Slashdot Mirror


Form Filling Through Office 12

Qa32 writes "For those chomping at the bit for more Office 12 details, Microsoft offered a tiny peek at the upcoming offering, or offerings, due next year. In what he termed the first public viewing of Office 12, Chris Caposella, corporate vice president of Microsoft's Information Worker Product Management Group, showed off a distributed forms capability that would enable customers to fill in and submit XML forms easily via a browser, without having to run Microsoft InfoPath on their PC."

20 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. So... by eggz128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like you can do with PDFs today (and for the past couple of years)?

    1. Re:So... by cnettel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Via a browser, they could mean "without plugin" in a browser. That is what would make it different from current InfoPath forms. (InfoPath is an Office component.) The point would be easy integration with Office documents, while maintaining a simple and general client side.

      If it requires Office installed, then I of course agree with you.

    2. Re:So... by zaktheduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Via a browser, they could mean "without plugin" in a browser.
      It's likely to be tied directly into IE7 and even more likely to be a Longhorn only feature. What better way to persuade those that want that feature to "upgrade"

      --
      Life is like an analogy
  2. Implements XForms Standard or Embrace and Extends? by Doug+Dante · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean the MS Office 12 implements the XForms standard, or that it embraces and extends it in a proprietary way? If so, what's the advantage for users of MS Office 12 over XForms?

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  3. Why all the bashing? by __aahsof7392 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft is using an open and robust format (XML) for their office documents - what's wrong with that? Now projects like OpenOffice have an easier time importing and exporting documents. The entire key is portability. (text also compresses better than .doc files)

    1. Re:Why all the bashing? by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The simple answer is its fun.

      The longer answer is that MS has a poor track record with actually implementing the standards they are "embracing". They take the standard, tack on a bunch of crap that isn't part of it, make that proprietary and part of their default build tools. Thus, stuff built by their software becomes unusable or annoying on other software even though it's using the "standard".

      Short verion of the long answer, they've hijacked any stanard they embraced in the past.

    2. Re:Why all the bashing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So how is XML an open format? XML is a dynamic file format, where embedded tags in the header describe how the data in the rest of the file is encoded. Proprietary tags can be used, and if the format of those tags isn't published, then you cannot read it. Microsoft is committed to XML, but not to open tags. Encrypted tags don't allow anyone else to access the data. DRM tags allow the silent sharing of your data with whoever created the DRM tags. Your "Private and confidential" information could go to 1. Microsoft 2. the US government 3. both 4. John Q. Hacker or anyone else. The really sick part is that Microsoft might be able to look, and J.H. might be emailed a copy of your document, but someone whos reader cannot make out the encryption tags might not be able to. The people you don't want reading "cold fusion made simple" can, and the people you want reading "cold fusion made simple" can't.

    3. Re:Why all the bashing? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm.. but InfoPath has been around since 2002.

  4. Can someone educate about MS Office? by greymond · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't use it often, since my job requires more design based software (read: Illustrator, Photoshop, Indesign, Dreamweaver, etc..) However every year my work spends quite a lot of money making sure I have the newest version, yet I don't really know what changes.

    We primarily use Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, and with small exceptions of where commands are located and the icons "bubbly-ness", I haven't noticed much of a difference between the 95, 2k, XP, and 2k3 versions. In fact the only difference that really pops out at me is what programs are considered as part of "Office Pro".

    It used to be that 95 and 2k came with Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Outlook and Access. Then XP came out with those plus Publisher (which IIRC was someone elses product that was purchased by MS) Then 2k3 came out and is the same but with Visio (which I know was someone elses product but bought by MS).

    So does each version just add a new software to the bundle or are there really changes? (changes being more than buubly icons and moving the location of th email-merge command)

  5. I, for one, welcome... by banglogic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... this capability. Yes, PDF forms have allowed this for quite some time. But, like it or lump it, MS is the leader when it comes to productivity apps. This ability expands the Office line further into the general web and closer to the world of open standards. Seems to me like one of the few useful features they have introduced in a long time. Besides, it's not like they have a choice. OpenOffice 2.0 (beta 1.9) is looking sweet and is finally starting to represent an actual threat to the Evil Empire.

    --
    Bang Logic - Serious Small Business Services
  6. Puh-leeeze... by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 3, Insightful
    98 percent of Office users won't use any of this new crap. 75 percent won't even upgrade.

    MS Office -- stick a fork in it -- it's done.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:Puh-leeeze... by jp10558 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know. While there might be some additions to be done to Access, the rest I don't see. What more could possibly be added to Word? I mean, wordprocessing is done. It is, it's a solved problem. Heck, my Lotus WordPro 9.8 from 2001 or whatever is fine. It does everything with wordprocessing (except a dashed underline, which I have only ever needed to do once in my life - I got a pen for that one underline lol).

      Anything much more than what can be done in any wordprocesser today pretty much ought to be done in a DTP program, like InDesign or one of the competitors (there are even free ones, though IDK about OSS ones).

      Access is itself mostly a solved problem IMHO - much more that what it does ought to use a real DBMS - there are definitely free ones's there - I think MySQL, or MS's SQL Server, or Oracle or whatever floats your boat.

      It's just, MS seems to be floundering with having maxed out the functionality that can really be put into a desktop office program environment. And I still don't know anyone IRL who uses more than Word and Outlook at work. The rest seems mostly wasted for many users.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  7. Re:Uh huh. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have no idea what this means, and I suspect you don't, either.

    Didn't I just admit that? I was only regurgiating the marketing materials. Here, you try:

    InfoPath (previously code-named "XDocs"), is a new product in the Microsoft Office family. Using InfoPath helps to streamline the process of gathering information by enabling teams and organizations to easily create and work with rich, dynamic forms.

    The information collected can be integrated with a broad range of business processes because InfoPath supports any customer-defined XML schema and integrates with XML Web services. As a result, InfoPath helps to connect you directly to organizational information and gives you the ability to act on it, which leads to greater business impact and productivity.


    Say what? The words above are flowing, but the ideas are not.

    I'm supposed to be a "troll" for asking if you actually had any clue

    Mods, will you please fix that? It's very annoying when we're trying to have a discussion and you go around modding people into oblivion.

    So, since a) you know what InfoPath is, b) neither the article or Microsoft are very helpful at defining it, how about sharing a useful definition of *what* it is?

  8. Wake me up... by thomas.me · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...when Microsoft stops talking about what they are going to reinvent next year, and releases something new .

    Yawn. Never saw a more boring company.

  9. marketing BS; "Office 2006, make YOU work faster!" by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I can see why some people might like having their icons change around, but I hate it. I want to click where the thing always is and have the thing work.

    They do it, quite simply, because Office does pretty much what it always has. Sure, maybe Excel gets a new graph format or a new function, and maybe Word tells you how many paragraphs per fortnight you write.

    None of these are sexy marketing bullets. "New in Office 2006! Sin() 125% faster! Slightly different 3D chart you'll never use! Spell check finally has 80% instead of 75% of English words!" doesn't cut it on the banners and magazine ads.

    "Office 2006- streamlined for the way YOU and YOUR business works. So you can get to the important things in life quicker" (insert picture of model playing with model child, both of them laughing. Flowers and ice cream and little puppies optional).

    Sound familiar? That's because that is the basis for virtually every "new" Office release marketing blitz in the last decade. Why? Because for much of the business world, if you're sitting there at your desk instead of home with your SO and/or kids, chances are you're staring at a Word, Excel, or Powerpoint document. Translation: you identify with the supposed problem and believe the utter lie- that the new software will boost your productivity.

    Also, changing around the interface keeps the training companies busy, and pushes companies to upgrade everyone so "people don't get confused" (same with the myriad of niggling little incompatibilities, especially in Powerpoint, which affect how slides are rendered.)

  10. What is an "XML Form"? by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could somebody please summarize what in the hell an "XML Form" is? XML is, quite simply, a way of formatting flat data. Saying "XML Form" is like saying "Comma-delimited Form". What in the hell does this mean?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  11. When is Open Office 2 coming out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Completely off-topic:

    When is Open Office 2 going to be released? I understand that it is still under production and a firm release date is difficult. But at least Mozilla, for example, gave us estimates for each new release of Firefox until 1.0 came out. All Open Office tells us is that it will come out. Not when.

  12. Re:More plugin nightmares... by dal20402 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TFA says "a browser." Doesn't specify which browser or platform.

    I'll eat someone's tinfoil hat if this works plugin-free with any browser other than IE7 on Windows.

  13. 75% by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will still eventually upgrade.. Can only put off the compatibility issue so long.

    It creeps up on you slowly. First one vendor upgrades, then another, then you find you cant 'talk' to your customers, and voila.. you upgrade..

    Happens to the best of us..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. Re:Uh huh. by MyIS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    less functional

    I think that's a very pessimistic description. InfoPath is essentially a knockoff from XForms, which is essentially a DTD with hints on data input. That means that very complex XML docs with nested tree-like structures, etc, can be created as a direct result of an XForms (or InfoPath) engine. Trust me, INPUT tags have nothing on that.

    --
    http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/