Slashdot Mirror


Review of Consumer-Friendly Linux Distro

miketronics writes "Linspire Five-O is a full-featured Linux operating system which is intended for desktop use, mainly as an alternative to Windows XP. XYZComputing has a review of the latest version. The company, which was formerly known as Lindows, has gotten a lot of press for including their OS with pre-bundled computers." From the article: "Once the installation is over with Five-O is ready to go. The first time the OS is used Linspire's tutorial program will activate. This is one of most accessible tutorials on any Linux distro and it should be a great help to new users. Though it does not go into extreme depth, it does give the user enough understanding of the OS to get started. Even if you are a Linux pro it will probably be helpful to check out the CNR section, as this system is unique to Linspire. The fact that the developers have the tutorial voice-narrated shows Linspire's commitment to user support -- this feature makes the otherwise boring tutorial watchable."

44 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Voice narration? by sharkb8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How helpful will a voice over be when Linux doesn't install your soundcard drivers properly?

    1. Re:Voice narration? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Debian is more PnP for me than Windows XP.

      I just installed Debian stable (sarge) last week on my Dell GX-270 at work (adding an XP partition and getting rid of FC2). In my past experience, all the dell optiplex hardware will work, but often times the proper config needs to be made, just like you mention.

      Anyway, this particular install of Debian everything Just Worked. Sound, network, USB mouse, LCD monitor, Intel video, USB ports - everything, no extra config needed.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Voice narration? by someone300 · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the zen you need libnjb and gnomad. Gnomad works for me, sorta buggy though.

      Linux needs a decent unified media device access library. Kio, gnome-vfs or the filesystem are "good enough" but they're not fantastic ;), and loads of different types of library being hard coded into the apps isn't a good thing. Freedesktop media access would be good.

      My biggest problem are Sony media devices (netmd, network walkman).. I think only a very small few of them work.

    3. Re:Voice narration? by sharkb8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generally most people won't carry a list of compatible hardware down to Fry's. They'll buy what's on sale and download the driver. No driver for Linux? That'll be the problem that keeps Linux from getting adopted as widely as Windows.

      Admittedly, it's a chicken/egg problem, as vendors won't write Linux drivers themselves until more people have linux.

      And then there are people like me who take an old computer, and put Linux on it to try out. You end up with too many problems, and turn the box into a Windows file server.

      And when I install XP, pretty much all I have to do is put the CD in and set a few options. It took me about 3 hours to get FC3 on my old ass Optiplex.

    4. Re:Voice narration? by arose · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ubuntu has one CD and unlike with MS Windows you are mostly done after that one CD.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Voice narration? by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      About drivers..
      Many people are already familiar with Windows. Not that is any easier then Linux but being familiar makes it easy. Keep in mind, there are people familiar with Linux as well.

      An example from today.

      New XP machine and a new HP9050 printer on the network with an IP of 192.168.0.100.

      Start --> Printers and Faxes. Select add new printer. I select next at the Add printer wizard box. I am given the option of "Local printer attached to this computer" or Network Printer. I select Netowrk Printer.
      "What printer do you want to connect to?" I try all three options with the printer ip address. None of them work. I go back and select "Local printer attached to this computer". Odd, it's not attached to my computer, it's on the network but I'll try it anyway. I select next and a box pops up and says No PNP printer found, press next to continue. I guess the box "Automatically detect and install my PNP printer" was checked by default. I browse through the list of available ports and do not see my network printer. I choose the other option called "Create a new Port". Standard TCP/IP Printer port is my best guess. When trying to create the port I recieve an error saying the port could not be created and i needed administrative rights to do that. I log off and log in as local administrator. I get back to that point and create the port with the printers IP address. I immediately get a prompt telling me to indentify what type of device I am trying to connect to and given a list of devices. I had the printer turned off so i turned it on and tried again. Ah, it determined it is a HP Jetdirect card now and Windows is asking me what type of printer am I trying to install. I am presented with a list of drivers I'd like to use. I browse through the HP printers and do not see the LJ 9050 listed. I cancel the process and hit HP's web site. After some searching around I see 2 drivers that look good for XP, a PCL5e and PCL6, I assume I do not need the 9050 printer system which is over 50MB in size. I browse the readme files and I have no idea which one I need or which is better. I decide to get the PCL5e because it only 5.8MB. I download and run the install. I am presented with two options. Automatically install the drivers and delete the temp files on completion or if I'd just like to expand the files into a specific directory. I take the default to perform the install automatically. That process completed. Well, what was that? I see no printers installed and now I have no idea what just happened or what was supposed to happen.
      For a forth time, I go back into "Add Printer". I selected Local Printer and add port again, type my ip address in and this time recieve an error that the port is already installed on my system. Oh, I canceled out of the add printer wizard earlier when I realized I need drivers but the wizard did at least create my port. I am now presented with a same dialog box asking to pick my printer model. I still see no HP 9050 printer listed under the HP printers list. I tried to browse the HD for the driver but not only do I not know what I am looking for, I do not know where to look. I will run the HP9050 PCL5E driver file again. This time I select to just expand the file into the c:\hplj9050 directory. For about the fifth time. I go back to "add printer", select my previosuly configured port, and this time select have disk and point to that directory on c:\. Finally, it shows my printer and installs the driver. I can now print to my 9050!!!

      Okay, in all honesty, I do this all day every day and it would really only take me about 3 minutes to get this installed but did you see those steps? Those are real steps and a realistic process of what a non computer geek would have to go through to get this printer installed. For someone NOT already familiar with Windows XP, this is by no means easy. It seems easy to you and others because you take it for granted because you have been using and messing with the OS for years. For someone who has not been, the process would be no easier then installing the same printer on a Linux system.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:Voice narration? by germanStefan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I also think that modern Linux distros will find and configure more drivers than Windows XP will. HOWEVER this is not really a fair comparison. Windows XP is what, from 2001? Lets pit Debian 3.0 with its native kernel against Windows XP and see which one gets more drivers out of the box correct.

      Don't get me wrong, I use Linux on all my systems and don't have any devices which don't work out of the box. I dislike microsoft as much as the next Linux using slashdotter, but I don't think its fair to compare a modern Linux to a 4 year old Windows...now it is their own fault for not releasing a "better" version of windows in those 4 years...just my 2 cents

  2. Mirror of full article by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

    here . Though I doubt that that a review of Linspire is going to get slashdotted late on a Friday afternoon.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Mirror of full article by debilo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Though I doubt that that a review of Linspire is going to get slashdotted late on a Friday afternoon.

      Because we geeks are busy getting ready for one of those zillion parties we alway get invited to?

  3. 50 bucks? by Eternauta3k · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The tradeoff is the price- Linspire Five-O can be downloaded for just $49.95, significantly less than most other retail desktop Linux distributions.

    You know, fedora's quite cheap...
    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    1. Re:50 bucks? by Sancho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Guess it depends on definitions. Fedora isn't a retail desktop Linux distribution, is it? Fedora's counterpart, is an enterprise solution, and thus doesn't fit the "desktop" modifier.

      In fact, offhand, the only other retail, desktop Linux distribution I can think of is SuSE, which is downloadable for free, but costs money if you want it on CDs. The full retail package of SuSE is around $90, but again, you're getting more than just a download.

      I have seen Debian CDs for sale in retail stores, and they were less than $50 I believe, however I haven't seen this in awhile.

      Truthfully, I'd like to know about all these other retail desktop LInux distributions....

    2. Re:50 bucks? by cosmic_gravy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Distrowatch has a page discussing the "freeness" (I know, not a word) of various linux distros:

      http://distrowatch.com/stats.php?section=freedom/

      Linspire is listed under "4".

    3. Re:50 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hi

      I'm writing to ask for your advice since you seem to know about Linux. I was recently at a friends house, and he showed me his new Linux. It had a lot of interesting "features" like windows and firefox and tcpip. He even showed me dirty pictures with it.

      My friend told me that he downloaded his Linux for free! He even showed me the web site. I think it was linuxtorrent.com. I freaked out! He's stealing form Linux! He told me that it was OK and that Linux is free, but I didn't believe him.

      What should I do? My friend is stealing from Linux. A lot of people worked very hard to make Linux, and he's taking it without even saying thanks. I want him to stop, but I don't want him to go to jail! Please, help me, I don't know what to do?

  4. Whats up with the screenshots??? by TheWorkz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on... taking screenshot images of the OS through a Digital Camera?? How about VMWARE? or Video Output? Anything is better than a monitor picture. Jeeesh...

  5. ... jarring word choice ... by ninjagin · · Score: 5, Funny
    I started reading the review, but I was shaken free when I read this, on page 2:

    "The company, which was formerly known as Lindows, has gotted a lot of press for including their OS with pre-bundled computers."

    After "gotted", I think that as I continue to read the review, I'm going to be looking for these little goodies more than actually taking in the content.

    ... must ... resist ... powers ... of ... critique ...

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  6. Punch Card by locokamil · · Score: 5, Funny

    When will people understand that Linux is for real men who honed their skillz by walking uphill both ways to the mainframe building in order to run their punch card programs? ::sigh::

    1. Re:Punch Card by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to my computer-challenged mother, who uses Linux. A friend at work who uses Linux and has no idea how to admin it. My best freind's 68-year-old father, who uses Linux.

      Linux doesn't *HAVE* to be any harder to install or use than any other OS.

  7. What I like about Linspire by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are many things to love about Linux based Operating Systems especially on the virus/malware/addware side, but what I have come to like about Linspire is that it just works as advertised. It just works! SuSE does not (remember multimedia)? Second, it's beautiful. I love its fonts. For other distros, I have had to tweak X11 and download this script http://vigna.dsi.unimi.it/webFonts4Linux/webFonts. sh in order to see fonts as I like them. What troubles me most is that even for Debian based ones, the invoking of this command "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade" might leave you with an unusable system.

    Now, if Linspire could adapt autopackage http://autopackage.org/, the better since Linspire packages would be able to install on any distro.

  8. GCC? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Linspire does not include GCC, and it is only available with a CNR subscription, unless you go back to using apt-get, which Linspire says may screw up your system. No gcc? can't install many apps..... Why should I pay for GPL'd software?

    1. Re:GCC? I think not. by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Philosophically, I agree with you, but I can see their point, too. Using GCC to compile and install non-Linspire sanctioned applications gives non-novice but non-advanced users the ability to majorly screw up their system. These users would then proceed to unduly tax the company's tech support people and, even worse, gripe about how unstable Linspire is to all of their friends and Internet forums.

      If you don't want to pay for GPL software, you don't have to. But remember the beauty of GPL software—Linspire can sell it to people who will pay for it if they want to, and the promise of stability and ease-of-use makes me lean towards thinking that it's justified.

    2. Re:GCC? I think not. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Funny
      No problem, just download the source and compile it. ;-)

      Sick bastard. Is this the answer to "How do you keep a Lindows user busy?"

  9. Awful review by Osty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's wrong with the review? I don't know. I couldn't bring myself to read through it. But from looking at the presentation and skimming the article, it sucks. Why?

    • 7 pages? WTF? Was that really necessary? Combine several pages (especially page 1 which only has two paragraphs) or at least provide a printer-friendly version.
    • Photographs for screenshots? Weak. Maybe that's fine for cases where you can't really get a screenshot (during installation, though you could've run an installation through Virtual PC or VMWare to get screenshots), but after that you can easily take normal screenshots. In fact, the images are a mishmash of screenshots and photographs. Why would you take a photo of the Linspire Control Center (for example) when you could take a screenshot?
    • Horrible conclusion. If you're going to give a pro/con list, you should explain it in your conclusion. You say that Linspire is "not as performance oriented as others", or "lacks important features"? What are they? I saw nothing about either of those two problems in the conclusion, and I really don't feel like going back through six other pages looking for the one sentence where you explained what you meant by "lacks important features".
    • Grammar. "These lax requirements is what allows Linspire (and other Linux distros) ..." wtf? "Requirements" is plural, so you need to match that with your verb ("are" instead of "is").
    • No explanation of system requirements. What is a "Linspire-compatbile sound card" or a "Linspire-compatbile ... modem, cable modem, or DSL modem"? If Linspire has a compat list, link to it. If they don't, why not do a bit of research and provide a nice list for users?
    • Still too much focus on installation, and praise for stupid crap. Linspire uses a GUI installer, making it appear more friendly? Woo! Distros have been doing this for years! Installation is pretty much a solved problem as far as I'm concerned (even Debian is supposedly getting a better installer some time). Besides that, though, the installer still doesn't appear to make partitioning any easier (whether it should or not is not the question here). The review chooses to go through the Advanced installation option, but never touches on the most difficult part. If everybody simply had their partitions magically configured like the reviewers, I'm sure nobody would ever be confused by partitioning.
    1. Re:Awful review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, one could argue that Slashdot is a blog masquerading as a serious news site.

    2. Re:Awful review by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? just because you are using a GUI, you automatically don't have total control over the install? And just because you don't have a GUI you automatically have complete control? That makes no sense. Here's a mock up of a non-GUI installation that gives you no control.

      Would you like to install Linux? (Y/N)

      It does everything for you, as soon as you say yes. Does that give you complete control? I'm tired of people who think GUI = No Control. You can have plenty of control with a GUI. It's just that usually you don't.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  10. Five - 0 by Quirk · · Score: 3, Funny
    Copyright infringement?

    Book him, Dano.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  11. YOU shouldn't pay for GPL'd software... by theurge14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...because you know to install everything on your own without the handholding.

    This product is for people who do not have your knowledge, and would gladly pay for the software to install on its own.

    That is in the GPL you know.

  12. Performance? by ucahg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From original article:
    The minimum requirements for Five-O:

    - 800 MHz or higher processor
    [snip]
    These lax requirements is what allows Linspire (and other Linux distros) to run well on both inexpensive and old computers- both of which may have trouble with Windows XP.


    Lax requirements? Better than XP? Those requirements seem high to me, as someone who has Windows XP running just dandy on a Pentium II 350MHz PC. 800? Minimum? Why?
    1. Re:Performance? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running Mandrake 10.2 on a PII 266. It's a little slow to boot, and doesn't compile stuff all that fast, but otherwise it's perfectly good for browsing the web, editing photos from my digicam, typing up documents, and most other day-to-day tasks. I don't understand why they would say 800 MHz is the minimum.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  13. Review of the review review by jlapier · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Awful review" was a great review of the Linspire review. The author plainly stated his opinion and then backed it up with a tightly prepared bullet-point synopsis of serveral points. I especially enjoyed the comments regarding the length of the article and the photographed screenshots. I couldn't agree more.

    The only bad thing I could say about this review (of the review) was that it was anti-climatic. After an intense, bullet-driven analysis, the author leaves us with no conclusion, instead leaving us to ponder over the difficulty of disk partitioning rather than tying together the point he was trying to make.

    4(/5)

  14. The killer: media players by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have a friend who is smart, but not a real "computers guy". He was at my house and needed to borrow a computer. I only have Linux computers here, and so he tried it and was impressed. He could do everything he needed to do under Suse without any problems: access his mail, access the Web, access Excel spreadsheets (with OpenOffice), etc. Except for one thing: he couldn't play video clips, and when he got his laptop, he said, "I'll use Windows on this so I can play video." That's all. Otherwise he would use Linux.

    I am very experienced with Linux and computers in general and I still can't get Windows Media video to work properly on this, and the only DVD playback I have is through MPlayer and I still can't get a GUI working on MPlayer.

    What I had to go through to get this far: Download and compile MPlayer. Ok, that's no problem and it plays DVDs. Download and install the Windows codecs pack. Now MPlayer (still with no GUI) can play WMV. That's great. Xine (KDE's preferred video player) can't detect these Windows codecs, even though I put them in /usr/lib/win32, which is where they're supposed to be. So no integrated desktop playback; if I want to play a clip, I download it, save it, open up a console window, and point MPlayer at it. I tried to get MPlayer to compile with --gui-enabled so at least I could have a front-end for it. No luck; it can't find gtk2+ development libraries. I tried to install them and couldn't find them anywhere that MPlayer could find them. I also tried to install a dvddecss lib where Xine could find it so Xine could play encrypted (standard) movie DVDs. Again, nothing I could do worked.

    Mind you, this is all with Suse 9.3, the latest and greatest. All of this stuff is supposed to be worked out by now. I can get it to just barely work, with no desktop integration and no GUI, and I'm an experienced and knowledgable user. What are other people supposed to do, just use their imagination?

    Oh and the situation is even worse with Flash. In my previous Suse installations, Flash worked fine in Konqueror. Now with Suse 9.3, I get a crash when Konqueror tries to render a page with Flash, so I have to use Moz or Firefox to view it, and guess what, those have problems working with KDE's sound system so I might not get sound with my Flash.

    I realize that there are legal problems with codecs and DVDs and whatever. Before Linux is ever going to get consumer-level acceptance, these problems need to be solved, or worked around. A solution would be to get a commercially-developed Linux media player that a) integrates with the desktop and b) works and c) package that with the distro. A work-around would be to make up a media player installer that you just click on, it downloads whatever it needs from non-US sites, and it does all the stuff, and it WORKS.

    I'm happy to pay for Linux distros (I think I paid almost $100 for Suse 9.3 pro). If they have to tack on another $10 or $20 to include a solid, well-integrated working media player, they need to do it.

    All the other apps are more than good enough right now. OOo is a good consumer-level (and biz level) replacement for MS Office. Firefox is better than IE. All that is lacking is multimedia playback.

    ---------------
    mobile search - coming soon

    1. Re:The killer: media players by Daniel+Baumgarten · · Score: 2, Informative

      Totem with gstreamer seems to handle most WMV files fine. Multimedia support is inconsistent in the open source community, but that doesn't mean that it's lacking. You need to know where to look.

      Incidentally, I use Debian, which handled all sorts of multimedia playback right out of the box, so to speak. So in some cases, you don't even have to look at all.

      --
      "Screw slashdot." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:The killer: media players by FictionPimp · · Score: 2, Informative

      doesn't totem just use xine-lib?

      I'm lucky I didn't have to worry about multimedia support

      I just emerged mplayer and win32codecs

      and on my ubuntu box I just followed ubuntuguide.org's instructions.

      No problems at all.

    3. Re:The killer: media players by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't say I've shared your experience, the only dodgy part was getting DVDs to play while I was still using Mandrake, the (well known) trick is to install libdvdread and decss, after that it works perfectly. I'm now using Gentoo, and multimedia is absolutely zero effort to get working. Portage has pulled in all of the codecs (win32 + others) for me automagically and I have yet to find a video I can't play, the same goes for DVDs.

    4. Re:The killer: media players by ithicine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of the many reasons I use Linux is because of the multimedia support. WMP doesn't seem to come equipped to play DVDs; when I insert a disc, it cries, screams, and runs home to mommy, who doesn't have any codecs to give. On the other hand, everything is always perfect with xine. It even loads faster than WMP. Come to think of it, I have yet to run into a video format that xine wouldn't play.

      It doesn't even seem to (in my case) require much special setup if anything. It worked great in Gentoo, and just dandy under Ubuntu. No problems either way... though playing videos sure as hell was a problem not all that long ago. The last time I remember running into these problems was back when Mandrake 6.0 was cutting edge.

      But hey, you're right that people run into problems. The fact that I haven't (in at least the last year) doesn't speak for everyone else's experience. So really, what I'd like to know is why people are having such a hard time when they don't have to.

  15. Tux tour by NullProg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first time the OS is used Linspire's tutorial program will activate. This is one of most accessible tutorials on any Linux distro and it should be a great help to new users. Though it does not go into extreme depth, it does give the user enough understanding of the OS to get started.

    Does anyone remember the disk you used to get when buying an Apple? Apple made a nice tutorial for all thier computers. I'm suprised the Gnome/KDE/whatever teams don't have something like this. It could be a flash animation or an interactive web site. Show them how to cut/paste, system configuration etc. Hell, do a interactive Tux demo.

    People love to be shown how to do things rather than reading TFM.

    Food for thought, enjoy.

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  16. Linux by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Linux is an amazing kernel regardless of how it's been developed, which actually makes it all the more impressive. The thing is right now there simply are not the resources to develop a competitive desktop operating system based on Linux. Every year Linux gets further behind Mac OS X and soon Microsoft's Vista for typical desktop use in business and homes.

    Linux is however superior for servers I think. Everything makes sense. Security, configuration and the many options are at least equal to what is shipped by others and the development tools are fantastic. Nothing as pretty as MS's Visual Studio but functionally Linux can offer anything that MS can. On the desktop, there is no Linux solution that offers the functionality that Windows or OS X have.

    I guess I stopped caring about Linux on the desktop a year ago or so. I gladly use it at home to run my various servers but use Win 2000 and OS X based systems for general tasks.

    Don't get me wrong, I used Linux as a desktop for s few years and thought it was decent. But after using OS X enough and even Windows 2K I just cannot bring myself to use Linux on a desktop all the time.

    Like I said, I enjoy using it for my servers, routing and some programming but it has a ways to go (and a fleeting ways at that) to catch up to commercial offerings. It doesn't take anything away from Linux and you don't have to tell me that Linux can be used as a desktop. I just think Apple and Microsoft provide better systems for day-to-day desktop use. Linux provides equal and better services for networks/servers.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  17. Why pay? Same reason you pay for plumbing. by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why should you pay for GPL software? Simple. Because you don't want to compile it yourself. (No, I don't mean you personally, of course.) It's the same reason as I'd pay for plumbing. I don't want to be elbow-deep in sewage, and I wouldn't have a clue what to do anyway.

    The software is free, but that doesn't prevent others from making a profit off services. The GPL specifically allows it. And the point of the CNR service is that it supplies working software to users who either can't or won't compile their own. Is that wrong?

    By the way, Windows doesn't come with a compiler. OS X does, but you have to install the development tools specifically. Ubuntu doesn't have the development toolchain in the basic installation. It's not as unusual as you seem to think, at least for a regular-person-targeted OS.

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
  18. Slackware Xine package works great with WMV by ph43drus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm running Slackware 10.1, but 10.0 also worked (didn't try to get Xine working with any earlier versions).

    So:
    1) Install Slackware
    2) Grab the codecs off of the MPlayer webpage
    3) Put them in /usr/lib/win32
    4) Play WMV files (and others)
    5) ???
    6) Profit!

    Again, Xine works great under Slackware. All you have to do is grab the codecs off of the MPlayer site and drop them into /usr/lib/win32, and it works with the default Xine package.

    Pat's the man. He'd never purposely cripple a package. $25 for the subscription, $40 to just order the CDs as a oneshot. (And yes, I'm a complete Slackware fanboy.)

    Jeff

  19. Helix Player 2.0 in development by kforeman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I agree with your assessment. Multimedia on Linux is behind other platforms. Real, Linspire, Red Hat, Novell and others aggressively working to change this landscape. Specifically, we are now working on the Helix Player 2.0 https://player.helixcommunity.org/ which provides for support of Windows Media, MP3, RealVideo, RealAudio, Flash, etc as well as other great features like Ad-free radio and Automatic Bandwidth Detection.

    I urge all interested to join us by joining the project mailing lists and letting us know if you encounter and bugs in the product.

    Kevin Foreman,
    GM, Helix

    --
    Kevin Foreman
    1. Re:Helix Player 2.0 in development by kforeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good clarification. The FAQ refers to version 1.0 of the Helix Player, which is the open source media player that powered the no-cost RealPlayer 10. The Helix Player 2.0, adds "support" for many more codecs and formats. Note, that in many cases a legal commercial use license will need to be obtained by the Distro in order to ship this "supported" format. So to be clear, the Helix Player is 100% GPL open source. Version 1.0.5 is gold and we are working on version 2.0. The Helix Player powers the no-cost RealPlayer which is a superset and adds the ability to play MP3, RealAudio, RealVideo, Flash, etc. Sorry for the confusion and I look forward to seeing you on the Helix User forums and mailing lists. Kevin

      --
      Kevin Foreman
    2. Re:Helix Player 2.0 in development by DashEvil · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd like to point out that XMMS didn't drop mp3 support. Distributions like RedHat and Fedora strip the mp3 support out.

      I'll install xmms from source, and the latest versions are of great use to me.

      --
      -If God wanted people to be better than me, he would have made them that way.
  20. Marble Blast Gold is an insanely boring freeware g by crivens · · Score: 3, Funny

    "As it turns out Marble Blast Gold is an insanely boring freeware game"

    I stopped reading at this point as it was an insanely boring review.

  21. You're fired. by Stauf · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry, you said "skillz". Clearly, a violation of section 4.

    You can turn in your punchcards on the way out.

  22. Review of the review review review by Stauf · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Review of the review review" was a reasonable review of the Linspire review review. However, the reviewer of the review's review was more then a little brief, and skimmed right over a few of his most important points. He claims to have "especially enjoyed the comments" about length and screenshots, however he neglected to back them up with any quotes or specific points from the original review of the review; leaving the audience to wonder exactly what it was he was agreeing with (many of us prefer to read the review's review before reading the review of the review).

    However, the author, jlapier, did raise some interesting points about the conclusion of the initial review's review. He claimed that it was "anti-climatic", and backed up his claims with a witty reference to the review's review's final point.

    A well written, snappy review. Even though it suffered a little without reference to his primary material.

    3.5 / 5