Slashdot Mirror


Women Control the DVR

JeiFuRi writes "While men normally hog the remote, a new study commissioned by Lifetime suggests that women are more likely to be in charge of their DVRs . Results from a survey of 1000 married woman say that 48 percent made the decision to purchase a DVR on their own and 55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband. Three-quarters of the women surveyed said that the reason they fell in love with DVR is that they are extremely intuitive and much easier than a VCR." The study also found some interesting things about DVR users' ad-watching habits.

61 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Really... by xerxesVII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And a study commissioned by ESPN found that men control the dvr.

    --
    "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Really... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's interesting is that the according to TFA, the study surveyed equal numbers of both men and women, but there is no sign of what the men thought about any question.

      Lies, damned lies and statistics after all...

    2. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look mac, if you define your relationship such that you allow a woman to control you with sex, you've lost before you've even begun.

      Learn to say no now and then.

    3. Re:Really... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, my guess is 100% of the men surveyed claimed that they understood the system more than their wives.

      Even if it wasn't true, how many men would admit it?

    4. Re:Really... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny

      No.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Really... by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You bring up a really interesting point about this being a Lifetime survey.

      Media in general is consumed and purchased disproportionately by women. Games are the exception, but women are catching up there too, although they tend to like non-combative games more.

      I freelance in media, mostly film, but some television. I've done some work for the Viacom empire, and I can tell you that programming for most television is preferentially geared to reflect that heterosexual women and gay men tend to overconsume television programming (viacom is actually preparing a channel devoted to gays). It's no surprise that women have a greater grasp of PVRs, since they are doing all the watching.

      Interestingly enough, Japanese men have this unholy obsession with little girls, really young, like 12-15. Schoolgirls. Psychologists thought that this was some kind of mass pedophilia movement, but after some research, it turns out to be something else. Japanese men are overworked, 80-90 hour weeks. They do not consume much media on average in a country where 4 hours each day are devoted to watching TV. So, what happens is that these men are culturally behind the times... they actually have no idea what's going on in their own country, in their own civilization. The working man has become the butt of a collective joke... they all wear the same suits, have no style or sense of individuality. They've effectively been emasculated by their women peers. The men respond by reacting to the women who still respond to their masculinity, namely by using their money to influence underage girls. Ironically enough, it's all because working Japanese men don't consume enough media and are hopelessly "out of touch."

      This is completely unrelated, but history, literature, and allegory all convey this same story. The man who swears his allegiance to a woman is emasculated for the world. Samson and Delilah, etc. Bill Gates, not the same since getting married. Paul Allen? Still hardcore. *shrugs*

      Average guy gets girlfriend and infrequent head, loses utter control over his PVR and becomes intimately acquainted with "Desperate Housewives" storylines. *shrugs*

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
  2. In related news... by iamnafets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Women also say they are the smarter sex. Since when does it matter that they "say" they know the DVR better. Everyone knows guys are television experts.

  3. Slanted a little... by kschawel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While 99 percent of women say they use their DVRs to zap through commercial spots, 76 percent reported that they stopped for ads that are entertaining or relevant to their own interests. Women are also more likely to pause for TV and movie promos.

    "DVRs give them a mechanism to find commercials that are relevant, and that's a big message," Brooks said. "It's not that people don't want commercials, it's irrelevant interruptions that turn them off."


    Ok, that is a big hint to the tv industry. Women do not want irrelevant commercials, but are willing to watch and advertisement that they are interested in. Unfortunately for the tv industry, I don't think men want commercials at all...

    Also FTA:

    The study, which was commissioned by Lifetime,

    Lifetime, the network for women, is saying, "ADVERTISE HERE! WOMEN WATCH COMMERCIALS!"

    See, there's a slant to everything.

    Keith

    1. Re:Slanted a little... by oldwolf13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> I'd think men want anything that has sex in them,,,

      I resent that.

      I want violence too.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    2. Re:Slanted a little... by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No commercials for me. No beer, no sex, no violence please. I just like to be left alone.

    3. Re:Slanted a little... by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering if "Lifetime" was the same as the Lifetime TV channel. If you want your ego/libido/esteem to take a hit and you are male, watch this channel for a solid day.

      They should change their name to "The Man Bashing Channel" or maybe "Dead-Beat-Dad TV".

  4. It makes sense by matt21811 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This doesn't surprise me at all.

    My wife and I have had cable for the last 6 years. I noticed and interesting difference in viewing patterns between us. I found that I tend to watch channels but she watches programs. I'll turn on the TV and watch news, documentary or sports channels and I'm not too fussy, I'll surf between the 4 documentary channels until I find something interesting and watch it. Her viewing decisions are made from looking at the program guide, the clock, recommendations from her friends and womens magazines and then decide what and when to watch. She will actually plan to watch a particular program (amazing I know). I don't think I've done that in years. A PVR would only improve her viewing convenience but it would make no difference all to mine.

    It doesn't seem surprising to me that women would then control the PVR.

    1. Re:It makes sense by montyzooooma · · Score: 3, Funny

      You realise it's going to cost a fortune in surgery to sort your relationship out? :-)

    2. Re:It makes sense by Talla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VCR not intuitive? A VCR has basically the same sort of interface as a PVR, with the PVR quite a lot more complex. Biggest difference? You set a VCR to record by time, not by program.

      On a PVR, you can just click record when you want to record something. When you want to view it, you look at the list of what you have recorded, and select what you want.

      With a VCR, you first have to find a tape, check that there's nothing on it you want to keep, and then start recording. If you want to keep whats on the second half of the tape, but not the first, it's a mess. Trying to plan for this can be difficult, because you may not know what you want to keep until you've watched it.

      Then, when you want to watch something, you first have to find the right tape, then you have to fast forward until you find it. You might say this is intuitive, but it's a lot more work, which in my opinion makes it feel less intuitive.

  5. After having a Tivo for about five years now... by cowmix · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could of told you this without any 'fancy' study..

    Yeah.. my Tivo is filled with my wife's crap... :(

  6. Irritatingly true. by dourk · · Score: 2, Funny

    She has to rewind every single time she misses the most miniscule piece of irrelevent dialog. Can't we just watch the show thru one time first?

    --
    Wake up.
  7. Re:My Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wow this was especially sexist. the disturbing part is that it was modded interesting.

  8. this is obvious, isn't it? by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    forgive me, some will think this is "sexist" but deep down you all know its true:

    Men hunt, women gather.

    Give women the opportunity to browse and pick the best [whatever] and they'll do it better than any man. A DVR does this. You can schedule things in advance, wait for them to come in, and pick the fruit when its ripened.

    channel surfing without a DVR is similar to hunting. you browse, you pick a target, and you strike at it by putting the remote down. decision made, decision executed, finality. man stuff.

    mod me down if you disagree, but before you do, give it some thought. its not as wrong as society would like you to believe.

    1. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by bsdrawkcab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      forgive me, some will think this is "sexist" but deep down you all know its true:

      You make it sound as if you're about to say something controversial when you're really just repeating conventional wisdom and pop psychologists. I do happen to find your attitude sexist, but it's an attitude that pervades our culture. Please don't portray hegemonic views as persecuted beliefs.

      Men hunt, women gather.

      I don't buy it. Your analogy doesn't even make sense. When hunting you have some target. You have to have a particular target in order to set the PVR. When browsing particular channels, on the other hand, you trust that certain memorized areas will bear fruit. Sounds like a gatherer's approach to me. [Of course this is an equally fatuous comparison. I make it only to demonstrate how easily expectations can be fulfilled, no matter their validity.]

      mod me down if you disagree, but before you do, give it some thought. its not as wrong as society would like you to believe.

      Since when has it ever been wrong to express such views in American society? I find it to be factually wrong and harmful to the extent that it's prescriptive, but I strongly doubt that I am in the majority here.

      --
      Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago. -Bernard Berenson
    2. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by learn+fast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a matter of disagreeing, it's a matter of falisifiable science rather than generalizating from trite, vacuous proverbs like "Men hunt, women gather." Pretty much any behavior could be described as either hunting or as gathering, and there is no way to resolve disputes as to whether an activity counts for sure as hunting or as gathering. Hence unscientific, astrology-like stuff.

      We could also say that men don't use the DVR as much because they are lazy, and women do because they are compulsive. Or maybe we could say that men are poor relaters and women like the interaction-like experience of using the DVR. Or maybe women use the DVR because they have exacting, varied tastes and men don't because they are generalizers and don't really care.

      And it would probably all be complete bullshit. Which is why we try to make simple, scientific hypotheses and test them in a way that could falsify them without requiring metaphor or analogy.

    3. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by Atario · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you saying a PVR can replace a wife? That's just ridic-- I mean, it's...uh...

      Hmmmm.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    4. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Men hunt, women gather.

      Regardless of the sexism, it's just plain false. For most of human history humans got 90% of their calories from gathering and only 10% from hunting. On the whole, humans were lousy hunters. The whole "human-as-mighty-hunter" thing was a myth disproven decades ago, but it still manages to perpetuate itself in popular culture.

      I guess guys just like to think that they're 'naturally' brave warrior types genetically suited to running down large mammals and eating them raw. In fact, most of the time the only thing a man 'ran down' was a carrot or apple.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:this is obvious, isn't it? by 0xygen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do they WANT to get ditched by their husband?

      No, they just need to feel better about their crappy lives by seeing others in a worse position.

  9. The reason is simple by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to a strange mis-wiring in thier brains, women are only able to watch one television show at a time.
    A shocking handicap, I know, but true.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:The reason is simple by Schmelvic · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's the reason why women don't get men. They listen, but if something gets lost in the communication process, they never ask for clarification!

  10. Lifetime's other studies by BBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I checked, Lifetime also conducts studies in order to improve the veracity of their television shows. According to their studies, 90% of married women are beaten by their husbands and 10% of those women kill/brutally maim their husbands and/or steal the children and run away.

    Hmmmm.

    Why does Lifetime care anyways? All their shows are the same so nobody really bothers recording them.

  11. I'm missing something. by bsdrawkcab · · Score: 4, Informative

    Namely, the other half of the numbers. 48% of women asserted x. 55% of women responded y. Okay, interesting, but what does this have to do with sex differences? The study included men and women in roughly equal proportions, but no comparison is made to the men.

    If someone could dig up the whole story, your efforts would be appreciated.

    --
    Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago. -Bernard Berenson
  12. No kidding by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, between the PBS sewing shows, hospital dramas, and all 42 variants of CSI... I'd say my wife pretty much controls our Tivo.

    Then this spring I bought a second one for the spare room, but now my daughter has managed to fill that one with her stuff! I can't win...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. Re:My Mom by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bought my parents a TiVo with built-in DVD burner last Christmas (it's their favorite present ever, btw). My Mom is fairly technophobic, but picked up on how to program the thing right away. I wouldn't say she controls it necessarily, but let's just say I'm guessing she's pretty adament about certain show's being high up on the ole priority list.

    Remember that old matra that was oft-spoke years ago: "someday the technology will be so advanced, it will be easy to use, and people will view their computers just like any other appliance"?

    Guess what? It's here, and it's called TiVo! For the relative complexity of what it does, I'd have to say that TiVo has one of the most brilliantly-designed user interfaces I've ever seen.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  14. Re:My Mom by binaryspiral · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Women especially with technology if they use it enough to get by will claim they're experts

    Whoa, reel in the sexism there spanky. I work in a office that has some of the smartest women I've ever met. Level 3 hardcore technowizbang smart women.

    Maybe you should work for a company that doesn't look for pants when they're hiring smart people. And dresses for receptionists?

  15. as they so succinctly put it themselves... by KillShill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lifetime

    Propoganda for Women.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  16. Damnit... by Vorondil28 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I used my last mod point not more than 2 minutes ago and the Flamebait-potential of this story is astronomical. ;)

    I'll have my fun yet!

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  17. I knew it by gadzook33 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, two weeks spent trying to set up MythTV and all I had to do was ask my mom.

  18. Doesn't surprise me at all. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 5, Funny

    My wife has like 4 or 5 directivos, 3 dish500s, a motorola DCT-5200 digital cable pvrs, and a few standalone tivos hooked up to 4dtv satellite recievers. Not to mention the DVB-S card in our home server. She even wrote special software, so they would all coordinate with each other, and not try to record something another DVR was already recording. With a terabyte fibre channel backend. It's kinda scary. She's even thinking of doing an episode guide database ala imdb, just so she can have better descriptions in the slice info.

    Oh wait, that's me. She can't turn the tv off with the universal remote.

  19. Re:Skewed? by neverkevin · · Score: 4, Informative
    I agree this is probably a flawed/biased study, however the sample size is not the issue. 1000 people is common for a national wide poll. See http://www.gallup.com/help/FAQs/poll1.asp :


    To be sure, there is some gain in sampling accuracy that comes from increasing sample sizes. Common sense -- and sampling theory -- tell us that a sample of 1,000 people probably is going to be more accurate than a sample of 20. Surprisingly, however, once the survey sample gets to a size of 500, 600, 700 or more, there are fewer and fewer accuracy gains that come from increasing the sample size. Gallup and other major organizations use sample sizes of between 1,000 and 1,500 because they provide a solid balance of accuracy against the increased economic cost of larger and larger samples. If Gallup were to -- quite expensively -- use a sample of 4,000 randomly selected adults each time it did its poll, the increase in accuracy over and beyond a well-done sample of 1,000 would be minimal, and generally speaking, would not justify the increase in cost.
  20. TV Advertising by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Informative

    There has been a lot of concern about DVRs destroying the advertising model TV is based on. I don't think that will happen. I did take the time to reprogram my comcast dvr remote to add the 30 second skip feature (http://dcortesi.com/2005/05/04/motorola-dct6412-c omcast-dvr-30-second-skip/) but I watch a LOT more TV now then I did before I got a DVR, and while I regularly skip the commercials, I don't every time and I'm pretty sure the extended amount of time I spend in front of the TV more than makes up for the number of commercials that I do skip.

    --
    You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
  21. aww but you forget by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most idiots don't have a clue but claim they do. That's why so many people get hurt or ruin things doing DIY. Where as the true experts who do know what they are doing get so sick of the idiots they end up not caring for what they know about.

    So sure Mrs. Smith might claim she knows how something works, but I claim to know how a clock works yet have no clue beyond "cogs and stuff" (to put it as simple as possible).

    To claim knowledge does not mean you have it. It means you claimed it.

    --
    I like muppets.
  22. A real quote from TFA: by plover · · Score: 2, Funny
    55 percent of the wives claim they understood how to interface with their unit's myriad features better than their husbands.

    Now, what features do their husbands have that these women DON'T understand how to interface with?

    --
    John
  23. Re:Women are smarter by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    Men can't think straight when they have hard-ons

    Are you trying to say that man are sexually excited by DVRs? You hang out with some weird men.

  24. Bad grammar or deep truth? by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 4, Funny

    > "55 percent claimed they understood the system > more than their husband." I understand my current DVR (DirecTivo) at least as well as I understand my husband, but the previous system I maintained (MythTV) turned out to be almost as bewildering to me as women are to some Slashdotters. Ellen

  25. Re:Women are smarter by tedrlord · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay, fun gender-bashing time! Men are controlled entirely by sexual urges! Women are emotionally unbalanced and can't think logically! Men are violent, dangerous brutes! Women are weak, timid sheep! Men never ask for directions! Women can't drive!

    Don't miss next week's episode of Idiotic Generalizations: Liberals vs. Conservatives!

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
  26. Re:My Mom by be-fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    LOL. Ask you average man how to extract the video data off the hard drive...

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  27. Re:But by ceeam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spongebob controls the DVR, of course!

  28. The nature of "understanding" by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of people are confusing the intent of the article when it speaks of woment "understanding" the technology. Whenever you speak of a particular product, keep in mind there are nearly an infinite layers of "understanding" one might have.

    To a user, "understanding" means knowing how to fully unitilize a product's features. This is not a completely illegitimate point of view. Software engineers think that they understand the DVR because they know how the code works. I'm guessing that hardware engineers could make a pretty good case that, compared to them, the software engineers don't really "understand" the machines either. It's also a pretty good bet that marketing and advertising executives think that they "understand" the DVR, since they know how it's positioned in the marketplace, etc, etc.

    You get the point... Understanding is in the mind of the beholder.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  29. Re:My Mom by robocrop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting that it's only sexism when something is said about women. But when women start talking about how much smarter they are than men ... that's headline news.

  30. Get the info right... by danon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your post says 1000 MARRIED women while the study says 1000 DVR users divided equally by sex.

    This is a key point here:
    a. You're surveying both men and women (which might seem obvious, but not from your post) - which is important because you're trying to claim to compare men and women habits - right? You can't do that if you only survey women.

    b. You're surveying a specific slice of people: those who bought DVRs - this already profiles the people you're surverying: certain income range, certain education, affiliation with technology, and so on...

    What's my point? Your post suggests that you can deduce on women vs men in general (see 'hunter-gatherer' post above...) - which is wrong: the target slice in society your "studying" is a specific group with very specific characteristics, and I don't think you can project from it on the whole group. The conclusions the survey makes can only be safely applied to DVR owners.

    What your post suggests is quite different than the origianl article.
    Dan

  31. Should we even allow these women to have DVR's? by pappy97 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Three-quarters of the women surveyed said that the reason they fell in love with DVR is that they are extremely intuitive and much easier than a VCR.""

    Think about it. Women (And many Americans, male and female), back in the day of the VCR, couldn't figure out how to set the clock. (P.S. I wonder if this is why most DVD's players don't have a clock. Sure you don't need a clock on a DVD player

    If given a TV properly hooked up to a VCR, and the remote for the VCR, and nothing else, you should be able to SET THE CLOCK within five minutes. If you can't, you should be shot.

    And we are giving these people MORE technology? I think there is a strong argument that people don't deserve to get the new tech toys if you can't understand simple things like setting the clock on the vcr.

    I remember back in the day when I used to watch a lot of the Annenburg-CPB Channel (Sue me. I can't get enough of The Mechanical Universe and its simple HS level calculus applied to physics AND Mireille in "French in Action."),

    They used to advertise a show and the clip they showed was interesting and I always got a kick out of it:
    A bunch of college grads (All disciplines), at graduation, were handed a simple light bulb, ONE wire, and a battery, and asked to light up the bulb (basically create a very basic circuit).

    All but one showed couldn't do it. They even said it was impossible. After we saw one guy figure it out, they'd cut to a professor asking (paraphrasing),
    "If college educated graduates don't even understand the basics of electricity, what does that say about a society that tremendously relies on electricity?"

    I am even suggesting that most people should be allowed near a computer, until they get a good understanding of it (hardware and software). That, however, would have the impact of putting Best Buy's rip off techies, "The Geek Squad," out of business.

    1. Re:Should we even allow these women to have DVR's? by radish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh. The reason people don't set the timer on their VCRs is not that they are dumb, or unable to deal with technology. It's that the timers are very poorly designed, with arcane interfaces, and most people simply don't care or have time to futz with them. Flip your argument around. If a regular, intelligent adult can't set a clock on a VCR within 5 minutes, the engineer who created the clock should be shot.

      This is precisely why we should be giving people DVRs - not just MORE technology but BETTER technology. Technology that is hard to understand and use serves nothing but a few geeks' egos.

      If college educated graduates don't even understand the basics of electricity, what does that say about a society that tremendously relies on electricity?

      It says that people who do understand electricity will be valued and well paid. Our society depends on lots of things - medication (but we're not all doctors), air travel (but we're not all pilots), oil (but we're not all geologists or petrochemical engineers), etc. Whilst basic skills like changing light bulbs, fuses etc will make people's day to day lives easier and are worth learning, I fail to see how not being able to make a circuit as described will affect most people. My GF is an english teacher, she loves video games, DVDs, all that electronic goodness. She has (despite my attempts to educate) very little idea how any of it really works, just like I have remarkably little knowledge of Shakespeare or Pepys.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  32. overextending the metaphor by mbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    When hunting you have some target.

    I get up before dawn, put on Woodland pajamas, douse the living room in consumer urine, power on the telly and sit for hours, silent and motionless behind the couch, waiting to spot that elusive creature: the ten-point news program.

    My weapon of choice? A Sony Universal with rechargeable AA Ni-MH rounds at 1.5V.

    And an eight-inch call that goes "market share! market share!"

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  33. Re:Women are smarter by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You hang out with some weird men."
    Or some sexy DVRs

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  34. Ask Oprah by rworne · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could not believe my ears when I was at Fry's one day and my wife asked me about TiVo and why we didn't have one.

    So I asked her to repeat herself and she did. She then wondered if I had ever heard of one and I replied that I certainly did know what one was - but with the lifetime service and the cost of the unit, it would be nearly $500 when we were done with it.

    She seemed disappointed. I was again in shock. Why the hell was she interested in a piece of "geek gear"? The answer was: Oprah talked about it one day and said how neat it was.

    I then replied "Did Oprah talk about how cool those new 2.5GHz Powermacs are? The ones with the new huge cinema displays?

    All that got me was a dirty look. Still, by the end of the month we had a new TiVo. And TiVo - it's TV HER way.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  35. Meaningless by ebuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well after reading the article, I'd say that this does nothing to prove or disprove anything.

    Taking a statictic on a person's opinion is not scientific in the least, heck it might not even be proper measurement.

    I'm suprised that only 55% of women believed that they knew more about thier DVR than thier husbands. That number seems a bit low to me, after all, this isn't a compentency test, it's a test about belief. I'd wager that 100% of all women believe that they can navigate to and from the grocery store quicker than their husbands, even though they both live in the same house, know where the nearest grocery store is located, and probably would take the exact same route.

    It doesn't even matter what the men thought, because it's still playing around with perception testing, which is interesting if you want to gather information about a perception. However, perceptive information isn't consistent amonst members within a population (even a very homogenous population) so I doubt this information will have any pratical application other than sensationalisim.

  36. I believe you're looking for this by mbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    nowhere in here does it mention how I can get a date?

    Whoa there, cowboy. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. First you'll need a shower, then we can work on that habit of saying "nyrrrrrr" between phrases. Then another shower just to be on the safe side. Then you get to decide which of Excelsior, Enterprise, and Exeter gets disconnected from the network so we can move it to a closet.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  37. gender roles by mbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lifetime says most women understand their Tivo system better than their husbands.

    I wonder what percentage of these take-charge independent wives feigned absolute helplessness at the prospect of hooking the unit up.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  38. Re:My Mom by oldwolf13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So... it's ok for you to make an assumption about him, and where he works based on a simple comment, but it's not ok for him to say anything based on his experiences?

    How is that world you're living in, anyways?

    --
    If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
  39. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by Aeiri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Currently it's about 15-19 minutes per hour.

    It's easier to think of it in terms of fractions, a little over a third of all TV programming is commercials.

    30 minute shows usually end up being 20-22 minutes long, 1 hour shows usually end up being 40-44 minutes long.

    I only watch "real" TV for one show a week at a time, maximum, now. BitTorrent rules (don't even have to remember to hit record, I can get shows as far back as the 1970s!).

  40. Not true at all! by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that I know this, I would like a lot more commercials about:

    - Feminine products that reduce the frequency of menstraul cycles
    - Public service announcements regarding the importance of the low oil pressure indicator light
    - The How-To's of toilet use: Look at toilet before use. If the seat is up, lower it, without comment.
    - Getting what you want by actually saying what you want
    - Weight Loss Success with the Microwaveable Frozen Food diet
    - Beer: The new Slim Fast
    - Top 10 Health Benefits of Breast Implants
    - New Cure for Erictile Dysfunction: The Silent Treatment

    I mean, since I'm fast forwarding through these things anyway, might as well give relevant information to the people actually watching the commercials.

  41. Re:Ad execs: read up! Blipverts! by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't exagerate. A little under a third of programming is commercials.

    or a little over a quarter.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  42. honest women. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Funny

    55 percent claimed they understood the system more than their husband.

    And I'm sure we can take them at their word.

  43. Re:My Mom by robocrop · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Because your wife will beat you up??? Gorw a pair, Nancy!

    It's brilliant how poetic that statement is. You've illustrated the problem perfectly. Men must accept, revere, and worship women. But if women do anything offensive and we complain, we're just too weak.

    The 'revenge feminism' angle is being played way too often. You can see it anywhere on TV if you have your eyes open. Men are consistently infantilized in entertainment and advertising. Since advertisements generally have less air time, they tend to be more egregious about it.

    For example, in Canada there is a commercial about stopping the spread of HIV. On this commercial a talk-show host - female - is paneling three 'guy' penis-shaped objects. The woman asks if they ever 'try for sex' on the first date, and the guys all hum and haw about how women aren't objects, they respect their spirituality ... and the woman instantly sneers at them and screams at the audience 'don't trust your date'. The audience, full of women, cheers raucously at this. End message: men are sex-obsessed pigs, and only women care about the spread of STDs.

    For me, true disgust with this odious gender bigotry pinnacled when I saw an episode of "Third Watch" (ok, it was a slow TV day) where a female detective rammed her gun into a guy's crotch and threatened to shoot off his toolkit. While this was happening heroic music was playing - see, the female cop was avenging the death of her sister, who OD'd on drugs bought from the male pusher. Hooray for justice!

    The odd thing is that this swing of attention - which is outright pandering to the female demographic - has actually infiltrated even the steadfastly male-dominated cultures. Yesterday I was watching 'Appleseed', an anime movie. The movie is set in a post-apocalyptic future in which mankind has formed a symbiosis with engineered beings. Every positive character in the movie is female. The Prime Minister is female. The doctor who invented the 'clones' is female. The hero is female. The men in the story are either war-obsessed genocidal maniacs or just there to spout anti-woman dialogue to justify the revenge feminist angle. And this is Japanese anime!

    Frankly as much as I find it offensive I also find it pathetic. There's a desperate neediness about the whole thing, which I don't believe truly 'equal' people would require in order to feel good about themselves. But to be fair, we've been suffering the 'white guys are lame, white guys can't dance, white guys can't jump, white guys can't play basketball' crap for years too. Hopefully it's all just a phase.

    And, hopefully, someday I'll be able to sit down to dinner without being assaulted by countless vignettes in which men are the goofy idiots and women the wise sages - or, at least, fewer commercials about feminine itch, odor, and leakage.

  44. Wife controls, hell the 4 year old recorded 90g of by skeptictank · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ed, Edd and Eddy.