Slashdot Mirror


Firefox and Thunderbird 1.0.6 Released

micpp writes "Only a short time after the release of version 1.0.5, Mozilla has released version 1.0.6 of both Firefox and Thunderbird . This update fixes a bug in the browser and email program which prevented some extensions from working."

11 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. RELEASE CYCLE!!! by JossiRossi · · Score: 5, Funny

    AHHHHHHHHHH!!! This wasn't part of any cycle I was told about! My god! My day is ruined! Thank god Microsoft will be consistent. My life can get back to normal in a couple weeks.

    --
    Just a boy doing unproffesional IT work that's way above his head.
  2. and of course by devilsandy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the software update feature never worked for me. I had to download and install.

    1. Re:and of course by PReDiToR · · Score: 5, Informative

      They stagger the release times to ease bandwidth. The setup file comes first, then it hits the update servers.

      In a couple of days people can autoupdate or use the little blue xmas tree.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  3. Stealing Microsoft's innovations... by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see they still have tabbed web browsing, which has been in Internet Explorer since version 7.0.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  4. Automatic updater by Xerotope · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All of these software updates are driving me nuts. Under Debian it's fine, just "apt-get upgrade" and things happen fairly seamlessly. But on my windows box, updating requires downloading a new installer for each program, in some cases uninstalling the new version, and then running each new installer. These window installers all require multiple steps, and so it's just a big hassle to stay current.

    Why can't more programs these days have automatic updates? Firefox does in theory. It'll check for new updates, then download the new version and start the installer for you and then break your install. Not the updating experience I'm looking for.

    Why can't software updates operate more like Eclipse's update tool? Or Sun's Java update? Or Adobe reader's? Or dare I say it, Microsofts Windows update?

    And yes, I'm lazy. This is supposed to be one of the menial tasks where computers replace people.

  5. Re:I'm still at 1.04? by blankmeyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    They release the new versions for download before they release it for auto-upgrade. It is usually several days behind the download version (this will be changed when Deer Park is released). Before they had a chance to get 1.0.5 setup for the upgrade, the bug was reported and they held off (why have people update to 1.0.5 when 1.0.6 is days away?). If 1.0.6 was released today, my next Monday it should be released to the auto-update system.

  6. Re:Thunderbird version increases from 1.0.2 to 1.0 by the+web · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
  7. Re:Check for updates... by ballstothat · · Score: 5, Funny
    How many of us want to prove how l33t we are by bragging about using Alpha releases? Hands?

    I can see yours is already raised.

    --
    10
    20 Print "Balls To That"
  8. 1.1 will solve these constant updates by JonVisc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Version 1.1 for both apps will be out in the summer which offers updates in the style of windows updates, which is a good thing. You don't have to reinstall the whole application, it just updates what is needed. Hur-ray!

    1. Re:1.1 will solve these constant updates by JonVisc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kind of answers that here: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Software_Update The main quote being... "The update itself will contain a manifest of files which need updating/removal." At which point it will delete or overwrite them, but you can read about it, it covers it better than I can :-)

  9. Re:That was certainly quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Security fixes made in FireFox 1.0.5, released July 12, 2005

    (Mozilla's rating) Mozilla's description of vulneraility, Date reported to Mozilla

    (High) Content-generated event vulnerabilities: April 11, 2005
    (Low) XBL scripts ran even when javascript disabled: May 2, 2005
    (High) Code execution via "Set as Wallpaper": May 3, 2005
    (Low) Same-origin violation with InstallTrigger callback: May 8, 2005
    (High) Script injection from Firefox sidebar panel using data: May 13, 2005
    (Critical) Code execution through shared function objects: May 19, 2005
    (Moderate) Possibly exploitable crash in InstallVersion.compareTo: May 28, 2005
    (Moderate) The return of frame-injection spoofing: June 6, 2005
    (Moderate) Same origin violation: frame calling top.focus(): June 6, 2005
    (Critical) Standalone applications can run arbitrary code through the browser: June 20, 2005
    (Low) javascript prompt origin spoofing: June 26, 2005
    (High) XHTML node spoofing: June 27, 2005