Slashdot Mirror


Leaked Screenshots Show Netflix Downloads

Mike1024 writes "US DVDs-by-post company Netflix appears to be planning a service that will let users download movies over the internet. Hackingnetflix.com has some accidentally-revealed screenshots, and the Netflix jobs page includes a product manager position, saying "The Electronic Delivery Service (EDS) will augment Netflix's current DVD delivery model with high quality movies delivered to consumers' home TVs through the Internet, on a subscription basis". Apple's iTunes demonstrated many people are willing to live with some DRM and hardware/vendor lock-in."

28 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Goodluck... by Afecks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as it's better than http://www.cinemanow.com/ Nothing worse than watching bad movies AND having to buffer every 5 minutes.

    1. Re:Goodluck... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      you know leaving the house for 5 mins to interact with other humans [even if they work retail they're still human].

      Uuh, last I checked, the blockbuster "human" you talk to after hours has a slot for entering your credit card, and another, larger one for spitting out VHS tapes or DVDs.

      As for real humans behind the counter during working hours, well, if you like talking to pimply teenagers...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Goodluck... by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Funny

      you [inside] ====> door ====> outside
      |
      |
      \--> Life happens here.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Goodluck... by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was under the impression Netflix is quite a bit cheaper then your local rental store. I know it's popular to make out anyone using online products must be avoiding human interaction, but when it's cheaper it's completely unwarranted. Then again this is slashdot so enjoy your +5 Funny mod. I'm content to receive a -1 Troll.

    4. Re:Goodluck... by BackInIraq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, because nobody lives in small towns that feature video stores with horrible selections of videos.

      There do still exist people in North America for whom the drive to a decent, well-stocked video store is much, much more than 5 minutes...and many of them do have access to broadband. Entire towns full of such people exist, all across the midwest and mountain west.

      Not everybody lives in metro areas...even small metro areas.

    5. Re:Goodluck... by timster · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer to interact with humans inside the house. See, I have this thing called a girlfriend and... well, I better not go into too much detail. Suffice it to say that, while going to Blockbuster is technically human interaction, it does not meet my standards.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    6. Re:Goodluck... by Aggrazel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its not about the convenience, its about the selection and the availability.

      Even Blockbuster with its "Guaranteed In-store" policy is occasionally out of a movie I'd like to see. A downloaded version won't have the problem of being "out". Plus your selection on downloaded movies will be much greater.

      At the end of the day, this is about the same thing as pay-per-view on demand, only with a much wider selection, and possibly a more consumer friendly pricing model.

    7. Re:Goodluck... by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I sort of thought we were talking about going to Blockbuster -- getting a beer with the buddies is something rather different, at least in my opinion. But when you started insulting me for completely irrelevant reasons I realized that we are actually talking about how unhappy you are, which is not a very interesting topic.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    8. Re:Goodluck... by nuxx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hell, even here in the Detroit area we can only rely on one single video store having a good selection of odd videos, and they are still a good half hour from my house. The other problem is that people have a tendency to steal rare / out of print films making them hard to see.

      Even in more metropolitan areas it's often hard to find smaller run films. Most people I know resort to buying everything because there is just no other way to rent them.

      (There's nothing like going into Blockbuster, asking for Brazil, and being directed to the travel section.)

  2. Wow. by neodude88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a screenshot of a login box. Exciting stuff.

    1. Re:Wow. by tommut · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm the guy who submitted that news to hackingnetflix. I actually just scraped that HTML by copying it from my account page and pasted it into my gmail that I sent to hackingnetflix. It wasn't a screenshot at all. The save button was probably below the stuff I grabbed.

  3. anyone surprised? by justforaday · · Score: 5, Informative

    This really shouldn't come as much of a surprise to anyone, since it was announced last fall that Tivo and Netflix had worked out some sort of agreement for downloadable movies...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  4. Hopefully not overzealous by jasonhamilton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with efforts like this is that they tend to be overzealous with the copyright efforts to make sure nothing is copied. Ultimately their efforts sabotage the product and no one buys.

    What is interesting is that they are claiming internet downloads to be watched on TV - which is quite different than internet downloads to be watched on a computer.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  5. That's a Lot Of Bits by DanielMarkham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Downloading movies seems like a lot of bits to push over the average consumer's pipe. Tie in a pre-constructed box for it (and who exactly wants to buy yet another home appliance when the computer will do?) and it sounds like an infrastructure mess.
    I wonder if consumers will be happy waiting for hours while their movie is delivered? Especially if the Blockbuster is just around the corner. Of course, it beats going out, but at what price? Something about the business model just doesn't add up to me.

    Night Of The Living Parrots

    1. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by pcidevel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I currently wait two days for my Netflix movies instead of going to the Blockbuster around the corner (1 day to ship to Netflix, 1 day for the movie to come back), so I don't see why waiting a couple of hours would be a big deal.

      And no, I don't use Netflix because I'm lazy (it's really more of a hassle than going to Blockbuster). I use Netflix because they have a HUGE selection of movies. Their buisness model provides for a much larger selection of movies than a brick and morter store. And going to a "movies on demand" format can only help to increase their selection, it sounds great to me (since I don't tend to watch the normal summer blockbuster style movies and instead watch more obscure stuff)..

      --

      I thought someone said there was going to be free beer!

    2. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by robertjw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny, Netflix seems to doing just fine with the "be happy waiting a few days" business model. Why do you think a few hours is a worse one?

      I use Netflix, and the thing is they send you more than one movie at a time (depending on your subscription). I can set up the list of movies I want to watch, and I almost always have one on hand when I want to watch something. The other great thing is no more wandering around a movie store looking for something to catch my eye. Currently I've got over 100 movies in my queue - I'll probably never see them all.

      I imagine any kind of download service will be the same way - I can download multiple movies, so I always have something available. After I delete the last movie I watched the next one in my queue will be downloaded. Probably a lot like their current service, just faster.

    3. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by BioCS.Nerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think there's a problem with bandwidth. What does your computer do all day with the bandwidth? Nothing. Most everyone has plenty of bandwidth to spare.

      Especially if the Blockbuster is just around the corner. Of course, it beats going out, but at what price? Something about the business model just doesn't add up to me.
      As another poster mentioned, Netflix is in cahoots with Tivo. As such, I'd expect TV and movie delivery over the 'net. I'm intrigued to see how they'll price it out. I'm not sure how much I'd be willing to pay to rent a show or movie via this mechanism. I would, however, be interested in purchasing movies and TV shows.

      O/T Addendum: it just occurred to me that the Xscale processor would be more than able to handle video playback on a PSP-like device. Could this be further impetus for Apple's IBM -> Intel switch? i.e. a forth coming "Apple PSP", if you will, with ensuing iTMS service for movies/TV/games?

    4. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 5, Informative

      For a full dvd disk image, its 4 gigabytes. They'll most likely use compression, but even if they didn't its still doable.
      The average download speed I'm seeing on residential cable is now 6megabit. google says:

      (4 gigabytes) / (6 (megabit / second)) = 1.51703704 hours

      Or, roughly a little longer than it takes to watch it. Buffer for 30 minutes or so and you could stream the rest.

      With FIOS and other closer to true broadband internet connections becoming much more common, it makes even more sense(FIOS's common package is 15/2):
      (4 gigabytes) / (15 (megabit / second)) = 36.4088889 minutes

      Most good codecs can squeeze a movie down to 1.4 gigs or so, so downloading is entirely an option. Streaming VOD as yous uggest would work just as well, but theres no reason you couldnt keep a copy.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    5. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't think there's a problem with bandwidth. What does your computer do all day with the bandwidth? Nothing. Most everyone has plenty of bandwidth to spare.

      I think your ISP may disagree when half their customers start saturating their pipes 24 hours a day so that they can watch a new movie each night.

    6. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by iainl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For a full Dual-Layer disc (and I really can't remember the last time I saw a retail movie come on a single layer) it's 9Gb, not 4, so the numbers are even worse.

      Besides, basic broadband packages in the UK usually have monthly download limits in the ~3Gb range. So it's not the 24-hour wait for the download, it's the 30-day wait until your ISP will let you have the next one.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    7. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by stienman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Using mpeg4 and supply barely broadcast quality (not even DVD quality, nevermind HDTV) means a typical 90 minute movie would run between 1/2 and 2 GB. At today's brodband speeds this will range from 40 minutes (500M @ 3Mbps) to 5 hours(2G @ 768Kbps).

      The sweet spot will likely be right around 1.5Mbps broadband and under 1GB movie size. Delivery would take less time than watching the movie, and so you order the movie, let it buffer for 10-15 minutes while you pop popcorn, etc, then start streaming the movie.

      Delivery isn't a concern as long as the bit rate of the movie is about half your download rate, and a 300Kbps bit rate is bearable, a 768Kbps stream is about what you expect for ok cable TV.

      While they won't be delivering at great quality, they will be getting consumers by the ability to get content on demand, for low cost, with a huge selection. Even home theater buffs will use the service simply because it's more convenient than waiting for the disc in the mail or leaving the house to pick it up - especially if the local video store is out of copies. Further, it'll probably be similar to the current system, but limited somewhat since the mailing delay is not built in. Pay $17.99/mo to get 12 movies per month (about 3/week). You can only have up to three movies on your player at a time, and can watch them at any time until you fill the slot with another movie.

      What would be really nice is if one could select the quality and trade off downlaod time for quality, as well as queuing up movies so they are available on the player at the time of release (new movies are released on tuesday - download starts at high quality monday afternoon and unlocks at midnight).

      And if they get large enough to push at the movie studios they may even be able to get movies before video store release dates, and possibly simultaneous with theater release. But these are very unlikely, due to the huge video store market.

      But the biggest change for NetFlix will be that they can (if they work out licensing correctly) get around the limitation of their current list system. Right now you won't necessarily get the movies you want in the order you prioritized them. With downloads there's no limit - you can get the movie you want, when you want it.

      -Adam

    8. Re:That's a Lot Of Bits by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "That and they'd have 9000 copies of "Adam Sandler Acts Like A Total Fuckhead, And Women Still Spead Their Legs For Him" and one copy [MAYBE] of that obscure independent film I'd been looking for."

      I've noticed that different Blockbusters will stock different titles based upon the neighborhood they're in. In my general area, there are three Blockbusters, one in each socioeconomic area: one in the upper class area, one in the middle class area and one in the lower class area. Having been to all three, it was very evident to me that the quality of selections slides downhill as you go down the economic ladder.

      The "good" store has tons and tons of indie films, as well as all the popular and standard catalog titles. Large foreign, special interest and anime sections. Virtually all titles are DVD and widescreen-only. Only a small handful of VHS titles for much older and obscure films.

      The "middle" store has a smaller selection of indie films. There are some foreign titles intermingled among the catalog stuff by genre (how it really should be, IMO). There is a greater emphasis on new release, pop culture titles and there are both widescreen (16:9) and full screen (4:3) DVDs. Most titles are on DVD only, but there is a visible amount of stuff on VHS still.

      The "bottom" store has a significant focus on new release pop titles, with very little in the way of independent films. Good luck finding foreign films, regardless of quality or genre. Most of the older catalog titles are VHS, whereas the same titles are on DVD at the better stores.

      The question is, does Blockbuster cater to the demands of the neighborhood they're in, or do they simply follow socioeconomic demographics (ie stereotypes) when they stock a store with videos?

      BTW, the "middle" store recently shut its doors for good, which signals to me the widening gap between rich and poor in this country, but that's another discussion :)

  6. Well, yeah. by 'nother+poster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple's iTunes demonstrated many people are willing to live with some DRM and hardware/vendor lock-in.

    People don't mind this as long as the DRM allows the consumer to do what they want with the media. As long as I can listen to my music when and where I want it's no problem. When the DRM is used to limit where and when I use what I purchased, that's when people get upset.

    It will be interesting if netflix learned this. If I pay a fee and can only watch the movies when, where, and on what netflix decides, they won't get my money. We'll see.

    1. Re:Well, yeah. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "What vendor lock-in? People are willing to put up with Itune's DRM because it's simple to "break" (merely convert it to another format, it's something even I would be able to do, and I know very little about computers), therefore there is no vendor lock-in."

      I see these sorts of comments on /. on a daily basis, and yet they still surprise me. Don't you have any non-geek friends? Almost no one cares about Apple's DRM - outside of /. types. Heck, most people don't even seem to realize there is DRM present at all!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  7. The Economist also has info about this by r0.ini · · Score: 3, Informative
  8. Re:DRM thoughts by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    DRM isn't something that a lot of consumers care about too much. Interesting as a lot of slashdotters seem to feel the opposite.

    DRM also isn't something most people understand at all, unlike most slashdotters. When someone tries to put a song they bought from the itunes music store onto their Sony brand mp3 player and can't get it to work, 9 times out of 10 they will blame the sony player. When a song bought from Napster 2 can't be transferred to an ipod, customers often blame the ipod. They don't understand that the behavior is intentional and if you explain to them that it is most people think it should illegal. Once someone understands DRM they dislike it, but very few people ever get to that point because it is a hard concept to grasp and as most americans know... thinking is hard.

  9. very realistic by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful



    If Netflix and TiVO work this out correctly, this is going to jam a sharp stick in the eye of pay-per-view AND Blockbuster. It may not seem convenient to you at a quick glance, but I'm guessing you haven't re-organized your TV usage through a Tivo or Netflix subscription. I'm not criticizing you, but pointing out that this makes sense to people who have.

    Sure, downloading a movie is annoying to satisfy an immediate whim craving for a film. That's where the local video store cannot be beat. The TiVO-Netflix partnership trounces the local video store in new releases, however. Blockbuster may carry 100 copies of Batman when it's eventually released on DVD and make a big promise about availability. But Blockbuster doesn't do this for the smaller movies that you and every other film nerd in your neighborhood want to see. It'll stock two copies that'll be perpetually checked out.

    Online Netflix means that you'll be able to create wish lists prior to the release of movies on DVD so that you'll be assured of getting them the day of their release. When you turn on your TiVO, you'll be greeted with a list of movies that have already downloaded, so it's not some deal where you have to actively select an online movie and wait for it to be transmitted. Besides, with Fiber-to-the-home looming in the future as well as IP-over-electric lines, our bandwidth future will speed up the download process for that scenario.

    Seth

  10. Not necessarily by sterno · · Score: 3, Informative

    DRM only becomes a problem when it inhibits the actual use of the product. ITunes and the IPod have been wildly successful because the average person is almost totally unaware that there's DRM involved. They download music, it plays on their computer and it plays on their IPod so what do they care.

    The most recent effort I saw for this was a service where you could download a movie file for a fee but could only play it within 30 days and once played it would only remain playable for like 24 hours. That's problematic. In this case though, I should think the downloads would be consistent with the NetFlix style of movie watching where you can have so many movies available at a time but for an unlimited time. If that's the case it will be far more viable.

    My ideal would be if I could take a netflix downloaded rental and play it on my TiVo. If I have to hook up a computer to my TV, it's a bit more of a hassle. I haven't been a NetFlix member for a while now because I got tired of discs piling up that I never got around to watching, but if I can download a movie in a few hours I may resubscribe.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service