Kernel 2.6.12 Released
Mad Merlin writes "Linux kernel 2.6.12 has been released! Kerneltrap has a brief summary on it. The changelog is only partial however: 'The full ChangeLog ended up missing, because I only have the history from 2.6.12-rc2 in my git archives, but if you want to, you can puzzle it together by taking the 2.6.12 changelog and merging it with the -rc1 and -rc2 logs in the testing directory. The file that says ChangeLog-2.6.12 only contains the stuff from -rc2 onward.' As always you can find the changelog and the source at kernel.org"
Just after hell froze over and ATI released new video drivers for Linux specifically supporting 2.6.11, 2.6.12 gets released.
Let me start off the collective "ARRGGGHHH!"
The full ChangeLog ended up missing, because I only have the history from 2.6.12-rc2 in my git archives, but if you want to, you can puzzle it together by taking the 2.6.12 changelog and merging it with the -rc1 and -rc2 logs in the testing directory
Nothing instills confidence in those who are not convinced that Linux is mature enough for their application like the messages: "I was too lazy to download these files to put together a changelog" and
"the changelog wasn't in our CMS."
When and why did they stop the system of releasing stable versions on the even minor releases (2.4.x, 2.6.x, etc.) and unstable/development versions on the odd minor releases (2.5.x, 2.7.x, etc.)?
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
Short answer: No, and no.
Longer answer, while there are a few places Solaris still has an advantage, you can't just rip code out of one and stick it another. The structure of the code is quite different, so an implementation in one codebase just won't transfer to another cleanly.
And two, the CDDL, besides being horridly written, is clearly and intentionally not GPL compatible, so even if you could transplant code like that technically, it wouldn't work legally.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Could this be part of the reason hardware manufacturers don't put a high priority for Linux drivers?
"Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
Sorry about being off-topic but I've been thinking, since Linus is a normal guy and not some super human CEO, he must go through a "family tech support guy" hell that only exists in only our darkest of nightmares. I pity him.
commit 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2
Author: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700
Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
-- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
We were negotiating with the Pentagon.
We had a blue screen of death.
That was the last straw.
When you're holding the moon for ransom, you value stability in an application.
Linux gives us the power we need to crush those who oppose us.
It's compatible with our orbiting brain lasers.
I've got a beowolf cluster of atomic supermen.
I have more friends now.
Genetically engineered cybergoats.
Henchmen with bad teeth.
Georgous fembots with a penchant for evil.
I mean Linux runs on anything.
I'm all about open source.
It's just changed my love life.
You have to uh.. config it.
Uh.. and then you have to write some shell scripts.
Update your RPMs.
You have to partition your drives... and patch your kernel.
Compile your binaries.
Check your version dependencies... probably do that once or twice.
It's just so easy and so simple, I don't see why most people don't run Linux.
Thank god they don't, because they'd all be super villans, wouldn't they?
Huh uh ha!
I'm Steve, and I'm a super villian.
In the meantime, there are a lot of valuable, interesting and worthwhile projects that aren't in ANY of the patchsets at this point in time. I e-mailed a few of the maintainers about that, and it appears that they're aware of the problem but want general users to pressure the patch maintainers to publish patches on the kernel mailing list AND that said patches should conform to the kernel programming style.
So, again, if you want updated drivers for RAID, or additional features you know damn well exist and are out there, lobby the maintainers until they publish the stuff in a way the core kernel maintainers like.
There is simply far too much good stuff out there that is not being seen and not being used. It has got to the point where I will be reviving my own FOLK patch series, to start documenting the patches that live out on the fringes of kernelspace. If we want a better Linux, all we have to do is ask in a way that will be heard.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Just make it easy :)
for us to read and do not
try and write haikus.
Open Source Java DAO Generator
he must go through a "family tech support guy" hell that only exists in only our darkest of nightmares
:).
It seems today
that all we see
is Longhorn delayed
and OS X on PeeCees
but where's the free and open source
on which we used to rely?
Luckily there's our Family Tech Support Guy,
the guy who makes the kernel
that runs on all the hardware
we bought at Fry's.
He's
our
Family
Tech
Support
Guy!
Hmm. Sorry. I got carried away
Thanks Linus for all your hard work!
Yeah, I hate it when engineers manage the business people.
[