Slashdot Mirror


Norwegian Minister: No More Proprietary Formats

Been on TV writes "The Norwegian Minister of Modernization today at a press conference in Oslo declared that proprietary formats will no longer be acceptable in communcation with government. He also calls for all parts of government to have a plan ready by 2006 for use of open source solutions. Taking great care not to mention the name Microsoft directly, but rather referring to 'the spreadsheet almost everyone uses' or saying this is the last time I will present a plan for information technology being broadcast on the net in Windows Media, the Minister sent strong signals in the direction of Redmond to open up or become irrelevant to the Norwegian Government."

27 of 697 comments (clear)

  1. Peru? by taniwha · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder if he's been reading a certain letter from Peru?

  2. Re:Hrmmm... by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 3, Informative

    After someone (or several someones) take time to reverse engineer the file format and then the next 'update' they're broken again. It's wasted time and effort because they're closed.

  3. Re:Which means txt & pdf by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Informative

    heh
    I don't know though , PDF was a fairly forward looking format and seems to be doing ok (.pdf and OS X seem to be fairly great , well pdf is if its used properly as opposed to people shoving everything in a pdf)and nobody can fault a pure text document for its functionality .
    Not to mention the plethoira of open standard formats out there.
    All i can say is , Way to go norway .

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  4. Re:Hrmmm... by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're not always opened correctly. People may have reverse-engineered the formats to a large extent, but not fully, and MS doesn't publish the specs.

  5. Here's the (open) fomats by Ryan+C. · · Score: 3, Informative

    Including the one for the "spreadsheet that almost everyone uses"

    http://www.microsoft.com/office/xml/default.mspx

    --
    -Ryan C.
    1. Re:Here's the (open) fomats by nickos · · Score: 4, Informative

      MS has just replaced the technical challenge of reverse engineering their closed formats with the legal challenge of infringing their patents on the new "open" formats.

      Please read this entire document carefully to understand your rights.

  6. Re:Hrmmm... by coolGuyZak · · Score: 2, Informative
    The problem is that closed standards need to be reverse engineered in order for that to occur. Because of this, regardless of what you use to open it, there will be information lost, due to the filter not "noticing" that such information exists. Furthermore, almost no programs can (legally) save to that form of file, making transfer even more difficult.

    Of course, you could always just claim that it's not an open standard b/c microsoft hasn't released it... *note: we're talking the binary versions. (e.g. not OASIS).

    And then there are other standards as well... for instance the ogg or XviD open standards, as opposed to .wmv or DivX.

  7. Heja Norge! by Arker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, Norway is small.

    It's also per-capita on of the richest nations in the world, with plenty of high tech business. And did I mention oil?

    She also punches far above her weight class in international affairs with a long and distinguished history of diplomatic intercession and hosting, and could serve as a shining example to many other nations, particularly her European neighbors.

    So, of course, it's easy to make disparaging remarks about a small nation, particularly posting on a site like this where the readership is predominantly USian (and, geeky or not, still subject to that typically USian fault of not knowing or caring about the rest of the world) but in fact this is a fairly prominent nation with some real influence, and it could be a turning point for MS dominance in other areas as well.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  8. Yes, but... by eeg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What are the Norwegians going to do when the US or British governments, for example, send them a .doc? Tell them they have to redo it over again in a non-proprietary format?

    Norway isn't really a big enough country for other countries to worry about conforming to its standards of documents. They're probably still going need Office, or OO.org atleast, to read files sent to them from other countries.

  9. Re:Norway is an OPEC member - NOT by TekGoNos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Norway isn't an OPEC member.

    They do, however, have a lot of oil.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  10. Re:Actually CNN hasn't done a thing since by jimson · · Score: 3, Informative

    BBC or CBC. http://www.cbc.ca/ is actively embracing open standards. They have an OGG stream they are testing out, give instructions for user of Mac or *NIX and link to Mplayer.

    http://www.cbc.ca/listen/index.html

  11. Re:Good by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a very good example for other countries to follow.

    Much as I love Norway, Norwegians and Nemi, Peru is the one leading the way on this. They got their first and are even mandating open source software for all government use.

    Still, great to see the Vikings joining in. :)

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  12. Re:The horror, the horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Norway is not member of the EU.

  13. Re:The horror, the horror! by __aaijsn7246 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I spent a few days in Norway last year (Fredrikstad, Oslo, and Bjørkelangen) and it is really a beautiful and well developed nation.

    Check out their GDP per capita: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_gdp_ppp_ca p
    Index of Economic Freedom is good too, although a bit socialist:
    http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/co untry.cfm?id=Norway

    Norway can afford to do what it wants. They are very rich (being one of the largest oil and gas producers in the world helps), and aren't even in the European Union nor do they use the Euro. The Norwegians I know are also very well educated, and tons of good software comes from .no as well.

    Their drug laws aren't as terrible as those we have in the United States either, nor do they have the death penalty, etc etc..

  14. Re:Norwegian Government == Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Umm... Off hand, I can't think of much that is more irrelevant than the Norwegian Government."

    Until you realize they control 1/5 of the oil market. That's enough to skrew over most countries twice.

    Norway could buy Microsoft by pumping 1% extra oil for half an hour.

  15. Re:Office 12 with XML. Doesn't matter. It's MS. by ishepherd · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...ah, the joke that they would just wrap the binary .DOC/.XLS in one big XML section. They haven't done it like that at all.

    I know it's bad form to bring up facts in a M$ discussion, but why not look for yourself? Here's one example from a quick Google, has the same simple document in different formats. DOCX is apparently new in a new version of Office.

    --
    fud, notfud, yes, no, maybe
  16. Re:What about non-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You don't have to buy software to read .docs either. There's plenty of free and open source text editors capable of opening .docs.

  17. Re:Hrmmm... by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought MS's idea of opening up document formats was to use "industry-standard XML" with restrictive licenses.

    Check out "Office 2003 XML Reference Schema Patent License" Hell, the title says it all, doesn't it?

  18. Money better spent elsewhere by chrispolarized · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's absolutely true that Norway is not a big country (population about 4.5 million), but note that
    • it has lots of money, and
    • the Government controls much more than it does in the U.S. -- for example, private schools, universities/colleges and hospitals are nearly nonexistant. Heck, even the largest ISP in Norway is largely owned by the Government!
    Now, for years, the Government has been spitting out money to Microsoft to purchase licenses for Windows and Office in all schools, universities, departments, hospitals and the like. Each and every high school in Norway has Windows and Office readily available for its students, many of whom have Microsoft Word and Excel as a part of their compulsory curriculum. A middle-sized high school in Norway spends up to 15,000 USD on Microsoft licenses alone.

    So Microsoft has done very well in Norway. In fact, Microsoft's Norwegian division did such a good job at dragging money out of the Government, that its CEO got promoted[link in Norwegian] to be the CEO of Microsoft Russia!

    Fortunately, certain groups and politicians have realized that the money spent on Microsoft could be spent on more important things, and have objected to pouring out money to Microsoft, and Linux has been tried out in several schools throughout the country, with largely positive experiences.

    The Government has therefore finally realized that the continuous flow of money going to Microsoft is better spent elsewhere, and that there are cheaper and better alternatives. And with this statement from the Minister, Norway is one step further on its way to stop this terrible waste of money.
  19. Re:Office 12 with XML. Doesn't matter. It's MS. by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Screw karma, I'm ticked.

    Now, essentially every microsoft product comes in a .msi package. .msi packages are not of the devil, as so many slashdotters make them out to be. Windows 2000 and higher supports them natively. You can install the needed app to support them down to Win95.

    .msi is everywhere, know it or not. Using acrobat reader at your office/house? Sure, you download a nice little .exe, but that .exe extracts a .msi to a temp dir and runs that instead. Macromedia is installed via .msi. VMWare is installed via .msi. Yes, you're running a .exe, but that .exe is just extracting a .msi and running that. Openoffice for windows is now a strictly .msi installer, and hey guess what? firefox has a .msi package too, suprise!

    .msi is the .rpm of the windows world, .rpm is the .msi of the windows world. Quit blasting it because you can't run it on your linux box, it's not like the windows users can run your .rpm packages either.

    Oh, and before you call me a windows zealot and some moderator mods me down for being a windows zealot, RTFJ.

  20. Re:Good by pllewis · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yes, I totally agree on open standards, however there is more to it then that. MP3 ( MPEG 1 Layer III ) is a standard, MPEG4, and now WMV9 are standards ( WMV9 goes by the name VC-1 and is will be used for HD-DVD content ). You can read all about their structure, but you cannot implement them without a license. That is the real issue.

    MS will be using XML to replace proprietary file formats in MS Office. So the Norwegian's will still be able to use Office.

    It still all goes back to patents. MPEG and SMPTE need to release MPEG4 (AVC) and SMTPE (VC-1) to the world, but that will never happen. And no Open-Source product will be able to compete effectively in these markets in the near future. The reason I say this is that it has been 10 years since MPEG-2, and we are finally seeing a MPEG-4 (http://www.mpegla.com/avc/) and VC-1 (http://smpte.org/smpte_store/standards/). These will be used for future High Def. Video and Broadcast. MPEG-7 and MPEG-21 are on the way, but that's another story, and still patent encumbered.

  21. Re:Right by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    He did coin a similar phrase though.

    "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again"

    As you alluded to, this has often been attributed to Lincoln, although we don't have quite as definitive proof as the above video. I've also seen it attributed as an ancient Chinese proverb, but either way, I'm pretty sure it predates both Bush presidencies.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  22. ogg by kisak · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Norwegian national radio (NRK) already stream all their radio broadcasting in the ogg format:

    NRK ogg

    The official streaming is in the windows media format though...

    --

    --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

  23. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Office's "Save as HTML" does not generate HTML. It generates some weird Microsoft-specific stuff that is neither XML nor HTML, but somewhere inbetween.

  24. Re:The horror, the horror! by bhiestand · · Score: 2, Informative
    You REALLY need to do your research before posting. The United States is currently (2004) #2 in GDP per capita. It is also the richest nation in the world by purchasing power parity. You probably don't feel the numbers here are correct, so feel free to check other sites. this site mysteriously leaves out the US. Odd. Perhaps that's your source? Most of your exports go to germany and the UK. Only about 8% go to the US, so you don't really control that much in the way of our prices. You do have no external debt, and that's something to brag about, big time.

    You do also produce 3.31 million bbl/day, which does indeed make you the 3rd largest exporter in the world.

    You're not really a part of the EU, though you do contribute a sizable portion of their budget.

    I'm not sure what the nobel peace "price" is, nor am I exactly sure what you mean. Your country HAS the prize? How did you get it? Are you planning on giving it back someday, or are you keeping it? Can I buy it on ebay? You do contribute a ton fo world aid, and should be applauded for that.

    I'd also like to point out that, last I saw, LUXEMBOURG has the highest GDP/capita in the world right now. And not by a small margin, either. I wouldn't say that luxembourgers necessarily have it "better" than the americans, nor would your GDP/capita being higher. I'm afraid I have to ask you to back up your claim. In terms of the least labour-hours for a loaf of bread, that's the UK. I'd much rather live in america than the UK, because damn their housing sucks compared to america. I'd much rather have a huge place to live in with lots of room than be cramped into a smaller place. In terms of best places to live, I've gotta say mexicans have it about the best, they just have a terrible economy, socio-cultural problems up the ass, etc. But it's by far the most comfortable, beautiful, #1 place to live by me.

    I will take this moment to admit that Norway is indeed one of the most beautiful countries in the world, and is doing MANY things right. I'm ashamed my country has been unable to at least catch up with you in many of these aspects. But I wouldn't say you have it the best out of everyone in the world :). If you were a real nerd, you'd remember the "cheap 1gbps fibre avaiable in hong kong for only $215 US per month and agree that they have it the best.

    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  25. Buzzword alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Using XML does not guarantee that the data contained is non-proprietary. It only guarantees that the data structure follows the XML-standard.

    The news about Microsoft Office to use XML is only about buzzword compliance and nothing else.

  26. Re:Irony of Ironies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ridiculous. Travel around Norway and you'll discover that people doing the most humble jobs can speak English perfectly well - certainly better than most Americans. Norway is a rich, well educated and highly literate society - it makes most other countries look quite poor by comparison - USA included.

    Have they ever got a lot of fucking tunnels and HEP!