Got Spyware? Throw out the Computer!

geeber writes "The New York Times (reg. required) has an article about a new response to spyware - throw out the computer and buy a new one. The notion is new computers can be had for $400 so it's a cost effective and 'rational response.'" From the article: "While no figures are available on the ranks of those jettisoning their PC's, the scourge of unwanted software is widely felt. This month the Pew group published a study in which 43 percent of the 2,001 adult Internet users polled said they had been confronted with spyware or adware, collectively known as malware. Forty-eight percent said they had stopped visiting Web sites that might deposit unwanted programs on their PC's. Moreover, 68 percent said they had had computer trouble in the last year consistent with the problems caused by spyware or adware, though 60 percent of those were unsure of the problems' origins. Twenty percent of those who tried to fix the problem said it had not been solved; among those who spent money seeking a remedy, the average outlay was $129."

Comments

And remember...

[pwnage]

...that once you throw out that old PC, remember to replace it with a Macintosh. Problem solved.

Bill says "thanks"

[mistersooreams]

Of course, when you throw out the PC, you then have to purchase a new copy of the operating system. In 99% of cases this is Windows. So you reduce the incentive for Microsoft to fix the spyware problem; in fact, you reward them for not fixing it! Quite brilliant! In fairness to Microsoft, Windows now does have a pretty good resistance to spyware, IF you run as user. The problem is that most people don't know what this means, how to do it, or anything of the sort. Education is the only solution. Note that I declined to make a "??? PROFIT!" joke in this post.

Re:Bill says "thanks"

[Kjella]

In fairness to Microsoft, Windows now does have a pretty good resistance to spyware, IF you run as user. The problem is that most people don't know what this means, how to do it, or anything of the sort.

Those that know, don't need to, and those that do, shouldn't even if they wanted to. I run as admin all the time, because it is simply much much easier. Running as a normal user is annoying at best due to all the stupid Windows software. A typical example (Win2k):

User:
1. Log out, log in as admin
2. Install as admin
3. Log back in as user
4. ???
5. Manually create shortcuts, menu folders, menu items, quicklaunch item and such for user.

Admin:
1. Install as admin

It's amazing how many programs that still haven't clued in that installing account is not always identical to user account. That is not counting every other stupid problem, like some programs requiring admin rights to run or other stupidity.

Kjella

Sssshhhh!

[jdavidb]

Don't tell anybody! I'm counting on this new idea to cause a glut in the market of used PC's. I can pick them up real cheap for extra Linux boxen.

Re:Stupid recommendation

[Rosco P. Coltrane]

Yeah... then your $400 new computer is going to get infected, are you going to throw it out and buy yet another?

It does get your 20 minutes per PC though.

My suggestion is: buy 24 $400 computers and switch every 20 minutes. That way, you can get a solid 8 hour day of work. When you're done, return them to the place you got them from and ask replacements, so you're good to go for another day :-)

Re:What does that make the Windows TCO?

[Rosco P. Coltrane]

Average lifespan of a windows computer - 4 minutes
Average lifespan of a BSD computer 10 years.

So the choice is between a computer that turns into a zombie in 4 minutes, or a one that keeps on dying for 10 years is it? :-)

Re:What does that make the Windows TCO?

[PakProtector]

GEEK: Bring out your obsolete boxen!
Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
[clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
[clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
[clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
[clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!

NETCRAFT: Ah! Good, Good! Here's one for you -- and here's your one gig of porn.
*BSD: I'm not obsolete!
GEEK: What?
NETCRAFT: 'S Nothing -- here's your one gig of porn now.
*BSD: I'm not obsolete, I'm not!
GEEK: Oy, what's this here? He says he's not obsolete!
NETCRAFT: Oh, Yes, Yes, he is.
*BSD: I'm not!
GEEK: He isn't obsolete.
NETCRAFT: Yes, Well, he will be soon, you see. He's dying.
*BSD: No I'm not! I'm gaining market share!
NETCRAFT: Oh no, you're not -- you'll be stone dead and useless in a moment.
GEEK: Oh, I can't take him like that -- it's against regulations y'know.
*BSD: I don't want to go in the dumpster! I don't want to go in the dumpster!
NETCRAFT: Oh, don't be such a baby. It's just like being on Hibernate!
GEEK: I can't take him like that.
*BSD: I feel useful! I feel useful!
NETCRAFT: Oh, do us a favor... c'mon.
GEEK: I can't.
NETCRAFT: Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes? He won't be long. Less market-share than Punch-cards and Paper-tape.
GEEK: Naaah, I really got to go on to IBM's -- they've lost OS/2 this week.
NETCRAFT: Well, when is your next round, then?
GEEK: Oh, I won't be back around here till next Thursday.
*BSD: I think I'll go do a compile, now!
NETCRAFT: You're not fooling anyone y'know. Look, mate, isn't there something you can do here?
*BSD: I feel useful... I feel useful. I'm just gonna do a little compile!
[bzzzzzzzzzzzzttttttt]
NETCRAFT: Ah, thanks very much.
GEEK: Not at all. See you on Thursday.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again...

[RichardX]

Slashdot. News for nerds, stuff that matters, failed car analogies.