Slashdot Mirror


Java: One Step Closer To Open Source

Ritalin16 writes "Sun Microsystems on Monday intends to celebrate the 10th anniversary of its Java programming language by sharing the proprietary source code for several key Java applications used by corporate customers. Sun officials believe that by making the source codes open to developers, they will spur more involvement and use of Java-based applications."

20 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Read the "fine" article, please by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ahh, someone who wants to make a front page slashdot article, but doesn't understand Java. What's worse? The editor that posts it, and doesn't understand java.

    The source code being released isn't "source code for several key Java applications," its the source to Sun's java application server (called "Platform Edition 9"). Other app servers you probably have heard of are WebSphere, WebLogic, and.... the open source JBoss! The reason Sun is open sourcing their app server is because no one uses it!

    If a company wants to run a giant professional website and has money to throw at it, they'll get WebLogic or WebSphere to run it. If they don't, they run tomcat (if no EJBs requried) or JBoss. No one uses Sun's app server cause its new and immature.

    This is not a step towards opening Java. The only relation this has to Java is the fact that it runs Java code and is written in Java. Just because sun open sourced it doesn't mean its thinking about open sourcing the Java lanugage.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Read the "fine" article, please by bheer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sun's app server is definitely not new and immature. It's based off iPlanet AS which if anything is older than Weblogic and Websphere. A better reason is that BEA (with Tuxedo) and IBM both have substantial experience selling app servers in general, and they know the enterprise software sales playbook by heart because they helped write it.

      Sun, OTOH, was and remains clueless about marketing software*. (Their latest foray, per-employee licensing for the Java Desktop System and the Java Enterprise Stack, got a good deal of buzz but it's far from being an MS- or IBM-killer yet.)

    2. Re:Read the "fine" article, please by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason Sun is open sourcing their app server is because no one uses it!

      Sun's application server has actually been free to use (including production deployment) for quite some time now, so this further step of releasing the source code under a friendly license isn't that big a deal. Let's face it, basic application servers are pretty much commodities these days, making it hard for anyone to compete in that space. With at least three open source app server projects on the go (this one, JBoss, Geronimo) it's certainly a crowded market. It's certainly not the big deal that misleading headline makes it sound like.

      Eric
      J2ME stuff
    3. Re:Read the "fine" article, please by bmarklein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If a company wants to run a giant professional website and has money to throw at it, they'll get WebLogic or WebSphere to run it."

      Or they'll forego bloated commercial app servers and EJB and go with a lightweight open-source framework. These aren't toys - in fact the EJB 3 standard being developed now is largely based on ideas copied from these frameworks, as well as the Hibernate open-source persistence service.

    4. Re:Read the "fine" article, please by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The GPL isn't the only definition of Freedom or Free.

  2. Too late Java is not cool anymore by FriedTurkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This doesn't really matter to Java detractors. IT types, usually not programmers, will bring up the same old tired clichés.

    Somewhere around the year 2000 Java became uncool especially with younger programmers. I guess because it became an institution taught in high schools everywhere. Maybe programmers feel Java is rammed down their throats so they champion less established languages even something by Microsoft.

    Java really is the best thing out there for a lot of things. Sun can give away everything and detractors will be like: "OK but what about your first born child?"

    1. Re:Too late Java is not cool anymore by afd8856 · · Score: 3, Informative

      massive runtime: last I look, the NET framework had me download about 40 megs from msft (includes sp1), while java stands at about 15 megs. The installation is a lot easier than NET (I had to run net twice because of some error, plus the service pack, which I needed for my app to work.

      And I don't find any java app to be slow.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    2. Re:Too late Java is not cool anymore by cyngus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe Java isn't cool on the client side, but its sure is used widely on the backend. I see many, many posting each day for Java programmers, as I'm looking for a way out of this hell hole I work in. When I first started writing Java I scoffed at it, my background educationally is in systems, so C and maybe C++ are my domain. But, if you need to throw something together quickly Java is a great language, not so much for the language features, but rather the API that comes along with it. I live by "make it work, make it right, make it fast" philosophy, and you can do the first two with Java very well. With some time you can even do the last one, but half the time development deadlines don't allow me to optimize things.

    3. Re:Too late Java is not cool anymore by duncanIdaho.clone() · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I mean, I can spot a Java application light years away.

      Perhaps Java's widget defaults aren't set to please everyone, but if someone releases a program that looks like ass it's their fault, not Sun's.

      --

      feints within feints, wheels within wheels

    4. Re:Too late Java is not cool anymore by Decaff · · Score: 5, Informative

      how the HELL do you expect an end user to run JavaApp123, when all they download is a .class file?

      Users almost never download class files. They download JAR files. JAR files can have a Main-Class property which means that with a JRE installed the user need only double-click the JAR to run it.

      Why in GODS NAME does Java NOT USE Native Widgets?

      Because native widgets can a wide range of capabilities on different platforms. The Java widgets are usually a superset of these capabilities, allowing a rich interface to be cross-platform.

      I mean, I can spot a Java application light years away.

      That is the developer's fault, not Java's. Java ships with the option to use widgets that have a very close match to the native OS widgets on platforms such as XP and MacOS/X (on the latter, they are indistinguishable). Sun is working to ensure that Java apps are completely visually compatible with Windows apps on the next version of Windows.

      It doesn't integrate cleanly in ANY regard.

      Yes it does. There is an API called JDIC (Java Desktop Integration Components) that allows very good integration with the GUI of a system, from using the 'systray' to opening native browsers and so on.

    5. Re:Too late Java is not cool anymore by Decaff · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh hahahaha... yes, if your app doesn't look completely native it's the developers fault. Fuck me, I have to wonder what planet you live on.

      This one. Your average user won't notice much difference between Swing and native on Windows, and will not see any difference at all on MacOS/X.

      Speaking as someone who has tried Swing under Linux and Windows, I have come to the following conclusions... and this is based on actual usage, not theoretical bullshit and Sun marketing (like your reply):

      Actually, I am a Java developer, who has had substantial practical experience of it since it started. It has been my main development language for about 5 years.

      1. Swing sucks balls under Linux. It's very very slow (and believe me, looking slow compared to GTK is quite an achievement) and ugly... even with the gtk plaf it stands out like a builder wearing a pink tutu to work.

      Swing works fine under Linux. It is fast and very user-friendly (I find novice users have no problems with it at all).

      2. Swing sucks balls under Windows... even though Sun have put a huge amount of effort into speeding it up by using all kinds of directX acceleration to hide just how slow it is.

      On the contrary, Swing is pretty good under Windows. It has good desktop integration and is very fast. The DirectX application means it is at least as fast as native apps.

      3. Sun's entire Java package for Linux sucks... and it's only going to get worse. Sun's Linux support is grudging and half-assed at best.

      Sun's package for Linux is first-rate. Not only have they directly supported it for years, they now ship Linux with Java installed as a product.

      Why do you think so many people hate Java on slashdot? It's partly a license thing... and partly that Java is a corporate quagmire and on Linux it is seriously shite.

      On the contrary, its a combination 'not invented here', geek culture not liking 'safe' languages where you can't hack everything and a dislike of everything that isn't open source.

      Linux is one of the main deployment platforms for server-side Java, and Java is very widelyused this way for high-performance critical applications.

      So I am afraid the evidence is strongly against your 'seriously shite' claim!

      The fact that you can claim Java is in *any* way a serious system for cross-platform desktop development betrays a complete and total break with reality. You might try using it in the real world.

      I do, and have for years. It's cross-platform ability is superb. I have written substantial (hundreds of thousands of lines) Swing and Web applications and these have ported between Windows and Linux with no changes.

  3. And Again by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Java: One Step Closer To Open Source

    *sigh* Sun is already as open as they're going to go with Java by releasing it under the Java Research License. Now Sun has never complained about or hawked Open Source JVMs, but neither have they been too keen on helping out projects who bite their hands. As a result, the project to watch is the Apache Harmony Project. Given that Apache maintains a close relationship with Sun, hasn't burned their bridges, and has a good track record for completing very complex software, there's a good chance that the Apache JVM will quickly exceed Kaffe and GCJ.

  4. "Open Source" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Sun really wanted to be helpful they could forget the application server and really forget the source, and just concentrate on making a less restrictive BINARY license for redistributors such as linux distributions. Java is being held back in the absence of something like Harmony, and that's just absolutely rediculous when the problem would be so easy to fix. Sun needs to come to terms with reality and realize that they need an installed base, not the other way around.

  5. In other news... by k4_pacific · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, the Ford Motor Company announced today a bold new initiative to sell more cars. It seems that they will now be allowing customers to open the hood and tinker with the engine after buying the car. Ford expects this to increase the popularity of their cars and create a huge market for third-party add-ons.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  6. What about your fiirst born? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    They already did that*.

    --
    * Well, mostly.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  7. Great... more stupid questions from management by pestilence669 · · Score: 4, Funny

    News articles, like this one, have a way of being read by my bosses who mistake their content entirely. "I just heard that Java is free, can you look into that?"

  8. Re:Great timing... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " As if Java isn't slow enough, they open source it just in time as .NET is 100x better and faster."
    Wow , i had no idea that .net was that much faster than natively compiled C binaries, considering Java is anywhere between 75-95% percent of the speed of C (Statistics pulled out of nowhere, i remember last time i checked Java was expected to be around 90% of the speed of Compiled C i was guessing that improved)
    That would make .net considerably faster than C ;)

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  9. Too late Java is not cool anymore by expro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't really matter to Java detractors. IT types, usually not programmers, will bring up the same old tired clichés.

    Same tired old cliches. I can tell you first hand that lots of major developers of Java and early advocates have been turned off directly by issues that could have been addressed by open sourcing it. But that won't stop you from your tired cliches that it doesn't matter, just because you don't want it to matter.

    I was developing major applications with it before it reached 1.0, and still work with it quite a bit, but it becomes more and more irrelevant despite my best work because Sun wills it to be irrelevant. Even as a major early licensee of Java, basic problems were not considered important enough for Sun to solve, and it hasn't changed much.

    Somewhere around the year 2000 Java became uncool especially with younger programmers. I guess because it became an institution taught in high schools everywhere. Maybe programmers feel Java is rammed down their throats so they champion less established languages even something by Microsoft.

    Again, strong on cliche, very weak on technical understanding or demographic fact, but at least you contradict your prior nonsense that it is not programmers turning away.

    Java really is the best thing out there for a lot of things. Sun can give away everything and detractors will be like: "OK but what about your first born child?"

    Go whine somewhere else. You think you should dictate what is useful to us without giving us adequate control to meet our needs? We will continue to use Java less and less as other tools continue come forward that are more responsive to our needs. The stuff we run today in Java doesn't benefit from the JVM and will be ported away as performance becomes more important and other features we need to build in are still not available in Java, since it is not open.

    The whole attitude that somehow open source is wanting more from Sun than it would contribute back is ignorant, uninformed, short sighted, etc. Sun and their apologists should get a clue. Open source would make it responsive to a much wider range of developers and would produce developments Sun was too blind to pursue or pursued way too late and too little. Any harm has already been done to a great extent by Sun's pig-headedness. They should go off in a corner and use it by themselves if they don't want to open it up.

    Waiting for Java has become a dead issue. No one expects Sun to get a clue, so why are you still whining that some in the past thought they might.

  10. Re:problems with Java by mcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds like a problem with Freenet, not with Java. You can write code with memory leaks in any language. Java makes memory leaks a little harder, but it in no way makes memory leaks impossible. If you had a C program where the author forgot to call free() would you complain about the "leak" in C?

  11. Re:Java is dying. by sproketboy · · Score: 3, Interesting