Slashdot Mirror


FrontPage Server Extensions for Unix?

beetle496 asks: "Okay, so I didn't research my choice of ISP adequately. Despite running Apache 2.0 on Red Hat, the only option for dynamic content they support is FrontPage Server Extensions. I am quite comfortable with X/HTML and CSS, and am okay with JavaScript. I am annoyed enough that I would buy FrontPage, were it available for my preferred platform. I've performed the customary MSDN and Google searches. The best I came up with was a page on FrontPage UNIX Server Extensions, which sounds exactly on target, but didn't help me. Can anyone point me toward a resource on writing HTML code to make use of FPSE (aka, webbot) -- without using FrontPage?"

45 comments

  1. power of choice by sofar · · Score: 4, Insightful


    use the power of choice: change ISP's

    1. Re:power of choice by jmt9581 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The OP said he'd buy Frontpage if it were available for his platform, but he won't spend the meager amount of money to find a decent webhost? That's ridiculous, I think that a (legal) version fo Office would cost at least $100, which should be more than a year of hosting from a decent webhost.

      --

      My blog

    2. Re:power of choice by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adelphia: 10MB space, and not much is allowed (no .EXEs, for example) - the only dynamic content is FP extensions. (this is according to TFA)

      Freeshell: $36 ONE TIME, 100MB web space (also 100MB shell and 100MB mailbox), Perl, PHP, and Python ALL supported for dynamic content, and you can put almost anything in your webspace.

      Which sounds like the better idea?

    3. Re:power of choice by swimin · · Score: 1

      Its quite possible he doesn't have much of a choice, (he's using Adelphia, which means his only high-speed competition is the telco), he could host his own site - using a dynamic dns solution, or he could pay for a seperate webhost.

    4. Re:power of choice by beetle496 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That is exactly correct. I am surprised that no one here sees writing code by hand to make use of FPSE to be an interesting hack.

      --
      I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
    5. Re:power of choice by beetle496 · · Score: 1
      Yes, $36 is a good value. But that is $36 versus $0 since I still need an ISP.

      I am surprised that no one here thinks making use of FPSE by hand is an interesting hack.

      --
      I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
    6. Re:power of choice by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      I don't deny that it's interesting, but not easy.

      See, Microsoft is going to make it a royal PITA.

      You're almost better off writing your HTML, then getting someone with FrontPage to put the components that you need in. (And, no, I'm not doing that...)

  2. FrontPage anything... by qualico · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...makes me shudder.

    yep, change ISPs.
    Web standards are scary enough without adding yet another layer of, "more to go wrong".

    1. Re:FrontPage anything... by itwerx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have used FrontPage a couple times over the years and it truly is horrible. Even the simplest text page with no tables or anything comes out as a nasty jumble of HTML that is terribly unpredictable across browsers.
      I do believe FP (even the 2003 version which I happen to have tried recently because I was given a copy for free) is hands down the worst web editor out there. (Well, okay, it's a tie between FP and MS-Word! :)
      So yeah, change ISPs...

    2. Re:FrontPage anything... by gregjmartin · · Score: 1

      Maybe, just maybe, OP signed a contract and isn't interested in throwing the money away.

      You might start by rooting around Microsoft's MSDN site for information.

      \\Greg

    3. Re:FrontPage anything... by qualico · · Score: 1

      Even with a contract, your going to come out ahead switching.
      The time wasted for a buggy outcome, will certainly exceed any money thrown away.

      "...start by rooting around Microsoft's MSDN site..."

      lol, not sure you meant the pun, but I alternatively read that as rooting the MSDN site, (running Linux), and use that for your host.

  3. I think... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 5, Funny

    geocities still has an impressive page builder. It might be worth looking into.

  4. You love to be hated? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Why would you punish yourself by using a product whos vendor hates its existence?

    Microsoft will make using Frontpage on Linux the most painful experience you've ever had, trying to force you into switching to Windows.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:You love to be hated? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      While it's worth noting,
      using frontpage on MSware is also painful, forcing you into trying other new things.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  5. $10 says... by hotgazpacho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that PHP (albeit an older version) is installed. Create a file called phpinfo.php in your web root, and put in the following:
    <?php phpinfo(); ?>
    Then, visit the page in your browser. If you see the code, or it wants you to download the file, you're SOL. Otherwise, rock on!

    1. Re:$10 says... by globalar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The function phpinfo() can be disabled at build time or via directive in php.ini, httpd.conf, or .htaccess. This is not uncommon on production machines which don't "officially" support php. Always try print/echo before you give up.

    2. Re:$10 says... by beetle496 · · Score: 1

      By visit the page, you mean try the URL for phpinfo.php file? I see the code, so I am SOL. http://home.adelphia.net/~bmss/phpinfo.php

      --
      I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
    3. Re:$10 says... by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      Try http://www.0php.com/free_PHP_hosting.php. There are a couple free hosts that support dynamic PHP pages, some also include MySQL. Happy coding!

  6. Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by fluor2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've installed Apache on windows, and I recently discovered that there was no Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS! I refuse running IIS on Windows, so what do I do? :)

    1. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 2, Informative

      If running Linux or BSD on your server isn't an option, then running Apache on Cygwin should work.

    2. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a FrontPage extensions for Apache on Windows. It just flew over your head, like the GP's analogy.

    3. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      That solves the parent poster's problem how ? It's not that he cannot run Apache (the native win32 version would be preferrable in that case anyway to some cygwin hack, but as I got it he already uses that) but that apparently no FP extensions seem to be available.

    4. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      cygwin == linux emulation so Apache + Cygwin ~= Apache + Unix and Apache + Unix has FP extensions. I'd say drop windows and drop fp extensions, making your life a lot easier.

    5. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      As cygwin is not an emulation but more of an API layer it would be useless for running Linux FP extensions if they are not available with sources (which would really amaze me). But anyway, getting rid of FP extensions would be the best anyway, I used them the last time many years ago and even then they sucked.

    6. Re:Frontpage extensions for WINDOWS by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      Nope, the source isn't available. #http://www.rtr.com/fpsupport/fp2002sr1_download.h tm# cygwin may help by letting you familiarize yourself with some bash / linux /unix commands in a familiar environment before ditching the beast.

  7. You have GOT to be kidding me by toygeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You want to use the frontpage extensions, OUTSIDE OF FRONTPAGE? Tell you what, go get a .22, and shoot yourself in the foot. It'll be more productive.

    I have the unfortunate "pleasure" of supporting the Frontpage extensions on about 40 production web hosting servers. They are *horrible*. I mean *HORRIBLE*. When they work, they work fine, but then they quit working, it sometimes takes wiping out a clients site, reinstalling the extensions, and then having them re-publish from *scratch*. Oh yeah, great stuff there.

    Do yourself a favor and use a few PHP or Perl scripts do do what you need to do. There's nothing in Frontpage that can't be done in PHP or Perl. Its NOT that great. Heck I've done prettier, more functional sites using shtml and php.

    Just reading this post makes me feel like I'm watching a bad horror movie and the main character is about to enter the room where the axe murderer is waiting, and everybody in the audience KNOWS there's an axe murderer. "DONT GO IN THERE!" somebody shouts.

    Remember, Friends don't let friends use Frontpage.

    1. Re:You have GOT to be kidding me by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is his host supposedly doesn't allow any dynamic content except javascript and FrontPage. PHP/etc. won't work.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:You have GOT to be kidding me by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

      Agreed 100%. Dealing with Frontpage extensions brings a new meaning to the word "frustration". Avoid like the plague.

  8. Frontpage for UNIX is EOL'd by Oinos · · Score: 4, Informative

    This seems pretty straight forward to me.

    Perhaps you should find a new ISP since your current one is using obsolete software.

    1. Re:Frontpage for UNIX is EOL'd by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      fpse 2000 are eol'd as of 6/30/05, yes, but fpse 2002 aren't eol'd until 6/30/06

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
  9. you would buy it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    then why not buy it and run it under crossover office on linux. Its un-supported but it may work.

  10. The 90's called .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. they want their "Ask Slashdot" back.

    Sheesh. "Frontpage Extensions" .. ew.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  11. [OT] For the love of Gods, WHY? by empaler · · Score: 1

    a style="background: rgb(255, 204, 153) none repeat scroll 0% ! important; color: rgb(102, 0, 0) ! important; -moz-background-clip: initial ! important; -moz-background-origin: initial ! important; -moz-background-inline-policy: initial ! important;" stylesave="" href="http://home.adelphia.net/"
    - it looks horrid! Make the bleeding stop!

    1. Re:[OT] For the love of Gods, WHY? by dratox · · Score: 1

      ^ when you use "& n b s p ;"just what happens to make your spaces

  12. Overview: Frontpage extensibility by demigod2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    As other people have mentioned, FPSE is obsolete. Today, you are supposed to use client-side dynamic (webbot, DTC, add-in) or more modern server-side dynamic (ASP) techniques. A lot of things including navigation can be handled design-time, reply or email if you're interested in that topic. I do everything design-time; it's my preferred method, and FP2003 is my preferred tool.

    However you can still use a webbot for server-side dynamic behavior. Visit MSDN and download the Frontpage 2002 SDK. Don't worry, it's not outdated. The extensibility models haven't changed between versions.

    With a perl script, it's the same as a standard CGI script as described on MSDN. Look for the example \FPSDK\Files\WebBot\wbtest4 in the SDK. If you prefer to use a DLL or shared library, use the BeginWebBotExpand macro which lets you access the bot attributes. In either case, you're going to build a BTL file and call the webbot from HTML like:

    <!-- WEBBOT BOT=name ATTR1="xxx" ATTR2="yyy" -->

    The SDK describes the four ways a webbot can activate. Try to test things client-side first, it's a lot easier. If your webbot fails it will just insert a generic [FrontPage Component name] on the page. Doublecheck the logs in _vti_pvt for the logs, to get hint why things are failing.

    It's oldschool, it works, and it's a simple variant on CGI scripting. Again, for simple things like navigation bars it's a heck of a lot easier to use a design-time dynamic control (client-side webbot, DTC, or add-in). I strongly recommend you consider those instead.

  13. No. by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can anyone point me toward a resource on writing HTML code to make use of FPSE ... without using FrontPage?

    No.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Get. Out. by Squozen · · Score: 1

    Change ISPs, yours sounds like a security nightmare.

  15. Frontpage Express by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    Frontpage Express can generate pages that use frontpage serve extensions, google Frontpage Express and see if pages created by that work. You're probably better off paying a small amount for PHP/MySQL/CGI capable webspace though.

  16. Cable by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    Unforunately, he probably can't change ISPs because he's using Adelphia - a cable provider. Thanks to a recent supr. court decision, he won't be ever able to change providers unless he goes DSL or Satellite.

    It sucks to have to pay more, but you could always find a webhost with cheap plans.

  17. Profit by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
    1) Setup-up Win95a with Personal Web Server and FP extensions
    2) ????
    3) Profit!

    Seriously, I have quite a bit of experience in MS Web Dev land. Stay clear of the FP extensions. If you are on IIS, use ASP or ASP.NET. If you are running on Unix PHP will probably be available and is the most widely supported (read: you will be able to find examples of what you want to do online) web scripting language out there. Also, give Ruby on Rails a try.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  18. You *could* pay for frontpage to work, but... by petard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Better hosting will cost you a fraction of what frontpage would for a very long time. And if your time's worth anything, this looks like an even better deal... Try these guys. No setup fee, no monthly fee. You just pay $1 per GB transferred and $0.01/MB/Month for disk space. php and mysql are included. To set up an account, you just transfer some money to them. If you use more bandwidth than you've paid for, they just stop serving your pages, so there's no risk of running up a huge bill if you get slashdotted. I'm not affiliated, just a really happy customer.

    (My experience: I run a lightly used download site there along with a personal bookmark synchronization php/mysql app to share my mozilla bookmarks between machines. I've spent just under $1.50 for credit card fees, transfer and disk space since October.)

    --
    .sig: file not found
    1. Re:You *could* pay for frontpage to work, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so they are a lot like bsdwebhosting.net except much more recent. Should have patented that business model....

    2. Re:You *could* pay for frontpage to work, but... by petard · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a few other differences. nearlyfreespeech charges half as much, doesn't nail you for CPU time, and (seem to) use faster servers. The most important difference from my perspective is that nearlyfreespeech doesn't make you use paypal, which I really try to avoid. If you need mail hosting too, though, bsdwebhosting.net is the only service I know that offers it using this pricing model.

      --
      .sig: file not found
  19. Lock-in by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

    Not only is this going to be a headache... You're going to be hand-coding all of the FrontPage stuff into your website, which may grow to be pretty large. Then you're probably stuck doing it that same way, because FP might kick back your code, and it would take too much effort to port to something else. You'll have to keep editing it by hand, FOREVER.

    Is this something you really want to do?

  20. Re: Reply if you're interested in that topic by beetle496 · · Score: 1
    A very generous offer.

    I was just trying to add a hit counter and was modestly surprised that I could not find the syntax documented. I then became astounded at Adelphia's refusal (or, more likely, inability) to explain why they supported FPSE but not cgi scripting when they were running Apache under Red Hat. (That discussion logically followed when they could not point me to resources either.)

    Anyway, the broken hit counter is here. Web searches turn up similar problems, but none that I could understand that were outside the context of using FrontPage to make the page.

    I would prefer a text-based counter. I have no idea if FPSE can provide that.

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!