Slashdot Mirror


How Schools Can Get Free Software

RicJD writes "The BBC is reporting on a school in England which has found a way to save money through Open Source Software. It goes on to explain the idea behind OSS, and briefly how they've incorporated it into the school system. Could this be the way to show the UK government that savings can be had through OSS?" Likely an adoption spurred by the education report we reported on earlier this year.

34 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. How Schools Can Get Cheap Software: by AEton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make a credible threat to switch to free software.
    (Submit your school's "migration plan" to the BBC. Just in case Microsoft doesn't read that, Slashdot the story!)

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:How Schools Can Get Cheap Software: by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is a very, very real danger in students using free software- they may develop a crazy idea that information should be accesible to everyone, and reasonably priced and GASP even free!!!
      Next thing you know these crazy kids will be downloading free copies of Boy George hits, drinking excessive amounts of YooHoo, and having parties where more than 10 people watch a movie on DVD without paying royalties!!!!
      This needs to be stopped now! Ship windows! Ship windows!!!!!!! Why isn't Geldoff taking up this cause!

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  2. Schoolforge-UK by alanw · · Score: 4, Informative
    Schoolforge-UK is an organisation that is working together to implement open content resources using Free, Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) in UK education

    The are organizing a conference in Bolton next week: on Thursday 14th & Friday 15th July 2005.

    1. Re:Schoolforge-UK by spectre_240sx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could be alone here, but having been a sysadmin for a small college using all Macs, I can't imagine what a nightmare it would be to support as many Windows computers as you probably have in your school. I'd have nightmares just thinking about it. I think a lot more knowledgable people would be much more interested in running a school that operates in a Linux environment. Overall, it's just easier to keep the machines all up and running.

      As for the tools being different in the Windows world and the Linux world, I can't really see all that many differences. Learning OpenOffice would be just fine imho. When you learn things like word processors or spreadsheets, you're mostly learning about how to organize information. Sure, there's always the part about teaching where everything is in the program, all the menus etc. If it's taught well, though, someone who learned on OpenOffice should be able to work with MS Office without much trouble. As for Access, I'm not sure what options there are for teaching that software. If I heard right, Base (the Access replacement in OO.o) is supposed to be a decent competitor. Maybe it would suffice. Again, they should be learning more about how the data is organized rather than absolute specifics.

  3. I for one, agree by Grep*coke* · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds like the best idea an education system, whether it be the UK or the US, has ever had. All schools could save hundreds of dollars by using Linux instead of Windows, and it would give kids a better background. Also, it might encourage the development of more OSS by the students.

    --

    $ cd/home/fridge
    $ ls | grep "coke"
    1. Re:I for one, agree by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All schools could save hundreds of dollars by using Linux instead of Windows, and it would give kids a better background.

      A better background in what? Using OSS software instead of Microsoft software? In the real world (yes, there are some exceptions) people use Microsoft Office. HR drones and automated readers reviewing your resumes aren't going to understand that Open Office is like Microsoft Office. They want to see Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft Access on your resume, not their OSS counterparts.

      Also, it might encourage the development of more OSS by the students.

      Why? Because a machine that's running OSS will somehow be any less locked down by the admins than a similar Windows workstation? Give me a break.

      Yes, Linux is less money and should be used in schools to give the taxpayers a break. It should not be thought of as anything other than a tool though. The students will use a web browser, an office suite, and e-mail. They aren't going to be using it any differently than if they were using Windows.

    2. Re:I for one, agree by Approaching.sanity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is one of the more horrible things I think you could have said.

      IT is pervasive in modern society. It not only runs our work lives as a tool, it is also recreation and education. The more exposure you have to more kinds of software the better equiped you are to deal with more situations.

      If we use your arguement then we should not require all students to take science courses as they will not all be using the knowlege of what a mol is in their every day lives.

      --
      RTFA again for the best results.
    3. Re:I for one, agree by jbolden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "HR drones" don't come from mars they come from the very school systems we are talking about. They believe that their job should involve pattern matching instead of understanding because non honors courses in school emphasize regurgitation instead of understanding (often the honors courses do as well).

      Correcting the use of Microsoft software and switching over to a Unix frame of mind could potential aid in fixing the larger problem.

    4. Re:I for one, agree by Aldric · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "A better background in what? Using OSS software instead of Microsoft software? In the real world (yes, there are some exceptions) people use Microsoft Office. HR drones and automated readers reviewing your resumes aren't going to understand that Open Office is like Microsoft Office. They want to see Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft Access on your resume, not their OSS counterparts."

      If schools all use free software (as they should, I don't see why my taxes should go to Microsoft) then the HR drones aren't going to have much choice but to learn that an office suite is an office suite no matter who the vendor is.

    5. Re:I for one, agree by paulymer5 · · Score: 2

      But it is likely they will encounter Windows in their everyday experiences. If they only know how to use *NIX with X windows manager / desktop environment, will they be able to competently work with a Start menu? Sure, the differences aren't necessarily too prononced, but any hesitation or lack of experience may be considered by a future employer, especially if there is another candidate who grew up with Windows.

    6. Re:I for one, agree by legirons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "In the real world people use Microsoft Office."

      Actually in the real world (when I was at school), people use WordPerfect for MS-DOS, and smaller companies were starting to use Lotus Ami Pro.

      How would it have helped if I'd learned those applications?

      We even had a fairly-major CS test at school, where one of the questions was 'what keystroke is used to right-format a line in Ami Pro'. How is information like that going to help me now, typing into a Slashdot textbox using FireFox (neither of which could even have been imagined when I was learning IT/CS)

      How would teaching people Word help now? The next generation of business technology seems to be influenced by what CS graduates are using at home today, and recently that's been Linux, Free Software on Windows2000, and we're starting to see some Mac OS. If you wanted to teach in school "for business", then you would start by thinking what people will find useful in 5-10 years when they get their first jobs.

      And even if you're "living in the present", why would you standardise on something that requires the parents to pay hundreds of pounds extra to do computer-related homework, when you could select an almost-identical program that you can distribute for free?

    7. Re:I for one, agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I can't tell you the horrible problems I had when I joined the work force, coming from my background of mostly Sinclair Spectrum and Amigas. I took me literally seconds to get to grips with Windows! That sort of hesitation nearly killed my career.

    8. Re:I for one, agree by ILikeRed · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know lots of people who are paid to develop free software, but only two who develop proprietary software. The proprietary developers hate their company, their work, and are looking for someplace more open. I think it's already been proven that most developers write software for in-house projects, not shrink wrapped goods.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    9. Re:I for one, agree by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [. . .] will they be able to competently work with a Start menu?

      That reminds me, I need to get back to my first-draft manuscript of "The Start Button for Real Dummies".

      Yea, I think that most X users can handle a Start menu. A more likely complication of learning Linux and then switching to Windows are screams of frustration at the bone-headed limitations inherent in the Windows environment. (Like the fact that you have to essentially run as root to do anything.)
      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  4. How Schools Can Get Free Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bit-Torrent?

    Oooooh you mean the other kind of free.

  5. um, rtfa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's about how the school uses OSS on servers and Windows on desktops:

    "What appears on screen - the so-called desktop - for ordinary users is the familiar, paid-for Microsoft Windows.

    The software used by staff and students includes the content management system Moodle, which is open source, and Microsoft's Word, Excel and Powerpoint."

    The administrator claims over 30,000 pounds yearly are saved by using OSS servers. That seems a tad high for a single high school.

    1. Re:um, rtfa? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative

      he administers not only the high school, but a lot of the local primary schools as well...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:um, rtfa? by mikeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you look at http://cutterproject.co.uk/Casestudies/orwell_cost _benefit.php
      it shows exactly how a single high school saves 40,000 pounds a year (approximately), or $70,000. It's not rocket science; the biggest saving is in staff costs by not needing more technician support.

      Interestingly, licence fees are only a moderate part of it.

  6. Some other interesting "F/OSS in schools" articles by codergeek42 · · Score: 4, Interesting
  7. My school uses Linux too! by rivenage · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've just left (about a week ago) my school after 7 years. Last year a new business studies block was built with two Linux suites in it. They both have about 30 thin clients in each, which run off of one server. They are using Suse (9.1 IIRC) after Fedora Core 2 kept struggling. All of the teachers were complaining that they didn't know how to use Linux, but of course now they've found it's just fine, because with KDE they can use it just the same way as windows. By using thin clients the school has saved a lot of money on hardware as well as software. The Linux machines are also a lot more stable than the Windows network, and everything is much more up to date (the windows network is still 98 with IE 5.0!). If anyone is interested its the Deepings School near Peterborough in the UK.

    1. Re:My school uses Linux too! by Lifewish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Remember in the long run it is the administrative costs that will outweigh the hardware/software costs. And for that, Windows has a much lower administrative cost.

      Actually, the BBC article specifically states that the school IT administrators now have enough time on their hands that they can help out in local primary schools as well (if I'm reading the article correctly). It's hard to see how that tallies with the higher administrative cost you mention.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  8. Money saved, but only to be wasted elsewhere by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one ever got elected by saving money. This saved money will only be spent elsewhere.

    That said, the best reason for using open source has nothing to do with saving money.

    It's the opportunity to get a look inside at how the machine works.

    Anyone that's taken apart a toaster or washing machine timer, etc, understands how valuable a thing it is to be able to see how it works.

    That's why open source belongs in schools.

    1. Re:Money saved, but only to be wasted elsewhere by dewie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This saved money will only be spent elsewhere.

      Um, yes. Yes it will. Is that a bad thing? Why save it otherwise?

      --
      Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On A Technicality --theonion.com
    2. Re:Money saved, but only to be wasted elsewhere by Tweak232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one ever got elected by saving money. This saved money will only be spent elsewhere.

      What about books? Higher teacher salaries?

      Of course this is not all about saving money, it is about allocating it. Money could go to far better places than microsoft's and other large companie's deep pockets.

      Your point is still valid, just modified.

  9. The switch isn't that bad by Nf1nk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the third time I have tried to switch to linux, The first two times went badly and I gave up
    (if you care Redhat in 2001, and Suse in 2003).
    I have tried Ubuntu and the installation went smooth, the applications work easy, and haven't even seen the comand line once.
    Everything works, that wasn't true before, The installation was easier than the last windows install I did, and for a school enviroment being somewhat incompatable with most games (and Viruses) seems like a huge plus.
    I think It's ready and everything works just the way I am used to, (except that the status bar is at the top wierd how much that bugs me).
    The kids shouldn't have any problems doing what they are supposed to with the computers.

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  10. Re:MS For Schools Is Cheap by djward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because feeding trolls is fun:

    1. As opposed to $0 a workstation. Times a bunch of workstations.

    2. Yeah, 'cause MS's current OS is just what these kids will be using when they enter the workforse in 10-15 years. Right. Crap argument. Teaching them to USE and UNDERSTAND COMPUTERS is far more important than teaching them about one particular OS that will have changed significantly by time they are entering the real world, supposing it's still dominant. This can be done just as effectively (perhaps moreso) on another OS besides Windows.

    3. -1 Offtopic.

  11. Do you ever get the feeling that... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...slashdot's +1, Funny maps disturbingly well to RIAAs +1, Insightful? I'm sure what their real market model is to have others pay them through their teens and student life (parents, university) and have them come out on the other side thinking "well, now I have to start paying for it myself". They don't want to lose customers in their youth, never to regain them. Make them feel that someone has been, or should have been paying all the time, even if they have not.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  12. I used to go to this school... by JimmehAH · · Score: 2, Informative

    and they've had this for a while (from at least 2000).
    All the computers there are old business ones that are now running Red Hat (they even got a little plaque from RH to put up in the lobby) with Citrix connected to Windows NT Terminal Server on top of that.

    I used to help out the head IT guy (Tim) at lunch (my nerdishness was secure even back then) by installing RH over the network for the new computers, fixing the mouse if it ever stopped working (by reinstalling the drivers usually) or just copying down the serial numbers of the computer equipment in to the online database they had.

  13. Re:MS For Schools Is Cheap by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, because we all know paying teachers, who already have starting areas as low as $20K/yr in places in the US , even less money is a great way to improve teacher quality. Thats an especially good deal considering the US is already falling behind in schooling.

    SOmetimes you get what you pay for. The place to cut money in schools is not in the teachers. Look further up the chain at the school boards. For a big city its as highly paid as a CEO, despite being even less useful. Cut there, and higher more/better teachers.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  14. Re:Dear Children by JTorres176 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Children learn what they're taught. This would be why there's such a huge push in MS to resist change. Windows XP works very similar to Windows 95 for this very reason. If we teach children OSS, they learn OSS. If we teach them windows, they learn windows. Your comment that "Linux is for techies" is like saying "We can't teach children english because japanese is easier!" By the way, I'm writing this while listening to the BBC news broadcast on a linux laptop. My sound to works just fine.

    --
    Evil Walrus >83=
  15. Re:Dear Children by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dear sch00l sys4dm1n d00dz...
    thnx 4 installing teh linux on the computaz! we iz LUVVIN it!!!

    just the otha day i woz finkin how totally 1337 it wud b 4 the skool 2 move 2 3 software. like cutin costs n shit! i sed to our Mynds, propriatary solushuns was not da way fowward, and that impartiality and freedum from corprut influnce in da edukashun system cood only be inshured throo open sours. yeh, that's wot gary the geek said anyway.

    yeh. and mynds wuz just sayin how good it woz to write up her gcse pole dansin coursework wiv LaTeX and not dat mingin Word shit!!! i fink she fancys gary coz he knows ALL DA TRIX! she said to me that she wood backslash his curly braces any time of da munf.

    i finks its GREAT that my kids gonna grow up in a world were software is free and it don't affect your benefits, and maybe they cood do the same 4 nappys coz my weekend job at teh off-licens^Hc^H^W booz r us pays shit and vodafone keep aksin me 2 pay 200 quid for those 4000 txts i sent. 2 ton? get out of heer!

    ur teh shit!!!!!
    sara xxxxx

    ps. sorry bout my speling and grammer and punctual^H^Hati^H^H^H^H^Hhuashun, teh inglish teeching is crap
  16. The biggest danger in bringing FOSS to schools by hadaso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a greater danger in students using free software than them getting the crazy idea of that information should be accesible to everyone ... some of them might even get involved in development. Imagine all these fresh minds that M$ cannot even hire because of age limitations on employment...

    Younger minds can have novell ideas. FOSS needs them. School kids getting involved can bring new ideas. Perhaps even non-geek participation in designing GUIs.

    I like to call it "the coolness factor" in OSS. If kids learn that they can actually make a difference: having your idea or design incorporated in software used by millions all around the world is cool, and kids should learn about it and go for it!

  17. Edubuntu by mberry · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We've been using Linux on our server(s) for five years now, and it's been an entirely positive experience. It just works - perhaps a couple of days of down time since September 2000, and they were over the weekend when we upgraded the OS.

    We've also been able to do far more in-house than we'd have been able to with MS stuff, I have a strong sense of ownership, and of kinda understanding how everything fits together. This last year we've been exploring web-based technology, such as the incredibly brilliant Moodle virtual learning environment.

    Anyhow, we're now interested in the notion of Linux on the desktop, and I too have been impressed by how easy ubuntu is to set up and use. Spent the weekend at the edubuntu summit, chatting about the idea of a ubuntu based, easy to install and use, distribution aimed at schools, including those in developing countries where internet access isn't all it could be. This is a tremendously exciting project, and given how easy the unbuntu experience is, could well be the way to get linux onto school desktops. The first release is due in October.

  18. It's not even news anymore ;-) by cheros · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do a Google on "Cutter" and "Orwell school" - they've been smart because for some apps you need Windows - all the rest is done via Terminal Servers (note to OpenOffice: why is your memory footprint so much larger than StarOffice?).

    The Ubuntu lot have a link into the SchoolTool efforts of Mark Shuttleworth, and anyone who's followed the FLOSS in Government trails will know about the fantastic work that has taken place in the Extramadura region in Spain. Link to all the presentations.

    There is far, far more happening out there than the UK Government seems to know - I wonder when they finally try and spend some money efficiently and emulate what the Spanish did. Could be a new concept: actual *efficient* use of tax money...

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.