Slashdot Mirror


Got Spyware? Throw out the Computer!

geeber writes "The New York Times (reg. required) has an article about a new response to spyware - throw out the computer and buy a new one. The notion is new computers can be had for $400 so it's a cost effective and 'rational response.'" From the article: "While no figures are available on the ranks of those jettisoning their PC's, the scourge of unwanted software is widely felt. This month the Pew group published a study in which 43 percent of the 2,001 adult Internet users polled said they had been confronted with spyware or adware, collectively known as malware. Forty-eight percent said they had stopped visiting Web sites that might deposit unwanted programs on their PC's. Moreover, 68 percent said they had had computer trouble in the last year consistent with the problems caused by spyware or adware, though 60 percent of those were unsure of the problems' origins. Twenty percent of those who tried to fix the problem said it had not been solved; among those who spent money seeking a remedy, the average outlay was $129."

33 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Bit of a waste, surely? by RichardX · · Score: 4, Informative

    Surely you could at least just reformat the harddrive?
    Throwing out the whole PC seems a bit excessive..

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Bit of a waste, surely? by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no, I'm okay with this.

      Just as long as they give me their "old" computer.

      :)

    2. Re:Bit of a waste, surely? by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, put yourself in Joe Blow's shoes.

      You put in the "Windows XP Home Edition with Service Pack 2" CD from your Dell, reboot, and it shows this weird blue screen that takes forever. It then comes up with some weird confusing stuff. If you get past that, then there's even more confusing stuff - stuff about NTFS, FAT, and partitions.

      Get that somewhat right, and it finally gets easy.

      Look at the easier Linux distros - put the CD in, boot, and it goes into a graphical setup that you can pretty much click Next on. Linux has surpassed Windows in ease of installation...

    3. Re:Bit of a waste, surely? by Khuffie · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've always heard people utter this bullshit, but I've never seen it experienced. I've never had a problem installing XP and having it do its update thing and being infected in between.

    4. Re:Bit of a waste, surely? by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most people can't do that on their own. I do this for my longtime customers as a service, and it usually costs about $125.00-$150.00 to rent me out for an afternoon and get a full reformat. Some local screwdriver shops do this for about $50.00, but you have to leave your PC with them, you're solely responsible for backing up what you want to keep, and most of your applications will be missing when you get it back.

      However, I think that this article is indicative of an awful amount of waste that goes on in this country. Computers are some of the most environmentally harmful products to produce and/or dispose of, and here we've got someone advocating throwing a computer away and buying a new one just because they don't like what's loaded into it? It's not just our corporations that think with their wallets and damn the whole world, there are plenty of consumers who think that way too!

      Jasin Natael
      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    5. Re:Bit of a waste, surely? by cashman73 · · Score: 3, Funny

      All your computer are belong to us. Somebody set us up the virus.

  2. Stupid recommendation by jleq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah... then your $400 new computer is going to get infected, are you going to throw it out and buy yet another? Average Joes don't want to run Linux, because their programs won't run on it (if they even know about Linux in the first place, chances are, they don't). Mac Minis don't count, because they're over $400. Hence, whoever wrote TFA could use an extra helping of logic.

    1. Re:Stupid recommendation by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah... then your $400 new computer is going to get infected, are you going to throw it out and buy yet another?

      It does get your 20 minutes per PC though.

      My suggestion is: buy 24 $400 computers and switch every 20 minutes. That way, you can get a solid 8 hour day of work. When you're done, return them to the place you got them from and ask replacements, so you're good to go for another day :-)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  3. I knew it by VikingDBA · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew the hardware companies were installing windows for a reason, repeat sales.

  4. And remember... by pwnage · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...that once you throw out that old PC, remember to replace it with a Macintosh. Problem solved.

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
  5. Bill says "thanks" by mistersooreams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, when you throw out the PC, you then have to purchase a new copy of the operating system. In 99% of cases this is Windows. So you reduce the incentive for Microsoft to fix the spyware problem; in fact, you reward them for not fixing it! Quite brilliant! In fairness to Microsoft, Windows now does have a pretty good resistance to spyware, IF you run as user. The problem is that most people don't know what this means, how to do it, or anything of the sort. Education is the only solution. Note that I declined to make a "??? PROFIT!" joke in this post.

    1. Re:Bill says "thanks" by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fairness to Microsoft, Windows now does have a pretty good resistance to spyware, IF you run as user. The problem is that most people don't know what this means, how to do it, or anything of the sort.

      Those that know, don't need to, and those that do, shouldn't even if they wanted to. I run as admin all the time, because it is simply much much easier. Running as a normal user is annoying at best due to all the stupid Windows software. A typical example (Win2k):

      User:
      1. Log out, log in as admin
      2. Install as admin
      3. Log back in as user
      4. ???
      5. Manually create shortcuts, menu folders, menu items, quicklaunch item and such for user.

      Admin:
      1. Install as admin

      It's amazing how many programs that still haven't clued in that installing account is not always identical to user account. That is not counting every other stupid problem, like some programs requiring admin rights to run or other stupidity.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Bill says "thanks" by Eric604 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of time you can shift-click and select run-as on the installer. (also on 'windows update' and 'computer management'). If you need to do more complicated stuff you're ofcourse not a 'normal user' and should run as admin like you do.

    3. Re:Bill says "thanks" by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's amazing how many programs that still haven't clued in that installing account is not always identical to user account.

      Word of cheer(!) to the would-be switchers: Macs have this problem too.
      The installer of MacOS is assumed to be admin, the first acct created. For a single user machine the question is, should Joe-six-pack then make himself a non-admin acct. for everyday use, does he know how, and could he be bothered?

      Mac application installers can be just as stupid as Windows. Apple have provided an installer application, which with admin password will install all parts of an app. with proper permissions in all the necessary parts of the filesystem, without needing to log out and back. Maybe one third of apps use this. About a third are "drag'n drop", so they will probably be executable by other users, but are owned by with permissions of the current user. The remainder are a ragtag bunch of leftovers from Classic MacOS with all sorts of perverse behaviour.

      I have just been thru an exercise of installing copy protected software with machine hardware dependent keys, requiring admin authority, which must then be transmuted to a generic non-admin acct in a student lab. Several times I wondered if Windows would make my task any easier. We're looking more closely at open source now with OS-X, but worried to find a lot of so-called open source apps in the multi-media field are being developed to run primarily on Windows OS.

  6. Perfect by platypus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lazy/stupid people driving the IT economy ...

  7. Sssshhhh! by jdavidb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't tell anybody! I'm counting on this new idea to cause a glut in the market of used PC's. I can pick them up real cheap for extra Linux boxen.

  8. Throw out $400 PC vs Keep $500 MacMini by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So, you can throw out a crappy PC and buy a new one for $400 every year, OR you can buy a MacMini for $500, and use it for at least three years.

    And frankly, if you're spending $400 on a PC, the GPU is not going to be able to run many cutting-edge games anyway. So it's hard to see what a MacMini couldn't do for the average home user that a $400 POS Wintel box could...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  9. Of those that "didn't fix it" by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...how many continued their stupid practices, so they were instantly reinfected? I've seen people reinstall the exact same crapware after a clean-up, because that was stuff they "wanted". With that kind of model, your new machine will be infected instantly.

    Besides, hardware is only a tiny fraction of it. Transferring all data, installing all programs and configuring everything to the way you are used to, that is what takes time. Even with a pre-installed Windows, people want all their various gadgets (one driver CD each, which they can't find), e-mail, bookmarks etc.

    The only upside of that is that your old computer can serve as your back-up until you transfer it to the new one. Helluva expensive way to buy back-up on, though.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  10. WTF by hector_uk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    throw out the pc and buy a mac maybe but throw out the pc and buy annother cheap POS pc thats just stupidity. if you go out and buy a car and acid rain eats all the paint off and your car falls apart do you go and buy the exact same one? hell no you go buy an acid rain proof car.

  11. Works for me... by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't throw them out. Donate them to any of the number of PC refurbishment and training charities that you'll find. They can always use good gear.

  12. Re:What does that make the Windows TCO? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Average lifespan of a windows computer - 4 minutes
    Average lifespan of a BSD computer 10 years.


    So the choice is between a computer that turns into a zombie in 4 minutes, or a one that keeps on dying for 10 years is it? :-)

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  13. The best solution is to... by canuck57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...has an article about a new response to spyware - throw out the computer and buy a new one.

    The best solution I have ever seen is a tech walks into your office with a CD, Ctrl-Alt-Delete - boot to CD-ROM, enters your user ID and walks away saying keep the CD for next time you infect your machine. It boots from the CD re-installing the entire system.

    Users hate it as they store stuff on the local drive but soon learn corporate no-tolerance policy for keeping critical data on the local drive and loading unapproved often unlicensed software. The raw fact still remains, 90% of the corporate spyware issues can be tracked back to the users (mis)behavior.

    Tossing out the computer prematurely has several disadvantages, the logistics of disposal, acquisition and software licensing. It is unlikely replacing the system with the same Windows operating system is going to change much. Mind you if the replacement was a locked down system where the user could not load software.... That would have some obvious benefits.

  14. My mom did this! by jafac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, when her winxp computer got sogged up with spyware, after weeks of attempts to clean it up, she got rid of it and bought another computer;

    A Mac.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  15. This is great! by fsck! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This means more people buying Mac Minis, and more free year-old computers for the Linux community to develop, test, and play on. Bring on the competition for the two best alternatives to Microsoft's hegemony.

  16. Re:Reformat? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Built a new windows box for my mom a couple weeks back (no linux griping, she needs applications that run under windows), and after everything was fully set-up and configured, I used a popular disk imaging program to create my own "emergency restore partition" on the drive.

    So if it really tanks after a year or two, it's just a matter of rebooting and pressing a few keys before windows begins to load in order to completely recover the system. Of course if the HD crashes, we're back to square-one, but otherwise I figure it was a smart move...

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  17. Deck Bill Gates while you're at it. by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd deck a punk for it.

    The script kiddies and the crooks who build zombie networks are morally equivalent to arsonists.

    Microsoft is morally equivalent to a contractor who insists on building houses out of balsa wood and flash paper, while telling the lie that the next one won't be flammable at all.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  18. The Argument is Sterile by nukenerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People buy new PCs not necessarily because they have spyware or spam bots - many would not realise it. They just find their PC is slow so they think they need a new, faster one.

    Even if they knew they had spyware, they would not have a clue how to remove it anyway. They might "rationalise" a new PC with arguments about the cost of their time, but that is just a comfort factor thrown in. Maybe they fancied a new PC and this is an excuse to the wife.

    I once worked in a research lab. One day someone building electronics dropped a resistor on the floor. Four of us, professional engineers, then spent the next hour debating whether or not it was cost effective for one of us to spend 5 seconds picking it up. I argued that it would take just almost as long to reach for a new one from the rack. I don't remember if it was picked up in the end.

    Such debates are sterile - in the end you argue yourself into never doing anything.

  19. Dear dumb**** by browncs · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) Go to the HP site and download the freakin drivers.

    2) Go to Fry's or online and buy a freakin NAT router/firewall for like $20. This will block the worms until you can get the updates installed.

  20. Re:What does that make the Windows TCO? by PakProtector · · Score: 5, Funny

    GEEK: Bring out your obsolete boxen!
    Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
    [clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
    [clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
    [clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!
    [clang] Bring out your obsolete boxen over here!

    NETCRAFT: Ah! Good, Good! Here's one for you -- and here's your one gig of porn.
    *BSD: I'm not obsolete!
    GEEK: What?
    NETCRAFT: 'S Nothing -- here's your one gig of porn now.
    *BSD: I'm not obsolete, I'm not!
    GEEK: Oy, what's this here? He says he's not obsolete!
    NETCRAFT: Oh, Yes, Yes, he is.
    *BSD: I'm not!
    GEEK: He isn't obsolete.
    NETCRAFT: Yes, Well, he will be soon, you see. He's dying.
    *BSD: No I'm not! I'm gaining market share!
    NETCRAFT: Oh no, you're not -- you'll be stone dead and useless in a moment.
    GEEK: Oh, I can't take him like that -- it's against regulations y'know.
    *BSD: I don't want to go in the dumpster! I don't want to go in the dumpster!
    NETCRAFT: Oh, don't be such a baby. It's just like being on Hibernate!
    GEEK: I can't take him like that.
    *BSD: I feel useful! I feel useful!
    NETCRAFT: Oh, do us a favor... c'mon.
    GEEK: I can't.
    NETCRAFT: Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes? He won't be long. Less market-share than Punch-cards and Paper-tape.
    GEEK: Naaah, I really got to go on to IBM's -- they've lost OS/2 this week.
    NETCRAFT: Well, when is your next round, then?
    GEEK: Oh, I won't be back around here till next Thursday.
    *BSD: I think I'll go do a compile, now!
    NETCRAFT: You're not fooling anyone y'know. Look, mate, isn't there something you can do here?
    *BSD: I feel useful... I feel useful. I'm just gonna do a little compile!
    [bzzzzzzzzzzzzttttttt]
    NETCRAFT: Ah, thanks very much.
    GEEK: Not at all. See you on Thursday.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  21. This can get nasty... by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    throw out the computer and buy a new one.

    A Dutch public prosecutor did exactly this. He bought a new computer after his old one got infested with malware and viruses. He put the old one out on the street as garbage.

    That got very nasty. Ultimately it cost him his job, because confidential correspondence was leaked when someone picked it up and examined the disk.

    In the end he was lucky not to be prosecuted himself, for having child pornography on the system. However, that set some nice precedence: apparently it is no problem to have something on your system when it has gotten there "unintentionally".

  22. I've said it before, and I'll say it again... by RichardX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot. News for nerds, stuff that matters, failed car analogies.

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  23. Re:Built in by deaddrunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A better solution would be a web browser that didn't allow malicious websites to silently download this crap, but that's just me.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  24. Someone forget the environment? by tfcdesign · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only do new computers strain the environment, but old computers need to be disposed of. It costs a great deal more than $400 to make a new computer, make the old computer, and dispose of the old computer.

    But what to you expect from the NY Times? Shortsighted and made up is their motto.