Slashdot Mirror


Rise of the Professional Blogger

Victor Cheng writes "Robert Scoble today points to a blogger who is claiming he earns between $10,000 and $20,000 per month via Google Adsense." From the article: "The cheque was the biggest cheque I've ever held onto (well the biggest I've held onto that has my name on it). The amazing thing is that in the month of May I earned more than I earned in a whole year in 2003 from a 'real job' (of course at the time I was only working a 3 day week while I studied part time) and well over half as much as I earned from Adsense in the whole of 2004."

46 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. And now he gets even more money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You just had to link to him on Slashdot, didn't you. Come on, he's making enough already ;)

    1. Re:And now he gets even more money... by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought you only make money from AdSense when someone clicks on an actual ad?

    2. Re:And now he gets even more money... by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Money, money, money...

      What in the world ever happened to building a web site to help people, to spread information, and to build a "community." Even more so, when did money become the primary goal of a web structure?

      For example, slashdot was built for fun and information spread first. Only after it became successful did it start making lots of money. Now people do just the opposite... they design the web site for money first and if the site turns out to be useful, then it's an accident.

      In college, I designed the Moan and Groan Page (now very dead) where people could bitch about their hardware. It was the hardware/software explosion time and all the major players were pushing a ton of junk into the marketplace. People could search my site before they purchased anything. I got threatened my tons of companies... and lawyers who used the site came to my defense. The hosting was donated, etc. Then I started my real life (job, family) and had to leave it all behind.

      Once I established all of that, I returned to the web to start another project. What a difference those few years made. I wanted to start a similar site helping people with computer problems and tech-recipes.com was born. No thrills, no fluff, no pop-ups... just helpful computer hints. We make enough money from google to pay our server costs... nothing more.

      Despite the fact that we just provide raw information, we have never developed a huge community around us. Sure we receive a ton of hits from the search engines, but I miss that feeling of having tons of users helping and supporting each other.

      Now I have to worry about everybody stealing my information and slapping their ads all over it...

      What a difference a few years make...

      AC

    3. Re:And now he gets even more money... by matt21811 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a large number of SEO webspammers out there churning out often useless cookie cutter sites designed mostly to get good positions in Search engines. I'm an editor of DMOZ.org and find it frustrating that 2 out of 3 sites submitted have been created for no other reason than to make money.

      Part of the blame lies with our beloved Google. They are actually funding a problem that they used to fight. It would be nice to see them put some effort into the problem instead of just cashing in like the do.

      Adsense isnt all evil. It does allow many people to fund their often beloved web sites. It can be a great way to encourage people to make public their skills and knowledge in their special interests. It is fueling the best aspects of the web, that being the amazing diversity and depth of knowledge in any area you care to name.

      It's such a good thing I even made a web site telling people how to do it right.

    4. Re:And now he gets even more money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was until now. If we all add this to userContent.css he can go back to his previous job:

      iframe[src*="googlesyndication.com"] { display: none !important; }

      If you don't want to see similar stuff on Slashdot, just do enter this:

      iframe[src*="googlesyndication.com"], iframe[src*="industrybrains.com"] { display: none !important; }

      I think this explains why I post this as AC. Further reading: Blocking Advertisement.

    5. Re:And now he gets even more money... by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay, I have to answer- with a shameless plug and a short story.

      I run a site called InsideWoodland.com (in my sig). So far I've written about 70 stories. Each one takes me about 8 hours to do- with photos, interview, etc. This is a major chunk of my free time.

      This is my main 'hobby', I spend a lot of time working on it, and a lot of time talking about it. Everyone I talk to wants to know why I am doing it, and most importantly, 'how much money do you make.' I haven't made a single dime. Monetary rewards were never my focus. (Although I do have an area where people can advertise, but nobody has done it yet, and I don't really push it.)

      My real reward is just the knowledge that people really do read my stories, and look at my pictures. AND, I get to make other people 'famous' along the way.

      The only people who have really understood this yet, were the gang-banger types that I met at low-rider car show while doing a story.

      While a guy is telling me that he has devoted the last 4 years of his life, and $50,000 into his car- he has no problem understanding that I am doing something just because I enjoy it. But sadly, most 'normal' people just think I am a nut for not trying to make money.

      I have looked into Adsense, but my traffic is to small since the website is tightly targeted (people in my small town). And, I don't like the way the ads look.

      My only real goal is to somehow make a little bit of money to pay for my hosting fees. And if I paid for my current hosting fees, the first thing I would do is upgrade my hosting plan, to make the site perform better- even if it did end up costing me more money.

      So yes, there are people out there who set up websites just for fun, and not for the money. So if this is a good thing, why do so many people tell me I am stupid for doing it?

      --
      No reason to lie.
    6. Re:And now he gets even more money... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What in the world ever happened to building a web site to help people, to spread information, and to build a "community." Even more so, when did money become the primary goal of a web structure?

      Who says they're building it just for money? Money does a lot of things. For one it pays for your webspace, domain name, and all that crap. Secondly, it pays your costs of living, so you don't have to get a second job, so you can focus on your website fully. Surely the quality's going to be higher when you're spending all your effort on it. Or would you rather website makers put 90% of their effort in their mindless day job?

      You're just making enough money to cover your costs. Now imaging you made so much money off it you were making ten times more than you were in your old job, meaning you could quit. Surely you wouldn't turn that down, or is your post thinly-veiled bitterness that someone else's site is more success?

    7. Re:And now he gets even more money... by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So yes, there are people out there who set up websites just for fun, and not for the money. So if this is a good thing, why do so many people tell me I am stupid for doing it?

      No mystery there. Lots of people believe that you should only do things that are profitable, and by "profitable" they mean you get money. They don't understand that there are other kinds of profit.

      Much of this can be understood as the "economic" model of human behavior. Some years ago, my wife was working toward a degree in economics, and she liked to describe a discussion topic that kept popping up at school: One way that scientific theories are tested is by using them to make predictions, and see which predictions come true. Most economic models aren't very good at prediction. Some are a bit better, and those are the ones that include things like fame and power as motivating forces. These don't translate easily to/from money, but they can be independently measured, so they can be used in models. Such theories aren't politically acceptable, however, because they're considered "Marxist".

      Myself, I like another illustration: If you consider it stupid to do things for fun and not for money, you would never have children. If humans actually worked that way, our species would be extinct within a century. This hasn't happened. So at least a significant minority of us must not have money as our only motivation. In fact, if you look at the costs of raising children, you have to conclude that some humans are stongly motivated to do some things that are financially really stupid. Most economists would call such people irrational. But without them, we would be extinct.

      Maybe you're one of these people.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    8. Re:And now he gets even more money... by onepoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You enjoy what you are doing, Never let anyone tell you different. I have a small site that I have updated daily since 2000, it does not generate alot of traffic but it helps my in my hobby. Also it's nice to recieve a thank you letter from people ( that's the best reward from my point of view ). so keep up the great work.

      Onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    9. Re:And now he gets even more money... by djChinito · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is that his original intent? I don't think anyone ever goes into blogging or site building ( outside of porn, maybe ) to make buckets and buckets of cash. It's just a consequence of a succesful site. I am building a site ( not a blog - since the format doesn't work well with the content ) to help men figure out the basics of a wardrobe and organize their closets. ( Plug - http://www.swaggerinc.com ). I find that having Amazon links and Google ads help subsidize the hosting fees. Your main purpose can be to help, but it doesn't mean that getting money for it is wrong...

    10. Re:And now he gets even more money... by ThePromenader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, I am completely in the same boat as you.

      I started a site to share (and as an excuse to continue my interest in) my love for the city where I live - every two weeks I would add a new section with a map itenerary covering a new section, some new photos and a bit of text describing the history of the land covered. It began simple but became much more... shall we say important.

      Some told me that I should have people pay for all the info I give out for free, but I don't think the web is ready for that yet (most prefer some for free over something more complete but pay-access - and as far as I'm concerned people are still wary of paying for anything through the web), so I chose instead to make a place for ads and have visits "make my site worth its while" in that indirect way.

      Not only am I told that I am stupid for doing this, but that I am naive. True that, open since a month and a half already, but not yet generating a lot of traffic, I am already finding bits and pieces of my info elsewhere on the web on sites that appear higher up in the SERP's than mine, sites that also sport google ads, and sites that probably also generate much more "click-through" cash than mine.

      By being honest, how are we to compete?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  2. *Cough*RolandPiquepaille*Cough* by Atario · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Nuff said.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:*Cough*RolandPiquepaille*Cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We all know some kind of deal was made behind the scenes.

      Some of us (I, for example) wouldn't mind it so much if Taco came out and said that the stories are sponsored (not by the subjects of the stories, mind you, just by the blogger). Of course, if that happened, others would infer via slippery slope that more links would be thus sponsored; they would probably get pissed and stop reading Slashdot.

      So instead, management acts as though nothing's going on, and we all grumble some, but largely nothing happens. Besides, we have bigger fish to fry (the usual suspects).

  3. The best part... by locokamil · · Score: 3, Funny

    is that his blog doesn't even render properly in my browser (Firefox, Unbuntu). Step right this way, ladies and gentlemen. Spew out your opinion and throw internet standards to the wind... it's all okay because you've got a big AdSense cheque coming your way.

  4. Not a smart thing to talk about... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google's terms of service explicitly forbit Adsense members from revealing details about how much they make.

    Adsense is great, and those figures are probably accurate. But if Google finds out this person broke the TOS, they might just take those payments away.

    1. Re:Not a smart thing to talk about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not anymore. Information about earning totals has been ok for some months now. Adsense publishers still can't reveal clickthrough rates and per-click earnings.

    2. Re:Not a smart thing to talk about... by paul.dunne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not so, at least not quite. It is now allowed to reveal gross income, which is all this chap has done. It is still against the TOS to go into detail, though.

    3. Re:Not a smart thing to talk about... by camcorder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not even to government?

  5. This is really sad... by rel4x · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I read this, and I swear, I half expected 'ol Roland to have submitted it...

    --

    Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
  6. Now I'm curious by AntiGenX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since this has been posted to /., is everyone looking at his blogs clicking on a adword? If so his check next month might be even larger. Perhaps that would constitute another definition of the /. effect.

  7. On logging webs. by hyperm0g · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly what on earth is with this 'blogging' craze? I refuse to even acknowledge 'blog' as a legitimate term. Web log perhaps, and I'm barely into my twenties! These web loggers seem to think they have stumbled onto some hertoforth undiscovered treasure -- compensated authorship! Wow, it turns out that a very small percentage of 'bloggers' have the writing ability to generate income doing said activity. Color me serpryzed. Oooh. I just invented a word. Serpryzed. I'm going to go append this to my meta-blog about blogging with a headline stolen from an obscure band from my assumed hometown.

    1. Re:On logging webs. by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Honestly what on earth is with this 'blogging' craze? I refuse to even acknowledge 'blog' as a legitimate term.

      I agree. What is the difference between a blog and a service like livejournal? Places where people write down their thoughts.

      I don't waste time on blogs. I have never found anything that interesting to read in them. Most are ramblings by people. It is too much work going through them until a good one is found. Then, with my luck, that person shuts it down and moves on. One of my favroites was fancyrobot, he sold his website to some chick and the quality of the writing has gone way down. Funny thing is I found his "blog" not because I was searching for blogs, but because I was searching for information on the cast of French In Action, what happened to them all. The blond in that show had the best titties of any woman I have ever seen, they would poke right through her puffy sweater. There was one scene, where they wanted to teach how to say "sorry" and they had robert spill some water on the blonds dress. The water must have been very, very cold, because I have never seen two nipples stick out that quickly in my life. And I wondered if the creater of the series is still alive, what he is doing, along with the younger sister and robert, the american.

      The ones that post about news, I'd rather watch the big 3 network news programs. I can't believe some guy in his basement will get better insight into what's happening in the world than ABC, NBC, or CBS news. I like solid news, not spinning. Plus, who has the better contacts in government?? Could a blog have gotten deepthroat, or some high ranking FBI official to spill the beans. Reporters are prepared to go to jail to protect thier sources, they have great legal teams. What protection does the blogger offer?

      The other reason I dislike blogs is because they are pointless. The person might write about food and recipies today, and about his walk in the park tomorrow. There is no real subject. I guess some could say it is like fiction, the linear life of a person, but most people don't live lives worth writing about. Well, there is one, Richard Marcinko. If someone lives a life like him, by all means, write it down and put it on the web. ;)

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:On logging webs. by FoXDie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is all a product of our collective Attention Whorishness. We all want people to pay attention to us, we want to look cool. People make blogs because they think people care, and that they will read their totally creative and interesting life stories.

      The kind of self-indulgent bullshit, pathetic emo ramblings, and general hollow angst that was usually safely confined within Diaries and Journals are now being broadcast to everyone with Webernet access.

      But that's not even the worst part. Here's an excerpt from someone's Xanga blog that I happen to know: "He said please let me give you a ride home with tears pouring from his eyes and I said no no no and ran the other way crying as I am still right now just remembering what happened. So I started to walk away looking back every once in a while hoping, praying he would come driving back to me. Picking me up saying that my world will be a little easier. And he never came and never came and never came. Which made me cry even harder."
      She just exposed the long-kept secret that women are manipulative drama queens... on the blog that her boyfriend reads... that his friends read... and that his parents read!

      If someone would like to help form some kind of terrorist organization (more COBRA less Al Queda) to rid the world of Blogs, and hell Reality TV while we're at it, please contact me.

    3. Re:On logging webs. by myster0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think "blogging" is the web version of rap. The basics of rap are that anyone can do it, you just take a riff and start rapping over it. And it was cheap. There was a time that rappers wanted to bring a message to the world (Grandmaster Flash, Public Enemy ...). But these days it's mostly just "I'm a pimp and I'm dangerous. I've got a big dick and I fuck around, YO bitch". That is to say : this is the only kind I here on the radio these days.

      I see a lot of similarities with blogging. Taking a sample (link to some story), and throw in some bullshit (most blogs don't really have a message).

      That said, I do read some blogs sometimes. But those that I read try to be funny, silly, entertaining.

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    4. Re:On logging webs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As someone who has been employed by one of the major news organizations you mentioned as a news writer, I disagree that "they" have any better insight than you or I or some blogger. The majors have an AP wire and subscriptions to the NY Times and the Wash Post.

      Then they rewrite it.

      Nothing, nothing is reported on a radio or TV network that is not a rewrite of a wire service or newspaper story. The sole exception might be a fire or hurricane where a network affiliate has sent a camera crew. But as far as news about politics or Washington or any other topic of substance, a good blogger may have just as much insight as the networks, and possibly more, since he or she does not have to worry about getting fired (or, more realistically, placed on next year's layoff list). On the other hand, anybody can start a blog, and it is harder to find a blog featuring a talented blogger than it is to find news by flipping between channels 2, 4, or 7.

  8. $10,000 - 20,000? by j_philipp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm missing the part in his blog post where he speaks about earning $10,000 - $20,000. He only talks about a big paycheck. Only in the comments is this figure mentioned. So I wonder where exactly the figure's coming from...

    1. Re:$10,000 - 20,000? by Spezzer · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. Self fullfiling prophesy? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A blog about how bloggers can get rich, gets him get rich from blogging.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Re:Advertisements by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    they read blogs, they click on ads. they probably buy herbal v1agra and L@@K at RARE! ebay auctions too.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  11. Did google ruin the internet? by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems to me, there are more websites now with the intention of making money than with the intention of fostering a community.

    The strategy has changed. 10 years ago, if someone wanted to talk about tv shows, they might have started a website called TvTome, and let members contribute, and it was a real community. You would not believe how many knowlegable star trek fans are out there, same goes for quantum leap. These people wrote some great insightful episode summaries, which had great attention to the shows history, philosophical meanings, and excitement. While I did not see them all, I bet there was a nice battlestar gallactica section. Those posts are gone.

    Then someone got the idea to start advertising, and nothing has been the same since.

    Now websites have a plan, get members to contribute for free, and take those contributations and make money. Isn't that crooked? There is no "thanks", no respect.

    In the case of TvTome, cnet came and purchased them for a cool $5 million dollars. The owner of TvTome did not care about his community anymore, he wanted the money. And all the posts, everything the community contributed was lost. How many people want to put the effort into rebuilding what they already made?

    I'll give another example. AVS forums is a place where people talk high end projectors and plasma televisions and the such. The owner sells projectors, and made a new rule, only MSRP prices can be quoted. Yet, if it was not for the 100 or so very insightful members who offer great advice, his forum would be nothing, meaningless. People go to his forum because there is a smart community there that is willing to offer good advice. Meanwhile, the owner capitalizes off this and makes a profit. Seems to me, the people who should be making a profit are the ones giving their free advice and building the community.

    And then there is one DVD website where the admins went bezerk. They lost their minds. They started banning people left and right, people whos posts are still there and posts that are valuable. Why were these people banned? Your guess is as good as mine, I think one admin said he banned a guy because he had a link to amazon, and did not use the forums link to amazon which generates some money for the forum.

    I love the idea of a community, where people exchange their knowledge and friendship. I hate the idea of 1 person owning these communities and getting rich off the free work and contributations of the members.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Did google ruin the internet? by DoktorTomoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The world is neither black or white, and the sades of grey it is painted with are mostly the lighter ones.

      Of course there are sites that only exist for a quick buck. There also are a lot of valuable "communities" (albeit it has come to my attention that communities tend to make a lot less ad-related income than websites with litte or no user-interaction).

      However, running a popular web project is not for free - there are hosting costs, and there may be a point when you need technical assistance from a professional (geeks as we are, we know how much we are billing). And after all the work the site maintainer has put into a successful site, I really think it is legitimate if he wants to get something back.

      I am running a fairly popular german-language download site. Adsense does pay for the bills of hosting and for my work. It even allows me my rather costly taste for good coffee. I am not feeling like a criminal - after all, I've had and have most of the work with this project.

    2. Re:Did google ruin the internet? by Eminence · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, money is evil, it destroys communities and pretty much everything.

      But seriously, you exaggerate. Only few would make any money from their blogging or sites yet many sites appear. For most of the bloggers I know putting an ad link is something extra, something that you do just for the heck of it. You can easily tell those who blog for money (or try to) from those who blog to express themselves - the former usually don't have anything to say. And if someone has something to say that is so interesting to people that he is able to get real readership and thus ad revenue then what's wrong with that?

      Same goes for forums etc. - no one forces you to post on a form whose policies you don't accept. And if there is no forum/community that would suit you start one with the policies exactly the way you want them to be.

    3. Re:Did google ruin the internet? by Just+Another+Poster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Seems to me, the people who should be making a profit are the ones giving their free advice and building the community.

      But the owner is the one who expended resources to set the site up in the first place. Without him, there would be no free advice or community.

  12. Re:But WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He does what always pays best in a new market: He shows a way to make money.

    The spammers who make the most are those who sell spamming tools. The people who earned the most with the web in its early days were the ones who built the tools to make websites. The bloggers who make the most are those who blog about making money. The podcasters who will make the most will be the ones who tell others how to make money podcasting.

    He's a pro-blogger blogging about making money with blogging. He's right on the money and tells you to do something else, because if you started to blog about problogging, you would start to cut in on his action.

  13. Live and learn ... by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We had the opposite experience with Adsense. We set up a site (j-london.com) with an agreement that we'd develop the back end (discussion, place for people to put adverts, etc.) in return for taking revenue from Adsense adverts on the site.

    Well, I think we earned about $600 last year from that one :-(

    It's not helped by the abysmal state of the dollar-pound, nor by the fact that Google pays with dollar checks and the bank takes a huge cut along the way.

    Adsense gives us hardly any guidance as to what fees we get. It seems like Google takes a large cut. We're looking at replacing it with a commission junction advert slot.

    Rich.

  14. Re:The REAL tragady of P2P by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Funny

    ahahahahaha! what do you call slashdotting? urinating?

  15. Numbers Game by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait a second... his site gets a piddling 3000 page views a day (/. gave it that many in the last hour, in the middle of the night!), and he claims to be making big bucks?

    WTF?

    Technorati has 16 links in the last three days (many of them this current story), which is nice, but not exactly Boingboing, is it? Alexa has it at a nice, but not spectacular, rank of 32,764 (compare to TalkingPointsMemo's rank of 19,893 or Juan Cole's 19,776), and it barely shows up on Daypop. I don't see where the money comes from with those types of numbers.

    1. Re:Numbers Game by Greg_D · · Score: 2, Funny

      He claims to have 20 blogs, and some generate more traffic than others. Of course, when Google decides to no longer advertise on blogs, he can apply for a nagging housewife position somewhere, since he seems to be successful at giving his opinion when nobody's ever asked him for it.

    2. Re:Numbers Game by hankwang · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wait a second... his site gets a piddling 3000 page views a day ... WTF?

      Read. He says that he has around twenty blogger web sites; he just doesn't tell which one is generating most of the revenue. For example his digital camera site has 20k views per day.

      Apart from that, Adsense revenue depends a lot on the type of advertisements. Advertisers only pay $0.05 for clicks on ads for small niche products with little competition. It can be over $10 for a single click on high-competition, high-profit products. See all the bogus web sites that are stuffed with "information" about debt consolidation, loans, online poker, etc.

    3. Re:Numbers Game by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Something tells me this guy is making this all up.

      Now why would a guy running a blog named "Professional blogger - Helping bloggers earn money" possibly want to exaggerate the amount of money he makes off his blogging?

  16. Sickening. by BubTheZombie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's things like this that prove that humanity as we know it is getting increasingly asinine. (As if that weren't already fucking apparent.) Blogging is the most redundant form of emo droning on the net.

    --
    Meh.
  17. He already blogged about being slashdotted by Thomas+DM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He already posted a new blog regarding this Slashdot in which he clarifies some issues, misunderstandings and other things.

    http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/17/prob logger-slashdotted/

  18. Has anyone here ever clicked an adsense ad? by Sark666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have never, and learned to mentally block out ads years ago before adsense existed probably like many of you here. Now, you might say that average joe six pack hasn't learnt this skill yet and might click through, but who is average joe six pack these days.

    For example, I have quite a few friends who never used a computer in their lives until the late 90's. I'd see them confused by webpage layouts, clicking ok and cancel on boxes which obviously are ads, but they'd see it as a functional part of the page. In not too short a time, they were surfing 'like pros' in that they'd never click any ads and I could tell they had just learned to mentally ignore them. Now these guys are still highly ignorant on computers in general (in dealing with software/hardware issues, spyware, adware etc). I've helped them with that with ff, and all the other tools etc. But with browsing with ads they just picked that up on their own. I didn't have to teach them how to filter out ads. It seems pretty much anyone, computer literate or not, will soon enough learn to filter ads all on their own.

    So who's joe sixpack these days? Our moms and dads? If so, I wonder as this generation gets older and the previous generation passes on, and an even more tech savvy generation comes online, how will any of these ad models sustain themselves.

  19. Podcasting is the Next Big Thing! by bubbaD · · Score: 2, Insightful
    like the...boom of the .COM days every idiot is going to go quit their job and try to become a pro-blogger.

    Thanks to the dot-com days these people don't have day jobs anymore. Really these scams have great appeal to the unemployed, who have extra time, are desperate, and feel like they have less to lose. And although its easy to make fun of "the losers," they're not paying income taxes or into social security, so we're all losing out.
  20. Yes, and I've bought from the advertiser by blorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...when I was searching for a product, and the ad was relevant and useful to me, and offered a good deal on the product. Why not?

    AdWords can even be _more_ relevant than the main search results if you are in a small European country; the main search results can tend to be from USA sellers that won't sell to you anyway, while the AdWords are targetted, from local sellers who will...

  21. Re:And now he gets even more money...HONEST Money by Iggert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All I see is a bunch of wannabe critics who obviously ooze with jealousy because they've never been able to achieve this level of success outside of their mere rantings they contribute to the comments section of Slashdot. Of course some of those who are posting such harsh criticisms are probably guilty of nothing but ignorance because they have yet to figure out how to do what many are doing... Personally, I believe the opportunities that come along with ads on blogs and websites are a win-win situation. Advertisers like them, Publishers like them and Uncle Sam likes them - why shouldn't you? And even if you don't, no one is forcing you to click. Sheesh! Besides WHAT are ya'all complaining about? At least the folks making money from blogging or a variety of other internet based avenues are helping support the millions of people on welfare regardless of what part of the world they are in. Helps keep YOUR taxes lower, don'cha think? Got things to say? Get a Blog! Perhaps people will like you well enough to click on you too! Iggy

    --
    Because we can all be an Iggert sometimes!