Slashdot Mirror


100 Million Online in China

Colin Smith writes "Rising levels of personal wealth in the nation of China means that the country now has over 100 million internet users, and the authorities are discovering just how difficult it is to place a dam against information in the digital age." From the article: "Only last week, the authorities threatened to shut down websites and blogs that failed to register with regulators in a new campaign to tighten controls on what the public can see online. The so-called Great Firewall of China is constantly being breached as citizens and the authorities play a cat and mouse game with the flow of information."

36 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by bigwavejas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The interesting point for me is the US companies who participate in helping the Chinese government censor their internet (ie Microsoft, Cisco Systems). I understand there is heaps of money to be made, but I question the integrity of their decision. IMO ethically it is *wrong*, but does that mean these companies can be faulted?

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO its ethically required! I cannot say I like the fact that Chinese gov is trying to block the free flow of information, but I like it even less when people seem to think if you aren't doing the exact same thing as the US you are evil or not ethical!

      There are different cultures and different ideals. Just because someone feels differently than you doesn't make them unethical. Also if someone helps that person who thinks differently than you, the person helping isn't nessesarily unethical.

      I know "your either with us or against us", "you either do stuff like we do or your evil" sentiments are pretty popular in the US, but different is not wrong.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    2. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not? IBM sold punch card machines to the Nazi's, which were used to track down Jews. It's the duty of capatilists to sell China the rope they are going to hang us with.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Business makes money. This is their sole purpose of existence. It is up to gov't to ensure that business' avenues to generate money align themselves with the public good.

      Microsoft and others are not to make ethical decisions about whether a particular gov't is good or bad, or whether to support a particular gov't edict. They are to obey the rules in whatever market they do business in. I don't want my pharmacy to stop selling a birth control pills and condoms because the owner is Catholic. I don't want business making my ethical decisions for me.

      Having said that, the developed world should band together and make strict financial punishment for companies that want to deal in countries without a minimum level of human rights. However, gov'ts have a way of turing a blind eye when there is money to be made by doing so.

      So, the blame falls with governments (and by extension, us as citizens), not business. Business does what business is supposed to do. It is gov't that is failing to do what IT is supposed to do.

      Otherwise, despite how hard you "wish" companies wouldn't do business with these countries, they will. Wishes don't do jack to accomplish anything.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here on earth, Cubans are in dire straits since the Soviets collapsed

      If by "dire straits" you mean not driving the latest Lexus, then you are correct. Otherwise, I'm not sure what you are talking about. Free health care, free education, one of the better medical/pharmaceutical industries in the world. Also, Cuba is getting along pretty well now all on thier own. They have a VERY strong tourist industry (from everywhere except the states) and also very strong medical/pharmaceutical exports to name a few.

      Where did you hear about Cuba's situation? Have you been there? Oh, of course not! But you heard Donald Rummsfeld on Fox News talking about the horrible conditions and oppressive dictatorship ;-)

      Its true they currently aren't a super propsperous country but does that make them bad? On my trips there, the #1 thing people their are upset about is the US embargo. They don't have any major problems with thier government, its the US government that they have the issue with (the reason for them not being very propsperous).

      Truth be told on my last trip thier recently they were complaining quite a lot about one thing the government recently did. That was ban smoking (basically everywhere). That is currently thier biggest beef with the Cuban government, the ban on smoking!

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    5. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. Business should do the right thing. All pharmacies should stop selling birth control items. Cause I'm Catholic, and those are my ethics.

      Yes. Business should ignore minimum age requirements to work in factories. Cause, dammit, working is good for the kids. Six year olds working on the assembly line builds character.

      Yes. Business should ignore your "Do Not Resucitate" wishes. Because, life is precious, and despite what you say, we love you and want you to keep living.

      Think I'm off base? Well guess what... some folks would agree with each of those statements above. Her's the point: If business is the mechanism for enforcing morality, then we are up shit crick. We don't elect business people. We have no say on how decisions are made.

      I, for one, do NOT want businesses making my moral decisions and "doing the right thing". I want them to obey the laws. And then, I want laws that make sense and direct the business to work for the good of the people.

      Dream land? Yup. But putting business in charge of morality is a very scary thought.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Fr**d*m *nd d*m*cr*cy? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "I'm not sure what you are talking about. Free health care..."

      Which is denied if you act up politically. The health care system has also included prison sentences for the "Crime" of merely being infested with HIV.

      "On my trips there, the #1 thing people their are upset about is the US embargo. They don't have any major problems with thier government"

      Of course. That is Castro's line, and his government has proven willing to kill and imprison those who express other beliefs.

      " That is currently thier biggest beef with the Cuban government, the ban on smoking!"

      Yeah, they can complain about that. But let them speak up about the unaccountable monarch that has been foisted on them for several decades? A monarch who has a death penalty imposed for Internet access? A monarch who forces Cubans to live in abject poverty (even taking hotel workers 90%) while he continues to amass a multi-billion dollar personal fortune?

      Cuba is not getting along well "on its own". They are still governed by a colonial governor put in place by the Soviets. There is no democracy or sovereignty there.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  2. Slashdot in China? by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would guess slashdot is one of the sites blocked in China. Is this correct? Anyone here from China?

    1. Re:Slashdot in China? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, not unless it is a recent addition. I am not from China but travel there frequently.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Slashdot in China? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I imagine they stop you from SSHing out?

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    3. Re:Slashdot in China? by shaobohou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so, I connected to my university (manchester) account via ssh while I was in china last year.

      --
      Just because it is not nice , doesn't mean it is not miraculous.
    4. Re:Slashdot in China? by AnObfuscator · · Score: 3, Informative
      I imagine they stop you from SSHing out?

      No, they don't block ports, they block hosts and IP addresses. So they'd keep you from SSHing to a forbidden server, but SSH in general is acceptable. It's just like using HTTP or any other protocol.

      --
      multifariam.net -- yet another nerd blog
  3. Geeze... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is going to be almost identical to the "War on drugs" in the United States.

  4. China is Also a Copyright-Free Zone by DanielMarkham · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With all those millions and millions online in China swapping programs, songs and such, you'd think the RIAA would go after them, if the purpose was really to prevent damage to the intellectual property holder.
    What's going to be extremely interesting is watching a closed society like China start talking one-on-one to the rest of the world. I'd give it twenty years before public opinion changes in China. I can't see them sharing information freely and being as nationalistic as they currently are. If you want to stop a future war with China, help them talk to each other all you can. My two cents.

    Brains! Brains! Give me Brains!

    1. Re:China is Also a Copyright-Free Zone by ericschoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting point on your RIAA comment: When I was in China and Hong Kong in 2000, I noticed that there were no legal DVDs of movies or CDs of artists to buy. At the time the big media conglomerates in the U.S. realized that the Chinese were not willing to pay full price for products. Those trading illegal copies weren't actually costing the companies a sale, but getting their products exposure.

      Because of this, MGM et al decided to license VCD copies of their movies to be produced and distributed at about 10% above the going rate for the pirated copies (the equivalent of about 1 USD). So for literally pennies more, you got a clean copy that was (almost always) guaranteed to work and was properly subtitled instead of a shoddy pirate copy. The companies realized that to capitalize on a massive market, they had to compete at a level they were not accustomed to dealing with in the U.S. and Europe.

      --
      --
  5. Re:There goes the internet by jim_v2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "But the Chinese authorities are less in love with the net. The government regularly tries to block access to material it considers pornographic or politically subversive."

    There goes about 80% or more of internet content.


    Yeah, that sounds about right. 80% or more of the internet is pornographic material.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  6. Breaking past the "Great Firewall" by MirrororriM · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just curious, if they can't host their blogs within China, why can't they do it elsewhere? Like perhaps in the US, Australia, or Canada?

    Also, if they can't *view* certain websites, what's keeping them from using a proxy (possibly an open proxy list) within their web browser to circumvent China's methods of blocking?

    One would think that they can only block items for so long until their methods are circumvented. After all, where there's a will, there's always a way. Sounds like a huge cat and mouse game indeed.

    --
    Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
  7. Re:Is it so? by mpathetiq · · Score: 3, Funny

    42

  8. Oh oh by LegendOfLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I will be getting e-mails from Mr. Lin from the Chinese government instead of Mr. Ubuntu from Nigeria.

    Either way, I've got my bank account ready ;)

  9. Cultural exports are the key. by J+Barnes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The greatest weapon the US has against oppressive regimes is our cultural, entertainment and information exports. It's hard to oppress a people when they know that there's something slightly cooler then living in China under a communist regime.

    The Soviets could regulate so many aspects of their citizenry's daily life, but what they couldn't manage to get a hold on was what they thought was cool. It might be an overly simplistic view, but part of me thinks that it was Coca-Cola and Levi's jeans that brought communism to its knees in the soviet bloc. (and of course, coca-cola and levis is not much to base a government on, which is why so many countries have struggled with the concept of democracy)

    I think something similar could easily happen in China.

    I don't presume to think that the Chinese would try, or even want to be like the US, but I think there's a certain sense of freedom and independence embodied in American culture, and that freedom is alluring and infectious. The more the Chinese people have access to something as stupid as Slashdot or Wikipedia or...anything, the more they're going to crave more content. The more content they crave, the more content must be censored until something has to break.

    1. Re:Cultural exports are the key. by cube_slave · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree with the bulk of your post, except:
      I don't really see the Patriot Act as even really limiting when talking about that kind of basic freedom. I mean, so the FBI can now figure out what you checked out from the library
      If checking out a book puts me on the short list to Gitmo because something happens in my city at the same time then that is a loss of liberty... If everyone is too scared to seek out information, how are they "free" to still seek it out?
    2. Re:Cultural exports are the key. by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Huh? The US has culture to export? Seinfeld, Friends, The Cosby Show, Carol Burnett, American Idol, ugh... I can understand why China is trying to filter the internet. I would too if I were them.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  10. China's economy improving... by Krankheit · · Score: 3, Informative

    With inititives like Haier (Chinese refridgerator manufacturer) building a plant in South Carolina, United States, Chinese companies are definitely expanding. An article in Time (IIRC) said that China's ecnonomy will top that of Japan by 2015, and eventually the U.S. economy. It has been said that Chinese have gotten where they are today because of discipline. Each day, Haier would gather the employees around, and have the name called of who made the most mistakes (like leaving a screw out of a refridgerator) and have them stand on designated green foot prints painted on the floor. This level of discipline will hopefully continue.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
  11. ...But Percentage-Wise? by BishonenAngstMagnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have to remember, with a country with a population of 1.3 Billion, with only 100million people online, that's still just over 7% penetration. While I admit it is growing by leaps and bounds, it is by no means a large percentage compared to the US, some European nations or Japan.

  12. Re:Great to hear by danormsby · · Score: 2, Funny
    > You don't need the internets to find out how to make a bomb. You just need half a brain.

    And half a brain is what you might have after the bomb goes off.

    For those wanting to experiment you will find many delights on my site.

    --
    Omnis amans amens
  13. When will China become the standard? by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If China becomes a dominant presence on the internet, I wonder when Chinese tech standards will become de facto standards for the net. Much as developers design for IE currently (regardless of the "issues" with IE), I wonder if future developers will target Chinese compatibility first, and ignore other de facto or de jure standards.

    Does anyone know if China is adopting/promoting DRM (perhaps for content control), open standards (to avoid U.S.-centric Microsoft technology), IPv6, or other internet-affecting standards.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  14. Re:Difficult, but... by Alphabet+Pal · · Score: 2, Funny
    especially over TCP/IP

    No, no, no - they've already banned TCP/IP. In China, their internet is entirely HTML-based.

    --
    Because you can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
  15. But they only come up to your knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like Chinese.
    I like Chinese.
    They only come up to your knees,
    Yet they're always friendly, and they're ready to please.

    I like Chinese.
    I like Chinese.
    They come from a long way overseas,
    But they're cute and they're cuddly, and they're ready to please.

    Wo ai zhongguo ren.
    Wo ai zhongguo ren.
    Wo ai zhongguo ren.
    Ni hao ma; ni hao ma; ni hao ma; zaijien!

  16. Free flow of information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would
    deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    -- Sid Meier's Alpha Centuri

    So true, so very true.

  17. How idiotic! by presarioD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the Chinese government is trying to stop a river with pebbles. What happened to the visionary leaders that opened up their market so they won't have the Soviet Union's fate? How long do they think they can buy time before information becomes utterly loose on their "kingdom"?

    Damn it folks! You can not stop progress! You can only impede it but never stop it! Get over it! You should either reform or perish! Do the Chinese Party commissars have to take history lessons anymore?

    --
    Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
  18. Chatting with People in China by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the last month or so, I've been chatting with a lot of different people in China using Skype. (Nice thing about Skype, is that it's encrypted end-to-end. No JBT's listening in.)

    I've found that the people I'm talking to are entirely aware that their government lies to them routinely, and they want to know about their own history.

    They know that they lost some relatives in the 1960's, but they have no idea that Mao killed more Chinese than Tojo. They know that something happened in Beijing in 1989, but they don't know that thousands of unarmed protestors were slaughtered. I've been doing a lot of cutting and pasting of wikipedia pages.

    I'm convinced that the internet will be the end of the Red Dynasty, and the way it will happen is that the JBT's will lose their ability to lie to the people. Once most Chinese realize that most of their countrymen are sick and tired of the Red Dynasty, then it's game over for the gerontocrats in Beijing.

    I only hope that China becomes a free country with as little bloodshed as possible. Killing the Politburo would probably suffice, although justice would demand the demise of thousands of the petty thugs as well.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Chatting with People in China by no_opinion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This gives me an interesting (not saying it's good ;-) idea. Someone should write a wikipedia text reader that can be called from skype. Then the Chinese could call it and get the information they want directly.

  19. They could learn from our government by dgenr8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Soon the Chinese government will learn from modern democratic governments and sophisticated corporations that trying to control the flow of information is the wrong way to go about it.

    It's far easier and more effective to control the public's interpretation and prioritization of information than to limit the information itself.

  20. Maybe they'll eventually get the message by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You CAN'T control what people think. You CAN'T control the urge to know. You CAN'T make people believe something is bad just because you say it is bad. You have to provide convincing evidence.

    For example, over in Denmark in the 1970s they dropped most restrictions regarding pornography. After 30 years, the nation did NOT turn into a gang of rapists. They probably mentally filter out billboards featuring naked people just like they filter out any other uninteresting advertising. So, where is the evidence to support Chinese government (or any other government) claims of bad things associated with pornography? It's in the unnecessary restrictions! Forcing it underground just makes it more interesting ("I want to see what they don't want me to see, to find out why they don't want me to see it!"). Exposing it takes away that incentive, and people tend to ignore what not's immediately relevant. A curb of freedom is ALWAYS immediately relevant!

    Now, you CAN influence what people do with what they know. Does the Chinese Constitution have any mechanism whereby it might be Amended, like the U.S. (and other) Constitutions? If not, then whatever curbs of freedom built into the Chinese Constitution will eventually and inevitably boil over into an ugly revolution. The leadership over there is going to find out, one way or another, just what The People can do. So, they can either plan on an England-like open system (which started with the Magna Charta), or they can keep a France-like repressive system (which ended with beheadings).

  21. Re:Freedom of Information an Inalienable human rig by spaceironape · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I can completely understand why places like China, N. Korea, and Iran want to control the information in their countries. Their entire power structure is based on controlling society. How do you accomplish control of society, through the knowledge you grant it.
    The funny thing here is that the US is also controlled society. Only difference is that its more subversive in the US. Fear keeps americans in line (and of course the illusion of freedom).
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion