Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple Releases Multi-Button "Mighty Mouse"

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the now-that-is-freakin'-awesome dept.

TheRaven64 writes "Hot on the heels of the announcement of x86 Macs, Apple announced a multi-button mouse, known as the Mighty Mouse. It appears that the entire surface is touch-sensitive, allowing the mouse to be programmed as a single-button, multi-button or scrolling device."

18 of 1,502 comments (clear)

  1. Welcome to 1986 by ChrisF79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's great that Apple finally came to their senses and created this mouse, but what I thought was really interesting is the fact that they allow you to still program it to use as a one button mouse. They're really holding onto their beliefs that people can only handle one button at a time with this thing. But, if they believe that people want the simplicity of a one button mouse, wouldn't they ship this thing out of the box with only one button functioning? Those people that want the simplicity of a one button mouse surely won't be the ones changing the settings to disable the other buttons. After all, that sounds awfully hard to do!

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Welcome to 1986 by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple is perfectly aware that intelegent users can handle more than one button at a time. They just don't believe that the average developer can handle more than one button at a time. At least, not and keep a good interface.

      So, they force the delevopers to think 'Oh, shit: this is a Mac, the user only has one button!', and then they actually think about what goes on the second.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:Welcome to 1986 by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, if they believe that people want the simplicity of a one button mouse, wouldn't they ship this thing out of the box with only one button functioning? Those people that want the simplicity of a one button mouse surely won't be the ones changing the settings to disable the other buttons. After all, that sounds awfully hard to do!

      If I'm a dad with young children, I might want to set up the mouse preferences differently depending on the user. Full-functions for me and the older kids, one-button for the toddlers and grandparents. It's actually a pretty fucking cool idea.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Welcome to 1986 by Xrikcus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All it ever really did though was shift the burden from a second mouse button onto the keyboard instead, hardly an improvement really...

  2. Re:Apple Innovates Again by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Horsecrap. Basically, your argument is whatever Apple does is exactly right, and more/less is wrong. This is the same crowd that up until TODAY said that more than one button would lead to widespread panic, confusion, and anarchy. Now two buttons plus a programmable surface and a cursor that looks like it was stolen from a Thinkpad is perfection.

    Same rhetoric as it was for the x86 chips. x86 was terrible until Apple adopted it, right?

  3. PowerBook!? by pergamon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now all they have to do is make the button-bar underneath the touchpad on the PowerBooks be touch sensitive to allow for multibutton there too.

  4. Anybody else think this'll be truly awful gaming? by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the design will be ok for basic desktop work (not so sure I'm keen on the ball), but as a gamer I question it. When I click, I want tactile feedback that it's been registered. Also, anyone who's played with anything touch-sensitive knows that it's never quite as reactive as as a regular mouse.

    I don't question that'll be fine for the average user, and I know the Macites will blast me with "get a gamer's mouse then" (I have one for my Mac), but anytime Apple leads the rest of the industry tends to follow. Hopefully Apple led well.

  5. Mighty usable? by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to the pictures I'd seen so far it doesn't seem to have any buttons, or any markings for buttons, or where they might be.

    I've got my flame-retardant jumpsuit close to hand just in case, but... this does seem like more style at the expense of actual usability. You have learn where the buttons are in the same way as Das Keyboard, but with this mouse you first have to realise that there *are* buttons.

    Very stylish. Nil point for usability.

  6. Bluetooth? by fuzzyping1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm really surprised there's no bluetooth version available, any idea why not?

  7. Re:Finally by kidtux1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My main concern with the mouse is that it seems like it provides no tactile feedback when you click. This may be very annoying. I'd want to try one of them out before deciding if I wanted to purchase it. -- http://www.kunae.blogspot.com/

  8. Re:Finally by Reaperducer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does making two buttons look like one, make this more intuitive?

    It's not two buttons. It's still one button, but there are sensors similar to the ones used in the iPod scroll wheel that sense which finger you're using.

    intuitive, no fucking way.

    Calm down, sport. It's just a mouse. It will be O.K. No one's going to take your Logitech away. But you might consider trading it in for some anger management classes.

    --
    -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  9. You don't get it do you? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You don't understand why Apple advocates(d) the one-button mouse, do you?

    The reason is quite simple: it is for programmers to make their applications in such a way that you can access ANY features using a single mouse button. Nothing is to be hidden in only right-click-only accessable menus.

    THAT is a big part of the Apple UI philosphy. And, that is a good thing IMHO.

    /uses a 4 button mouse at home
    //can still get by 100% without it

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:You don't get it do you? by Pwned · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because holding down keys on the keyboard is a whole lot more intuitive than clicking the other button on the mouse when something dosen't work.

    2. Re:You don't get it do you? by lrodrig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't think I'd like a single button mouse. When I got my iBook I noticed that using a touchpad with just one button is _much_ easier to use than a regular 2 button touch pad. You never click on the wrong button.

  10. Re:Apple Innovates Again by consequentemente · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's only one key short of being a Hawaiian-language compatible keyboard!

  11. Re:Finally by Paradox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Because the Apple fan-boys have been arguing that one button is best for many years, so they have to continue to pretend that one button is somehow better. Even though they have basically caved in on this issue and realised that extra UI hardware might actually make the UI better to use.
    Dude. Very few people are saying, "One Button Is Better." The people who are saying the one button mouse has merits are considering grandma and grandpa, who had to practice to learn to double click. No really, they actually did. For them, a single mouse button makes far more sense.

    Apple users who care though, can now simply change their perspective, click a checkbox, and progressively disclose new features. Heck, they can do it on their user profile, so that grandma and grandpa can share the same computer with me and still be comfortable.

    I think it's a rather elegant migration strategy. I didn't think that a multi-button mouse could have also looked just like a single button mouse.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  12. Re:Finally by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
    > Crumbs won't clog my scroll wheel!

    Hey, these aren't crumbs! Crumbs aren't curl-eeeeew!

  13. Re:Hell... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's odd, does anyone else think it looks kind of strange? From the name, I was expecting it to look more like this.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?