penis. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oddly enough, I've always wondered about that. After all, he does wear a codpiece, although it's flat, unlike the bulbous Stormtrooper codpieces.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  23. Proper Order by glwtta · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There's a couple of posts suggesting the proper order to watch all 6 movies.

    I personally find that the best order to watch them is:

    I, II, III.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  24. Did R2D2 get a memory sweep? by Jaxim · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How does R2D2 remember Obi-Wan was his previous owner if R2 got a memory sweep after the last prequel? Was R2D2 just saying that to convince Luke to bring them to Ben? Or did he figure out a way to back-up his memory before the mind-sweep, so he could restore his memory after the sweep? Also, how come we didn't get to see the spirit of Qui Gon Jinn? Does Darth Vader ever see the spirit of Qui Gon Jinn? Obi-wan tells Darth that if he strikes him down (in New Hope) that he'll become more powerful, which makes me come to think that Darth had seen the spirit of Qui Gon Jinn and knows Obi-Wan will become a spirit.

  25. Re:It's all about the droids by ajs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It has been my speculation since about 2 seconds before the end of Episode 2 that R2 is, in fact, an avatar of the force. Here's the details of the theory:

    Long ago, Corsicant, a plantet girded by a single city, became not just self-aware (which many droids are), but self-motivated and free-willed.

    It decided that humans (and I'll use that term, even when I mean "all biological sentients") were a threat of some sort. Perhaps their wars could have destroyed the computer, or some other, more subtle sort of threat.

    In order to keep humans in check, it produced a nanotech tool called mediclorians, which could simulate a number of seemingly magical effects such as enhancing strength, generating magnetic and gravitation fields, providing sensory data, modifying the moods and simple surface-thoguhts of other (by dispersing a small cloud of them into the target creature) beings.

    By dispersing this tool among the humans, two factions were created. The first (the Sith) were meant to maintain order, but they were too ruthless, and warred among themselves. So, a second group was created to counterpoint the Sith (the Jedi). This group, however, simply wiped out the Sith, rather than achieving a balance with them.

    Anakin was created either directly by Corsicant's agents and avatars or by Palpatine on behalf of the planet (almost certainly without knowing the purpose). R2 was sent along by way of Padme to look after Anakin and make sure he was being guided down the path to "restoring balance to the force" (which becomes quite a bit more sinister when you think about it meaning the death of all but a handful of Jedi from the beginning).

    Evidence:

    R2 is the hero in so many scenes in all six movies that the point is hardly worth mentioning.

    "He's been known to be wrong... from time to time." We never do establish how smart R2 is, but clearly it's far beyond the capabilities of most Astro Droids.

    Several times people do things around R2 which make little sense (e.g. wiping the memory of C3PO, but not R2, combat droids deciding that the noise in the corner was "nothing"... do droids here things when R2 ISN'T around?)

    R2 and Yoda have a very interesting relationship. Either R2 makes Yoda forget who he is (surely a blue R2 unit showing up along side Luke isn't a mere coincidence), or they both know what's going on... which makes me wonder who exactly WAS Yoda's master....

    R2 is everywhere that an avatar of Corsicant would need to be to see the prophesy fulfilled and then set the whole process in motion again.

  26. Re:yeah by coldblooded · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you are partly right. But I don't think the balance was in numbers so to speak, both Jedi and Sith are extremes. The real balance is embodied in Luke, Anakin goes to both extremes and meets luke halfway. Anakin I believe brings balance in the form Luke, by destroying both Jedi and Sith and ultimately open the way for a new breed of Jedi who see the Force as a whole, not a good light side and an evil dark side. The force is niether good noir evil, the Jedi and Sith made that distinction, each one believing the other is evil, these are people who are evil not the Force. Both factions are largely dehumanized, one are selfish and care more about themselves and indivuals than for the greater good, the other are selfless, they don't care about themselves they only care for others and are detached from most of the basic human emotions, take Obi-Wan, he is more than willing to sacrifice people in order to perform his "duty" and for the great good. I think the point is that anything taken to Extremes is bad, even if they are well intended like the Jedi.

  27. Wrong....adds new depth by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Interesting
    First off, I think the series should now be watched in this order:
    1. Ep. 4, A New Hope - Introduces you to the story, concepts, and characters. The best way to start the mythos, no doubt. Lucas did good using this as a starting point.
    2. Ep. 1, The Phantom Menace - Goes back to the things Obi Wan Kenobi was talking about. You still think Luke's Father was a hero, and you see the similarities between them. The Jedi still seem wise, and the Sith evil, though it's apparent the Republic is on its last legs.
    3. Ep. 2, Attack of the Clones - Further elaborates on the history. By now, a few people should be picking up clues, especially visual clues with the Clone Trooper armor and Anakin's revenge upon the sandpeople. Mysteries are no good unless you have some chance of deducing the truth. Things begin to get dark at this point.
    4. Ep. 5, The Empire Strikes Back - To those with some deductive ability, Vader's interest in Luke is a further clue, especially "He's only a Boy. Obi Wan can no longer help him". Most newbies to the series haven't figured it out yet, though it's tugging in the back of their brains. When Vader finally tells him, probably 10 to 20 percent of the audience is going "I knew it!", but the rest are still going "Oh shit...". But after the revelation, it all makes sense. Otherwise, thee's still the possibility that Vader is simply lying to Luke. We're about to hit the low point with...
    5. Ep. 3, Revenge of the Sith - Now that we know that Vader is Luke's father, we want to know "what the hell happened to cause the change?". We now fully grasp Palpatine's deceptions, how he got an Empire, and the buttons he was helping to push to get Anakin to the Dark Side. But we also lose some sympathy for the Jedi, for by now, it's not that we realize they're inept, but that they are, in their own way, as arrogant as the Sith, but their arrogance blinds them. We get the sense that the Old Republic really wasn't worth saving, but that the coming Empire will be worse (Alderaan, anyone?). But most important...the Luke and Leia revelation is a SUPRISE this way...when it's revealed in 6, it was done in a totally cheesy way. This is a far better way to spring another "Oh crap!" on people. We also have sympathy for Anakin/Vader, as we understand he's not a monolithic evil villain; we understand his reasonings, where he went wrong, and that through it all, he was trying to do right by those he loved, and that he was being used (by both sides). But we also see just how twisted he became. The Emporer makes much more sense at this point as well...all questions about him are answered.
    6. Ep. 6 Return of the Jedi- The only remaining question at this point is now "Can Luke turn Vader back?". Also, we get more insight on the Jedi, especially the hippy-dippy "our own point of view" crap, that reveals that while why the old Jedi were more refined and powerful, Luke is a better man. He's more honest and straightforward, and is more in tune with the good side of the force, because he's not a moral relativist; and that's precisely what the old Jedi had become. They bent the rules whenever it suited them in the Clone Wars because, after all, they're the Jedi. In many ways, they had become as bad as the Sith. This is why they couldn't see the Sith coming, and it's why it's good the old Jedi Order was destroyed. Luke will rebuild it from the ground up, with a much more honest perspective. We also cheer when Vader is gone and Anakin is back; the prophecy if fulfilled. Anakin brings balance to the Force by killing the Emporer, and for the love of his son. It was a long, twisting, winding road, but it all makes sense now. The New Republic can start without the baggage of the corrupt Old Republic, and a new, BETTER Jedi can begin with Luke and Leia.

      Now on to the parent comments...

      You will never have the opportunity to relive the moment of truth at the end of Empire..

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Wrong....adds new depth by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that looks like a good way to introduce it to new viewers (perhaps my now 6 year old nephew?) however there is one thing i would add... stay away from the (official) DVD of ESB for the first time though! Paplatine talks about luke as vaders son in that version. :\

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  28. Re:And from Empire Strikes Back by BrynM · · Score: 2, Interesting
    On a more serious note, 20 or so years of cloaking his existence from the Emperor and Darth Vader may have taken a serious toll on him.
    That explains why he was hiding on Degoba(sp?). That place was all cracked-out with the force. He would have seemed like another anomaly.
    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  29. 5.56 vs 7.62 by Create+an+Account · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having shot both weapons I can say that there definitely is a difference between them... in the hands of a properly trained marksman. There is a reason the US trains their infantry so hard. Those guys can shoot. They make good use of the superior accuracy of they M-16/M-4.

    Also, the M-16 has a much lighter kick, allowing for faster accurate followup shots than you can get with the AK. Even using three-round-bursts there is less deflection/vibration.

    Another major advantage of the smaller lighter round is that the troops can carry far more 5.56 ammunition. The loudest sound in a gun fight is *click*, and he who runs out of ammunition first loses. Sure, you get a bunch of jerks out there with only 15 or 20 rounds in their AKs, but these are not long-lived individuals, generally. The word 'cannonfodder' comes to mind.

    And, yes, our third-world adversaries do consider it a victory when one of their illiterate enthusiasts manages to shoot on of our boys/girls (or blows him/her up, more likely), but this has nothing to do with the quality of the American rifle.

    I know there was debate about the decreased kill probability when using the smaller round. I think the final outcome was that a wounded enemy was often better than a dead one, and I think this speaks well of Americans generally.

    Oops, I just realized that this isn't a gun thread. Sorry. Back to Star Wars.

  30. Millions of protocol and astromech droids: by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yet the designations of the two that we see are C3PO and R2-D2. Never do we find out if C3PO is a model number or a serial number, but the latter seems to be implied. As for R2, It is clearly implied that it is an R2-unit. Meaning model number R2, serial number D2. Even granting that there could be more letters in the galactic alphabet, The population of the republic is so large that our named numbers probably don't do it justice. Those droids have very low numbers indeed. What are the odds that two 'low-number' droids would end up in the hands of a moisture farmer on tatooine? I still remember that time I was driving behind the car with registration number: 7. Those droids are billions of times more rare than that.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  31. Edited Episode 6 - New Ending by digid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone seen the new ending of Episode 6? They replaced the old Anakin (played by Shaw) with Hayden Christensen when Luke sees Yoda, Obi Wan and Anakin appear to him. As well, they added a short aerial tour of animated celebrations throughout various parts of the galaxy.

  32. Re:While we are on the subject. by tunesmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Emporer didn't know that Vader had children - he thought Vader killed him. I think he was being honest there. The identity of the children were hidden, and Padme's funeral showed her still pregnant.

    --
    skkkoooonnnggggkkk ptui
  33. Re:It's all about the droids by Snaller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But why would the planet want to "bring balance"?

    And its Coruscant btw.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  34. there was a master plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I remember seeing an interview with Lucas (I believe it was one of the pre-show interviews with Leonard Maltin on the THX-remastered VHSs) where he admitted that his original grand scheme was to write a 9-part epic where the only common characters were two robots. This lends support to that theory, not quite R2 as a demigod, but maybe more of a narrator. R2 is the one being to make it through the rise, the climax, and, presumably, the decline of the Empire with his life and memory intact. He's the only being qualified to give an eyewitness account.