Firefox and Thunderbird 1.0.6 Released
micpp writes "Only a short time after the release of version 1.0.5, Mozilla has released version 1.0.6 of both Firefox and Thunderbird . This update fixes a bug in the browser and email program which prevented some extensions from working."
the software update feature never worked for me. I had to download and install.
...is having all my extensions and themes disabled whenever I install a new version of Firefox. Granted, you can re-enable them through about:config, but wouldn't it be nicer to have a dialogue box on first launch (along the lines of "You have some old extensions installed which may not be 100% compatible - do you want to disable them?")?
And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
Now if only they could fix a bug that would get authors to update their extensions to the new browser version. I miss my FireGoat browswer
(yes, I know there's a way to fix firesomething, but I haven't had time and it's just annoying to install an extension to get an error saying that it's for an older version)
Perfecting Discordia
www.stevenvansickle.com
I'm still at 1.04 and for the past few weeks I've checked for new updated (Tools > Options > Advanced) and my Firefox still says there are no updates for the browser. Extensions have been updating.
I wish I could better manage less-standard header fields in the message list in Thunderbird. I recently posted this question to Mozillazine:
7 61
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=294
Can anyone tell me if this kind of Spamassassin integration is possible?
Patience... soon enough Windows Update will become an API you can leverage as an app developer to tell Windows where to find patches and updates to your software. Just wait.
What I was trying to figure out was why someone felt it necessary to synchronize the versions of Firefox and Thunderbird. After all, if you do that, in the future you'll either get them out of step again, or kept artificially in-step. By artificially, I mean that when critical changes are needed for one package, a corresponding copy of the other will be released whether it needs changes or not; or critical changes for one package will be stalled for release until similar changes are required to the other package.
And to whoever it was who modded my parent post 'Redundant', erm, what? Perfectly sensible question. Version numbers are supposed to indicative of (a) the progress of the project and (b) the degree of change from one version to the next. Messing with the version numbers for no good reason only causes confusion.
"If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
Does FF/TB have some type of a management console, that allows you to push updates out to client computers. I work at a university with 3k+ computers, I pity the foo who has to update boxes for a week straight, only to have 1.0.7 come out the next day. Or does anyone know of an open source client management system, that would hold updates for clients and auto-update if out of date clients pass by the manager?
I've noticed quite a bit of unauthorized pop-ups making it through Firefox lately.
Easiest example I could think of off the top of my head to show this is to search google for song lyrics and visit one of those sites.
WTF? They're always from fastclick and casalemedia and other shit that's already on the block list.
Also notice that even blocked domains for setting cookies (also from fastclick and casalemedia) are STILL able to set cookies.
Hopefully it's been fixed...
We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
Yeah, well, avoiding memory leaks is Programming 101 (or at least 102).
I used to use Opera. I switched to Firefox and Thunderbird to finally have a completely free, un-ad-supported browser and email client. And actually I find Firefox crashes less than Opera did, especially with the Register site which used to crash Opera regularly.
But I save images regularly from the Net, and after a few hundred image saves, Firefox becomes almost unusable and must be restarted, which indicates a serious memory leak to me.
Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!